Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 23:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#264702: fixed in trr19 1.0beta5-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 341228 normal
Bug#341228: mazeofgalious: patent infringement
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:15:41 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361572: wajig cannot perform administrative commands and
says "Access denied" (sudo related)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Well, it took longer, but I got the same crash I got with 3.5.1. Oh well.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358648: fixed in pyme 0.7.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362650: fixed in lat 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Subject: xlockmore: uninstallable
Package: xlockmore
Version: 1:5.21-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After a recent dist-upgrade, which included an upgrade of Xorg, xlockmore
is uninstallable. It was removed in the dist-
If 3.1.2-1 cannot be built from source on the amd64 architecture, is it possible to put the 3.1.1-8 arch:any binary packages back in the amd64 repository? If 3.1.1-8 is kosher for amd64 but 3.1.2-1 isn't, why would eclipse be left in a mixed state in the repository on
amd64.debian.net?This seems t
Package: octave2.1
Version: 1:2.1.73-6
Severity: serious
Hello,
Octave fails to run,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
octave2.1: error while loading shared libraries: liblapack.so.3: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
despite having all dependencies satisfied. The problem looks
reassign 362594 gtk+2.0
severity 362594 serious
merge 362594 362451
thanks
> If the packages xlibs-pic and xlibs-static-pic are now removed with xorg
> 7.0 feel free to reassign the bug to libgtk2.0-0 and remove the
> xlibs-pic and xlibs-static-pic packages from unstable.
Yep, this is bug #362451
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362594 gtk+2.0
Bug#362594: xlibs-pic: Can't be installed (depends on xlibs-static-dev (=
6.9.0.dfsg.1-6))
Bug reassigned from package `xlibs-pic' to `gtk+2.0'.
> severity 362594 serious
Bug#362594: xlibs-pic: Can't be installed (depends on xl
This bug can be easily fix, a dllmap is missing.
The evolution-sharp.dll library P/Invokes the glibsharpglue
(libglibsharpglue.so) directly which is not in /usr/lib anymore (the CLI
Policy requires this). Means evolution-sharp.dll needs a dllmap
(evolution-sharp.dll.config) that tells where the fi
Teemu Ikonen wrote:
(...)
Hi Teemu,
The baz-import plugin does not work due to pybaz not being in the depencies:
$ bzr baz-import
This command is disabled. Please install PyBaz.
Right, it was already reported in #346332. Since this bug doesn't break
all bzrtools "plugins", it isn't serio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362587 important
Bug#362587: bzrtools: missing dependency to pybaz
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags #317988 - experimental
Bug#317988: mboxcheck-applet: does basically nothing.
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
> tags #308268 - experimental
Bug#308268: mboxcheck-applet: Should depend on python-gnome2-extras
Tags were: experiment
I have just done a dist-upgrade on i386 to attempt to
resolve this bug and it is certainly not fixed. even
after upgrading to xserver-xorg-core_1.0.2-4. I still
get the mesage re missing modules for bitmap and
pcidata although only bitmap was specified in
/etc/X11/xorg.conf. commenting out this lin
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:03:19PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> One question I have on this: That location is not always but almost
>> always due to imake, not due to any conscious decision by the package.
>> If the packages are rebuilt with the lates
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:22:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358553: fixed in addresses-for-gnustep 0.4.6-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:53:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:32:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340105: fixed in vpnc 0.3.3+SVN20051028-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:32:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304933: fixed in openafs 1.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:24:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
* Jim Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> A gimpse of the browser and then it is gone
>
> lax:~> firefox
> Bus error
> lax:~> firefox -safe-mode
> Bus error
>
> I move ~/.mozilla
tag 360379 fixed-upstream patch
thanks
This problem was fixed upstream by
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/balsa/src/ab-main.c?r1=1.19&r2=1.20
and
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/balsa/src/main.c?r1=1.195&r2=1.196
. The attached patch includes both of these patches.
--
Matt
diff -Nru balsa-2.3.8
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:02:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360036: fixed in shfs 0.35-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 360379 fixed-upstream patch
Bug#360379: balsa_2.3.8-2(amd64/unstable): GNOME_PARAM_POPT_TABLE undeclared
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream, patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
reassign 358303 libgpgme11-dev
tag 358303 patch
thanks
As noted in the upstream bug report, this is a bug in gpgme-config.
I'm reassigning this bug to the appropriate package and attaching the
patch used by upstream to fix this problem. I verified that it does
fix the problem.
--
Matt
diff -Nru
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 358303 libgpgme11-dev
Bug#358303: FTBFS: undefined reference to 'gpgme_get_protocol_name'
Bug reassigned from package `balsa' to `libgpgme11-dev'.
> tag 358303 patch
Bug#358303: FTBFS: undefined reference to 'gpgme_get_protocol_name'
There wer
Okay, after looking more closely and trying to link with the library, it
looks like it actually DOES use glib, but doesn't have it's dependencies
right. I just submitted another bug about that.
--
Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6
Package: libmms0
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
libmms doesn't seem to depend on anything in particular:
$ ldd /usr/lib/libmms.so.0.0.0
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x2ae123713000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x4000)
$ apt-cache show li
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:02:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346164: fixed in mcvs 1.0.13-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 360604 grave
Bug#360604: dchroot broken due to recent changes in "su"
Severity set to `grave'.
> tag 360600 + patch
Bug#360600: dchroot: chroot(".") fails with ENOPERM
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> merge 360600 360604
Bug#360600
[I've sent a separate, similar, message to xine-devel.]
The relevant log fragment (taken from, at random, the most recent ia64 buildd
log for xine-lib [1]) follows:
h263.c: In function 'mpeg4_decode_partition_a':
h263.c:69: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to
'mpeg4_decode_dc':
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 22:52:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:02:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316277: fixed in directfb 0.9.24-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
severity 360604 grave
tag 360600 + patch
merge 360600 360604
thanks
Hi,
These two bugs are actually the same, so the patch applies here. Both
bugs being open for more than 10 days, and this bug is very annoying, as
it prevents me to develop easily for Debian. I suppose it is the same
for other p
Package: libmms-dev
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
The public headers for libmms in libmms-dev include "bswap.h", which
includes "glib.h". This is a needless dependency, because nothing in the
*headers* actually uses any of the macros from bswap, nor do they use
anythin
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
It's that time of the year (month?) again:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html#firefox1.5.0.2
MFSA 2006-29 Spoofing with translucent windows
MFSA 2006-28
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308586 - experimental fixed-in-experimental
Bug#308586: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so',
which is also in package python-apt
Tags were: fixed fixed-in-experimental patch experimental
Tags removed: experimental, fi
Package: lat
Severity: serious
This package has some major packaging bugs:
1) dh_clideps out of cli-common should be used to get correct
dependencies
2) arch all instead of any, the CIL bytecode is architecture independent
3) do not (build-)depend on user meta packages like mono or gtk-sharp2,
but
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 358397 serious
Bug#358397: initramfs-tools: Fails to install
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 361741 important
Bug#361741: Fail to mount root filesystem
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Le vendredi 14 avril 2006 à 21:24 +0200, maximilian attems a écrit :
> Having evms call update-initramfs at install time is completely gratuitous,
> because the system *won't* be set up for evms at the time of the evms
> postinst: either the update-initramfs will be a complete no-op and have
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #362069
Doing some more debugging.
# strace xinit /usr/lib/X11/xinit/xinitrc
write(2, "xinit: ", 8xinit: ) = 8
write(2, "Server error.\n", 14Server error.
) = 14
exit_group(1) = ?
Not
I can confirm that this is present in sarge and fixed in testing.
Is this a bug in policy? dpkg? I've opened a very similar fontconfig
bug (#362534).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362640 grave
Bug#362640: gajim: Cannot start because of sqlite2 error
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 361236 362640
Bug#361236: gajim: pysql problem
Bug#362640: gajim: Cannot start because of sqlite2 error
Merged 361236 362640.
> thanks
Stop
initramfs differs from initrd as it's no fs, but just an archive.
you can easily append stuff to it that wasn't inside yet.
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:18:59PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > by design initramfs-tools needs that:
> > a) allows e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # it is neither a real security issue, nor unuseable for all users
> severity 231436 important
Bug#231436: gidentd opens /proc/net/tcp and /proc/net/tcp6 immediately at
startup while still running as root
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 362633 important
Bug#362633: installation-report: fails to detect hard drive
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Hi,
OK. As far as I know, this bug will only affect 2.2.5. I'll have a
look, and try to make a patch for it.
Qian
On 4/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gkrellmd 2.2.5 is the lastest version (stable).
>
> Ciao,
> --
> Carsten Otto
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.c-otto.de
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> # lots of packages can leave temp files around on error -- not RC
> severity 362622 important
Bug#362622: gotmail fills up my /tmp/
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, st
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:32:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259410: fixed in linneighborhood 0.6.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 362631 morinfo
Unknown tag/s: morinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n et
tags 362631 morinfo
severity 362631 important
reassign 362631 initramfs-tools
stop
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 06:19:04PM +0100, C. Dominik =?UTF-8?Q?B=C3=B3di ?=
wrote:
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> The kernel seems to boot up normally, but then fails to mount the root device
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362058: fixed in uml-utilities 20060323-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 308586 + fixed
Bug#308586: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so',
which is also in package python-apt
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental patch experimental
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.14
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: etch beta 2, amd64, 15 Mar 2006 and daily image 14 april 2006
Date: 14 april 2006, 18:00 MET
Machine: HP xw9300
Partitions: no
Base S
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> severity 147187 important
Bug#147187: xdelta: Deltas generated on i386 fail to apply on alpha
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.16-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The kernel seems to boot up normally, but then fails to mount the root device
with a message
"failed to mount root on /dev/hda8 - no such device"
according
Package: gnobog
Version: 0.4.3-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Gnobog segaults on amd64 sarge. Example output:
$ gnobob
Gnobog-Message: User Home Directory : /home/ccw
Gnobog-Message: Gnobog Working Directory : /home/ccw/.gnobog/
Gnobog-Message: Creating New
Package: freepops
Version: 0.0.98-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi, I have been using freepops for a while for accessing some of my
accounts and I just discovered that the hotmail plugin seems to have a
*very* nasty side-effect: it creates a world-readable file
Tired of working a dead end job ?
C_al.l us now get any de_gr.ee you desire in 2weeks or less! _1.0.0% verifiable
1+206-337-1883
Thanks,
Bill Simo
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:34:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 360588 !
Bug#360588: hibernate: prerm renders package uninstallable with a read-only
/usr/local
Changed Bug submitter from Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Y
Giridhar Appaji Nag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 315182 !
Bug#3151
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 287244 with 335665
Bug#287244: kudzu: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'module_file'
follows non-static declaration
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Bug#321563: kudzu: FTBFS (ppc64/gcc-4.0): label at end of compound statement
Blocking bug
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've reopened this bug because xdm 1:1.0.1-5 remains broken exactly as
> before; xdm-config refers to a nonexistant Xsetup_0, and if I fix that
> xdm still fails on login with this in the log:
>
> error opening security policy file /usr/lib/xserver/SecurityP
Package: gotmail
Version: 0.8.2-3
Severity: grave
When encountering an error, gotmail version prior to 0.8.6 does not
cleanup the temporary files it creates in /tmp/. Users fill up my
/tmp/ causing a DOS (max inodes reached), without even knowing it !
This bug has been described on gotmail tracke
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 358981 serious
Bug#358981: enigmail: FTBFS on powerpc
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:43:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line acknowledge NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Em Qui, 2006-04-13 às 20:23 +0200, Martin Michlmayr escreveu:
> Well, it may be old but it's the latest version in unstable.
Sure. What I meant with that was that it has not changed.
> What's
> the status of moving 1.7 to unstable? Maybe it's fixed there.
It probably is, just like another handf
Package: nunit-console
Version: 2.2.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
robinson:~# LANG=C dpkg -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/nunit-console_2.2.7-1_all.deb(Reading database ...
309436 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace nunit-console 2.2.6-1 (usi
The next lvm2 release upstream (possibly later today, else middle of
next week) should handle the backwards compatibility.
Alasdair
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/14/06, Stephan Michels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To have the same swt lib into two different packages was not our intention.
> It would be good to have one swt lib in the archive, then such things
> won't occur.
> Is it possible to merge your swt package with our swt package?
> Can we resol
dann frazier wrote:
> If for no other reason, upstream release process changes will likely
> make this much more difficult. As I'm sure you know, 2.6 is being
> actively developed indefinitely, as opposed to the previous method of
> branching off and stabalising a development tree. Since there is
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:19:30 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362599: Policy violation when removing the old deprecated
zeroconf-up script
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Package: mtr
Version: 0.70-1
Severity: serious
mtr fails to build from source on arm, sparc, and m68k. This appears to
be a timestamp skew problem. For more information on this problem
search for skew in /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
| make -C mtr
| make[1]: Entering directory `/
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361048: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: zeroconf
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
/etc/network/if-up.d/zeroconf-up is simply removed if it exists. According to
the policy it should be preserved somewhere. This may somehow be done the same
way as dbus (see /var/lib/d
Hi,
I do not really have an idea on what's going on here, specially
considering how old this release actually is. I have asked upstream
about it, and am currently waiting for a reply on the issue.
--
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
tag 345450 pending
tag 357885 pending
quit
Just as a status update, the upload that fixes this bug is sitting in
the GNOME Team SVN repository, waiting for a fix for a problem involving
the GNOME libs and libXcursor.
We hope to have that sorted out soon, sorry.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Guilherme de
Uwe Hermann wrote:
Thanks for the patches, will test and upload soonish...
What's the status for the upload?
--
Mattias Nordstrom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alain Richoux wrote:
Please find below more accurate information about this problem.
Version: the problem occurs with the most recent dnsmasq testing packages,
in other words version 2.27-1
Syslog messages:
Apr 13 21:51:32 Sartre dnsmasq[6827]: started, version 2.27 cachesize 150
Apr 13 21:51:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 07:20:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I suggest depending upon w3-el-e21 unconditionally, which would make
> things robust, even if it's not strictly required in all cases.
> xemacs21 already depends upon xemacs21-basesupport, so
>
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1), libxml2 (>
Hi Ola,
I stumbled over this bug report looking for the conflict
between vnc4server and the new Xorg 7.0. It is tagged
"patch" since yesterday, but there is none included, and
no new vnc4server is in incoming either, so hopefully it
is allowed to post my suggestion here?
Regards
Harri
diff -ur
subscribe 334697 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 04:52:28PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> I noticed maintainer's cron script at osdn.d.o.j had stopped
> since a long time ago by wrong permission.
>
> I fixed it and hope this bug is solved.
Hi, I'm willing to fix that problem fo
Package: xlibs-pic
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
$ sudo apt-get install xlibs-pic
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using
Package: dvifb
Version: 1:01.03-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When using dvifb on my G3, it will render upper part of the first page
of the dvi file correctly (by upper part I mean the portion that fits
on the screen). Then it will not respond properly to any keys pres
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362567 important
Bug#362567: CVE-2006-1678: Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Package: bzrtools
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
The baz-import plugin does not work due to pybaz not being in the depencies:
$ bzr baz-import
This command is disabled. Please install PyBaz.
[The funny thing is though that even after 'apt-get install pybaz', the
abov
severity 362567 important
thanks
I'm lowering the bug severity, because it is not exploitable if
register_globals are disabled and it is the default configuration for Debian.
On Friday 14 April 2006 10:53, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Package: phpmyadmin
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> CVE-20
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:30:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gwydion-dylan was removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:30:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gwydion-dylan was removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:30:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gwydion-dylan was removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:30:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gwydion-dylan was removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
package lvm2
reopen 358373
thanks
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 06:24:44PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:18:13AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 02:37:22PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lvm2
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lvm2
> reopen 358373
Bug#358373: lvm2: doesn't install if kernel is too old
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
> Hi. This would seem to be the same bug as has been reported earlier and if
> so, it
> should be fixed by upgrading the scrollkeeper package to version 0.3.14-10.1,
> which
> has recently been uploaded to unstable. Could you try upgrading scrollkeeper
> and
> see if that fixes it?
I upgraded
severity 358295 important
thanks
* Guilherme de S. Pastore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-13 16:52]:
> It probably is, just like another handful of issues. It has already
> received some polishing on experimental, and should be ready for
> upload to unstable soon. Could you test whether it solves th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 358295 important
Bug#358295: FTBFS: test suite failure: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32]... FAILED
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upgrading fails due to custom config. xserver-xorg fails to update
xorg.conf due to md5sums missing. linking to old md5sums fails also.
removing xorg.conf works. Also (in my case) xserver-xorg-input-all
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
