Bug#286929: marked as done (gtkhtml3.0: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'html_cluealigned_class' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:23:26 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gtkhtml3.0: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#274892: marked as done (openduke: FTBFS on amd64/gcc-3.4)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:26:38 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line openduke: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#286734: marked as done (ggz-kde-games: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0))

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:24:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ggz-kde-games: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#274248: marked as done (hitop: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: extra ';' and libpq++.h does not exist)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:28:43 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line hitop: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#266120: marked as done (ggz-kde-games: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: '->' cannot appear in a constant-expression)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:25:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ggz-kde-games: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#266114: marked as done (ggz-gtk-client: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'ggz_table_left')

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:24:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ggz-gnome-client: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#266117: marked as done (ggz-kde-client: FTBFS with gcc-3.4:)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:25:07 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ggz-kde-client: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#265126: marked as done (gimageview: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'cb_move_tab')

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:31:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gimageview: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#263333: marked as done (hptalx: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'whereami')

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:20:38 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line hptalx: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#340072: progress on this bug? -- xsp: FTBFS: dh_installxsp not found

Is there any progess on this bug? Where is dh_installxsp supposed to come from? -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327049: progress on this bug? -- wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

Is there any progress on this bug? http://bugs.debian.org/327049 -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341305: valgrind

Perhaps you could run the process under valgrind, and get a backtrace sometime before the crash? Sometimes this points to the source of the problem, rather than the thing that ultimately causes the SEGV. Thanks. -- Clear skies, Justin References [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#341236: your bug -- doxygen: fails to generate html documentation (segmentation fault)

Hello Tero, Maximiliano Curia suggested that this bug might be fixed in sid. Could you check if the problem is solve? Thanks. -- Clear skies, Justin References [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=341236 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Bug#304167: marked as done (xml-soap: FTBFS: 'activation.jar' missing)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:05:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xml-soap: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#300385: marked as done (haddock: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): lexical error in string/character literal)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:10:05 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line haddock: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

Dear Grant, On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 12:27:59AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > Can you provide more context around the offending insn? > 10 lines of asm before and after the SIGILL instruction? > And possibly a register dump just before the SIGILL is issued? > It would be interesting to know what

Bug#321618: marked as done (lg-issue95: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:03:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-95: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#321617: marked as done (lg-issue94: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:02:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-94: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#321602: marked as done (lg-issue88: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:01:17 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-88: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#321613: marked as done (lg-issue93: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:02:37 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-93: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#321609: marked as done (lg-issue92: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:02:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-92: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#321605: marked as done (lg-issue90: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:01:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-90: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#321607: marked as done (lg-issue91: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:01:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-91: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#321604: marked as done (lg-issue89: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:01:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-89: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#321600: marked as done (lg-issue86: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:00:46 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-86: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#321601: marked as done (lg-issue87: FTBFS: Missing '=' in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:00:59 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-87: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#318411: marked as done (lg-issue85: FTBFS: '=' missing in tar --exclude parameter)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:00:14 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-85: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#318383: marked as done (lg-issue84: FTBFS: '=' missing in tar --exclude switches)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:59:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line lg-issue-84: FTBFS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Processed: ogre: FTBFS: dh_compress: Can't cd to debian/libogre5-dbg: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 343239 +patch Bug#343239: ftbfs [sparc] dh_compress: Can't cd to debian/libogre5-dbg: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tr

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 344942 patch Bug#344942: doxymacs: Fails to install with "!! File error (("Cannot open load file" "url"))" There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 341236 moreinfo Bug#341236: doxygen: fails to generate html documentation (segmentation fault) There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#343239: ogre: FTBFS: dh_compress: Can't cd to debian/libogre5-dbg: No such file or directory

tags 343239 +patch thanks The attached patch fixes the problem. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ogre-1.0.6/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/ogre-1.0.6/debian/rules 2005-12-27 18:36:33.0 + +++ ./debian/rules 2005-12-27 18:33:01.0 + @@ -129,7 +

Processed: serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 259324 serious Bug#259324: tkrat: segfaults if tk8.4 is not installed Severity set to `serious'. > clone 259324 -1 Bug#259324: tkrat: segfaults if tk8.4 is not installed Bug 259324 cloned as bug 344981. > clone 259324 -2 Bug#259324: tkrat: se

Processed: Re: Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # don't reassign bugs without explanation, please > reassign 343328 gtkmm2.0 Bug#343328: gtkmm2.0 FTBFS on hppa Bug reassigned from package `gtkmm2.0,libc6' to `gtkmm2.0'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Bug#286929: Bug#320519: remove gtkhtml3.2 ?

On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 12:44:33AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Can gtkhtml3.2 be removed from the archive? Jeroen note that it > should be removed soon some 4 months ago, and the 2 pacakges which > used to depend on it apparently have moved to a newer version. On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 12:48:26A

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 307103 - sid Bug#307103: clara: segmentation fault at startup Tags were: patch sid Tags removed: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Bug#329387: Security advisory posted

Upstream security advisory for this issue has been posted at http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.16.10-nr/ -- Dave Miller http://www.justdave.net/ System Administrator, Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ Project Leader, Bugzilla Bug Tracking System

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 343328 gtkmm2.0,libc6 Bug#343328: gtkmm2.0 FTBFS on hppa Bug reassigned from package `gtkmm2.0' to `gtkmm2.0,libc6'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#286929: remove gtkhtml3.0 ?

Can this package be removed, too? -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#126471: grave bug? chdrv: freezes terminal on startup

Hello Martin, You changed the severity of this bug to 'grave' without any explanation: http://bugs.debian.org/126471 Though I don't know anything about chdrv, I wonder whether this was the wrong bug? -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

Bug#320519: remove gtkhtml3.2 ?

Can gtkhtml3.2 be removed from the archive? Jeroen note that it should be removed soon some 4 months ago, and the 2 pacakges which used to depend on it apparently have moved to a newer version. -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Bug#337606: marked as done (- openslp depends agains unused lib)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:32:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337606: fixed in openslp 1.2.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#329387: CVE assignment for syncshadowdb issue

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote on 12/27/05 8:30 PM: this has been assigned CVE-2005-4534 by MITRE. Please refer to it in the 2.16.11 release notes. Thanks! I'm not getting any traction on trying to push a full release out for this. Seems nobody cares about the 2.16 branch anymore (it's two stabl

Bug#329387: CVE assignment for syncshadowdb issue

Dave, this has been assigned CVE-2005-4534 by MITRE. Please refer to it in the 2.16.11 release notes. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344909: marked as done (agrep: FTBFS (amd64): CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:47:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344909: fixed in agrep 4.17-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#339251: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 339251 Bug#339251: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#339251: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

reopen 339251 thanks > plptools (0.14-3) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Rebuild C++ ABI transition (Closes: #339251) - note library is > internal to plptools suite No, it isn't. The plptools package provides a shlibs file; there is a plptools-dev package containing .so symlinks for use

Bug#334676: marked as done (wsola - fails to build)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:18:02 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line wsola - fails to build has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#339221: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:12:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339221: fixed in libterralib 3.0.3b2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#339162: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:12:04 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339162: fixed in eris 1.3.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#344482: reopen 344482

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Geert Stappers wrote: > klibc-utils still fails to build from source, > details at > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=klibc&ver=1.1.1-9&arch=sparc&stamp=1135419885&file=log&as=raw trave11er succesfully build this on his unstable sparc machine, could you please try to d

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#342780: usrp: FTBFS on ia64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 342780 USB headers (?) give lots of errors on ia64 Bug#342780: USB headers (?) give lots of errors Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Processed: Re: Bug#342780: usrp: FTBFS on ia64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 342780 linux-kernel-headers Bug#342780: usrp: FTBFS on ia64 Bug reassigned from package `usrp' to `linux-kernel-headers'. > retitle 342780 USB headers (?) give lots of errors Bug#342780: usrp: FTBFS on ia64 Changed Bug title. > thanks Stoppin

Bug#335120: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Frost wrote: > * Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if >>you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a >>patch or if you think that the attached

Processed: Re: Processed: firefox remote control not working on ppc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 343914 serious Bug#343914: mldonkey: FTBFS: build-depends on removed package libgd2-dev Severity set to `serious'. > severity 343913 important Bug#343913: firefox: Remote interface doesnt work on powerpc Bug#344902: /usr/bin/firefox won't open

Bug#338377: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mikael Hedin wrote: > > 27 dec 2005 kl. 19.16 skrev Luk Claes: > >> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload > > > Thanks. I assume you have tested it properly, I'm not fluent in tex > macros. Yes, it does build and the resulting dvi

Processed: As requested by the RM

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 344946 grave Bug#344946: gnus: Incoming mail does not get saved to file specified in mail-crash-crash-box Severity set to `grave'. > tags 344946 +moreinfo Bug#344946: gnus: Incoming mail does not get saved to file specified in mail-crash-cr

Processed: Re: Bug#344946: gnus: Incoming mail does not get saved to file specified in mail-crash-crash-box

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 344946 unreproducible Bug#344946: gnus: Incoming mail does not get saved to file specified in mail-crash-crash-box There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > severity 344946 important Bug#344946: gnus: Incoming mail does not get saved

Processed: reopen 344482

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 344482 Bug#344482: klibc-utils: FTBFS Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 344482 d-i Bug#344482: klibc-utils: FTBFS There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > thanks mate Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Bug#344946: gnus: Incoming mail does not get saved to file specified in mail-crash-crash-box

tags 344946 unreproducible severity 344946 important thanks Hi, Well, I am not sure what happened here: I am attaching the mail function that is used to get mail from imap folders. Note: The removing of stuff asked in mail-source-delete-incoming happens in `mail-source-callback' -- a

Bug#344482: reopen 344482

reopen 344482 tags 344482 d-i thanks mate Hello, klibc-utils still fails to build from source, details at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=klibc&ver=1.1.1-9&arch=sparc&stamp=1135419885&file=log&as=raw From http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=klibc is this overview: # 1.1.1-9 (mips)

Bug#344872: cups-pdf creates 0 bytes pdf file.

A NFS mount is a possibility though that should not prevent logging (except /var is also an NFS mount). Is perhaps the RunAsUser option set to yes in CUPS? Then CUPS would not run as root and therefore would fail for all CUPS-PDF operations except if initiated by root. If already the initialization

Bug#339251: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:32:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339251: fixed in plptools 0.14-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#335120: Intention to NMU

* Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if > you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a > patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. I don't see any obvious reason why it won't work. I t

Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every graph

i'll need some more information if you would like to have help with resolving this. here are a few questions off the top of my head: - what version of mysql? mysql Ver 12.22 Distrib 4.0.24, for pc-linux-gnu (i386) - remote mysql server or local? local - what's in my.cnf? grep -v '#' my.cnf

Bug#344950: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper: update lib-dir (ff trans)

Package: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper Version: 0.9.4-1 Severity: grave i think the files have to move to: /usr/lib/firefox (from /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox) otherwise the plugin is not usable florian ludwig -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT poli

Bug#338377: Intention to NMU

27 dec 2005 kl. 19.16 skrev Luk Claes: Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload Thanks. I assume you have tested it properly, I'm not fluent in tex macros. /Micce BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Hedin;Mikael;;; FN:Mikael Hedin NICKNAME:Micce TITLE:MSc EMAIL;INTERNET;HOME:[EMAIL PR

Bug#344872: cups-pdf creates 0 bytes pdf file.

ti, 2005-12-27 kello 15:51 -0300, Andres Junge kirjoitti: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > ti, 2005-12-27 kello 02:53 -0300, Andres Junge kirjoitti: > > > >>Cups creates 0 byte pdf file as normal user. As root works ok. > > > > Please check /var

Bug#344946: gnus: Incoming mail does not get saved to file specified in mail-crash-crash-box

Package: gnus Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 Severity: grave Recently, the following situation occurred: Gnus downloaded mail from the IMAP server I use, and it deleted it on the server, since this is the way I have configured it. However, there was something in the mail messages that caused Gnus

Bug#344575: hula: Build-Depends needs "zlib1g-dev" package.

On Dec 27, 2005, at 2:25 AM, Alex Hudson wrote: Hula doesn't need zlib, so it certainly shouldn't Build-Depend on it. Something, then, is adding in this zlib flag incorrectly - it sounds a bit like bug#337873, but that is fixed as far as I know. Would it be possible for you to have a look at the

Bug#343912: Intention to NMU

I will apply this patch and upload when I do a batch this week. On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 07:58:35PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > > Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if > you don't want this NMU to happen, if

Processed: firefox remote control not working on ppc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 344902 343913 Bug#343913: firefox: Remote interface doesnt work on powerpc Bug#344902: /usr/bin/firefox won't open new firefox window anymore Merged 343913 344902. > severity 343914 important Bug#343914: mldonkey: FTBFS: build-depends on removed

Bug#344942: doxymacs: Fails to install with "!! File error (("Cannot open load file" "url"))"

Package: doxymacs Version: 1.6.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to configure due to missing dependencies Configuration of the package fails: Setting up doxymacs (1.6.0-3) ... install/doxymacs: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs21 Loading 00debian-vars... Loading 20apel (source)..

Bug#343912: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debi

Bug#326372: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debi

Bug#344872: cups-pdf creates 0 bytes pdf file.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > ti, 2005-12-27 kello 02:53 -0300, Andres Junge kirjoitti: > >>Package: cups-pdf >>Version: 1.7.3-7 >>Severity: grave >>Justification: renders package unusable >> >>Cups creates 0 byte pdf file as normal user. As root works

Bug#332622: A pre-existing debian/files violates Policy 4.10

On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:53:43PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > IOW, either repackage the original tarball, or convince upstream to > ship a clean debian/ directory, or remove the file via the debian diff. I will do the second, but upstream releases are scarce these days. The last isn't possible

Bug#261932: marked as done (libcompface: FTFBS - make up-to-dateness confusion on fast machines)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#261932: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#343418: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debi

Bug#338377: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debi

Bug#344313: marked as done (cryptsetup: unable to create map with libdevmapper1.02)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:02:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344313: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#341606: marked as done (cryptsetup: depends on unavailable libdevmapper1.01)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:02:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341606: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Fixed in NMU of animal 0.14.3-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 340399 + fixed Bug#340399: animal0: links to libfreetype6, which is going away Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Re: Bug#344900: kernel-package: fails to build kernel-image

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 344900 linux-2.6 Bug#344900: kernel-package: fails to build kernel-image Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `linux-2.6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#344900: kernel-package: fails to build kernel-image

reassign 344900 linux-2.6 thanks Hi, This appears to be4 a kernel source tree issue; and so reassigning manoj -- Are we THERE yet? My MIND is a SUBMARINE!! Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410

Bug#342887: /etc/localtime

If you decide that /etc/localtime should be a copy and not a symlink, let me know; there is code in d-i that sets up the symlink. Using a copy seems problimatic, since the zoneinfo files can be updated from time to time. Perhaps hwclock should stash a copy of /etc/localtime at shutdown and run us

Bug#344900: kernel-package: fails to build kernel-image

severity 344900 important thanks Hi, This seems like a mess up in the arch detection scripts for powerpc. I'll have to defer this tothe powerpc folks to settle. manoj -- A lie in time saves nine. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1024D

Bug#340399: Intention to NMU

Luk Claes schrieb: > Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if > you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a > patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Hi Luk, I do not mind. Regards, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#300549: marked as done (kuake: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Can't find X libraries.)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300549: fixed in kuake 0.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#343035: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debi

Bug#334037: marked as done (kuake_0.3-3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: gcc-4.0 workaround needed)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:44:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#340163: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Versi

Processed: bug 294865 is forwarded to http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/coq-bugs/open?id=828

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > forwarded 294865 http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/coq-bugs/open?id=828 Bug#294865: coq-doc: The documentation for coq is non-free (this issue is being solved) Noted your statement that B

Bug#321832: libpango1.0-0: Pango 1.10.1 still crashing

Package: libpango1.0-0 Version: 1.10.1-2 Followup-For: Bug #321832 Applications using pango are still crashing with SIGSEGV, however not all, evolution and gaim work well, however xchat is crashing. According to the xchat bug report [1] this might be a problem with pango. See [1] for full bugre

Bug#320260: marked as done (qgo: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lXinerama)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:02:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320260: fixed in qgo 1.0.3-r2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#339806: [DB2LaTeX-apps] Problems with db2latex and current TeX distributions: \pdfoutput

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 04:19:04PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote: > db2latex-xsl maintainers in Debian, do you want me to do an NMU for this? This answer is not coordinated with the team, but: Yes! Cheers, WB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Processed: Fixed in NMU of isdnutils 1:3.7.2005-07-09-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 331866 + fixed Bug#331866: isdnutils depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 333476 + fixed Bug#333476: isdnutils-base: [PATCH] /etc/isdn/init.d.functions needs

Processed: Re: [DB2LaTeX-apps] Problems with db2latex and current TeX distributions: \pdfoutput

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 339806 patch Bug#339806: cdbs: FTBFS: DVI file can't be opened Tags were: help upstream Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#338879: [DB2LaTeX-apps] Problems with db2latex and current TeX distributions: \pdfoutput

tags 339806 patch thanks James Devenish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frank, > > Can you find out if the attached patches fix the problem for Debian? Yes, it works: With a db2latex package that has these patches, cdbs can be built fine now. db2latex-xsl maintainers in Debian, do you want me

Bug#344909: agrep: FTBFS (amd64): CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set

Package: agrep Version: 4.17-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'agrep' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/agrep-4.17' gcc -march=i486 -DMEASURE_TIMES=0 -DAGREP_POINTER=1 -DDOTCOMPRESSED=0 -I. -DUTIME=1 -DISO_CHAR_SET=1 -c -O2

  1   2   >