Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:47:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362083: fixed in zope-common 0.5.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352052: fixed in tdfsb 0.0.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352052: fixed in tdfsb 0.0.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334737: fixed in tdfsb 0.0.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I had also this bug. Fixed with installing xkb-data, using XkbRules to
xorg and Driver to Keyboard.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334737: fixed in tdfsb 0.0.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362233 libxfixes3
Bug#362233: xcursor-themes: symlinking default cursors makes xterm fail with
BadRequest
Bug reassigned from package `xcursor-themes' to `libxfixes3'.
> severity 362233 grave
Bug#362233: xcursor-themes: symlinking default cur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362269 libxfixes3
Bug#362269: x11-common: pgrade from 6.9.0.dfsg to 1:7.0.10 breaks many programs
with "request_code 151 minor_code 23"
Bug reassigned from package `x11-common' to `libxfixes3'.
> severity 362269 grave
Bug#362269: x11-common:
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362103: fixed in xfonts-scalable 1:1.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
acking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xutils-dev
Version: 1:1.0.1-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xutils-dev_1:1.0.1-3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started
ou are not allowed to store it in your Windows computer.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:17:35 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssa
> Same error with spanish keyboard: AltGr doesn't works (and at, ntilde,
> ccedil)
>
I had the same trouble, was fixed instaling xkb-data and runing
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
and selecting latam as layout (I'm using latam keyboard).
> Section "InputDevice"
>Identifier "Generic
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 362089 + pending patch
Bug#362089: vnc4server: xorg 7.0.0 no longer provide xserver-common
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
ou are not allowed to store it in your Windows computer.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
tags 362089 + patch pending
thanks
Thanks for the reports.
I'll be corrected soon.
Regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 05:03:11PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to raise the severity of this bug because the package is not
> installable any longer:
>
> # apt-get install
Hi
I saw this morning that the upload has been accepted into sarge.
Regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:21:17PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > tags 361967 +etch sarge security
> > thanks
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:46:07AM -0300, Pedro Müller wr
Package: madwifi
Version: 0.svn20060207-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Trying to builf madwifi version 0.svn20060207-4 on mipsel, I have seen
it now fails to build from source:
rm -rf debian/patched
/usr/bin/make -C tools clean
make[1]: Entering directory
On 12 Apr 2006, Marco d'Itri stated:
> reassign 362064 initramfs-tools
> thanks
>
> On Apr 12, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Why is udev trying to write to a working boot mechanism
>> without asking?
> Why do you believe that udev creates initramfs images?
Hmm, it is tr
Package: libqt4-dev
Version: 4.1.1-1+b1
Severity: grave
With the new version of xorg in unstable, the xlibs-static-pic package
has been removed. Since libqt4-dev has a dependency on this package, it
is no longer installable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers u
I've just remove __EXPORT keyword between class Pointer and it seems to
pass for sflphone compilation.
The __EXPORT keyword is not present in commoncpp2 from fedora package.
(1.3.23)
It seems it was added in version 1.3
ttp://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/gnutelephony/testing/commoncpp2/templa
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 06:04:56PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>- Open /proc/net/tcp and /proc/net/tcp6 immediately at startup while
>still running as root. Grsecurity can be configured not to allow access
>to /proc/net for non-root users, so this patch is required for those
>users.
Could you p
Package: sylpheed-gtk1
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp $ sylpheed-gtk1 &
[1] 19476
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp $ Gdk-ERROR **: BadRequest (invalid request code or no
such operation)
serial 366 error_code 1 request_code 152 minor_code
Package: fuse-utils
Version: 2.5.2-4
Followup-For: Bug #325993
This seems to be because postinst says "addgroup --system fuse"
whereas it ought to say "groupadd --system fuse".
Similarly postrm says "delgroup --system fuse" instead of "groupdel
--system fuse".
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 356311 serious
Bug#356311: dosbox: Shifted symbols broken
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
reassign 362192 gnustep-base-common
thanks
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:21:24AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: gorm.app
> Version: 1.0.6-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> gorm.app failed to build on sparc and hppa buildds. (It failed on my
> sparc pbuilder
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 231436 gidentd opens /proc/net/tcp and /proc/net/tcp6 immediately at
> startup while still running as root
Bug#231436: security patch
Changed Bug title.
> severity 231436 serious
Bug#231436: gidentd opens /proc/net/tcp and /proc/net/tcp6 immed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362192 gnustep-base-common
Bug#362192: gorm.app: ftbfs [sparc] Bus error
Bug reassigned from package `gorm.app' to `gnustep-base-common'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:02:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362149: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tags 361952 unreproducible
severity 361952 important
thanks
Hello,
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Meike Reichle wrote:
> This (the partially upgraded system) might be the source of the problem.
> I just went through a full upgrade + dist-upgrade that also got me the
> new tetex-bin (3.0-15). So, I am sorry
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> merge 361890 362173
Bug#361890: libtasn1-2: changed so-name requires changed binary package name
Bug#362173: libtasn1-2: Mutual dependency problem with libgnutls12 in unstable
-- can
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 361952 unreproducible
Bug#361952: tex4ht-common: Package uninstallable due to missing configuration
file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 361952 important
Bug#361952: tex4ht-common: Package uninstallable due to missin
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:58:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360476: Bug #360476: celestia FTBFS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libxklavier10
Version: 2.2-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
At start-up of a GNOME session, I get the error-dialog:
Error activating XKB configuration.
It can happen under various circumstances:
- a bug in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Version: 1:0.2.17-2
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> severity 362173 grave
Bug#362173: libtasn1-2: Mutual dependency problem with libgnutls12 in unstable
-- cannot install either
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 362173 361890
Bug#
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:09:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362173: libtasn1-2: Mutual dependency problem with
libgnutls12 in unstable -- cannot install either
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:26:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362234: deboostrap: Failure while installing base packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like this possibly means that libxcursor-dev needs to have
> Depends: libxfixes-dev. If that's correct, feel free to reassign the bug.
Well, xbase-clients still has missing build dependencies either way,
as xdpyinfo, xsetmode, and xsetpointe
Same problem here: after update I couldn't even login... AltGr doesn't work.
I also noticed that Ctrl+Alt+Fx doesn't switch to a fb console as usual.
Fortunately I could login to ssh: that allowed me at least to downgrade
Xorg.
In my xorg.conf I already had Option "XkbRules" "xorg".
Thanks
Mau
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:26:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362234: deboostrap: Failure while installing base packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Version: 1:0.2.17-2
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 362234 libtasn1-2
Bug#362234: deboostrap: Failure while installing base packages
Bug reassigned from package `debootstrap' to `libtasn1-2'.
> merge 362234 362173
Bug#362
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:09:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362173: libtasn1-2: Mutual dependency problem with
libgnutls12 in unstable -- cannot install either
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:27:02PM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 1:7.0.0-2
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> xcursorgen-X11R7.0-1.0.0
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> checking whether build environment
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:44:48AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I don't think this to be a bug of gtk-engines-industrial, because the same
> error occurs, if you for example use the "whiteglass" theme, which is a
> part of xlibs-data.
>
> The original submitter "fixed" this by removing g
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:07:21PM +0200, Florian Cramer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. April 2006 um 23:10:34 Uhr (-0400) schrieb David Nusinow:
>
> > This sounds like your /etc/init.d/x11-common script isn't correctly
> > creating the necessary files to allow clients to connect to the server. Can
>
Package: tar
Version: 1.15.1dfsg-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of tar_1.15.1dfsg-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060413-0012
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelp
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:09:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line updated packages entered archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:09:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line updated packages entered archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:02:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361931: fixed in tar 1.15.1dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:00:07PM +0200, Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
> if udev is used and /etc/init.d/lirc loads the lirc modules,
> it should wait for a moment after doing modprobe. Otherwise
> this happens in /etc/init.d/lirc:
> modprobe lirc_serial
> # here we should sleep for a second, so tha
The latest version of ncsd opens a socket in /var/run/.nscd_socket, however
it appears the glibc libraries are looking for it in /var/run/nscd/socket.
After making a symlink from /var/run/nscd/socket to /var/run/.nscd_socket,
an strace on 'ls -l' shows nscd being used. I also note that an strace on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> reassign 362227 libxfixes3
Bug#362227: xterm fails to start: X Error of failed request: BadRequest
Bug reassigned from package `xterm' to `libxfixes3'.
> merge 362227 362049
Bug#362
Hi Martin,
I see you have problems with compiling Balsa. I had the same problem
when I prepackage 2.3.12 for Debian Sid some weeks ago but was
eventually able to solve it. Please read this bug thread at
bugzilla.gnome.org: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334704
If you have any q
reassign 362234 debootstrap
thanks
* Timothee Besset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-12 17:03]:
> http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id271960
> # debootstrap --arch i386 sid /var/local/chroot/sid-ia32
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
> [..]
> W: Failure while in
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 07:52:34PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Steve Langasek:
> > FWIW, I'm not convinced this bug warrants grave severity anyway; unless the
> > crasher bug allows arbitrary code execution as well, it doesn't seem like
> > this is really a big issue given that the radius cli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362234 debootstrap
Bug#362234: deboostrap: Failure while installing base packages
Bug reassigned from package `debootstrap' to `debootstrap'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 362234 debootstrap
Bug#362234: deboostrap: Failure while installing base packages
Warning: Unknown package 'deboostrap'
Bug reassigned from package `deboostrap' to `debootstr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 359110 Miguel Gea Milvaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#359110: /org/bugs.debian.org/etc/indices/sources outdated
Changed Bug submitter from Miguel Gea Milvaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Miguel
Gea Milvaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 314808
Package: deboostrap
Version: 0.3.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to setup a 32 bit chroot as documented in the HOWTO:
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id271960
# debootstrap --arch i386 sid /var/local/chroot/sid-ia32
http:/
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 12:37, Some have written:
> There seems to be tons of feedback with that bug report.
[ Or similar. ]
I must get better at phrasing things then. There is a lot of
feedback in the bug report. However, within the bug report there
are still many questions which are never
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362224 gksu
Bug#362224: libgksu1.2-0: looking for xauth in the wrong folder
Bug reassigned from package `libgksu1.2-0' to `gksu'.
> merge 362118 362224
Bug#362118: gksu: looking for xauth in the wrong folder
Bug#362224: libgksu1.2-0: looking f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 362148 354961
Bug#354961: nvidia-glx won't install with X.org 7.0
Bug#362148: nvidia-glx depends on xserver-common which isn't in unstable anymore
Merged 354961 362148.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
I tried that under KDE: I get the errors
Then I tried fluxbox, twm as windowmanagers: No problems with xterm,
rxvt or amule.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von
Package: xterm
Version: 210-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried this on two boxes with Xorg 7.0: both expose the same behaviour:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xterm
X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such
operation)
Major opcode of failed re
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:33:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354131: fixed in mplayerplug-in 3.25-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: lirc
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
if udev is used and /etc/init.d/lirc loads the lirc modules,
it should wait for a moment after doing modprobe. Otherwise
this happens in /etc/init.d/lirc:
modprobe lirc_serial
# here we should sle
On Apr 12, Cesare Leonardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, i don't know udev in details, but i don't understand why you have
> reassigned this bug to initramfs-tools.
Because it's initramfs-tools which tends to break people's systems, the
initramfs-related bits of udev have not changed in a w
Package: libgksu1.2-0
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
After xorg is upgraded in Debian Sid to 7.0 gksu no longer works because
it looks in a wrong folder for xauth. See debug output below
$gksu -d /usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator
try_su_run: buf: -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 358648 pending
Bug#358648: FTBFS: 'alloc2' undeclared
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362180 grave
Bug#362180: octave-gpc_0.1.6-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep?
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 362180 334230
Bug#334230: libgpcl-dev: headers in wrong directory on alpha, ia64
Bug#362180: octave-gpc_0.1.6-1(ia64/unstabl
Marco d'Itri wrote:
reassign 361741 initramfs-tools
thanks
Sorry, i don't know udev in details, but i don't understand why you have
reassigned this bug to initramfs-tools.
The aptitude's log of that day is the following:
==
tags 362058 +confirmed +pending
thanks
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 07:57:40PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
[...]
> uml-utilities goes out of its way to force use of /usr/lib64 on amd64,
> which is a big no-no on Debian and clashes with libc6:
Ops, sorry.
> > Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> > dpkg:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 362058 +confirmed +pending
Unknown tag/s: +pending.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-ups
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362198 normal
Bug#362198: cupsys includes the non-free URW luxi fonts (Courier & Symbol)
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 362198 [bogus] "send before think report"
Bug#362198: cupsys includes the non-free URW luxi fonts (Courier & Symbol)
C
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.1.23-15
Severity: serious
usr/share/cups/fonts/Courier
usr/share/cups/fonts/Courier-Bold
usr/share/cups/fonts/Courier-BoldOblique
usr/share/cups/fonts/Courier-Oblique
usr/share/cups/fonts/Symbol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
There are at least two GCC visibility bugs preventing enigmail from
building: 20297 and 26905 (both present in Debian gcc 4.0.3-1). Mozilla
configure from CVS trunk includes a check which uses -fvisibility=hidden
instead of pragmas if your compiler suffers from bug 20297, but this check
was too la
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 07:21:49PM -0700, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> Occasionally I get an email from someone who is reporting back to
> many people, but in general I have gotten NO FEEDBACK on this bug
> report! It apparently wasn't reproducible to the person fielding
> the bug report, but it i
Package: libgnutls12
Version: 1.2.9-2
Followup-For: Bug #361874
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=C,
Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Are you planning a new stable release of pyme soon which will include
this patch ?
Well.. I do plan 0.7.1 release "any minute now" for the last half an
year. :-(
I want to figure out why do I still have problems with MinGW32 built
PyMe on Windows.
The problems boil
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:47:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361781: fixed in plplot 5.3.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362180 libgpcl-dev
Bug#362180: octave-gpc_0.1.6-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep?
Bug reassigned from package `octave-gpc' to `libgpcl-dev'.
> merge 362180 334230
Bug#334230: libgpcl-dev: headers in wrong directory on alpha, ia64
Bug
> Automatic build of octave-gpc_0.1.6-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> > Build started at 20060412-0944
>
> [...]
>
> > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > Build-Depends: debhelper, perl, libgpcl-dev, octave2.1-headers (>=
> > 2.1.72-10), cdb
> "Igor" == Igor Belyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Igor> I've got it! Here's a slightly better patch which should not
Igor> break back compatibility and does not use undocumented
Igor> features. I'm making similar changes in CVS as well.
Hello Igor,
Are you planning a new stable
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:32:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361940: fixed in python-mysqldb 1.2.1-p2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
* Steve Langasek:
> FWIW, I'm not convinced this bug warrants grave severity anyway; unless the
> crasher bug allows arbitrary code execution as well, it doesn't seem like
> this is really a big issue given that the radius clients shouldn't normally
> be under the control of an attacker?
Nowadays
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:57:16 +0200
Stijn Declercq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.10
> Followup-For: Bug #362112
>
>
> Hi
>
> i've got the same problems like the one with the german keymaps.
> be-keymap doesn't load.
>
> Xorg.log says
> (WW) Couldn't load X
Igor Belyi wrote:
I'm still trying to find the right workaround for this. For now it
seems SWIG 1.3.28 is not good
version to use for pyme build.
I've got it! Here's a slightly better patch which should not break back
compatibility and does not use
undocumented features. I'm making similar cha
Package: gorm.app
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
gorm.app failed to build on sparc and hppa buildds. (It failed on my
sparc pbuilder due to uninstallable build-dependancies.)
echo '@set GNUSTEP-VERSION' 0.10.0 \
> version.texi
echo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> You can argue, depending on the type of service, that a remote DoS makes a
> package unusable. That doesn't seem to apply to a database server that is
> unlikely to be on the public Internet, though.
Plus, the vulnerability at
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.10
Followup-For: Bug #362112
Hi
i've got the same problems like the one with the german keymaps.
be-keymap doesn't load.
Xorg.log says
(WW) Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap
xkb-data is installed(manual after upgrade)
output of the c
OK, I've looked at it and I'm sorry to say I don't think this is the
right patch.
It seems to me that the patch disables gpgme.i's "const char *" typemap
definition by using
SWIG's bug of not reporting invalid syntax but silently ignoring it to
work around another SWIG
bug of the typemap causi
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Stefan [UTF-8] Völkel wrote:
> Package: dovecot-imapd
> Version: 1.0.beta5-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After the last update I can only log log in from localhost.
>
> Neither my old config file, nor the one packaged (with things like ip
>
At Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:57:28 -0400,
Martin Stolle wrote:
> After upgrading to this xdm version in unstable, users can no longer log
> on. It seems like xdm tries to execute some scripts, as configured in
> the default xdm-config, that don't exist. The missing scripts are
> Xsetup_0, GiveConsole a
I have a 2.0.6 upload headed in (probably today) that seems to fix this
issue.
I do not have an amd64 box to test it on.
Steve Langasek wrote:
> There are reports saying that this bug still exists after your latest
> upload. Can you confirm this? Is this problem specific to amd64 now?
--
Tim
Hi
Frank Küster said/sagte on/am 12.04.2006 07:55:
> I guess this must be a partially upgraded system, tex-common is
> installed, but not yet configured properly, and tetex-bin (and probably
> -base) is still at the old version. tetex-bin_2.0.2-31 means that he is
> using testing, but testing has
Package: xutils-dev
Version: 1:1.0.1-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xutils-dev_1:1.0.1-3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060412-0940
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Package: octave-gpc
Version: 0.1.6-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of octave-gpc_0.1.6-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060412-0944
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 362125 362118
Bug#362118: gksu: looking for xauth in the wrong folder
Bug#362125: gksu fails because it looks for xauth in wrong location
Merged 362118 362125.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: ocp
Version: 0.1.10rc5-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ocp_0.1.10rc5-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060412-0941
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Package: sip-tester
Version: 1.1rc4-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of sip-tester_1.1rc4-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060412-0942
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Package: libtasn1-2
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: L
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
