Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:17:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347008: fixed in kinput2 3.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:47:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347996: fixed in fetchmail 6.3.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package wily
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wily
> tags 347056 + pending
Bug#347056: wily: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346773 fixed pending patch
Bug#346773: xt: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed, pending, patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Amaya wrote:
> Patch is attached.
Now.
--
.''`. sleep: command not found
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
cpanel_0.4.0-1.1.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
Format: 1.0
Source:
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:47:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346764: fixed in xbubble 0.5.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346646 fixed
Bug#346646: cpanel: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
tags 346626 fixed pending
thanks
Hi there!
I intend to lovingly NMU airsnort.
Patch is attached.
Thanks!
--
.''`. sleep: command not found
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:30:10AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> reopen 346639
> found 346639 0.4.3
> thanks
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of buici-clock_0.4.3 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
> [...]
> > Checking for source dependency conflict
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346626 fixed pending
Bug#346626: airsnort: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Package: beagle
Version: 0.1.3-1
Severity: grave
beagle depends on libgmime2.1-cil (< 2.1.18). The only available version
in unstable currently is 2.1.18-1. This makes the package uninstallable.
Cheers,
Michael
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346622 fixed pending
Bug#346622: cheops: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: fixed pending patch
Tags added: fixed, pending
> tags 347096 fixed pending
Bug#347096: rigel: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 339276 pending
Bug#339276: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 346646 patch pending
Bug#346646: cpanel: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added:
On Jan 14, Robert Cheramy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My /etc/fstab was using /dev/ide/*, which is broken. I replaced it with
> /dev/disk/by-label, but the system hans by starting kdm, so I suspect
> that other devices than /dev/ide are broken.
I know that the /dev/ide/ devices are totally broken
Hi there, Chris and Justin
Du to the xlibs-dev transition, I intend to lovingly NMU jester, with
the changes suggested by Justin. I will also take care of 270691, and
any lintian/linda warnings that I find.
Chris, will you forward 270691 upstream, or should I rather do it?
Tell me how can I be of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346827 + fixed
Bug#346827: xmms-jack: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Hi Amaya,
Amaya wrote:
> If you still intend to NMU airsonrt, would you mind tagging this bugs
> both with patch and pending? It will let us know that this is being
> taken care of. Would it be of help if I did it? Just let me know if you
> need anything.
airsnort is one of those that I didn't ge
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:57:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348102: reportbug: Do not give users the option of filing
bugs of severities higher than "normal"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346624 + fixed
Bug#346624: grig: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 303699 + fixed
Bug#303699: Please build-depend on libpng12-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 346669 + fixed
Bug#346669: freecraft: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346634 + fixed
Bug#346634: bdfresize: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Bcc:
Subject: Still intending to NMU?
Reply-To:
Organization: Debian - http://www.debian.org/
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7
X-No-CC: Do not Cc me to mailing list posts unless you really have to
Hi there, Justin
If you still intend to NMU airsonrt, would you mind tagging this bugs
both w
Package: mail-notification
Version: 2.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package should depend on libgnome-menu2 instead of libgnome-menu0.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture:
Package: quick-lounge-applet
Version: 2.10.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It should depend on libgnome-menu2 instead of libgnome-menu0
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i6
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:17:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347564: fixed in darcs 1.0.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346795 + fixed
Bug#346795: xcdroast: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 346639
Bug#346639: buici-clock: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> found 346639 0.4.3
Bug#346639: buici-clock: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Bug marked as found in version 0.4.3.
> than
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346669 + patch
Bug#346669: freecraft: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 348018 +help
Bug#348018: gnucash: crash on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 346866
Bug#346866: xview: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> found 346866 3.2p1.4-20
Bug#346866: xview: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Bug marked as found in version 3.2p1.4-20.
> There
tags 348018 +help
thanks
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whatever the problem is, it seems to involve the way that the Gnucash core
> calls the Scheme modules. The following code in an interactive Guile session
> does what you would expect:
>
> (use-modules (ice-9 slib))
> (requi
bind.c:1578: error: syntax error before 'Boolean'
> make[1]: *** [evbind.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xview-3.2p1.4/clients/olvwm-4.1'
> make: *** [build-other] Error 2
> ***
Hi János,
please note that you should orphan the packages using the procedure
outlined in the developer's reference[1] at the time you discontinue
your maintenance.
Note also that you sent your mail about agreeing to the NMU only to the
maintainer adress.
Lastly, plase note that I'm not sure how
tags 346669 + patch
thanks
I'm preparing an NMU to fix this problem. Here is the patch and
proposed changelog entry.
* Change build depend from 'xlibs-dev (>> 4.1.0)' to 'libx11-dev,
libxext-dev, x-dev', as xlibx-dev is being removed from Debian.
(Closes: #346669)
diff -ur freecraft-1.1
reopen 346639
found 346639 0.4.3
thanks
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of buici-clock_0.4.3 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 264883 + fixed
Bug#264883: boson-base: FTBFS: g++ compile error: BosonPlayFieldView undefined
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 327934 + fixed
Bug#327934: boson-base: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: patch si
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346664 + fixed
Bug#346664: e16keyedit: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
This bug keep this package from propagating into testing. Because of
the 'wontfix' tag, I am unsure if this is intentional or not. What is
the plan? Perhaps the severity of the bug should be reduced, the
wontfix flag should be removed and the bug fixed, or what?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just uploaded a NMU to fix this bug. Attached is the diff.
Regards,
Bastian
- --
,''`. Bastian Kleineidam
: :' :GnuPG Schlüssel
`. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E
`-
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:04:31 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347096: fixed in rigel 0.2.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:02:41 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346636: fixed in cheops-ng 0.2.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:05:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347054: fixed in wmnetmon 0.2p6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:05:32 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346958: fixed in xpad 2.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:04:51 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346943: fixed in usermode 1.81-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346612: fixed in aee 2.2.15b-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Martin Schulze dijo [Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 08:43:57AM +0100]:
> Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The bug is indeed important, even if it is not easily exploitable, and
> > the fix is trivial. I am pushing it to the security team so they can
> > apply it to the version in Sarge as well.
>
> Pleas
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached is a patch for the 4 RC bugs against you package. I am
> uploading now to a delayed queue. If you want to override this NMU,
> please upload a fixed version yourself.
Thanks! But...
There is a -9 version in NEW that addresses these bugs,
htt
Package: bsdgames
Version: 2.17-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have attempted to upgrade to the testing branch. In the middle, it
tried to install bsdgames, and the system locked. Now, the package
managers report the package as broken, badly inconsistent, and I cann
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 12:47:02PM -0800, Isaac Jones wrote:
> On 1/12/06, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When building darcs from a tarball, the documentation shouldn't be
> > built, since it's built during the make dist that generates the
> > tarball...
>
> From what I can tell, the
Package: gnupg2
Version: 1.9.19-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Looks like the opensc maintainer moved to libopensc2-dev ungracefully, causing
libopensc1 packages to be removed from the archive.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
David, Is there anything that can be done in configure to set the
TEX4HTENV variable in Debian? I think that would fix the build
problem we're seeing, at least on i386. There are also flags to
tex4ht where you can specify this path.
TEX4HTENV=/etc/tex4ht/tex4ht.env
peace,
isaac
On 1/12/06, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When building darcs from a tarball, the documentation shouldn't be
> built, since it's built during the make dist that generates the tarball...
>From what I can tell, the makefiles are set up such that it's
impossible not to rebuild the documen
Strange strange strange.
1) I did the trick UDEV_DISABLED="yes" in /etc/udev/udev.conf (note not
on the command line) and got nothing under /etc/udev/.dev ???
2) In order to help you, I removed it and booted normally with udev
0.080 and it worked (execpt a message that i have a .udev in my static
Whatever the problem is, it seems to involve the way that the Gnucash core
calls the Scheme modules. The following code in an interactive Guile session
does what you would expect:
(use-modules (ice-9 slib))
(require 'hash-table)
(display (hash-for-each))
However, placing this at the from of
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.18
Severity: critical
(Severity a tad over-inflated to make a point)
I'm sick of continuously having to downgrade bug severities because
users always over-inflate them. By definition, a bug is at least
severity important to a user, or otherwise they wouldn't file it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 333839 fixed
Bug#333839: Broken on ia64 by binNMU, needs new upload
Tags were: confirmed pending
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> So, if you do not care about devfs names you could try this to remove
> some variables:
>
> cd /etc/udev/rules.d/
> ln -s ../udev.rules .
> rm devfs.rules compat-full.rules
Done. Thanks.
>>I discovered (the hard way) udev does need a minimal /dev and added by
>>hand some d
tag 333839 fixed
thanks
I've uploaded an NMU (1.3.6-1.1) so lyx will be rebuilt.
--
Pelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:45:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no response
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Let's not start with wild guesses, OK?
Yep. Just being tired to have non working system after udev upgrade. Ok
I'm running unstable so I just have to shut up but I did for, say the
last seven years, without such regular breakage.
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Jan 14, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No I'm not using devfs compatibility script (or do not want to). I just
Well, you are:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2005-06-30 21:23 devfs.rules -> ../devfs.rules
So, if you do not care about devfs names you could try this to remove
some variable
Eric Valette wrote:
> case "$(uname -r)" in
> 2.6.1[0-4]|2.6.1[0-4][!0-9]*)
> /lib/udev/udevsynthesize
> load_input_modules
> exit 0
> ;;
> esac
Sorry was readding the wrong version of the file. the 0.0080 version use
another trick.
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 14, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>No other way to create the filesystem by hand? I can reinstall
>>udev-0.080 on a running system, it does not break anything, generate the
>>/dev filesystem from /sys happend it (ls -lR) and reinstall the working
>>vers
Let's not start with wild guesses, OK?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:22:58PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Methinks we will need to evaluate what needs to be fixed, and how
> difficult the fix is, and then proceed further.
Maybe, there is smth. wrong with .*rc of target user's shell?
For example, I see that environment is preserved
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> forwarded 337632 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337632: matchbox-panel: exits at startup with floating point exception
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Jan 14, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No other way to create the filesystem by hand? I can reinstall
> udev-0.080 on a running system, it does not break anything, generate the
> /dev filesystem from /sys happend it (ls -lR) and reinstall the working
> version. Just need to command t
case "$(uname -r)" in
2.6.1[0-4]|2.6.1[0-4][!0-9]*)
/lib/udev/udevsynthesize
load_input_modules
exit 0
;;
esac
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris has a AMD64 machine I think, I'll get him to take a look.
-- Matthew
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 19:17 +, Moray Allan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There doesn't seem to be a matchbox-panel product in your bugzilla, or
> I'd report this there.
>
> Someone's complaining about matchbox-panel crashing on
Hi,
There doesn't seem to be a matchbox-panel product in your bugzilla, or
I'd report this there.
Someone's complaining about matchbox-panel crashing on AMD64. Do you
know what's going wrong / if this works for other people?
Thanks,
--
Moray
http://www.morayallan.com/
--- Begin Message ---
P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 336428 fixed
Bug#336428: Remove xlibs-dev build-dep
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 14, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Just tell me the command so that you can see the crasy naming sheme...
>
> Booting with UDEV_DISABLED=yes on the kernel command line should make
> udev use /etc/udev/.dev/ as the /dev root.
Except I have a /dev that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 343944 -pending
Bug#343944: mol: xlibs-dev transition patch
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
tags 343944 -pending
thanks
Victor, I have told you mol does not build for me, you and Steve
Langasek have told me mol is powerpc only. I lack such hardware, or
interest in finding it.
Please find another sponsor or provide me with complete build results
(.dsc .changes .deb diff.gz).
Thanks!
--
Mika Bostrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It appears this bug still bites, although not exactly like before.
> Upgraded packages just now, gnucash fails to start due to this:
>
> % gnucash
> ERROR: Unbound variable: hash-for-each
>
> Downgrading slib package to 3a1-4.2 fixes the problem again
tag 336428 fixed
thanks
This bug was fixed in my NMU 1.3.6-1.1 (see patch in #342538). I
simply removed the dependency on xlibs-dev and it builds in
pbuilder. I think that the existing build-dep's in turn depend on the
correct X -dev packages, but I might be wrong.
--
Pelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346840: fixed in xtrlock 2.0-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:47:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346761: fixed in xbs 0-7.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 339276 +patch
Bug#339276: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 342538 + fixed
Bug#342538: lyx-qt: depends on unavailable libaiksaurus-1.2-0 (>=
1.2.1+dev-0.12)
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Jan 14, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just tell me the command so that you can see the crasy naming sheme...
Booting with UDEV_DISABLED=yes on the kernel command line should make
udev use /etc/udev/.dev/ as the /dev root.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
I NMU'd lyx to fix this bug, here's the patch:
diff -u lyx-1.3.6/debian/control lyx-1.3.6/debian/control
--- lyx-1.3.6/debian/control
+++ lyx-1.3.6/debian/control
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Section: editors
Priority: optional
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: libqt3-mt-dev, libforms-dev, libforms-b
tags 339276 +patch
thanks
Hello,
Attached is a patch for the 4 RC bugs against you package. I am
uploading now to a delayed queue. If you want to override this NMU,
please upload a fixed version yourself.
Thanks,
--
-
| ,''`.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 342325 patch
Bug#342325: init.d/oops fails silently
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
Please go ahead,I don't have a valid key currently, so I can't upload. Hope to have one later this week...Regards,Joop-- Linux for your hamradio desktop___
http://www.qsl.net/pg4i/linux
Just tell me the command so that you can see the crasy naming sheme...
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 342325 patch
thanks
I'm attaching what I just uploaded to ubuntu. just a quick fix for
imminent problems
--
Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- oops.init 2006-01-14 19:39:26.0 +0100
+++ /etc/init.d/oops 2006-01-14 15:30:57.0 +0100
@@ -49,10 +49,16 @@
GROUP="proxy"
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:17:26 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346799: fixed in xcolors 1.5a-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hey,
Thanks for everything. I really appreciate all your help.
Sylvester
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does it also remove the grub hooks in /etc/kernel/* ? Those are the ones
causing the problem, i believe.
The only reference I see to grub there is in kernel-img.conf.
Uninstalling grub (0.97-3) does not change that file, but delete the
/sbin/update-grub file that it refers to. Removing those re
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:47:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346622: fixed in cheops 0.61-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
OK, so I NMU to rectify this.
Gürkan, I'm sorry for getting this wrong the first time.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
diff -u ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
--- ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
+++ ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+ocp
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:47:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346731: fixed in ascdc 0.3-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346647: fixed in coolmail 1.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 327934 patch
Bug#327934: boson-base: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> tags 264883 patch
Bug#264883: boson-base: FTBFS: g++ compile error: BosonPlayFieldView undefined
There were no tags set.
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:32:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346640: fixed in ascd 0.13.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package synergy
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: synergy
> tags 347066 patch
Bug#347066: synergy: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
package synergy
tags 347066 patch
thanks
The attached patch should fix this bug. I've verified the result with
pbuilder and piuparts.
diff -ru synergy-1.2.2-debianorig/debian/control synergy-1.2.2/debian/control
--- synergy-1.2.2-debianorig/debian/control 2006-01-14 16:02:15.0
+010
Just a note:
I'm perfectly aware of this easy issue. I'll do not upload a new version
because while patching for using UNIX98 pts and so squashing all other
reports, I discover a major issue with the I/O Window which causes
the program to freeze, also with current version. I would prefer take
this
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:29:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341508: slony1_1.1.2-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS:
/usr/lib/postgresql/8.1/lib//plpgsql.so not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
