Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 348824 important
Bug#348824: ecartis: arbitrary web content security problem
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
severity 348824 important
thanks
The user is now warned about the security risks of the rarly used
pantomime-dir option in README.Debian.
At its worst, it is equivelent of an anonymous writable ftp directory.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Package: libgtk2.0-0
Version: 2.8.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.4
Hi,
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
If I
Package: libdmx-dev
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
libdmx-dev Pre-Depends: x11-common (>= 1.0); it needs to include the epoch.
- Josh Triplett
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: procps
Version: 1:3.2.6-2.1
Severity: serious
The copyright file contains no mention of Kjetil Torgrim Homme, the
author of pgrep. From pgrep.c:
/* emacs settings: -*- c-basic-offset: 8 tab-width: 8 -*-
*
* pgrep/pkill -- utilities to filter the process table
*
* Copyright 2000 Kjet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 362773 patch
Bug#362773: xautolock conflicts with x11-common
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
tags 362773 patch
thanks
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:51:33PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Package: xautolock
> Version: 1:2.1-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Because xautolock install binaries in /usr/X11R6/bin, it now conflicts
> with x11-common and therefore is
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352050: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361800: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:48:00PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: liblwp-dev,libopenafs-dev
> > Severity: serious
>
> > The etch release policy states that:
>
> > | http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
> > | If two packages can
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> # not RC :)
> severity 355129 normal
Bug#355129: A bug in debian/rules
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Package: evolution-webcal
Followup-For: Bug #350413
Hello,
I am running etch amd64, and evolution-webcal is still uninstallable for me
due to an unmet dependency on libecal1.2-2 (>=1.2.3). Perhaps this has been
fixed in sid, and I just need to be patient?
Thanks,
Andy Huhn
-- System Informatio
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362693: fixed in xlockmore 1:5.21-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hola Daniel Jacobowitz!
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:30:08PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > I intend to NMU ncurses to fix this bug.
> >
> > I'm attaching the full diff file, and the corresponding interdiff.
>
> Thanks. I left this sit too long, because there was nothing in the bug
> rep
Hi,
Abuse has a bad management of types, uses int, enum, int32_t and long
interchangeably. The attached patch fixes this bug, as it fixes an inconsistent
declaration. But abuse is doomed to have more bugs as it has a badly designed
implementation.
The real solution would be to review every numeri
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 07:59:26PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 07:31:40PM -0400, pryzbyj wrote:
> > retitle 362845 Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at
> > usr/share/man/man5/ftpusers.5.gz
> > thanks
> > Note that each one of these packages must conflict with every
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:44:31AM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 1:7.0.0-3
> Followup-For: Bug #362686
>
> A temporary fix is:
>
> ln -s /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc ~/.xinitrc
I think I've found the cause of this bug. The package doesn't actually seem
to be getting p
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 07:31:40PM -0400, pryzbyj wrote:
> retitle 362845 Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at
> usr/share/man/man5/ftpusers.5.gz
> thanks
>
> Note that each one of these packages must conflict with every other
> package, either directly with an explicit "Conflicts:" or by
>
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362439: fixed in xutils-dev 1:1.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362842: fixed in openafs 1.4.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #362686
A temporary fix is:
ln -s /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc ~/.xinitrc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:34:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354098: twm_1:1.0.1-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS:
configure error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362678: fixed in xutils-dev 1:1.0.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:22:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353356: xlibmesa-gl-dev: trying to overwrite
`/usr/include/GL/glext.h', which is also in package mesa-common-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: hula-mta,exim4-base
Severity: serious
The etch release policy states that:
| http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
| If two packages cannot be installed together, one must list
| the other in its "Conflicts:" field.
Both hula-mta and exim4-base include the pathname
us
retitle 362845 Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at
usr/share/man/man5/ftpusers.5.gz
thanks
Note that each one of these packages must conflict with every other
package, either directly with an explicit "Conflicts:" or by
conflicts+provides+replaces with some virtual "ftpd" package I guess.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 362845 Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at
> usr/share/man/man5/ftpusers.5.gz
Bug#362845: Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at
usr/share/man/man5/ftpusers.5.gz between proftpd-common, lukemftpd
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stoppin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362845 proftpd-common,heimdal-servers,ftpd-ssl,wu-ftpd,lukemftpd
Bug#362845: Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at
usr/share/man/man5/ftpusers.5.gz between proftpd-common, lukemftpd
Bug reassigned from package `proftpd-common,lukemftpd' t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package rsibreak
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: rsibreak
> found 361283 0.6.0-0
Bug#361283: rsibreak_0.6-rc1-0(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: ./configure: No such
file or directory
Bug marked as found in version 0.6.0-0.
> tags 361283 + unstable
Unknow
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: liblwp-dev,libopenafs-dev
> Severity: serious
> The etch release policy states that:
> | http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
> | If two packages cannot be installed together, one must list
> | the other in its "Conflicts:"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 362842 pending
Bug#362842: Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at usr/lib/liblwp.a between
liblwp-dev, libopenafs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
tag pending 362804
merge 360193 362804
thanks
On 15/04/2006 at 15:31 Christian Marillat wrote...
> Package: torcs
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> libopenal0 has been replaced by the libopenal0a package and torcs need to be
> rebuild.
>
Yes, I've fixed that but I still have a runtime issue that
Package: proftpd-common,lukemftpd
Severity: serious
The etch release policy states that:
| http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
| If two packages cannot be installed together, one must list
| the other in its "Conflicts:" field.
Both proftpd-common and lukemftpd include the p
Package: kudzu
Version: 1.1.67-1
Severity: grave
kudzu depends on libnewt0.51. However libnewt0.51is no longer in unstable. It
looks
as if it was replaced by libnewt0.52.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Version: 1.3.7-2
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> severity 362118 important
Bug#362118: gksu: looking for xauth in the wrong folder
Bug#362125: gksu fails because it looks for xauth in wrong location
Bug#362224: libgksu1.2-0: lookin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #341248 normal
Bug#341248: [sarge] bogus "Filesystem would be destroyed" message
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 362832 important
thanks
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 05:00:00PM -0400, alex bolgarov wrote:
> Package: gksu
> Version: 1.3.7-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> On a freshly installed Debian Unstable (that is, yesterday I have installed
> Unstable onto fresh clean
Package: webhttrack
Version: 3.40.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.3
The Debian policy states "Packages must not require the existence of
any files in /usr/share/doc/ in order to function". The webhttrack web
server uses templates from /usr/share/httrack/html to construct its web
pag
Package: liblwp-dev,libopenafs-dev
Severity: serious
The etch release policy states that:
| http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
| If two packages cannot be installed together, one must list
| the other in its "Conflicts:" field.
Both liblwp-dev and libopenafs-dev include the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Source: xorg
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Version: 1:7.0.12
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 362817 xserver-xorg-input-all 1:7.0.10
Bug#362817: xserver-xorg-core: no input driver modules in amd64 re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362832 important
Bug#362832: gksu looks for /usr/X11R6/bin/xauth
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:59:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362817: xserver-xorg-core: no input driver modules in
amd64 repository
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Package: mpfr
Severity: grave
Howdy Laurent,
My CGAL software no longer runs, since it uses mpfr and libmpfr relies
on an internal symbol __gmp_rand. In 4.1.4 this was a function and
therefore a symbol in libgmp. In 4.2, it is a #define and thus no
symbol.
I'm of two minds on this one. On one
Package: spampd
Version: 2.30-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upon upgrading to 2.30-2 (from 2.30-1):
---
Setting up spampd (2.30-2) ...
Starting spam checking proxy daemon: spampdScalar found where operator
expected at /usr/sbin/spampd line 598, near "$status"
(
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:07:09PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:40:38AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Today, "apt-get dselect-upgrade" wants to remove several packages,
> > e.g. "xfs", presumably due to new conflicts by xorg.
> > I checked for a bug report on "xfs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> # loose build-dep only affects backports, so not RC
> severity 362791 important
Bug#362791: orbit2 build dependencies are not accurate
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 337799 + fixed
Bug#337799: invalid paths in c2hs.conf
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
-
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:19:07PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Both pgaccess and pgmonitor are part of the package pgaccess.
> Should I file a bug against that package too?
The current version of pgaccess no longer ships files in this location, so
no other bug should be required.
Thanks,
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 351156 + fixed
Bug#351156: Please stop build modules for python2.1/python2.2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 355307 + fixed
Bug#355307: FTBFS: Build-Depends conflict: libdb4.2-dev vs libdb4.3-dev (apache)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342251: fixed in cgoban 1.9.14-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: gksu
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On a freshly installed Debian Unstable (that is, yesterday I have installed
Unstable onto fresh clean partition, by using Testing net-inst CD and then
changing /etc/apt/sources.list to point to unstable), gksu l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 351110 + fixed
Bug#351110: Please stop building the modules for python2.1/python2.2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 351109 + fixed
Bug#351109: Please stop building the modules for python2.1/python2.2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 359882 + fixed
Bug#359882: libapache-mod-cgi-debug: FTBFS: Build-Depends conflicts
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 356745 + fixed
Bug#356745: pam-mysql: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362132: fixed in cgoban 1.9.14-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 347541 + fixed
Bug#347541: pyopenssl: please update to libssl0.9.8
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 351133 + fixed
Bug#351133: Please stop build modules for python2.1/python2.2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stoppi
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xserver-xorg-input-all does not depend on any other packages and there
are no other xserver-xorg-input-* packages. Thus the xserver cannout
find modules like kbd and mouse that are necessary for
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:24:46 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line there is a file conflict, but Conflicts is set
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 317822 debian-goodies
Bug#317822: debian-goodies, debget: two 'debget' programs with different
functionality
Bug reassigned from package `debget,debian-goodies' to `debian-goodies'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:30:08PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I intend to NMU ncurses to fix this bug.
>
> I'm attaching the full diff file, and the corresponding interdiff.
Thanks. I left this sit too long, because there was nothing in the bug
report that explained why it was a problem
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59b
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Today, I updated my system. It updated two things important I think :
linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 and initramfs-tools. Strangely, linux-image was
already the same version, so apt just updated a up-to-dat
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353857: fixed in libspf 0.999-1.0.0-p3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
I have uploaded the corrected package to close this RC bug.
Matthias:
In the future, if you have the package and need sponsoring, in order to
close an RC bug, it's a good idea to:
* Include the URL of the package that needs sponsoring in your
messages (It took me a lot of googli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 336437 + fixed
Bug#336437: libxine1: use of internal libmad makes other apps crash in amd64
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 355129 + fixed
Bug#355129: A bug in debian/rules
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 13:57 +0200, alex wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>nvidia-glx: Depends: nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 but it is not installable
> E: Broken packages
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
Not willing to build your own kernel module from nvidia-kernel-source
eh? Well p
Hi,
I've finally uploaded a non-maintainer upload fixing this issue. Patch
attached.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Aleja
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:02:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362149: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
severity 362800 important
thanks
On Saturday 15 April 2006 19:22, Nizamov Shawkat wrote:
> Today I downloaded the fresh Etch iso image (CD-1, ~650Mb).
> When I tried to install, installer correctly recognized media as Etch
> 'testing' medium Then installer required to define the online
> repositor
Package: chiark-tcl
Version: 1.0.0
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
chiark-tcl failed to build on all buildds. Appears to be missing
build-dependancies.
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/chiark-tcl-1.0.0'
set -e; for d in base adns hbytes cdb crypto; do /u
Package: torcs
Severity: grave
Hi,
libopenal0 has been replaced by the libopenal0a package and torcs need to be
rebuild.
$ LANG=C sudo apt-get install torcs
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
reques
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362685: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362685: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362713: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362713: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362711: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I intend to NMU ncurses to fix this bug.
I'm attaching the full diff file, and the corresponding interdiff.
--
Besos,
Maggie.
ncurses_5.5-1.1.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
diff -u ncurses-5.5/debian/changelog ncurses-5.5/debian/changelog
--- ncurses-5.5/debian/changelog
+++ ncurses-5
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362672: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362713: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
Followup-For: Bug #362069
AFAICS the fix for the startx-problem is pretty simple.
In /usr/bin/startx you have to change the line:
sysserverrc=/usr/lib/X11/xinit/xserverrc
into:
sysserverrc=/etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc
HTH && regards,
-mika-
--
To
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362711: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362711: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362672: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362672: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362711: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: debian-installer
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Today I downloaded the fresh Etch iso image (CD-1, ~650Mb).
When I tried to install, installer correctly recognized media as Etch 'testing'
medium
Then installer required to define the online repository to instal
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362685: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362685: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362713: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362672: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hmm, this was supposed to have been fixed in xserver-xorg 1:7.0.11 by
> removing the symlink in question. :/ So there are two bugs here --
> xserver-xorg needs to drop the symlink, and x11-common needs to bump its
> versioned conflict with xserver-xorg...
Just to add to th
* Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-15 11:50]:
> >
> > zgrep "^Filename: " $PATH_TMP/Packages.gz
> > which was working since years, but now I get
> Since when? grep hasn't changed. You might check /var/log/dpkg.log.
sed has changed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.0.1-5
Followup-For: Bug #362149
Debian patches don't go in unless quilt is installed.
quilt was not installed even after I did 'apt-get build-dep xdm'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archite
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.11
Followup-For: Bug #362672
FYI:
I figured that the X symlink was probably just a left over and not all that
important, so I tried deleting it and doing a reconfigure of the x packages.
This caused the /usr/X11R6/bin folder to be deleted and a new symlink to
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:18:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353920: fixed in mysqltcl 3.01-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 362686 grave
Bug#362686: xbase-clients: .xsession and .Xresources not honored
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 362686 362069
Bug#362069: xbase-clients: xinit broken - X sess
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 362678 grave
Bug#362678: xutils-dev: missing Imake.tmpl
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:18:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343784: fixed in mysqltcl 3.01-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
