reopen 339085
close 339085
thanks

Michael Stone a écrit :

On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 06:20:49PM -0400, you wrote:

Michael, this bug report is pretty long, and opened at critical severity against a required package since many monthes, and has also reached testing by error. Would you please send an update summarizing what you think should be done before closing this bug?


Hmm. I don't immediately see why 5.96-3 got into testing. C'est la
vie. Given that, and since the world doesn't seem to have come to an end over the issue, I'll just close the bug.
Mike Stone

Thanks for the quick reply. Your reply didn't seem to change anything to the bug, so I'm marking the bug as closed and not found in any version. The reason the bug got into testing is that I closed the bug in 5.93-3, but the bug was still open. britney doesn't do version tracking, which is usually just conservative, but in the case of bugs that are reintroduced, it is not strict enough. I didn't think about that, so sorry for taking the risk to break testing (I'm glad this didn't happen).

Reply via email to