Bug#361956: nagios2-common: postinstall script uses unconditional chmod/chown, breaking any dpkg-statoverride

tags #361956 - patch tags #361956 confirmed pending thanks On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:35:09PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > As stated in the subject -- the postinstall uses unconditionally > chmod/chown. If the local admin tries to change permissions using > dpkg-statoverride, these local c

Processed: Re: Bug#361956: nagios2-common: postinstall script uses unconditional chmod/chown, breaking any dpkg-statoverride

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags #361956 - patch Bug#361956: nagios2-common: postinstall script uses unconditional chmod/chown, breaking any dpkg-statoverride Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > tags #361956 confirmed pending Bug#361956: nagios2-common: postinstall script use

Bug#356055: loadlin: loadlin.exe cannot be built from source

On 5/3/06, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sven Joachim, le Thu 09 Mar 2006 13:45:04 +0100, a écrit : > (b) Failing that, move the loadlin package to the contrib section, see > sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of the Policy Manual. This would be _very_ unfortunate. Very much indeed. wh

Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

> Sweet! Let's just kill it then. I'll add some code to the postinst to > remove the questions all together. Christian, let's just make it dead and > give the translators a little rest :-) Ack. They will love this..:) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#365693: marked as done (xserver-xorg: I got an error code 10 when making apt-get upgrade)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365282: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365353: marked as done (missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365282: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#356341: marked as done (dist-upgrade from sarge to testing)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354146: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365740: nautilus: fails to start due to undefined symbol

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:33:50PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > The libnautilus-extension1 >= 2.14.1 dependency exists, but just for two > architectures: hurd-i386, kfreebsd-i386. Could you confirm that > installing it in amd64 (it seems to be your arch, right?) solves the > pro

Bug#365804: r-cran-rodbc: not loading (R 2.3?)

Subject: r-cran-rodbc: not loading (R 2.3?) Package: r-cran-rodbc Version: 1.1.5-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** When loading library(RODBC), I get: Error in lazyLoadDBfetch(key, datafile, compressed, envhook) : Read

Bug#354146: marked as done (x11-common: Cannot upgrade from sarge: file conflict with xfree86-common)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354146: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365755: marked as done (installation fails)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365282: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365282: marked as done (xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails installation (pre-inst exit status 10))

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365282: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365022: marked as done (file /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc available in both xserver-xorg-core and xbase-clients)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:17:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365022: fixed in xbase-clients 1:7.0.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: Re: Bug#365568: Gdm 2.14 refuses to start scim automatically

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 365568 gdm Bug#365568: Gdm 2.14 refuses to start scim automatically Bug reassigned from package `scim' to `gdm'. > severity 365568 critical Bug#365568: Gdm 2.14 refuses to start scim automatically Severity set to `critical'. > merge 365568 36

Bug#363922: marked as done (x11 libraries don't call ldconfig)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 20:17:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363922: fixed in xft 2.1.8.2-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365740: nautilus: fails to start due to undefined symbol

Hi Vincent, The libnautilus-extension1 >= 2.14.1 dependency exists, but just for two architectures: hurd-i386, kfreebsd-i386. Could you confirm that installing it in amd64 (it seems to be your arch, right?) solves the problem ? Thanks, Gustavo Franco - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Bug#356382: marked as done (glibc: FTBFS in experimental on amd64: segmantation fault.)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 22:45:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line amd64 ftbfs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Bug#365740: nautilus: fails to start due to undefined symbol

Hi Vincent, The libnautilus-extension1 >= 2.14.1 dependency exists, but just for two architectures: hurd-i386, kfreebsd-i386. Could you confirm that installing it in amd64 (it seems to be your arch, right?) solves the problem ? Thanks, Gustavo Franco - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#362614: marked as done (FTBFS: timestamp skew?)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 19:17:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362614: fixed in mtr 0.71-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:08:21PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:44:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > Quoting Adam Borowski (

Processed: Re: Bug#365790: libccgnu2-1.3.so.2 error while loading shared lib

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 365790 Bug#365790: libccgnu2-1.3.so.2 error while loading shared lib Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 365790 libccrtp1-1.3-0 1.3.7-1 Bug#365790: libccgnu2-1.3.so.2 error while loading shared lib Bug reassigned from package `twink

Bug#365790: libccgnu2-1.3.so.2 error while loading shared lib

reopen 365790 reassign 365790 libccrtp1-1.3-0 1.3.7-1 close 365790 1.3.7-1+b1 thanks On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:39:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On the contrary, version 0.6.2-1 of twinkle, which you've filed this bug > against, does *not* depend on libccgnu2-1.3.so.2; it depends on > libccg

Bug#365790: marked as done (libccgnu2-1.3.so.2 error while loading shared lib)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 17:39:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365790: libccgnu2-1.3.so.2 error while loading shared lib has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#364810: Fixed in 1.5.0.3

Looks like this is fixed in Firefox 1.5.0.3, please update the package ASAP, as it's a critical and publically known security issue. http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/releases/1.5.0.3.html Uwe. -- Uwe Hermann http://www.hermann-uwe.de http://www.it-services-uh.de | http://www.crazy-hacks.org htt

Bug#365794: cbrowser: Does not start: Error in startup script: syntax error

Package: cbrowser Version: 0.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ cbrowser Error in startup script: syntax error in expression "[info tclversion] < 7.6" ("if" test expression) while compiling "if {[info tclversion] < 7.6} { ..." (file "/usr/bin/cbrowser" line 2

Bug#328004: marked as done (sim: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 03:52:23 +0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing as fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#360461: marked as done (gwget2: FTBFS: epiphany-1.8 not available anymore.)

Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 01:19:42 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ack NMU for gwget2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#365790: libccgnu2-1.3.so.2 error while loading shared lib

Package: twinkle Version: 0.6.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable twinkle: error while loading shared libraries: libccgnu2-1.3.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I cannot even find this file thru packages search. Certainly not listed as a dep

Bug#300930: marked as done (sim: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'const char*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision)

Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 03:09:46 +0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 0.9.3.99svn20060428-2 compiles, closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#361874: libgnutls12: uninstallable due to Conflicts/Depends cycle with libtasn1-2

severity 361874 important thanks On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:08:19PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > libgnutls12 depends on libtasn1-2, which however conflicts with > libgnutls12 (<< 1.3.5) as of version 0.3.1-1. As a result, (...) The libtasn1-2 upload with the problemetic conflict was reverted, s

Bug#365714: emacs21: FTBFS on most architectures, xaw issues.

Hi, On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:48:07AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > According to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=emacs21, > building of emacs after the last NMU failed on most architectures. I'm > confused, though, because the NMU was in January according to the > changelog, and make

Bug#365540: marked as done (gcompris: FTBFS: Missing build dependencies.)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 15:02:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365540: fixed in gcompris 7.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Re: libgnutls12: uninstallable due to Conflicts/Depends cycle with libtasn1-2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 361874 important Bug#361874: libgnutls12: uninstallable due to Conflicts/Depends cycle with libtasn1-2 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admi

Bug#356055: loadlin: loadlin.exe cannot be built from source

Hi, Sven Joachim, le Thu 09 Mar 2006 13:45:04 +0100, a écrit : > (b) Failing that, move the loadlin package to the contrib section, see > sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of the Policy Manual. This would be _very_ unfortunate. The problem is that in some circumstances, blind people _DO_ need loadlin

Bug#365780: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on amd64, sparc with "configure.in:2177: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TARGET"

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.0-2 Severity: serious The patch ada-link-lib.dpatch changes the top-level configure.in, then calls autoconf to regenerate configure. Autoconf then bails out with: configure.in:2177: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TARGET If this token and others are le

Bug#365680: I have requested a CVE assignment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 CVE-2006-2148 was assigned for this vulnerability. Micah micah wrote: > > I have requested a CVE assignment for this vulnerability, and will send > it on as soon as it is obtained. Please include this reference in any > changelog resolving this iss

Bug#365166: marked as done (libmusclecard: FTBFS: Undefined references to log_msg)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 14:18:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365166: fixed in libmusclecard 1.3.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#365748: marked as done (dvbstream_0.6+cvs20060501-1(unstable/sparc/spontini): missing build-depends)

ted at 20060502-0745 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.0), linux-kernel-headers [...] | /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean | debian/rules:16: /usr/s

Bug#283049: marked as done (unalz_0.21(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 14:18:52 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283049: fixed in unalz 0.55-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365746: marked as done (FTBFS: misses dependency on: dbs)

x27;. Stop. ** Build finished at 20060502-1639 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Hence, it misses usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk, which is shipped with dbs pacakged. Adding it to the dependencies should solve the issue. Thanks, Roberto -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefe

Bug#365714: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

clone 365714 -1 reassign -1 xaw3dg-dev retitle -1 Depends on libxaw8-dev and breaks building packages thanks Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My question is now whether to switch away from libxaw8 is a wishlist >> issue or in fact a fixed plan? What's the appropriate severity for >>

Bug#365778: xviewg: Can't install

Package: xviewg Version: 3.2p1.4-21 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable xviewg can't be installed. apt-get output: $ apt-get -sV install xviewg Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable

Bug#365176: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D

Simon, > It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: > > usr/share/doc/libpt-doc/samples/xmpptest/draft-ietf-xmpp-core-22.txt.gz > usr/share/doc/libpt-doc/samples/xmpptest/draft-ietf-xmpp-im-21.txt.gz this was addressed upstream and will be resolved with the next update of the Phobos relea

Bug#258293: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on xmms-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 23:34:18 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Processed: tagging 356055

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 356055 + upstream Bug#356055: loadlin: loadlin.exe cannot be built from source There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#365640: marked as done (gnome-session segfault)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 23:08:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365640: Acknowledgement (gnome-session segfault) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#365680: Patch for 0.5.4-6

Hi, The appended patch should fix this issue. It's based on the upstream patches in 0.5.8. This is the result of Mario already reviewing it. Everybody else is invited to review it too. To create a new package: - Place the .dpatch in debian/patches - Add 50_client-c_bufferoverflow_fix.dpatch t

Processed: Intend to NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 364729 + patch pending Bug#364729: Should stop building libgnutls-dev and gnutls-bin There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#365629: cyrus-common-2.2 version 2.2.13-1 0: cyrdeliver segfaults

tags 365629 +pending thanks Sven Mueller wrote: > So for some unknown reason, res1 is a NULL pointer. I would be glad if > someone else from the packaging team could help me here. I'm deeply > covered with (paid) work, so I can't investigate any further for a while. > > Regards, > Sven > > > > ___

Processed: Re: Bug#365629: cyrus-common-2.2 version 2.2.13-1 0: cyrdeliver segfaults

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 365629 +pending Bug#365629: cyrus-common-2.2 version 2.2.13-1 0: cyrdeliver segfaults There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#364729: Intend to NMU

tags 364729 + patch pending stop Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2006, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > gnutls12 builds libgnutls-dev and gnutls-bin, which are now also > provided by gnutls13. gnutls12 got scheduled a number of binNMUs for > the libtasn1-3 transition. This doesn't work now anymore, bec

Processed: Serious bug, not normal (I know fixed, but should be properly set in BTS)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 365561 serious Bug#365561: libwxbase2.6-0: installation overwrites file from libwxgtk2.6-0 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#365680: It does affect all installs

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:46:28PM +0100, David Leadbeater wrote: > Mario: It does affect all configurations, just because the > configuration file says client-perl.cgi it doesn't stop someone > accessing client.cgi as the package builds client.cgi and puts it Yes, i missed that in the first

Bug#365770: [inux-image-2.6.16-1-686] Kernel panic after update

Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 Version: 2.6.16-10 Severity: grave After updating the linux-image (from 2.6.16-8 ?) on one of my systems (PIII 700) the system do not boot anymore (rescue kernel still works), and stops with a kernel panic message. Sorry, I haven´t more information, I´ve no info

Bug#365640: Acknowledgement (gnome-session segfault)

Sorry, It seem that is was a prelink problem on my computer. Work well now. To be closed. Regards, Emmanuel. Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; 3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34 €/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34€/mn)

Processed: tagging 365598

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 365598 + patch Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#365680: It does affect all installs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mario: It does affect all configurations, just because the configuration file says client-perl.cgi it doesn't stop someone accessing client.cgi as the package builds client.cgi and puts it into the cgi-bin directory. David -BEGIN PGP SIGNA

Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize

Package: gdm Version: 2.14.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #365598 I've the problem on my computer, and here is some comment : - you don't have the bug if use-ssh-agent is selected in /etc/X11/Xsession.options, so it may be why there is no bug on the maintainer's computer (probably ssh-agent to drop the

Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize

* Loïc Minier: > I was pointed at: > > > > If someone wants to check it solves the issue, it would help the > package maintainer to decide whether to include the patch or not. (I > don't have

Processed: setting package to kdewebdev kdewebdev-dbg kdewebdev-doc-html kfilereplace kimagemapeditor klinkstatus kommander kommander-dev kxsldbg quanta quanta-data ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > package kdewebdev kdewebdev-dbg kdewebdev-doc-html kfilereplace > kimagemapeditor klinkstatus kommander kommander-dev kxsldbg quanta quanta-data Ignoring bugs not assigned to: klinks

Processed: Re: Bug#365755: installation fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xserver-xorg Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xserver-xorg > severity 365755 grave Bug#365755: installation fails Severity set to `grave'. > merge 365755 365282 Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails installation (pre-inst exit status 10) Bug#365

Bug#194248: let's meet

Hi there lovely, I was searching the net few days ago. I am new to this thing. and saw your profile. I decidbed to email you acause I found you attractive. I might come down to your city in few weeks. Let me knoaw if we can meet each bother in person. I am attractiave girl. I am sure you won't reg

Bug#364434: marked as done (gwget2: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/gwget/usr/lib/epiphany': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 11:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364434: fixed in gwget2 0.97-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#355457: marked as done (fetchmail uses /var/lib/fetchmail rather than /var/run for pid file)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 11:32:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355457: fixed in fetchmail 6.3.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in upload of mambo 4.5.3h-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 326827 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#326827: mambo: postrm must call ucf --purge on purge Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 326828 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#326828: mambo: configuration.php should start with tag 34406

Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:44:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Quoting Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > The debconf question xserver-xorg/config/i

Bug#365714: emacs21: FTBFS on most architectures, xaw issues.

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:48:07AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > As to the actual failure, it doesn't look as if it should be related to > the NMU patch, and this is some other strange thing. On i386, it fails > with > > i486-linux-gnu-gcc -c -DUSE_LUCID -Demacs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_LUCID -I.

Bug#365729: mount fails on unmountable filesystem despite 'noauto'

Hi, On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:03:40PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > /dev/srv_vg/lvol0 /srv/public ext3noauto 0 2 > > This should cause mount not to attempt to mount it on boot, leaving the > user (root) free to mount. Unfortunately, it does not, and I have to are you sure it

Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided

> Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You are neither the submitter of the bug nor the package's maintainer. > > Please read hmm, somehow the above (quoted) mail reached Joerg Schilling, but not the BTS. I give it here for reference (with control messages removed):

Bug#364339: marked as done (Some files (test/*, form/fty_*) in ncurses are not copyrighted properly/sanely)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 10:15:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364339: fixed in ncurses 5.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#360548: marked as done (openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes on startup)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:23:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#358470: marked as done (mathwar: Entry not in GNOME 2.12 Foot menu)] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#365115: mkcfm removed

I read on bug 362296: > Last but not least mkcfm had been drooped out of xutils because it's > non-free. cid_term() tries to call mkcfm and will fail doing so with > with recent versions of xutils. Is the solution to rewrite mkcfm, thus to provide a drop-in free replacement? Or is the way mkcfm

Bug#358570: marked as done (openoffice.org: signal 11 on startup)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:23:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#358470: marked as done (mathwar: Entry not in GNOME 2.12 Foot menu)] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#365752: FTBFS on AMD64: missing SSE2 header

Package: opencv Severity: serious opencv_0.9.7-1 seems to miss #include for AMD64 inside opencv-0.9.7/cxcore/include/cxtypes.h. In fact, it FTBFS while compiling the first file, as shown: if /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I. -I../../cxcore/inc

Bug#365680: I have requested a CVE assignment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have requested a CVE assignment for this vulnerability, and will send it on as soon as it is obtained. Please include this reference in any changelog resolving this issue so that it can be appropriately tracked. >> There is no CVE assigned yet as f

Bug#359297: marked as done (openoffice.org-writer: Old openoffice.org-gnome crashes writer on startup)

Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:23:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#358470: marked as done (mathwar: Entry not in GNOME 2.12 Foot menu)] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#193787: hanging out with you

Hi, Hope I am not writing to wrong address. I am nice, pretty looking girl. I am plabnning on visiting your town this month. Can we meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Processed: Re: Bug#365688: auctex emacs21 incompatible => auctex to be removed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 365688 emacs21 is uninstallable Bug#365688: auctex emacs21 incompatible => auctex to be removed Changed Bug title. > reassign 365688 emacs21 Bug#365688: emacs21 is uninstallable Bug reassigned from package `auctex' to `emacs21'. > severity 365

Processed: Fixed in upload of coq-doc 8.0pl3+8.1alpha-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 266019 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#266019: coq-doc: please split into doc-html and doc-ps There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 294865 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#294865: coq-doc: The documentation for coq is non-free (thi

Bug#365680: cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c

Hi, On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:15:37AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Upstream has just released 0.5.8, which fixes a buffer overflow in > client.c amongst other things. The 0.5.8 timeline can be seen here: Just as a short-term reply and for documentation reasons regarding this issue: The Debian packa

Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize

Hi, I was pointed at: If someone wants to check it solves the issue, it would help the package maintainer to decide whether to include the patch or not. (I don't have the bug.) Bye

Bug#363107: marked as done (apt-listchanges: Fails with an error about TLS data)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#361024: marked as done (libstdc++6: cannot handle TLS data)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#365750: gnus doesn't start

Package: gnus Version: 5.11+v0.4.dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3 Loca

Bug#364041: marked as done (bugsx: uninstallable, FTBFS with Xorg 7.0)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:27:40 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364041: fixed in bugsx 1.08-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#360895: marked as done (ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#360776: marked as done (apt-show-versions: cron.daily fails noisily)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#361221: marked as done (apt: traceback with "ImportError: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data")

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#361904: marked as done (Failed to load application: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361904: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#361143: marked as done (apt-show-versions: Invocation fails with Perl errors)

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:29:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360895: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#365680: cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c

package cgiirc tags 365680 + confirmed thanks On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:15:37AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: [...] > Upstream has just released 0.5.8, which fixes a buffer overflow in > client.c amongst other things. The 0.5.8 timeline can be seen here: [...] Okay, I can confirm the buffer overflow.

Bug#348729: please recheck with zeroconf 0.8

Tested zeroconf 0.9-1: I had to first uninstall network-manager (which does not use if-up.d and friends...), and re-enable laptop-net. That all worked. Now, trying again I have the same symptoms as before: I get two IP addresses. I can ping hosts on the same hub, or outside our network. Hosts on

Processed: Re: Bug#365680: cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package cgiirc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cgiirc > tags 365680 + confirmed Bug#365680: cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c Tags were: security Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#365746: FTBFS: misses dependency on: dbs

/rules:16: /usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk'. Stop. ** Build finished at 20060502-1639 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Henc

Processed: Fixed in upload of glibc 2.3.999.1-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 181494 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#181494: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1olisfcbc] includes non-free documentation Tags were: sarge-ignore Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian b

Bug#339240: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 08:46:38 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339240: fixed in opencv 0.9.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#365748: dvbstream_0.6+cvs20060501-1(unstable/sparc/spontini): missing build-depends

Package: dvbstream Version: 0.6+cvs20060501-1 Severity: serious You appear to be missing a build-depends on dbs. | Automatic build of dvbstream_0.6+cvs20060501-1 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85 | Build started at 20060502-0745

Processed: Re: Bug#362170: Good backtrace for bus error on sparc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 362170 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161826 Bug#362170: firefox fails to start with bus error on sparc64 Forwarded-to-address changed from http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36146#c44 to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/s

Bug#362170: Good backtrace for bus error on sparc

forwarded 362170 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161826 thanks On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:06:11AM -0400, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...) > > 5102 while (aNumChars-- > 0) { > > 5103// XXX: If you crash here then you may see the issue described > > 5104// in htt

Bug#365623: ipchains

On 5/2/06, Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Therefore, one might need both packages to be installed. Please remove > your version of the manpage, or mail me. i think someone who installs freebsd-manpages usually does it on debian gnu/kfreebsd (where ipchains won't ever be ported to).

  1   2   >