Bug#341877: marked as done (gcc-3.4: ftbfs [sparc] error: conflicting types for 'malloc')

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:38:53 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-3.4: ftbfs [sparc] error: conflicting types for 'malloc' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#318942: marked as done (exrtools: Uninstallable (soon)- rebuild against libopenexr2c2)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:29:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line exrtools: Uninstallable (soon)- rebuild against libopenexr2c2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#344872: cups-pdf creates 0 bytes pdf file.

2005-12-26 Thread Andres Junge
Package: cups-pdf Version: 1.7.3-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Cups creates 0 byte pdf file as normal user. As root works ok. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell:

Bug#343562: marked as done (scim-pinyin should Replaces scim-chinese)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343562: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: closing 333202

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > # document this as completely closed, not just "fixed" > close 333202 0.2.3+20051105 Bug#333202: binary packages are empty 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Devel

Bug#344869: mozilla-firefox: Bookmarks not working, stays running in background after closing main window

2005-12-26 Thread Rajesh Deo
Bookmarks load if opened with right click-> Open in New Window or Open in new tab HTH, Rajesh

Bug#329564: marked as done (epiphany: cannot be installed)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:01:56 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line epiphany: cannot be installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#344868: 'mozplugger.so' not made executable by default

2005-12-26 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 344868 important tags 344868 moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:33:01PM -0500, Michael wrote: > Really? I assumed they did since the .so file in mozplugger cvs was, and it > worked, while mozplugger (apt-get) didn't. Ok, well, I have mozplugger 1.7.1-1 installed a

Processed: Re: Bug#344868: 'mozplugger.so' not made executable by default

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 344868 important Bug#344868: 'mozplugger.so' not made executable by default Severity set to `important'. > tags 344868 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#344868: 'mozplugger.so' not made executable by default There were no tags set. Tags added: morei

Bug#344853: (no subject)

2005-12-26 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Hmmm doing an apt-get upgrade has made it work again, I suspect there is an undeclared (or too losely declared) dependency. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344869: mozilla-firefox: Bookmarks not working, stays running in background after closing main window

2005-12-26 Thread Rajesh Deo
Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After a apt-get upgrade, firefox is completely unusable. We expect the maintainer to atleast test his build before upload! If one closes the main window via clicking the 'x' button on the window

Bug#344868: 'mozplugger.so' not made executable by default

2005-12-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:00:10PM -0500, Michael wrote: > Package: mozplugger > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > I have been trying to figure out for quite some time now why mozplugger > wasn't working, and it turns out it was because 'mozplugger.so' is not > made execu

Bug#344868: 'mozplugger.so' not made executable by default

2005-12-26 Thread Michael
Package: mozplugger Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have been trying to figure out for quite some time now why mozplugger wasn't working, and it turns out it was because 'mozplugger.so' is not made executable by default. I have used mozplugger via apt-get in the past a

Bug#325843: marked as done (clamcour: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:40:47 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line clamcour: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processed: closing 341347

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > # document this as completely closed, not just "fixed" > close 341347 0.4.0-5experimental1 Bug#341347: aptitude: fails to start: symbol lookup error "_Z14ReadConfigFileR13Configurat

Processed: upgrade xalan bug

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339396 serious Bug#339396: please package xalan 1.10 depending upon xerces27 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#344859: marked as done (selinux-policy-default: Unmet Dependencies)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:04:44 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344859: selinux-policy-default: Unmet Dependencies has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: (no subject)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 344858 important Bug#344858: gaim: crashes with "*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer:" Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Processed: Fixed in NMU of anon-proxy 00.02.39-7.2

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 335368 + fixed Bug#335368: anon-proxy FTBFS with current openssl Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 339405 + fixed Bug#339405: please depend upon xerces27 instead of xerces25 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processi

Processed: upgrade xalan bug

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339405 serious Bug#339405: please depend upon xerces27 instead of xerces25 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#339405: upgrade xalan bug

2005-12-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
severity 339405 serious thanks I'm upgrading the severity on this bug to serious since I am now requesting removal of xerces25. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#332442: apt-listbugs: Apt-listbugs doesn't actually download any bug reports

2005-12-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Brad, I don't understand how this bug is happening; apt-listbugs runs fine for me. Could you try attaching to apt-listbugs with strace (probably strace -s128 or something, so we can see where this getaddrinfo is going), and post the output? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever

Bug#344859: selinux-policy-default: Unmet Dependencies

2005-12-26 Thread Vincas Ciziunas
Package: selinux-policy-default Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable An attempt to install selinux-policy-default results in the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux# apt-get install selinux-policy-default Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done So

Bug#344858: gaim: crashes with "*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer:"

2005-12-26 Thread Gabriele Stilli
Package: gaim Version: 1:1.5.0+1.5.1cvs20051015-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable As per subject, Gaim crashes on displaying the ICQ buddy list. Also tried purging and reinstalling, to no extent. I attach the outputs of "strace" and "gaim -d". Let me know if I should provi

Bug#280987: mig: keep it out from testing

2005-12-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:05:57AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=mig , > Build-Depends seem to be correctly tracked, and this bug can probably be > closed. Build-Depends are tracked, they're not enforced. -- Steve Langasek

Bug#340990: marked as done (gnat-glade-doc: FTBFS: etex error)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:02:24 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340990: fixed in gnat-glade-doc 3.15p-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#344699: marked as done (libaws: ftbfs [sparc] file "sinfo.ads" not found)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:02:28 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344699: fixed in libaws 2.0p-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#335837: marked as done (gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-11(m68k/unstable): missing headers?)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:17:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335837: fixed in gnat-gdb 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Bug#292854: Upgrading to serious

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 292854 serious Bug#292854: emacspeak: wrong debian/info file Severity set to `serious'. > retitle 292854 emacspeak FTBFS because of bad debian/info file Bug#292854: emacspeak: wrong debian/info file Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping proces

Processed: Re: Bug#342488: upgrade still doesn't happen

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 342488 0.9.0-2 Bug#342488: Wrong Conflicts/Replaces makes upgrade fail 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.9.0-2, send any further explanations to Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECT

Processed: Bug#292842: Upgrading to serious

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 292842 serious Bug#292842: tkusr: there is no CHANGES Severity set to `serious'. > retitle 292842 tkusr FTBFS because of bad debstd call Bug#292842: tkusr: there is no CHANGES Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please cont

Processed: Bug#292840: Upgrading to serious

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 292840 serious Bug#292840: obexserver: no ChangeLog, NEWS or README Severity set to `serious'. > retitle 292840 obexserver FTBFS because of bad debstd call Bug#292840: obexserver: no ChangeLog, NEWS or README Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopp

Bug#342488: upgrade still doesn't happen

2005-12-26 Thread Steve Langasek
close 342488 0.9.0-2 thanks On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:45:02PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > reopen 342488 > thanks > It seems that the upgrade still doesn't happen as it should. This is > with libsvncpp0c2_0.8.0-3 installed, though I don't understand why > not. No, this is not the same bug. I

Bug#329387: Bugzilla: Unsafe use of temporary files in the syncshadowdb script

2005-12-26 Thread David Miller
FYI, the reporter was mistaken, the upstream bug was NOT public. He could see it because he reported it. It might as well be now. (I just removed the security flag from it, so it is indeed public now). The patch he supplied (while a good start) was stated to be untested, and we also determi

Bug#344853: host: symbol lookup error: host: undefined symbol: isc_net_pton

2005-12-26 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Package: bind9-host Version: 1:9.3.1-2 Severity: grave File: /usr/bin/host -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:archives$ host google.com host: symbol lookup error: host: undefined symbol: isc_net_pton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:archives$ ldd `which host` linux-gate.so.

Bug#280987: mig: keep it out from testing

2005-12-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=mig , Build-Depends seem to be correctly tracked, and this bug can probably be closed. Regards, Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343720: marked as done (libdjvulibre-dev: missing dependencies)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:17:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343720: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.16-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#335368: intending to NMU anon-proxy to fix RC bugs

2005-12-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
severity 339405 serious thanks I'm stating my intention to NMU anon-proxy to update its build dependencies from xerces25 to xerces27 and to fix the FTBFS. I don't use anon-proxy myself, but I am doing this NMU so that the removal of xerces25 can proceed without leaving this package stranded. Th

Processed: intending to NMU anon-proxy to fix RC bugs

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339405 serious Bug#339405: please depend upon xerces27 instead of xerces25 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Processed: Re: netplan: memory errors

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 334351 + patch pending Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Processed: Please

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 46709 +upstream Bug#46709: Mach lets processes write to I/O ports Tags were: sid security Tags added: upstream > forwarded 46709 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=15295 Bug#46709: Mach lets processes write to I/O ports Noted yo

Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors

2005-12-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
tags 334351 + patch pending thanks I believe the attached patch solve the issue, but dropping the use of NGROUPS_MAX, and instead count the number of groups before allocating the memory needed from the heap. Please test it and let me know if it solve your problem. Unless you tell me it failed t

Processed: Re: libcompface: FTFBS - make up-to-dateness confusion on fast machines

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 261932 serious Bug#261932: libcompface: FTFBS - make up-to-dateness confusion on fast machines Severity set to `serious'. > tags 261932 + patch Bug#261932: libcompface: FTFBS - make up-to-dateness confusion on fast machines There were no tags

Bug#323315: FTBFS: Conflicting declarations of cn_tab

2005-12-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Matt Kraai, le Mon 15 Aug 2005 15:36:02 -0700, a écrit : > > ../device/cons.c:46: error: static declaration of 'cn_tab' follows > > non-static declaration > > ../device/cons.h:49: error: previous declaration of 'cn_tab' was here This line disappeared on 26th May, and isn't present in current

Bug#344841: need to ignore /sys/devices/parisc

2005-12-26 Thread Bdale Garbee
Package: yaird Version: 0.0.12-2 Severity: serious This version of yaird fails on hppa because it doesn't know what to do with the contents of /sys/devices/parisc: Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk. yaird error: unrecognised device: /sys/devices/parisc yaird error: unrecognised device: /s

Processed: dialog bugs

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 343444 serious Bug#343444: netenv segmentation fault Severity set to `serious'. > severity 344002 serious Bug#344002: dialog segfaults with empty or non-existing --default-item Severity set to `serious'. > merge 343444 344002 Bug#343444: nete

Bug#327312: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot find libclutils)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:43:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#344612: marked as done (openswan: pluto has shared library dependency on libkrb5support.so)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:17:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344612: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#343909: update error with amule-common_2.0.3-4+b1_i386.deb (--unpack)

2005-12-26 Thread Uwe Mesecke
tags 343909 patch thanks Hi, it seems that in 2.0.3-4 the files in /usr/share/cas/* moved from amule-utils to amule-common. So a simple Conflict should solve the problem: --- debian/control.old 2005-12-26 15:40:29.408288741 +0100 +++ debian/control 2005-12-26 15:41:02.997825600 +0100 @@

Bug#343909: update error with amule-common_2.0.3-4+b1_i386.deb (--unpack)

2005-12-26 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Uwe Mesecke [Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:00:41 +0100]: > tags 343909 patch > thanks > Hi, Hi Uwe, > it seems that in 2.0.3-4 the files in /usr/share/cas/* moved from > amule-utils to amule-common. So a simple Conflict should solve the > problem: Not really. The correct relationship would be a

Bug#328008: marked as done (prokyon3: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:08:47 -0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line prokyon3: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#342488: upgrade still doesn't happen

2005-12-26 Thread Justin Pryzby
reopen 342488 thanks It seems that the upgrade still doesn't happen as it should. This is with libsvncpp0c2_0.8.0-3 installed, though I don't understand why not. $ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following

Processed: upgrade still doesn't happen

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 342488 Bug#342488: Wrong Conflicts/Replaces makes upgrade fail Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian B

Bug#344329: marked as done (xscreensaver: does not build from source)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:53:38 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This does not reproduce has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Processed: Re: Bug#343909: update error with amule-common_2.0.3-4+b1_i386.deb (--unpack)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 343909 patch Bug#343909: update error with amule-common_2.0.3-4+b1_i386.deb (--unpack)  There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#344795: syslog-ng: FTBFS: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old.

2005-12-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: syslog-ng Version: 1.9.6 Severity: serious Tags: exprimental Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: checking for pkg-config... no checking for GLIB_CFLAGS... checking for GLIB_LIBS... configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old. Make

Bug#343991: marked as done (python2.3-utidylib: not installable in sid)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 04:02:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343991: fixed in utidylib 0.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: tagging 340163

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > tags 340163 patch Bug#340163: 3ddesktop: links to libfreetype6, which is going away There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please cont

Processed: tagging 340399

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > tags 340399 patch Bug#340399: animal0: links to libfreetype6, which is going away There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contac

Processed: still fails to find dash

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 344657 Bug#344657: tix - FTBFS: /bin/dash: Command not found Bug reopened, originator not changed. > found 344657 8.4.0-2 Bug#344657: tix - FTBFS: /bin/dash: Command not found Bug marked as found in version 8.4.0-2. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#344658: vim - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/rview': No such file or directory

2005-12-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 11:01:05AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > raptor.debian.org (3.80), then the responsible is probably make. In > particular, vim's debian/rules uses 'export' target specific variables, > for example: I changed debian/rules so that this feature is no longer used. The patc

Bug#344657: still fails to find dash

2005-12-26 Thread Blars Blarson
reopen 344657 found 344657 8.4.0-2 thanks Failed on all buildds, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344658: vim - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/rview': No such file or directory

2005-12-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:04:16PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: vim > Version: 1:6.4-006+1 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > Automatic build of vim_1:6.4-006+1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 > [...] > > dh_install -X.svn > > cp: can

Bug#344763: fireflier: FTBFS: undefined reference to `NETRootInfo::NETRootInfo(_XDisplay*, unsigned long, int, bool)'

2005-12-26 Thread Torok Edwin
tags 344763 patch fixed-upstream Thanks On Monday 26 December 2005 01:47, you wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:19:15AM +0200, Torok Edwin wrote: > > Not reproducible with the latest packages from debian unstable, and > > latest SVN version, architecture amd64. Could you tell us what are the >

Processed: Re: Bug#344763: fireflier: FTBFS: undefined reference to `NETRootInfo::NETRootInfo(_XDisplay*, unsigned long, int, bool)'

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 344763 patch fixed-upstream Bug#344763: fireflier: FTBFS: undefined reference to `NETRootInfo::NETRootInfo(_XDisplay*, unsigned long, int, bool)' Tags were: experimental Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#344401: firefox: not all printing broken

2005-12-26 Thread Mark Robinson
Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg-3 Followup-For: Bug #344401 My system seems to be similar to those of people seeing this behaviour, but I am instead seeing a message to the effect of "All printing disabled, Debian bug ... " pop up very briefly on pressing the print button. The printer then pro

Bug#337395: marked as done (libgtk-trayicon-ruby: FTBFS: Tries to install outside build directory)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:47:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337395: fixed in libgtk-trayicon-ruby 0.1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#337395: marked as done (libgtk-trayicon-ruby: FTBFS: Tries to install outside build directory)

2005-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:47:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337395: fixed in libgtk-mozembed-ruby 0.3.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case