Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.11+cvs20060126-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Mutt doesn't filter control characters, in particular the ^J and ^M,
> from headers, which can lead to unwanted behavior; in particular when
> replying,
Package: tla-buildpackage
Version: 0.9.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Most commands fail with something like:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/tbp-importdsc", line 38, in ?
tbpimport.importdsc(dscname)
(...)
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344725 grave
Bug#344725: libdb2-ruby: Please consider dropping this package
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> reassign 358308 libxft-dev
Bug#358308: x11-common collides with libxft-dev (/usr/include/X11)
Bug reassigned from package `x11-common' to `libxft-dev'.
>
End of message, stopping pro
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:32:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358308: fixed in xft 2.1.8.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
clone 358305 -1
reassign -1 dlm
retitle -1 dlm: mislinked on mips/mipsel: needs -lpthreads
thanks
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 04:17:45AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: lvm2
> Version: 2.02.02-1
> Severity: serious
> This package currently doesn't build on mips and mipsel. You need to
> pa
Package: scim-chewing
Version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: serious
> Automatic build of scim-chewing_0.2.1-2 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106
...
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link mips-linux-gnu-g++ -Wall -g -O2
> -o chewing.la -rpath /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine -avoid-version -rpath
> /usr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 358305 -1
Bug#358305: FTBFS on mips/mipsel: needs -lpthreads
Bug 358305 cloned as bug 358311.
> reassign -1 dlm
Bug#358311: FTBFS on mips/mipsel: needs -lpthreads
Bug reassigned from package `lvm2' to `dlm'.
> retitle -1 dlm: mislinked on mips/m
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:55:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #355840,
regarding FTBFS in unstable: LIBGTOP_LIBS not expanded
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a syste
Package: gclcvs
Version: 2.7.0-54
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build in unstable beause of an undefined
reference to 'init_gcl_cmpfun'.
> Automatic build of gclcvs_2.7.0-54 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.106
...
> ar rs libgcl.a ../o/alloc.o ../o/array.o ../o/assignment.o ../o/backq.o
>
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: grave
x11-common is currently uninstallable resp. can't be upgraded to
6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 because it conflicts with libxft-dev. The error
message is:
Unpacking replacement x11-common ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6
Package: avahi
Version: 0.6.9-5
Severity: serious
This package currently doesn't build on mips and mipsel. You need to
pass -lpthreads during linking (at least for now). Please see 346346
and http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2006/01/msg00040.html
> Automatic build of avahi_0.6.9-5 on bigsur
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.02-1
Severity: serious
This package currently doesn't build on mips and mipsel. You need to
pass -lpthreads during linking (at least for now). Please see #346346
and http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2006/01/msg00040.html
> Automatic build of lvm2_2.02.02-1 on big
Package: libgdchart-gd2
Version: 0.11.5-3
Severity: serious
Your package doesn't build in unstable:
> Automatic build of libgdchart-gd2_0.11.5-3 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106
...
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.23-1.1), debhelper (>= 4.1.0), dh-bu
Package: balsa
Version: 2.3.8-2
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build in unstable. Steve Langasek has some
comment:
04:07 that looks like a missing -l argument on the linker
line, as if one of its build-deps *used* to depend on libgpgme
04:08 yeah, balsa has a build-dep on libgpgme11-
Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:53:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:53:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:53:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:54:37 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:53:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Subject: kpackage: Breaks sources.list
Package: kpackage
Version: 4:3.5.1-2
Severity: critical
*** Please type your report below this line ***
When using the menu item Settings/Configure Kpackage, selecting APT:Debian,
pressing the "Location of packages" button to edit the sources, and pressing
Package: john
Version: 1.6-39
Severity: serious
john fails to build because of a problem in the test suite:
> Automatic build of john_1.6-39 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106
...
> Benchmarking: Standard DES [24/32 128K]... 41701 c/s real, 41768 c/s virtual
> Compiling: DES benchmark (bitslice)
> ma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 351706 serious
Bug#351706: m-tx: FTBFS on mips and mipsel
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Hi,
I missed two things:
1. the two typos in the error message :-/
2. the build dependency must be changed, too.
HS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: affix
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
There was a new version of libopenobex accepted in unstable. However,
it does NOT use openobex-config anymore but pkg-config. Thus,
configure fails on openobex.
I would provide a patch but the configure.ac file is b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 358274 http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3991
Bug#358274: ocaml: FTBFS on hurd-i386
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3991.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> # hurd is not RC
> severity 358274 important
Bug#358274: ocaml: FTBFS on hurd-i386
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 356918 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#356918: libx11: FTBFS in experimental.
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 358073 important
Bug#358073: lxdoom: no .orig.tar.gz file in the archive!
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Package: kdebluetooth
Version: 0.99+1.0beta1-6+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Tags: patch
Hi,
A new version of libopenobex (1.1) finally was accepted in unstable.
This version does NOT use openobex-config anymore but the more
standardized pkg-config. The patch be
Hello,
today I upgraded my system and sadly evolution was dying while showing
html-messages first. Some restarts later it hangs in the formating issue
and *** glibc detected *** was printed out.
The workaround from Gustavo Franko posted by Thomas Weber helped to get
it running again.
So many tha
severity 358073 important
thanks
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-22 02:25]:
> So the source is available, but not on the expected spot. This prevents
> (auto)building, and automatic source retrieval.
OK, lowering severity.
> Bottom line: by far easiest is to ensure you get a
Package: ocaml
Version: 3.09.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
ocaml FTBFS on hurd-i386 because of lack of configure support. Please
apply proposed patch on upstream bts
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3991
Regards,
Samuel Thibault
-- Syst
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:49:20AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but afaict there is no .tar.gz file for lxdoom in
> the archive. If ftp-master cannot do something about this, can you please
> upload a new package and pass an option to dpkg-buildpackage so it'll inc
Package: flexml
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
And you thought you'd get rid of me so easily? flexml fails to build
on AMD64. According to a quick search, it seems this is a problem in
your code. See
#358174 - ]] in comments screw up flex's generated C code
I might be wrong though.
> Aut
Package: smarteiffel
Version: 1.1-8
Severity: grave
The AMD64 package does not contain /usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/short,
causing other packages to fail to build:
> Automatic build of gobo_3.3-3 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.106
...
> Building HTML index of the Eiffel class library...
> ls: ./*.e: No s
Package: evolution
Version: 2.4.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #347672
This is what I get:
(evolution-2.4:3071): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_gc_set_foreground: assertion
`GDK_IS_GC (gc)' failed.
No hang or reference to "double free".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unsta
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:32:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357788: fixed in dmapi 2.2.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 347242 + fixed
Bug#347242: libkolab-perl: uninstallable because of missing
kolab-libcyrus-imap-perl
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 350677 + patch
Bug#350677: apr-util_1.2.2-3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Package: nbsmtp
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
hi,
nbsmtp depends on openssl (libssl0.9.8), but according to the copyright
file it is GPL without a special exception (at least, I could not find
one there, nor in the source package).
Please either disable OpenSSL support, convince up
Hi Chet,
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:13:29AM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Debian recently decided about distribution of GFDL documents in Debian
> > (http://www.us.debian.org/News/2006/20060316). Here is the
> > corresponding bug report for bash.
> > - would you consider re
Package: gforge-db-postgresql
Version: 3.1-31
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
When installing slapd...
portatildebian64:~# LANG=C aptitude install slapd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading
Package: gcc-h8300-hms
Version: 2.95.2.2.1
Severity: serious
Your package is available on mips in the archive but it no longer
builds on that platform.
> Automatic build of gcc-h8300-hms_2.95.2.2.1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106
...
> # configure gcc build for our cross target
> /build/tbm/gcc-
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:23:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358217: fglrx-driver: Fail to upgrade: try to overwrite
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 also in package xlibmesa-gl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 358202 -1
Bug#358202: FTBFS: error: Could not find gtk/gtk.h.
Bug 358202 cloned as bug 358230.
> reassign -1 libcairo2-dev
Bug#358230: FTBFS: error: Could not find gtk/gtk.h.
Bug reassigned from package `choosewm' to `libcairo2-dev'.
> retitle -
Hi.
I'm experiencing the same bug, and after some investigation, it seems the hang
happens when evolution tries to show a mail.
After moving the .evolution folder, it started normally, and downloaded
normally mails from the server, but as soon as I click on one of these mails to
view it, evo ha
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:46:10 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> I noticed your patch to this problem, so I decided to review it.
Thanks.
> It looks good to me. Other solutions are also possible, but your
> solution looks better.
>
> However, I notice the cleanup() routine still calls pclose(...). Thi
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.23.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.1
When upgrading from 8.21.7-1, fglrx-driver does not handle diversion
properly. The maintainer scripts fail (so the serious severity).
The error I got is (in french):
Dépaquetage de la mise à jour de fglrx-driver ..
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 358210 grave
Bug#358210: debian-installer: Possible DoS attack: World writable directory
remains after installing Debian 3.1r1 from the official network install CD
Severity
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:15:42PM +0100, Pierre M. wrote:
> Package: nvu
> Version: 1.0-1
> Followup-For: Bug #306822
> Hello, shouldn't 306822 be reclosed ?
> According to p.qa.d.org/n/nvu.html there is no more mips/mipsel problem.
> That would be cool to have this wysiwyg tool in Etch.
> Isn't
Package: evolution
Version: 2.4.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #358071
I see the same kind of error here today. But the exact error varies. Two
examples from different sessions:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08717d18 ***
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0x098
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 355840 pending
Bug#355840: FTBFS in unstable: LIBGTOP_LIBS not expanded
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060321 19:29]:
> Your package fails to build. Maybe a missing build-deps or something?
At the first look, it seems gtk changed the compiler flags
it needs again. (Why can't they properly name their headers
so that it does not need tons of -I directives?)
T
tag 355840 pending
thanks
On 08/03/2006 at 09:51 Martin Michlmayr wrote...
> Package: xfce4-netload-plugin
> Version: 0.3.2-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Your package doesn't build in unstable because LIBGTOP_LIBS not
> expanded:
>
netload-plugin shouldn't use libgtop anymore. I'm preparing a patc
Hi,
First, for those who care my name is Gustavo Franco. :-)
FYI, it seems that applying those two patches below over the
latest evo in Debian really fix the bug. It was confirmed
by heikkih (Heikki Henriksen), so it seems that we've more than
a workaround.
gtkhtml:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs
tags 357936 + pending
thanks
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 13:02:31 +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> The new gnumeric packages now depend on a non-existent gnumeric-common (=
> 1.6.2-3+b1), and therefore are uninstallable in unstable at the moment.
Yes, I'm aware of thi issue.
> A sourceful upload is req
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 357936 + pending
Bug#357936: gnumeric: Uninstallable after binNMU.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358188: fixed in pyntor 0.5+svn46-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fine that we agree, but (as indicated in my older mail), I meanwhile
> have found that the directory becomes non-world-writable only when the
> existing debconf question is shown. Do you agree that the revised
> wording of the question is sufficient?
Wit
Package: evolution
Version: 2.4.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #347672
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today I upgraded my system, together with libc6, and now evolution hangs
on startup, usually displaying "Formatting message..." on status bar.
I noticed that also "Veryifing message" caus
#include
* Eduard Bloch [Tue, Mar 21 2006, 05:32:17PM]:
> And finally, in the last mail I have already presented the exact chain
> of conclusions, including the intent of the OP. I expect you (as
> programmer knowing how logic works) to be able to find the wrong link
> there -- so would you consi
Package: evolution
Version: 2.4.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #347672
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After a bit of messing up with ~/.evolution dir, I think it's not a
"Formatting message" issue, but a more general one. I got also this
somehow new glibc error message, before the usual f
Hi Bill,
thank you for pointing this out.
* Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-20 17:38]:
> Since the admin can run update-menus at any time, there is
> no warranties /usr will be mounted read-write.
> Auto-generated files should be created in /var/lib/fvwm-crystal.
you're right on that
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:32:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358169: fixed in sleepd 1.3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: choosewm
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build. Maybe a missing build-deps or something?
> Automatic build of choosewm_0.1.1-1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106
...
> checking for pango/pango.h... yes
> checking atk/atkobject.h usability... yes
> checking atk/atko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Schulze wrote:
> This is CVE-2004-2043, please mention it in the changelog when you're
Great! Thanks.
> doing the next upload.
Sure.
- --
dam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozill
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 351789 patch
Bug#351789: anjuta_2.0.1-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: /usr/lib/libwnck-1.la:
No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
* Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 16:45]:
> > I submitted 2 bugs about libgl1-mesa-dri on Radeon X300 (#350847 and
> > #353458) about a month ago. But I got a message saying that my reports
> > would have to be moderated. It does not seem to have been done so far.
> > Is anybody awar
* Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 16:45]:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:20:42 -0500, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > I submitted 2 bugs about libgl1-mesa-dri on Radeon X300 (#350847 and
> > #353458) about a month ago. But I got a message saying that my reports
> > would have to be moderated. I
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:05:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line is fixed in unstable version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Package: pyntor
Version: 0.5+svn46-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
pyntor is missing a dependency on python-pygame, and fails to
start if it isn't installed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testi
tag 351646 + patch
quit
Dear DD,
During my NM process I have to work on fixing one of the RC bugs and for
some reason I stopped at some point at this bug...
It seems that the bug is really caused by a bug of make. To overcome the
bug, simple patch is provided which let me to build atlas3 packag
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You did understand me correctly, but I reconsidered. I guess people who
>> install a TeX system first will face the same problem, and will find
>
> [...]
>
>> Therefore I think a debconf note is the only way
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 351646 + patch
Bug#351646: atlas3: FTBFS: No rule to make .../3dnow/liblapack.so
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Package: anjuta
Version: 2.0.1-2
Tags: patch
Hi,
the problem is a missing build-dependency to libwnck-dev on the
debian/control file. please take a look to the patch attached. Thnx!
Ghe Rivero
--
one bug less to finish the NM process
--
CPD - Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
retitle 358071 SIGABRT error after glib update
thanks
Change bug-title according to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/03/msg00941.html.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 358071 SIGABRT error after glib update
Bug#358071: SIGABRT error after libc6 update
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 347751 normal
Bug#347751: esound: esddsp causes firefox to segfault on amd64
Bug#348938: esound: esddsp causes firefox to segfault on amd64
Bug#350428: esound: esddsp causes
#include
* Joerg Schilling [Mon, Mar 20 2006, 11:21:30PM]:
> It seems that you never did read and understand the GPL :-(
>
> The GPL is as holey as a Swiss cheese when talking about the compile
> environment:
...
Joerg, could you please stay ontopic and not flame? We try to discuss
with you...
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Here's a patch that fixes the crash. The fix is
> rather ugly IMHO, but this is what upstream proposed.
>
> Please apply it to stable version of firebird2.
>
> Unstable package is due for upload.
>
> More information (discovery, reproduction) on
> http://bugs.debian.org/35
Package: anjuta
Version: 2.0.1-2
Tags: patch
Hi,
the problem is a missing build-dependency to libwnck-dev on the
debian/control file. please take a look to the patch attached. Thnx!
Ghe Rivero
--
one bug less to finish the NM process
--
CPD - Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
h] Error 127
> **
> Build finished at 20060321-1602
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:20:42 -0500, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I submitted 2 bugs about libgl1-mesa-dri on Radeon X300 (#350847 and
> #353458) about a month ago. But I got a message saying that my reports
> would have to be moderated. It does not seem to have been done so far.
> Is anybo
Package: thewidgetfactory
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of thewidgetfactory_0.2-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> touch debian/stamp-autotools-files
> chmod a+x /build/buildd/thewidgetfactory-0.2/./configure
>
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You did understand me correctly, but I reconsidered. I guess people who
> install a TeX system first will face the same problem, and will find
[...]
> Therefore I think a debconf note is the only way to address everybody
> we want to. We can still copy
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:05:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346655: fixed in erlang 1:10.b.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:45:54PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> apt-index-watcher: Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.0) but 1:4.0.3-1 is to be
> installed
> Depends: libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.0) but 4.0.3-1 is to be
> installed
T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 357983 tex-common
Bug#357983: tetex-bin: mktexmf can't write new .mf files
Bug reassigned from package `tetex-bin' to `tex-common'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 358156 wine
Bug#358156: wine-0.0.9-1: does not start anymore
Warning: Unknown package 'wine-0.0.9-1'
Bug reassigned from package `wine-0.0.9-1' to `wine'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Gustavo Franko has posted a workaround to debian-devel.
===
There's a workaround that is run the application as follows:
$ G_SLICE=always-malloc application
===
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 347751 grave
Bug#347751: esound: esddsp causes firefox to segfault on amd64
Bug#348938: esound: esddsp causes firefox to segfault on amd64
Bug#350428: esound: esddsp causes firefox to segfault on amd64;
Severity set to `grave'.
> retitle 35042
Hi Andrea,
Andrea De Michele said:
> Hi Regis,
> I used ati driver without DRI.
> I do not use DRI because it give me some problem: when i switch console
> (CTRL+ALT+Fn) the system crash if DRI is loaded.
Thanks for the additional informations. This tend to confirm my thoughts
that the problem is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 356580 + fixed
Bug#356580: FTBFS: b-d libmysqlclient14-dev no longer exists
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Debian recently decided about distribution of GFDL documents in Debian
> (http://www.us.debian.org/News/2006/20060316). Here is the
> corresponding bug report for bash.
>
> - would you consider removing the section about the cover texts?
Sure, I'll consider it. On the oth
Sorry about that and thanks for the report. Will fix ASAP.Regards,Joop2006/3/21, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Package: hamlib3-perlVersion: 1.2.4-3Severity: graveTags: securityHello Joop,
usr/lib/perl5/auto/Hamlib/Hamlib.so include a rpath to a user-writabledirectory.%chrpath usr/lib/perl5/a
Thanks,I will have a look as soon as the new hamlib packages (1.2.5-2) get accepted.Regards,Joop2006/3/21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Package: hamlibVersion:
1.2.5-1Severity: seriousHi,building the package grig in a clean sid build environment(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 342694 grave
Bug#342694: /dev/ubd/1 missing
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSC
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I assume that you already did see the debconf question, but still
> answered "yes" and were not aware of the consequences, right ?
Hmmm, I think I remember seeing this question recently yes. I probably
read the text too quickly, in which case y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 300638 segfaults after a few messages on ppc+amd64
Bug#300638: ircd-hybrid: segfaults after a few channel messages on ppc
Changed Bug title.
> severity 300638 grave
Bug#300638: segfaults after a few messages on ppc+amd64
Severity set to `grave'
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
