Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 353613 + fixed
Bug#353613: ethereal: latest NMU linked against OpenSSL
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> close 346594
Bug#346594: libxml2: 2.6.23-1 breaks xsltproc
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Bastia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 337394 + fixed
Bug#337394: Recent security problem from NetSNMP also affects ucd-snmp?
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 353613 patch
thanks
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:22:29PM -0500, Ivan Nestlerode wrote:
> The latest ethereal NMU is linked against OpenSSL which is not legal.
> Ethereal is licensed under the GPL while the OpenSSL license has an
> advertising
> clause that renders it incompatible with the GPL.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:13:01AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Package: libxul-dev
> > > Version: 1.8.0.1-2
> > > Severity: serious
> >
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:59:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 353600 pending
Bug#353600: libxul-dev: Should conflict with mozilla-browser
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 350744
Bug#350744: gliv aborted
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Package: libxul-dev
> > Version: 1.8.0.1-2
> > Severity: serious
>
> > The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser.
>
reopen 350744
thanks
Uh... whoops, sent to the wrong address. Let's reopen this... ShunTim, the
request still stands. :)
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTEC
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:38:00 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gliv aborted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:41:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:19:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:19:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 195825 fixed-upstream
Bug#195825: directory-administrator: tries to create users violating object
class rules
Tags were: confirmed upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 333118 + fixed
Bug#333118: gcc-4.0: Segfaulting code generated for gtkboard-0.11pre0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
tag 195825 fixed-upstream
thanks
Upstream fixed this in 1.7.1 by replacing the account object class
(structural) with hostObject (auxiliary).
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:02:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351534: fixed in yahoo2mbox 0.19-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:11:54 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ghfaxviewer: double free or corruption (!prev)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:47:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319713: fixed in goobox 0.9.93-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 01:42:38PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:49:48PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:40:26AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > I'll ask again: Is the purpose of ndiswrapper running non-free
> > > drivers? If it isn't, sho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 343781 + fixed
Bug#343781: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 343781 patch
Bug#343781: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
tags 343781 patch
thanks
Hi José,
I've prepared an NMU to fix this bug. Please find the (trivial) patch
attached.
The NMU will be uploaded to unstable shortly.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 07:06:05PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> Hi all,
>The broken shlibs in freetype is causing huge issues for testing right
> now because xft migrated in without the correct freetype. There are two
> options that I'm aware of: to have freetype migrate in or to upload the ol
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 353606 libxft2
Bug#353606: mozilla-mailnews: crashes with symbol lookup error (libXft2) when
click in Inbox folder
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla-mailnews' to `libxft2'.
> merge 353606 350113
Bug#350113: libxft2: "FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 353430 = moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#353430: banshee: problem on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags set to: moreinfo, unreproducible
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
tags 353430 = moreinfo unreproducible
stop
Hi,
after talking to the reporter in private and trying some things we're
now waiting if 0.10.6 fixes this problem or if gst-register-0.8 fixes it
as there were some similar problems with other software using gstreamer
where a corrupted plugin registry wa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 348999 normal
Bug#348999: banshee: Segfault on startup
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 348999 banshee: segfault on startup with daap
Bug#348999: banshee: Segfault on startup
Changed Bug title.
> tags 348999 = moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#3
Attached is the diff for the NMU which I have uploaded to the 3-day
delay queue on gluck. This upload can be overridden by a maintainer
upload between now and then.
Don Armstrong
--
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired
signifies in the final sense, a theft from tho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 353572 libxft2
Bug#353572: Crash: libXft.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden
Bug reassigned from package `k3b' to `libxft2'.
> merge 353572 350113
Bug#350113: libxft2: "FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden" disappeared since version 2.1.7-1,
apps
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 353598 libxft2
Bug#353598: kvirc crashes. Repeatable and random.
Bug reassigned from package `kvirc' to `libxft2'.
> merge 353598 350113
Bug#350113: libxft2: "FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden" disappeared since version 2.1.7-1,
apps depends on this!
Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352785 patch
Bug#352785: couriergraph: FTBFS: can't parse dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Package: ethereal
Version: 0.10.13-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
The latest ethereal NMU is linked against OpenSSL which is not legal.
Ethereal is licensed under the GPL while the OpenSSL license has an advertising
clause that renders it incompatible with the GPL.
Ethereal must
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352382 patch
Bug#352382: connect.app: FTBFS due to unmet build-dep libgnustep-gui0.9-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
tag 352785 patch
thanks
The attached patch adds commas between the packages in couriergraph's
Recommends field.
--
Matt
diff -ru couriergraph-0.24-orig/debian/control couriergraph-0.24/debian/control
--- couriergraph-0.24-orig/debian/control 2006-02-19 14:53:56.0
-0800
+++ courier
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350093 patch
Bug#350093: libfinance-quote-perl: binary-indep files in /usr/lib
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tag 322819 patch
Bug#322819: finish /usr/doc transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tag 320815 patch
Bug#320
tag 352382 patch
thanks
The attached patch makes connect.app build-depend on
libgnustep-gui0.10-dev instead of libgnustep-gui0.9-dev.
--
Matt
Only in connect.app-0.1-orig: build-stamp
Only in connect.app-0.1-orig: configure-stamp
diff -ru connect.app-0.1-orig/debian/control connect.app-0.1/debia
tag 350093 patch
tag 322819 patch
tag 320815 patch
thanks
I have just made an NMU to resolve these bugs to the 3 day delay
queue. This NMU can be overridden by the maintainer making an upload
which fixes these bugs between now and then.
The interdiff of the NMU is attached.
Don Armstrong
--
It
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
>> The availability to do this is enough even if there are other
>> (possibly better) ways to do the same. One free driver _in_ Debian and
>> the package should stay in main.
>>
>> But does th
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353531: fixed in dumputils 1.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:59:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351801: Adding the sarge tag
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Package: libxul-dev
> Version: 1.8.0.1-2
> Severity: serious
> The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser.
> Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it,
> there should also be
Lo?c Minier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On sam, f?v 18, 2006, Kevin Brown wrote:
> > It's possible this bug is somehow AMD64-specific...
>
> Yes, it seems likely.
>
> > I'll be reverting to 0.8.8-13 until this bug gets fixed. Going back and
> > forth between this version and 0.8.8-13 is quite eas
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:32:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353543: fixed in cdrdao 1:1.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:32:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353529: fixed in cdrdao 1:1.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:32:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353529: fixed in cdrdao 1:1.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:32:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353543: fixed in cdrdao 1:1.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:32:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353515: fixed in miscfiles 1.4.2.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 351801 sarge
Bug#351801: aspell-da: dansk.dat not found when invoking aspall -l da -c
file.txt
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of gtkboard to fix #333118; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
gtkboard_0.11pre0-4.1.dsc
Description: Binary data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 287066 + fixed
Bug#287066: kflog: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Flight*' to 'int' loses
precision
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 314008 + fixed
Bug#314008: kflog: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352796 patch
Bug#352796: alml: FTBFS: can't parse dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> # downgrading, per maintainer
> severity 340439 important
Bug#340439: firestarter: denial of service
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The miscfiles copyright file says GNU-manifesto.gz is distributed under
> the GPL. The file itself says "Modified versions may not be made."
>
> Please edit the file to remove the misleading statement, perhaps
> replacing it with a standard GPL notice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I found a similar bug in mozilla-mailnews, I run some
tests and sent a bugreport against mozilla-mailnews package,
but looks like that following both bugs could help users of
the two systems and also the maintainers.
I'm sending t
tag 352796 patch
thanks
The attached patch fixes the malformed values in alml's Conflict
field by adding an equal sign before the version number.
--
Matt
diff -ru alml-2005.01.01-orig/debian/control alml-2005.01.01/debian/control
--- alml-2005.01.01-orig/debian/control 2006-02-19 11:37:56.00
tag 351801 sarge
thanks
Since this bug only applies to sarge, I'm adding the sarge tag.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: skkserv
Version: 10.62a-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This speaks for itself:
la:~# /usr/sbin/skkserv
Segmentation fault
Cursory examination of the source for skkserv reveals that, not to put
too fine a point on it, the code is a crock of shit: it doesn't in
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:47:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352786: fixed in ddtc 0.17.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:47:37 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353321: fixed in kdeadmin 4:3.5.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352795: fixed in acheck 0.5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:47:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352794: fixed in acheck-rules 0.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 353515 serious
Bug#353515: miscfiles: please clarify license for GNU Manifesto
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352370 + fixed
Bug#352370: libnss-lwres: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on liblwres1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of kflog to fix #287066, #314008, and #327992; diff
attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u kflog-2.1.1/debian/changelog kflog-2.1.1/debian/changelog
--- kflog-2.1.1/debian/changelog
+++ kflog-2.1.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+kflog (2.1.1-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+
Package: snd-doc
Version: 7.18-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is what happens when I attempt installation. Similar problem when
I attempted upgrade.
Selecting previously deselected package snd-doc.
(Reading database ... 349026 files and directories currently inst
Package: libxul-dev
Version: 1.8.0.1-2
Severity: serious
The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser.
Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it,
there should also be an explicit conflict in libxul-dev.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: kvirc
Version: 2:3.2.0-5+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When i run kvirc, the app starts working but at a certain point, sooner
or later it crashes completely without a drkonqi screen.
The below messages were obta
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:47:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of libnss-lwres to fix #352370; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u libnss-lwres-0.93/debian/changelog libnss-lwres-0.93/debian/changelog
--- libnss-lwres-0.93/debian/changelog
+++ libnss-lwres-0.93/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+libnss-lwres (0.93-4.1) unstable; urg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352794 patch
Bug#352794: acheck-rules: FTBFS with new make
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 303233 + fixed
Bug#303233: njbtools: Uninstallable in sid
Tags were: patch sid
Tags added: fixed
> tag 336706 + fixed
Bug#336706: FTBFS: Undefined references to njb_error_dump
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing he
tag 352795 patch
thanks
The attached patch fixes the acheck build failure by adding a space
after the first "done".
--
Matt
diff -ru acheck-0.5-orig/debian/rules acheck-0.5/debian/rules
--- acheck-0.5-orig/debian/rules2006-02-19 11:25:11.0 -0800
+++ acheck-0.5/debian/rules 20
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352795 patch
Bug#352795: acheck: FTBFS with new make
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
tag 352794 patch
thanks
The attached patch makes acheck-rules build by adding a space after
the first "done".
--
Matt
diff -ru acheck-rules-0.3-orig/debian/rules acheck-rules-0.3/debian/rules
--- acheck-rules-0.3-orig/debian/rules 2006-02-19 11:29:48.0 -0800
+++ acheck-rules-0.3/debian/
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:17:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353238: fixed in libnjb 2.2.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:02:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353188: fixed in zsh 4.3.0-dev-4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of njbtools to fix #303233 and #336706; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u njbtools-0.0.1/debian/control njbtools-0.0.1/debian/control
--- njbtools-0.0.1/debian/control
+++ njbtools-0.0.1/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Law
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 350113 grave
Bug#350113: libxft2: "FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden" disappeared since version 2.1.7-1,
apps depends on this!
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 353561 grave
Bug#353561: akregator: Some articles cause Akregator to crash
Severity set to
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298413: fixed in sopwith 1.7.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: libgpod-dev
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
/usr/lib/libgpod.la references eg. /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la, but
libgpod-dev does not depend on the package shipping it, libgtk2.0-dev.
You may find the following irc snippet useful:
19:07 can somebody remind me, -dev pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 353583 libxft2
Bug#353583: kontact: libXft.so.2: undefined symbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden
Bug reassigned from package `kontact' to `libxft2'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 11:34 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 19, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nevertheless, if you think abiword and openoffice.org should be moved then
> > go
> > for it. Just don't use them as excuse to turn warez wrappers into "generic"
> > driver interfac
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:02:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353498: fixed in notification-daemon 0.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
> Seems you've changed ABI in 2.5.x version of FUSE, but you left old SONAME
> version, which causes many issues when filesystems that still want to work
> with such library.
>
> Please take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/352631
>
> Could you please update your SONAME version to reflect ABI cha
Package: kontact
Version: 4:3.5.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
When using the organizer part of Kontact, the application frequently
crashes with this error in .xsession-errors:
kontact: ERROR: Can't decrement change count. It already is 0.
kontact: symbol lookup
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 352494 help
Bug#352494: passwd: confusing error message if /proc is not found
Tags were: d-i
Bug#353562: adduser: [s/390] chfn: Permission denied
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 353562 serious
Bug#353562: adduser: [s/390] chfn: Permission denied
Severity set to `serious'.
> severity 352494 serious
Bug#352494: passwd: confusing error message if /proc is not found
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 353562 352494
Bug#35
Package: libdb4.2-java
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Causes any jvm to crash. which one of the 225 warnings didn't you see? ;-P
Patch can be found at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/libdb4.2-java.diff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Package: libdb4.3-java
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Causes any jvm to crash. which one of the 225 warnings didn't you see? ;-P
Patch can be found at http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/libdb4.3-java.diff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:32:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330048: fixed in nedit 1:5.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:32:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318261: fixed in nedit 1:5.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:32:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330048: fixed in nedit 1:5.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:32:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318261: fixed in nedit 1:5.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 349213 + fixed
Bug#349213: heimdal-dev: Ships /usr/include/ss/ss.h, but does not conflict with
libss-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 08:51:41 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337898: fixed in php-net-checkip 1.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2006 08:51:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337378: fixed in illuminator 0.10.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 327319 fixed-upstream
Bug#327319: FTBFS: gnome_window_icon_set_default_from_file not declared
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
tag 327319 fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
sagasu 2.0.8 compiles fine with GNOME 2.12. I'll probably NMU it if I
don't hear back from you...
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo