Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:38:53 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-3.4: ftbfs [sparc] error: conflicting types for 'malloc'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:29:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line exrtools: Uninstallable (soon)- rebuild against libopenexr2c2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: cups-pdf
Version: 1.7.3-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Cups creates 0 byte pdf file as normal user. As root works ok.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:17:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343562: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> # document this as completely closed, not just "fixed"
> close 333202 0.2.3+20051105
Bug#333202: binary packages are empty
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Devel
Bookmarks load if opened with right click-> Open in New Window or Open
in new tab
HTH,
Rajesh
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:01:56 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line epiphany: cannot be installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
severity 344868 important
tags 344868 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:33:01PM -0500, Michael wrote:
> Really? I assumed they did since the .so file in mozplugger cvs was, and it
> worked, while mozplugger (apt-get) didn't.
Ok, well, I have mozplugger 1.7.1-1 installed a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344868 important
Bug#344868: 'mozplugger.so' not made executable by default
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 344868 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#344868: 'mozplugger.so' not made executable by default
There were no tags set.
Tags added: morei
Hmmm doing an apt-get upgrade has made it work again, I suspect
there is an undeclared (or too losely declared) dependency.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After a apt-get upgrade, firefox is completely unusable.
We expect the maintainer to atleast test his build before upload!
If one closes the main window via clicking the 'x' button on the window
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:00:10PM -0500, Michael wrote:
> Package: mozplugger
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> I have been trying to figure out for quite some time now why mozplugger
> wasn't working, and it turns out it was because 'mozplugger.so' is not
> made execu
Package: mozplugger
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have been trying to figure out for quite some time now why mozplugger wasn't
working, and it turns out it was because 'mozplugger.so' is not made executable
by default. I have used mozplugger via apt-get in the past a
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:40:47 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line clamcour: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against
libgmp3c2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> # document this as completely closed, not just "fixed"
> close 341347 0.4.0-5experimental1
Bug#341347: aptitude: fails to start: symbol lookup error
"_Z14ReadConfigFileR13Configurat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 339396 serious
Bug#339396: please package xalan 1.10 depending upon xerces27
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:04:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344859: selinux-policy-default: Unmet Dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344858 important
Bug#344858: gaim: crashes with "*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer:"
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 335368 + fixed
Bug#335368: anon-proxy FTBFS with current openssl
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 339405 + fixed
Bug#339405: please depend upon xerces27 instead of xerces25
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 339405 serious
Bug#339405: please depend upon xerces27 instead of xerces25
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
severity 339405 serious
thanks
I'm upgrading the severity on this bug to serious since I am now
requesting removal of xerces25.
--
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Brad,
I don't understand how this bug is happening; apt-listbugs runs fine for me.
Could you try attaching to apt-listbugs with strace (probably strace -s128
or something, so we can see where this getaddrinfo is going), and post the
output?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
Package: selinux-policy-default
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
An attempt to install selinux-policy-default results in the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux# apt-get install selinux-policy-default
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
So
Package: gaim
Version: 1:1.5.0+1.5.1cvs20051015-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
As per subject, Gaim crashes on displaying the ICQ buddy list. Also tried
purging and reinstalling, to no extent. I attach the outputs of "strace" and
"gaim -d". Let me know if I should provi
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:05:57AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=mig ,
> Build-Depends seem to be correctly tracked, and this bug can probably be
> closed.
Build-Depends are tracked, they're not enforced.
--
Steve Langasek
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:02:24 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340990: fixed in gnat-glade-doc 3.15p-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:02:28 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344699: fixed in libaws 2.0p-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:17:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335837: fixed in gnat-gdb 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 292854 serious
Bug#292854: emacspeak: wrong debian/info file
Severity set to `serious'.
> retitle 292854 emacspeak FTBFS because of bad debian/info file
Bug#292854: emacspeak: wrong debian/info file
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping proces
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 342488 0.9.0-2
Bug#342488: Wrong Conflicts/Replaces makes upgrade fail
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.9.0-2, send any further explanations to
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 292842 serious
Bug#292842: tkusr: there is no CHANGES
Severity set to `serious'.
> retitle 292842 tkusr FTBFS because of bad debstd call
Bug#292842: tkusr: there is no CHANGES
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 292840 serious
Bug#292840: obexserver: no ChangeLog, NEWS or README
Severity set to `serious'.
> retitle 292840 obexserver FTBFS because of bad debstd call
Bug#292840: obexserver: no ChangeLog, NEWS or README
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopp
close 342488 0.9.0-2
thanks
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:45:02PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> reopen 342488
> thanks
> It seems that the upgrade still doesn't happen as it should. This is
> with libsvncpp0c2_0.8.0-3 installed, though I don't understand why
> not.
No, this is not the same bug. I
FYI, the reporter was mistaken, the upstream bug was NOT public. He
could see it because he reported it. It might as well be now. (I just
removed the security flag from it, so it is indeed public now).
The patch he supplied (while a good start) was stated to be untested,
and we also determi
Package: bind9-host
Version: 1:9.3.1-2
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/host
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:archives$ host google.com
host: symbol lookup error: host: undefined symbol: isc_net_pton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:archives$ ldd `which host`
linux-gate.so.
Hi,
According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=mig ,
Build-Depends seem to be correctly tracked, and this bug can probably be
closed.
Regards,
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:17:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343720: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.16-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
severity 339405 serious
thanks
I'm stating my intention to NMU anon-proxy to update its build
dependencies from xerces25 to xerces27 and to fix the FTBFS. I don't
use anon-proxy myself, but I am doing this NMU so that the removal of
xerces25 can proceed without leaving this package stranded.
Th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 339405 serious
Bug#339405: please depend upon xerces27 instead of xerces25
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 334351 + patch pending
Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 46709 +upstream
Bug#46709: Mach lets processes write to I/O ports
Tags were: sid security
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 46709 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=15295
Bug#46709: Mach lets processes write to I/O ports
Noted yo
tags 334351 + patch pending
thanks
I believe the attached patch solve the issue, but dropping the use of
NGROUPS_MAX, and instead count the number of groups before allocating
the memory needed from the heap.
Please test it and let me know if it solve your problem. Unless you
tell me it failed t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 261932 serious
Bug#261932: libcompface: FTFBS - make up-to-dateness confusion on fast machines
Severity set to `serious'.
> tags 261932 + patch
Bug#261932: libcompface: FTFBS - make up-to-dateness confusion on fast machines
There were no tags
Hi,
Matt Kraai, le Mon 15 Aug 2005 15:36:02 -0700, a écrit :
> > ../device/cons.c:46: error: static declaration of 'cn_tab' follows
> > non-static declaration
> > ../device/cons.h:49: error: previous declaration of 'cn_tab' was here
This line disappeared on 26th May, and isn't present in current
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.12-2
Severity: serious
This version of yaird fails on hppa because it doesn't know what to do with
the contents of /sys/devices/parisc:
Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
yaird error: unrecognised device: /sys/devices/parisc
yaird error: unrecognised device: /s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 343444 serious
Bug#343444: netenv segmentation fault
Severity set to `serious'.
> severity 344002 serious
Bug#344002: dialog segfaults with empty or non-existing --default-item
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 343444 344002
Bug#343444: nete
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:43:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:17:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344612: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 343909 patch
thanks
Hi,
it seems that in 2.0.3-4 the files in /usr/share/cas/* moved from
amule-utils to amule-common. So a simple Conflict should solve the
problem:
--- debian/control.old 2005-12-26 15:40:29.408288741 +0100
+++ debian/control 2005-12-26 15:41:02.997825600 +0100
@@
* Uwe Mesecke [Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:00:41 +0100]:
> tags 343909 patch
> thanks
> Hi,
Hi Uwe,
> it seems that in 2.0.3-4 the files in /usr/share/cas/* moved from
> amule-utils to amule-common. So a simple Conflict should solve the
> problem:
Not really. The correct relationship would be a
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:08:47 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line prokyon3: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE
transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
reopen 342488
thanks
It seems that the upgrade still doesn't happen as it should. This is
with libsvncpp0c2_0.8.0-3 installed, though I don't understand why
not.
$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 342488
Bug#342488: Wrong Conflicts/Replaces makes upgrade fail
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:53:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This does not reproduce
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 343909 patch
Bug#343909: update error with amule-common_2.0.3-4+b1_i386.deb (--unpack)Â
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Package: syslog-ng
Version: 1.9.6
Severity: serious
Tags: exprimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for pkg-config... no
checking for GLIB_CFLAGS...
checking for GLIB_LIBS...
configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old. Make
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:02:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343991: fixed in utidylib 0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 340163 patch
Bug#340163: 3ddesktop: links to libfreetype6, which is going away
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 340399 patch
Bug#340399: animal0: links to libfreetype6, which is going away
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 344657
Bug#344657: tix - FTBFS: /bin/dash: Command not found
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> found 344657 8.4.0-2
Bug#344657: tix - FTBFS: /bin/dash: Command not found
Bug marked as found in version 8.4.0-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 11:01:05AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> raptor.debian.org (3.80), then the responsible is probably make. In
> particular, vim's debian/rules uses 'export' target specific variables,
> for example:
I changed debian/rules so that this feature is no longer used.
The patc
reopen 344657
found 344657 8.4.0-2
thanks
Failed on all buildds, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:04:16PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: vim
> Version: 1:6.4-006+1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of vim_1:6.4-006+1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79
> [...]
> > dh_install -X.svn
> > cp: can
tags 344763 patch fixed-upstream
Thanks
On Monday 26 December 2005 01:47, you wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:19:15AM +0200, Torok Edwin wrote:
> > Not reproducible with the latest packages from debian unstable, and
> > latest SVN version, architecture amd64. Could you tell us what are the
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 344763 patch fixed-upstream
Bug#344763: fireflier: FTBFS: undefined reference to
`NETRootInfo::NETRootInfo(_XDisplay*, unsigned long, int, bool)'
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg-3
Followup-For: Bug #344401
My system seems to be similar to those of people seeing this behaviour, but
I am instead seeing a message to the effect of "All printing disabled,
Debian bug ... " pop up very briefly on pressing the print button.
The printer then pro
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:47:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337395: fixed in libgtk-trayicon-ruby 0.1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:47:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337395: fixed in libgtk-mozembed-ruby 0.3.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
68 matches
Mail list logo