Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 367374 serious
Bug#367374: ..pre-removal script assumes hyperestraier runs, and fails,
stalling update.
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jul 2006 07:06:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Package: bluez-utils
Version: 3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hello.
Some of our autobuilders do use sudo instead of fakeroot to build the
package. For some months now, the sudo package clears the environment,
so you can't use variables from the environment in debian/rules anymore.
PWD is su
Bartosz, is the package still unusable even with Filippo's instructions
below? If it's just a matter of configuring, this doesn't sound like
grave.
Filippo, what's your opinion?
Thanks.
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:22:45 +0200]:
> reopen 378446
> severity 378446 grave
> thank
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378173: fixed in sdl-image1.2 1.2.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
* Filippo Giunchedi [Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:03:03 +0200]:
Hey Filippo :)
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:19:34PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Package: bluez-pin
> > Severity: grave
> > Heya,
> > bluez-pin still depends on libbluetooth1. You will need to update your
> > build-dep to libblu
Package: gtk-smooth-themes
Version: 0.5.8-2
Severity: serious
Hi. This package depends on gtk2-engines-smooth, which has disappeared
in favour of gtk2-engines.
As the gtk2-engines transition to testing has not happened for a long
while now, I'd like to make a urgency=high upload before dinstall,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 378366 + fixed
Bug#378366: gtk-smooth-engine: needs to drop gtk2-engines-smooth from
debian/control
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
tag 378366 + patch
thanks
* Josselin Mouette [Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:37:53 +0200]:
> > Please make an upload dropping the gtk2 binary, or (if appropriate) file
> > a removal bug against ftp.debian.org.
> I think it should be removed unless someone wants to specifically
> maintain the gtk1 version.
found 378986 0.3.2-8
thanks (and that's stable, btw)
* Goswin Brederlow [Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:40:38 +0200]:
> Package: libradius1
> Severity: serious
> The libradius1.shlibs file contains:
> libradiusclient 0.0.1 libradius1
> But the library has a soversion of 0. This causes dpkg-shlibdeps to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 378986 0.3.2-8
Bug#378986: shlibs file is broken
Bug marked as found in version 0.3.2-8.
> thanks (and that's stable, btw)
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 378366 + patch
Bug#378366: gtk-smooth-engine: needs to drop gtk2-engines-smooth from
debian/control
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
> > Are these fixed in 6.6? When do you expect to release
> >6.6?
> >
> It is fixed in 6.6. I have just launched the beta start for 6.6 meanings
> code in current 6.6 package will not change (except for bug corrections
> found during beta).
> Beta last about 2 month.
>
> I also updated the AWSt
found 378824 2.0.3-3.1
thanks
> Package: libtexttools
> Severity: serious
> Steinar,
> The NMU you just did introduces a serious policy violation:
> recompiling with GCC 4.1 changes the ABI of the library, so the soname
> must change.
Seems like Steinar's upload made into testing. I've checked
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 378824 2.0.3-3.1
Bug#378824: libtexttools: ABI change requires soname bump
Bug marked as found in version 2.0.3-3.1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
* Eduard Bloch [Thu, 20 Jul 2006 01:19:56 +0200]:
> (btw, packages.d.o still says it is there)
(JFTR, you're confusing 2.7.3-2 with 2.7.7-2.)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> close 356761 0.8-2.1
Bug#356761: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in v
This bug is not present in 2.7.7-2.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
You've come to the right place. At debian-devel we are always willing
to argue over the meanings of words.
tags 375105 patch
thanks
The attached patch will fix this FTBFS on 64 bit arches. I have build
tested it on amd64.
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fix FTBFS on 64 bit arches; lost precision.
Index: amaya-9.51/Amaya/MENUconf.c
Package: zope-plonearticle
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is for v3.2.0-2 on a testing (etch) box. I have an out-of-the-box
plone-site. When I install plone article (with help from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339049), and add an
article to m
Hi Sven,
On 7/21/06, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any progress on this bug? If not, I'll reassign
it to ftp.debian.org and request removal of your package,
to avoid legal risks for Debian.
Daniel wanted to upload a new package but I haven't seen it so far.
Regards,
Torsten
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 379083 important
Bug#379083: libpam-ccreds: simply doesn't work
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Hello ace maintainers,
Thanks for being so prompt in locally removing your dependency on
libxerces26-dev. That was the only issue blocking the removal of
xerces26. I would be grateful if you can go ahead and do that upload
so that ftp-masters can proceed with the removal. Since this is an RC
b
Charles Fry a écrit :
Hi Laurent,
Can you please comment on these vulnerabilities, especially
CVE-2006-3681?
This vulnerability is true.
Are these fixed in 6.6? When do you expect to release
6.6?
It is fixed in 6.6. I have just launched the beta start for 6.6 meanings
code in current 6.6
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 11:52:51PM -0600, david wrote:
> It simply doesn't work. I installed it, configured pam according to the
Unlikely since it works for lots of other people. Are you sure you're
actually using commmon-auth?
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Tags 378173 + patch
thanks
I've done a patch, the tidiest I could. After having a look at the other
files, it was not as bad as I thought.
This should be run through upstream. But, anyway, applying the patch
prevents sear from segfaulting, and I think that it does not do any harm,
so it could b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 378173 + patch
Bug#378173: sear: Seg fault on startup after installation
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 378173 libsdl-image1.2 1.2.5-1
Bug#378173: sear: Seg fault on startup after installation
Bug reassigned from package `sear' to `libsdl-image1.2'.
> tags 378173 + upstream
Bug#378173: sear: Seg fault on startup after installation
There were no
reassign 378173 libsdl-image1.2 1.2.5-1
tags 378173 + upstream
forwarded 378173 http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284
thanks
As I said earlier, this is a bug in libsdl-image1.2, the current version
(uploaded a month ago) is filled with calls to functions that don't check
if the variable i
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 26, 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> This is blocked waiting for the python-defaults to be changed.
>
> It's not clear to me why you can't fix the gcc-4.1 build failure before
> python2.4 is uploaded. I've read your argument concerning li
Package: passwd
Version: 1:4.0.3-31sarge5
Severity: grave
I just checked the source. From there it seems that the Debian passwd
is affected by CVE-2006-3378 (USN-308-1 in Ubuntu), too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
This is a backtrace of the segfault:
#0 0xb7f0376a in IMG_isXCF () from /usr/lib/libSDL_image-1.2.so.0
#1 0x080b151c in Sear::GL::createWindow (this=0x0, width=640, height=480,
fullscreen=false) at GL.cpp:261
#2 0x080a5f46 in Sear::RenderSystem::createWindow (this=0x8186f20, width=640,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 377781 + fixed
Bug#377781: monotone - FTBFS: Missing build dependency: g++-4.0
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:02:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339344: fixed in belpic 2.5.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Tags 377781 + pending
Thanks
I'm planning on NMUing monotone today. The diff that I'm attaching is the
output of interdiff for the package that I'm about to upload.
Basically, I just erased the conditional compiler choosing, and removed the
versioned dependency for arm, hppa or m68k.
I couldn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 377781 + pending
Bug#377781: monotone - FTBFS: Missing build dependency: g++-4.0
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379157: fixed in srcinst 0.8.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:01:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Same broken behaviour here...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:33:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378372: fixed in libxmlada2 2.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> found 377418 1.8.0.4-1
Bug#377418: xulrunner - FTBFS: Assumes s390x even if dpkg-architecture reports
s390
Bug marked as found in version 1.8.0.4-1.
>
End of message, stopping proce
reopen 375533
thanks
I think this bug is not resolved. When I use 'id' to check a user id, I get
the error common in this bug report:
% id statd
id: ldap-nss.c:1312: do_init: Assertion
`cfg->ldc_uris[__session.ls_current_uri] != ((void *)0)' failed.
uid=107(statd) gid=65534(nogroup)
zsh: abort
Op do, 20-07-2006 te 16:03 +0200, schreef Martin Michlmayr:
> So what's going to happen with hat?
Hi Martin and Ian,
I was just updating the package of hat when I got Martin's email :) I
want to take over the package if Ian has no objections. I have updated
the package quite a bit already and I
tags 339344 - patch
thanks
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:56:10AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Package: belpic
> Followup-For: Bug #339344
>
> Hi,
>
> attached is a patch for the pointer conversion error.
It doesn't actually work, though; you can't change the definition of a
class which is rath
On Friday 21 July 2006 18:09, Jim Woodruff wrote:
> Subject: boinc-client errors out with a "Floating point exception" error
> when application is launched.
>
> I think the CFLAGS option "-ffast-math" is the culprit.
Could you compile boinc without -ffast-math and try out if the BOINC core
clie
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 339344 - patch
Bug#339344: belpic - FTBFS: invalid conversion from 'unsigned int*' to 'size_t*'
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
For me apt-file works fine again!
Regards,
Adalbert
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 09:00:56PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: srcinst
> Version: 0.8.4
> Severity: serious
>
> Seems like you had to update another package:
Sigh. I thought I had them all. Thanks.
-- John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 375533
Bug#375533: Assertion failed when using LDAP for user accounts
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
tags 378160 pending
thanks
I'm waiting for a change to packages-arch-specific to allow building
asis on all architectures supported by GCC 4.1. I will upload the
fixed adacontrol aftwerwards.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 378160 pending
Bug#378160: adacontrol: FTBFS: missing build-dep on debhelper
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: Frank Küster 2006-07-21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I believe that we need to rephrase the TeX Policy. But this requires
>> not just to specifiy that each "cfg" file must be in /etc. Instead, I
>> think we need to find a distinction between
>>
>> - fil
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:41:38 +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Le 21 juil. 06 à 18:23, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>>
>> While it is true any file can be changed to change behaviour for
>> TeX (like things can be changed in /usr/include/foo.h to change
>> behaviour of a -
Re: Frank Küster 2006-07-21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I believe that we need to rephrase the TeX Policy. But this requires
> not just to specifiy that each "cfg" file must be in /etc. Instead, I
> think we need to find a distinction between
>
> - files that can be used to modify the behavior of prog
Hi,
%% Copying of part or all of any file in the seminar.sty package
%% is allowed under the following conditions only:
%% (1) You may freely distribute unchanged copies of the files. Please
%% include the documentation when you do so.
%% (2) You may modify a renamed copy of any file, but only
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> severity 379089 serious
> thanks
>
> While it is true any file can be changed to change behaviour
> for TeX (like things can be changed in /usr/include/foo.h to change
> behaviour of a -dev package), any file with a name *.cnf is meant to
>
Package: srcinst
Version: 0.8.4
Severity: serious
Seems like you had to update another package:
> Automatic build of srcinst_0.8.4 on usurper by sbuild/amd64 0.46
...
> ./setup configure --prefix=/usr --ghc
> setup: srcinst.cabal:13: Parse of field 'extensions' failed:
> make: *** [configure-sta
While composing an answer to Manoj, and before I had come to a
conclusion for myself, I wrote the parts below. They're probably boring
now, but just in case they're going to be needed again, here they are in
the archive.
As a matter of fact, the common extension for "configuration files" in a
Te
; make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd/stardict-2.4.7/build/stardict-2.4.7/src'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/stardict-2.4.7/build/stardict-2.4.7'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/build
#include
Is there any progress on this bug? If not, I'll reassign
it to ftp.debian.org and request removal of your package,
to avoid legal risks for Debian.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bonjour Denis,
>
> I'm a Debian and TeXLive developer and currently doing a license
> auditing of the stuff included in TeXLive and teTeX. I found that your
> package aeguill.sty, which is under LPPL, comes with two documentation
> files, guil-test1.tex and guil-test2.tex. Does the LPPL also a
Package: headache
Version: 1.03-8
Severity: grave
when you configure headeache to generate 'line' setups, like:
| ".*\\.c" -> lines line:"*" width:1 open:"/*" close:"*/" begin:" * " last:" "
it is unable to recognize its previous headers, and creates new ones
ever and ever again.
w
I'm preparing an NMU for this bug since it'd been open for so long.
If no feedback in the next days I'll upload.
regards
--
Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org ,''`.
http://www.apesol.org - http://www.debian.org : :' :
GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:47:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376979: fixed in democracyplayer 0.8.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: mldonkey-server
Version: 2.7.7-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.4
The 'function' command is not the POSIX shell way of defining functions.
Setting up mldonkey-server (2.7.7-5) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mldonkey-server.postinst: 3: function: not found
dpkg: error processing mldon
Package: boinc-client
Version: 5.4.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I think the CFLAGS option "-ffast-math" is the culprit.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: alpha
Shell: /bin
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:51:33PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * Amaya Rodrigo Sastre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060717 18:23]:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>debuild
> [..]
> > Checking build conflicts and dependencies; just a minute...
> > grep-dctrl...grep-status: /var/lib/dpkg/status:19571: expected a c
Bonjour Denis,
I'm a Debian and TeXLive developer and currently doing a license
auditing of the stuff included in TeXLive and teTeX. I found that your
package aeguill.sty, which is under LPPL, comes with two documentation
files, guil-test1.tex and guil-test2.tex. Does the LPPL also apply to
thes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379089 serious
Bug#379089: tex-common: unclear wording of debconf messages, assumes wrongly
mktex.cnf has been created by a knowing admin
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379092 normal
Bug#379092: xen-utils-3.0: xen-backend.rules placed incorrect directory
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
> tags 379092 moreinfo
Bug#379092: xen-utils-3.0: xen-backend.rules placed incorrect directory
There were no tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 379123 !
Bug#379123: xtel: not installable in sid
Changed Bug submitter from "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Laurent
Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 352844 !
Bug#352844: thuban: does not start up (TypeError)
Changed Bug sub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 365150 +patch
Bug#365150: enigmail-locales: Uninstallable after mozilla-enigmail -> enigmail
renaimg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:03:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379128: mldonkey-server: cannot install nor remove
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
severity 379092 normal
tags 379092 moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 05:44:03PM +0900, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote:
> The xen-backend.rules file is stored in /dev/udev, but it is not
> correct.
This is correct, check the udev policy.
> I made the symlink into /dev/udev/rules.d/ so it works.
Th
Package: mldonkey-server
Version: 2.7.7-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
after trying to upgrade mldonkey server, for each action I get :
Please set both variables MLDONKEY_USER and MLDONKEY_GROUP in
/etc/default/mldonkey-server
invoke-rc.d: initscript mldonkey-server,
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364239: fixed in ctwm 3.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # This bug doesn't render the package unusable to everyone; people who keep
> the workspace manager up as with the default config are not affected.
> severity 375240 important
Bug#3
Hi,
On Fri, May 26, 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> This is blocked waiting for the python-defaults to be changed.
It's not clear to me why you can't fix the gcc-4.1 build failure before
python2.4 is uploaded. I've read your argument concerning lilypond
working best when python2.4
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 07:02:42PM +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote:
> > We really need this bug to be fixed soon.
>
> dbmail-2.2 is imminent. And the packages I have prepared for that
> release address all concerns my sponsor raised (hopefully). Expect an
> upload within the next three or four weeks.
Package: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-5.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install xtel
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situa
tag 373903 + unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006, Adalbert Dawid wrote:
> Subject: apt-file: Same broken behaviour here...
> Followup-For: Bug #373903
> Package: apt-file
> Version: 2.0.8
>
> I'd like to state that the broken behaviour described above also occurs
> on two etch machines of m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 373903 + unreproducible
Bug#373903: Broken apt-file.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:02:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358960: fixed in regina 3.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:02:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358960: fixed in regina 3.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276735: fixed in aleph 0.9.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317491: fixed in aleph 0.9.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
I'm going to close this bug because it is fixed in package "povray"
which supersedes povray-3.5:
- "ldd -r" outputs no warning message
- the package builds from source
Thanks !
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Is this correct?
>
> - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: bluez-pcmcia-support: udev support broken
>
> Package: bluez-pcmci
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 05:44:03PM +0900, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote:
Hi,
> Package: xen-utils-3.0
> Version: 3.0.2+hg9697-1
> Severity: critical
>
> The xen-backend.rules file is stored in /dev/udev, but it is not
> correct.
> I made the symlink into /dev/udev/rules.d/ so it works.
>
> It is also
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 346526
Bug#346526: FTBFS: undefined reference to `png_write_finish_row'
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> thanks
Stopping pr
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378807: fixed in stardict 2.4.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 12:26 +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Adriaan Peeters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > A simple rebuild fixes this bug since the updated imake installs
> > in /usr/bin now.
>
> No, you also need to update debian/menu.
Oops, you are right. A patch is attached.
Adriaan
--- ddd/x
Package: zaptel-source
Version: 1:1.2.7-1
Followup-For: Bug #378864
Hi,
I believe I've found the cause of this bug: The toplevel Makefile is missing
from the tarball.
- Jonas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archite
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 11:44:25AM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> ===
> RCS file: /usr/local/cvs/cvsnt/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.41.2.183
> retrieving revision 1.41.2.184
> diff -u -r1.41.2.183 -r1.41.2.184
> --- config
Adriaan Peeters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A simple rebuild fixes this bug since the updated imake installs
> in /usr/bin now.
No, you also need to update debian/menu.
Cheers,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 376670 !
Bug#376670: reseed: postinst failure when no HTTP proxy and ICMP is filtered
Changed Bug submitter from "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Laurent
Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 303864 !
Bug#303864: lazarus: not inst
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Works without problems.
Thank you for testing. I've just had a look at the upstream sources and
I've found that the upstream author has found another solution for the
upcoming 2.5.04 (It's a small patch so I attached it)...
Anyway: It's fixed and that counts...
Thank you and
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379064: fixed in libdumb 1:0.9.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
A simple rebuild fixes this bug since the updated imake installs
in /usr/bin now.
Adriaan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: xen-utils-3.0
Version: 3.0.2+hg9697-1
Severity: critical
The xen-backend.rules file is stored in /dev/udev, but it is not
correct.
I made the symlink into /dev/udev/rules.d/ so it works.
It is also mentioned at the following place:
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/396
-- Sy
99 matches
Mail list logo
