On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:13:01AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > Package: libxul-dev > > > Version: 1.8.0.1-2 > > > Severity: serious
> > > The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser. > > > Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it, > > > there should also be an explicit conflict in libxul-dev. > > Shouldn't a Replaces: be sufficient here? > If libxul-dev was compatible with mozilla-browser, it would. Presumably, "libxpcom.so" is just a symlink, so shouldn't be a major cause of compatibility problems...? I dunno. Jordi has mentioned on IRC that there are other file conflicts, and that the libs probably are not ABI compatible? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
