tags 379502 patch
thanks
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> severity 379502 serious
> thanks
>
> As lowmem is a valid mode for the installer and even essential on some
> arches, I'm raising this to RC. Probably nothing really breaks, but it
> should be trivial to add appropriate tests.
M
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379502 patch
Bug#379502: localechooser fails in lowmem install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> severity 379502 serious
> thanks
>
> As lowmem is a valid mode for the installer and even essential on some
> arches, I'm raising this to RC. Probably nothing really breaks, but it
> should be trivial to add appropriate tests.
Actually, the only possibil
Hi Pawel,
as you can likely tell, this bug has attracted quite a bit of attention.
What's going on with it? A two years old RC bug and there is nothing
better to do than discussion of the proper use of BTS tags?
Back in the day, having DAK send a mail to -done ASAP was the proper way
of dealing wi
The package failed to build in hppa, but apparently this is not due to
using g++-4.1 for the compiler, but because of one of the dependencies.
I've managed to get access to an hppa machine, and I'm looking into this.
--
Besos, ,''`.
Marga : :' :
`. `'
On Jul 24, 3:03am, Adeodato SimĂł wrote:
> > If it's prepared in my not-yet-ready-to-upload code, then it *is* pending.
> No, sorry, that's the definition of "fixed-upstream", which means "fix
> is commited somewhere, but not yet ready to be uploaded". "pending",
> otoh, implies that the fix has b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 243007 - fixed-upstream
Bug#243007: libvpopmail-perl_0.08-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags removed: fixed-upstream
> tags 243007 + p
severity 342215 important
stop
OK, until we get some reasonable confirmation that the bug is still
present, I'm lowering to 'important'.
Cheers,
Christopher Martin
On Sunday 23 July 2006 18:23, you wrote:
> Sorry, but can't test at this moment. To upgrade to that version, I
> would have to upda
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:00:49 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package works in console, but not in Gnome-Terminal or Konsole
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
reopen 339085
close 339085
thanks
Michael Stone a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:20:49PM -0400, you wrote:
Michael, this bug report is pretty long, and opened at critical
severity against a required package since many monthes, and has also
reached testing by error. Would you please send
Hi,
We just wanted to let you know it is fixed in svn using autotools (the
good way).
But due too a lot of changes between 0.1.7 and current svn, we were
unable to create a patch that would fix *this* issue without breaking
something else.
The fix was only possible as we changed the whole linki
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 342215 important
Bug#342215: kmail crashes very oftenly on SPARC (other KDE apps crash too, but
not so often)
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
fp-ide don't works in gnome-terminal or Konsole but yes in text console
Where is the bug? in fp or in gnome-terminal and Konsole?
Regards
Sergio Vernis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 339085
Bug#339085: coreutils: tail and sort does not recognize the option +n
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> close 33908
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 243007 - pending
Bug#243007: libvpopmail-perl_0.08-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
> tag 243007 + fixed-upstream
Bug#243007: libvpopmail-perl_0.08-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared li
tag 243007 - pending
tag 243007 + fixed-upstream
thanks
* Pawel Wiecek [Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:59:20 +0200]:
> tags 243007 + pending
> thanks
> If it's prepared in my not-yet-ready-to-upload code, then it *is* pending.
No, sorry, that's the definition of "fixed-upstream", which means "fix
is commi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 340119 wishlist
Bug#340119: Fails to upgrade
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
> tags 340119 +pending
Bug#340119: Fails to upgrade
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Package: lilo
Version: 1:22.6.1-7+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: breaks all kernel upgrades
On upgrade, I find that running lilo gives me this:
Fatal: '/dev/sdb' is not a whole disk device
If I remove the "disk=/dev/sdb inaccessible" line from my lilo.conf
and rerun lilo, I instead get:
Can
severity 340119 wishlist
tags 340119 +pending
thanks
The debian version already removes the proper file. I had assumed that
the rm /usr/share/man/man1/md5sum.textutils covered some case I'd
missed, and I'll remove the line in the next upload. It's not a real
high priority since all it's doing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379502 serious
Bug#379502: localechooser fails in lowmem install
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Michael, this bug report is pretty long, and opened at critical severity
against a required package since many monthes, and has also reached
testing by error. Would you please send an update summarizing what you
think should be done before closing this bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:15:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 372500 + moreinfo
Bug#372500: system hangs after loading of hald
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Sorry, but can't test at this moment. To upgrade to that version, I would have
to update to xorg, which is broken for SPARC. :-(
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:36:15 -0400, Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you confirm that the crashes you reported still afflict the latest
>
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:15:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package digikam
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: digikam
> tags 379501 + pending
Bug#379501: digikam: FTBFS: grep: /usr/lib/libltdl.la: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 378953 pending
Bug#378953: ftbfs on ppc and parisc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:57:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Package: klog
Version: 0.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of klog_0.3.3-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006072
Hi all,
to make things worse, my 3rd son was born on June 9th, and I'm only
starting to slowly recover - and the HD on my sid box is doing strange
noises, so I have to revive the chroot on another box :)
Should be able to package it soon, though.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 06:22:31PM +0200, [EMAIL
Package: yate
Version: 0.8.7+cvs20050604-4
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of yate_0.8.7+cvs20050604-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006072
Package: predict
Version: 2.2.2-6
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of predict_2.2.2-6 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006072
Package: libjpeg-mmx
Version: 0.1.5-4
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of libjpeg-mmx_0.1.5-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006072
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:58:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Package: asterisk-oh323
Version: 0.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of asterisk-oh323_0.7.3-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060722-2307
>
Package: digikam
Version: 0.9-beta1-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of digikam_0.9-beta1-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006072
Package: xplot
Version: 1.19-7.1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of xplot_1.19-7.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060722-2227
> **
...
>
Hi CAIRO,
I don't know if you had a look at the suggestion Lee wrote on this bug
report. It is available at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363464 in the lower
part of the page.
Please try it and let me know if it solve the problem.
Thanks,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Package: statdataml
Version: 1.0.9-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of statdataml_1.0.9-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060722-0257
>
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 17:36 +0200, H.-Dirk Schmitt wrote:
> Package: quodlibet
> Version: 0.21.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ %1976 $ quodlibet
> Supported formats: flac, mod, mp3, mpc, oggvorbis, wav, wavpack
> Loaded song library.
> Chec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 347773 ftp.debian.org
Bug#347773: webmin-ldap-netgroups: Depends on removed webmin
Bug reassigned from package `webmin-ldap-netgroups' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 347773 RM: webmin-ldap-netgroups -- RoM; depends on removed webmin
Bug#347773
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:42:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > As mentioned earlier this month, a regression was found in the freetype
> > > 2.1.7-2.5 package uploaded for DSA-1095 which caused applications to crash
> > > with division-by-
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:50:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379451: dak: Packages-arch-specific: please change the
architectures for Ada packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
reassign 347773 ftp.debian.org
retitle 347773 RM: webmin-ldap-netgroups -- RoM; depends on removed webmin
thanks سلام שלום
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Your package depends on the now removed webmin package suite. (See
> #343897 for more).
> Possible solutions:
> - File a bug agai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 378387 important
Bug#378387: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686: Boot hangs when USB UPS (APC SmartUPS) is
attached
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stop
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335137: fixed in libwmf 0.2.8.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379271: fixed in ocaml 3.09.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: zaptel
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
Several firmware files are included as binary-only within the source tarball:
OCT6114-128D.ima
xpp/utils/*.hex
Regarding the ones below xpp, they are covered by this file (which is *not*
included in
debian/copyright):
xpp
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379271: fixed in ocaml 3.09.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379271: fixed in ocaml 3.09.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 369512 + pending
Bug#369512: gaphor: contains files already in zope3 package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 170529 + fixed
Bug#170529: wrong assumption on char signedness
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 378447 + fixed
Bug#378447: vflib3-dev should depend on libkpathsea-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping process
Package: gcfilms
Version: 6.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I launch it, I get this :
$ gcfilms
*** unhandled exception in callback:
*** Can't locate object method "signal_connect" via package "GCFrame" at
/usr/bin/../share/gcfilms/lib/GCMainWindow.pm line 1796
Package: dak
Severity: serious
Justification: blocks a transition of Ada packages
I am doing a transition of Ada packages from gnat 3.15p to GCC 4.1 as
the default compiler. The new compiler adds support for alpha, arm,
hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, and s390 to the existing i386, powerpc and
sparc.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 379443 + pending
Bug#379443: FTBFS: lacks b-d on gnome-pkg-tools
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 12:59:59AM +0200, Henry Jensen wrote:
>
> I just checked the source. From there it seems that the Debian passwd
> is affected by CVE-2006-3378 (USN-308-1 in Ubuntu), too.
Here is a patch for this issue (taken from the ubuntu package).
Its changelog could be:
*
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 03:55:33PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> If I do a gvim with the unset DISPLAY environment, it doesn't crash.
> Like the original submitter, my default locale is a Russian one,
> but I did verify that the crash happens also with LANG=C.
When DISPLAY isn't set, the GU
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of vflib3 to fix #170529 and #378447; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u vflib3-3.6.13/debian/changelog vflib3-3.6.13/debian/changelog
--- vflib3-3.6.13/debian/changelog
+++ vflib3-3.6.13/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+vflib3 (3.6.13-3.5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
tag 379443 + pending
stop
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006, Adam Borowski wrote:
> debian/rules:3: /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/uploaders.mk: No such file
> or directory
> make: *** No rule to make target
> `/usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/uploaders.mk'. Stop.
>
> Adding a Build-Depends: on gnome
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379174 security
Bug#379174: shadow: CVE-2006-3378
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:32:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379362: fixed in writerperfect 0.7.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:16:00PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hello dear Security team (and ftpmasters, and shadow package maintainers),
>
> Being back from 2 days holiday I discover CVE-2006-3378 which has just
> been revealed to our attention (#359174 in the BTS).
I guess you mean #379
Quoting Steve Kemp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:16:00PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Hello dear Security team (and ftpmasters, and shadow package maintainers),
> >
> > Being back from 2 days holiday I discover CVE-2006-3378 which has just
> > been revealed to our attent
tags 379174security
thanks
Quoting Henry Jensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: passwd
> Version: 1:4.0.3-31sarge5
> Severity: grave
>
> I just checked the source. From there it seems that the Debian passwd
> is affected by CVE-2006-3378 (USN-308-1 in Ubuntu), too.
>
Thanks for reporting this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 379390 1.2.9-4
Bug#379390: libxmlsec1-gnutls: Dependency information incorrect. Links agains
libgutls13, depends on libgnutls11
Bug marked as found in version 1.2.9-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
found 379390 1.2.9-4
thanks
Hi John,
> xmlsec1 (1.2.9-4) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Fix gnutls dependency in shlibs.local (Closes: #379390)
I'm afraid this is not really a good fix. Could you please drop your
shlibs.local file instead, as Andreas suggested?
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó
Package: industrial-cursor-theme
Version: 0.6.1
Severity: serious
debian/rules:3: /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/uploaders.mk: No such file
or directory
make: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/uploaders.mk'. Stop.
Adding a Build-Depends: on gnome-pkg-tools make
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> merge 379428 379429
Bug#379428: FTBFS: undefined reference to `fmod', etc
Bug#379429: libgnomeprint: FTBFS gnome-print-stdapi.c:607: undefined reference
to `fmod'
Merged 379428 37942
Package: quodlibet
Version: 0.21.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ %1976 $ quodlibet
Supported formats: flac, mod, mp3, mpc, oggvorbis, wav, wavpack
Loaded song library.
Checking /computer42/audio/music
Checking /computer42/audio/children/music
Check
Hello dear Security team (and ftpmasters, and shadow package maintainers),
Being back from 2 days holiday I discover CVE-2006-3378 which has just
been revealed to our attention (#359174 in the BTS).
As far as I can tell, this is is locally exploitable root
vulnerability. Passwd is vulnerable in s
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379390: fixed in xmlsec1 1.2.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: pypar2
Version: 0.06-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If python-xml is not installed, pypar2 does not start, giving the
following error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pypar2", line 26, in ?
import dlgOutput
File "/usr/share/pyp
Hi,
Can you confirm that the crashes you reported still afflict the latest
KDE 3.5.3? It's been seven months since the report, and we've had no
other reports of KMail crashes on sparc since.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
> Since I upgraded KDE to 3.4.x, I'm getting unpleasant crashes on
> various
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:21:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug#379313 fixed in isdnbutton 2.6-970413-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379424: fixed in libtasn1-3 0.3.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package boinc boinc-client boinc-dev boinc-manager
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: boinc-manager boinc-client boinc-dev boinc
> tags 379137 + pending
Bug#379137: boinc-client errors o
Package: libgnomeprint
Version: 2.12.1-5
Severity: serious
This package fails to build in unstable:
> Automatic build of libgnomeprint_2.12.1-5 on prehension by sbuild/sparc 0.47
...
> cc -shared .libs/gnome-print.o .libs/gnome-print-stdapi.o
> .libs/gnome-print-config.o .libs/gnome-print-filte
Package: libgnomeprint
Severity: serious
Version: 2.12.1-5
Justification: no longer builds from source
I just tried to rebuild libgnomeprint in a up-to-date sid chroot. The
build fails at linking stage:
--
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/include/glib-2.
Package: libtasn1-3-bin
Version: 0.3.5-1
Severity: serious
While running a (partial) upgrade from stable to testing I've got the
following:
Unpacking libtasn1-3-bin (from .../libtasn1-3-bin_0.3.5-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libtasn1-3-bin_0.3.5-1_i386.deb
(--un
Hi, I have radeon M6-L and no DRI and I had the same problem with the
amaya I have installed with apt-get install with deiban
testing/unstable. After I have installed amaya_wx-9.51-1_i386.deb from
Amaya web site it started to work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ amaya --sync
03:30:37 PM: Deleted stale l
Package: nfs-user-server
Version: 2.2beta47-22
Severity: serious
This package no longer builds on amd64 in unstable:
> Automatic build of nfs-user-server_2.2beta47-22 on usurper by sbuild/amd64
> 0.46
...
> gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -g -O2 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME -D_GNU_SOURCE
> -Wall -c u
severity 379364 normal
merge 379364 379309
thanks
Replace the line
in /etc/dbus-1/system.d/knetworkmanager.conf with
and reload dbus. Make sure your user is in group "netdev".
Updated packages will follow soon.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379364 normal
Bug#379364: network-manager-kde: Error when knetworkmanager starts
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> merge 379364 379309
Bug#379309: network-manager-kde: spurious error message on startup
Bug#379364: network-manager-kde: Er
Package: vim-lesstif
Version: 1:7.0-035+1
Followup-For: Bug #378721
If I do a gvim with the unset DISPLAY environment, it doesn't crash.
Like the original submitter, my default locale is a Russian one,
but I did verify that the crash happens also with LANG=C.
I suspected my .viminfo but removing
retitle 379415 unicode-data: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'unzip, bzip2'
thanks
Hello,
my previous report was incomplete. A Build-Depends on 'bzip2'
is also necessary for a successful build.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/unicode-data-4.1.0/debian/control ./debian/control
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 379415 unicode-data: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'unzip, bzip2'
Bug#379415: unicode-data: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'unzip'
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Package: unicode-data
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'unicode-data' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
dh_testdir
mkdir -p build-tree
mkdir -p stampdir
(cd build-tree && unzip ../UCD.zip )
/bin/sh: unzip: command not found
make: *** [stampdir/bu
Package: sparc-utils
Version: 1.9-2.4
Severity: serious
This package no longer builds in unstable:
> Automatic build of sparc-utils_1.9-2.4 on prehension by sbuild/sparc 0.47
...
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/sparc-utils-1.9/audioctl-1.3'
> cc-c -o audioctl.o audioctl.c
> audioctl
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 05:02:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379369: fixed in crossfire 1.9.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package mldonkey
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package glibc
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 379388 1.0.0.1-3
Bug#379388: pgapack license is non-free, restricts selling
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.0.1-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package binutils
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:38:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060721-1 (source
i386 powerpc)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
found 379388 1.0.0.1-3
thanks
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Man is certainly stark mad; he cannot make a flea, yet he makes gods by the
dozens.
-- Michel de Mon
"David Welton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Since there doesn't seem to be any prospect of making tcldom buildable,
>> would you object to a removal request? (I'm just going through old RC
>> bugs; if you want to keep it, that's fine by me.)
>
> I don't want to keep the package, but it should b
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:54:21 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 1.2.1-4 solves this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Hi all!
Short comment from TeX live side, out of St. Moritz before leaving to
mountains:
On Fre, 21 Jul 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> - files that can be used to modify the behavior of programs, and/or
> >> files that make sense to customize site-wide behavior on a multiuser
> >> system (I j
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 07:38:34PM +1000, Mark Hannon wrote:
> Package: tar
> Version: 1.15.91-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> I have used some simple scripts to make incremental backups with tar for
> many years. I have attempted to restore a couple of backu
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
