On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:19:15AM +0200, Torok Edwin wrote:
>
>
> Not reproducible with the latest packages from debian unstable, and latest
> SVN version, architecture amd64.
> Could you tell us what are the versions of your packages you have installed?
> Could you specify what distribution y
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:02:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344614: fixed in ocamlodbc 2.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:02:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340103: fixed in ocamlodbc 2.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:51:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344463: cameleon: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to
`caml_Double_val'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
On Sunday 25 December 2005 22:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: fireflier
> Version: 1.99.beta1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> g++ -O2 -fno-check-new -o fireflier-client-kde fireflier_client.o
> traywidget.o firefl
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:47:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343502: fixed in liferea 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:47:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333103: fixed in liferea 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:32:51 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344148: Sorry for my lack of response
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> If you then use dh_shlibdeps with the -L and -l options, it
> should properly add the required Depends for your other packages,
> and you can remove the one in your control file.
This probably isn't true, so you have 2 options:
- Add i
Package: kdeedu
Version: 4:3.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
/build/buildd/kdeedu-3.5.0/build-tree/kdeedu-3.5.0/khangman/khangman/khangmanview.cpp:206:
error: no matching function for call to 'KPassivePopup::show(QPoint)'
Package: fireflier
Version: 1.99.beta1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
g++ -O2 -fno-check-new -o fireflier-client-kde fireflier_client.o traywidget.o
fireflier_indep.o about_dialog.o fireflier_ui.o login_dialog.o error_dialog.
Package: libpisock-dev
Version: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package has a Depends on libpisync0. Which mean the version
from unstable (0.11.8-17) should work. But it doesn't.
libpisync.so (from 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3) points to
libpisync.so.0.0.2, but libpisync0 0.11.8-17 has
I was busy with christmas preparations, so I did not look again at this issue.
However, I got a nice christmas present when I tried again the upgrade. The
crash had disappeared. I apologize for the creation of this bug. I guess you
can close it.
Merry christmas to every member of the X Strike F
tags 344566 pending
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCC'd
Yes, I know about this conflict, please see bug#339481.
Unfortunately I noticed this reduplication of effort rather late,
and furthermore right now I have locked myself out from my
working machine (again) being away from home over the holi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 344566 pending
Bug#344566: sysutils: /usr/bin/memtest also found in package memtester
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCC'd
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344740: fixed in kernel-package 10.025
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344413: fixed in kernel-package 10.025
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: shfs-source
Version: 0.35-5
Followup-For: Bug #342522
Dec 25 16:22:54 kernel: kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:252!
Dec 25 16:22:54 kernel: invalid operand: [#1]
Dec 25 16:22:54 kernel: PREEMPT
Dec 25 16:22:54 kernel: Modules linked in: shfs hidp hci_usb
ehci_hcd uhci_hcd sd_mod usb_storage
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 344615 ocaml
Bug#344615: missinglib: ftbfs [sparc] *** [test] Bus error
Bug reassigned from package `missinglib' to `ocaml'.
> severity 344615 important
Bug#344615: missinglib: ftbfs [sparc] *** [test] Bus error
Severity set to `important'.
>
reassign 344615 ocaml
severity 344615 important
thanks
Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hi,
Blars Blarson wrote:
missinglib failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder. Please note that some buggy code that casts structures used
to work no longer works due to changes in gcc.
./ru
I haven't looked into this much but it seems I'm experiencing the same
bug. I get:
Starting crypto disks: root(running) home(starting)Command failed: Invalid
argument
blain-backup(starting)Command failed: Invalid argument
.
After downgrading to cryptsetup_20050111-3_i386.deb and
libdevmapper1.
Package: lsh-utils
Version: 2.0.1-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
#mv debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lsh.1 \
debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lshc.1
/bin/sh: line 1: debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/lshc.1: No such file or directory
make: ***
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:46:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed some time ago
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Package: libsmbios
Version: 0.10.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
BUILDING dox config file.
[ -e doc/reports ] || mkdir -p doc/reports
[ -e doc/reports ] || mkdir -p doc/reports
DOXYGEN : doc/full/html/index.html
/bin/sh: doxyge
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343280: fixed in yaird 0.0.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343042: fixed in yaird 0.0.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343280: fixed in yaird 0.0.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343042: fixed in yaird 0.0.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> reassign 344741 kernel-source-2.4.27
Bug#344741: kernel-source-2.6.8 - device-mapper patch lacks support for
major/minor device resolution
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-
Package: libmpd-dev
Version: 0.01-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
When building gmpc I get the following error:
source='main.c' object='gmpc-main.o' libtool=no \
depfile='.deps/gmpc-main.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/gmpc-main.TPo' \
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh /build/buildd/gmpc-0.12.0/./depcomp \
Package: verbiste
Version: 0.1.14-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
creating verbiste-applet
sed 's|%{libexecdir}|/usr/lib/verbiste|g; \
s|%{PACKAGE}|verbiste|g; \
s|%{APPLET_FULL_NAME}|Verbiste Applet|g; \
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> block 341452 with 344741
Bug#341452: lvm2: v2.02.00-1: breaks VGs: "device-mapper ioctl cmd 9 failed:
Invalid argument"
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 344741
>
En
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 341452 -1
Bug#341452: lvm2: v2.02.00-1: breaks VGs: "device-mapper ioctl cmd 9 failed:
Invalid argument"
Bug 341452 cloned as bug 344741.
> retitle -1 kernel-source-2.6.8 - device-mapper patch lacks support for
> major/minor device resolution
B
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.024
Severity: grave
Hello,
The changes introduced in kernel-package between 10.020 and 10.023 break
the amd64 build in the linux-2.6 package, see attached build log.
This might be a problem with amd64/x86-64, having dpkg and the kernel
sources call the arch di
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
touch patch-stamp
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
aclocal-1.8 && automake-1.8 && autoconf
bash: aclocal-1.8: command not found
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.15
Followup-For: Bug #328170
On a fresh apt-buid installation (this morning), same problem occured.
# apt-build build-source firefox
Building the following packages from source:
-> Installing build dependencies (for firefox) <-
Lecture des listes de paque
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:17:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343902: fixed in debconf 1.4.66
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 341452
Bug#341452: lvm2: v2.02.00-1: breaks VGs: "device-mapper ioctl cmd 9 failed:
Invalid argument"
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344731 important
Bug#344731: libgtk2.0-0: the menus of gtk applications are black
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
severity 344731 important
thanks
Le dimanche 25 décembre 2005 à 04:11 -0200, Adriano Bonat a écrit :
> Package: libgtk2.0-0
> Version: 2.8.9-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After upgrade the libgtk2.0-0 from version 2.6.10-2 to 2.8.9-2, the
> background of the me
reopen 341452
thanks
This bug was _not_ fixed with the upload which had the particular
changelog entry; the only thing changed in that particular revision is
that the error message used (IMHO) cryptic wording instead of a cryptic
number.
The kernel patch still needs to be backported to 2.4 before
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:02:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344653: fixed in electricsheep 2.6.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: bl
Version: 1.2-10
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
bl renders my keyboard (asus m3n laptop) unusable; it's as if numlock
were really on or something weird. Consequently, it's left to chance to
be able to type in the superuser's password to remove the package (as
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:29:58AM -0800, Max Alekseyev wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >Well, after fixing the dialog crash, the link from the bug report works
> >fine
> >for me on alpha. Perhaps you could test using the patch I sent in the last
> >mail, to confirm the bug still exists?
> Unf
Hi,
Has there been any progress on finding what the cause of this is?
There is also a bug open about this in the Debian bug tracking at:
http://bugs.debian.org/338006
There might be some more useful information in it.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 344313 patch
Bug#344313: cryptsetup: unable to create map with libdevmapper1.02
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 02:31:02AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Hmm I think i'd rather restrict this package to just i386 and
> (maybe) amd64 architectures??
Yes.
> After all, and know i come to think about it, non-PC architectures don't
> have SMBIOS... or do they?
No.
Bastian
--
We
tags 344313 patch
thanks
The attached patch fixes the problem.
Bastian
--
The sight of death frightens them [Earthers].
-- Kras the Klingon, "Friday's Child", stardate 3497.2
diff -urN cryptsetup-20050111.old/lib/libdevmapper.c
cryptsetup-20050111/lib/libdevmapper.c
--- cryptse
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 344653 + pending
Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11
Tags were: confirmed help
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
tags 344653 + pending
thanks
* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> The addition of libx11-dev, libxext-dev and x-dev are because the package
> #includes headers from those packages. I only did a simplistic grep
> test, so it may be over generous in my dependency (for instance, if a
> chun
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:15:48AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> tags 321644 - unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder why Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> set this bug to unreproducible,
> we have no woreking mozilla since August in the amd64 port, and 1.7.12-1
> is still affected.
>
reassign 344711 linux-2.6
retitle 344711 [powerpc] linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc: Can't install
merge 344711 344416
thanks
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 02:50:19AM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc
> Version: 2.6.14-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unu
Hi Marcela,
The problem was that the imlib package is not on testing/unstable now. I
add a patch that correct the problem.
--
e-mail: Miguel Gea Milvaques http://www.livejournal.com/users/xerakko/
GnuPG key: 0x580808C4
Key fingerprint = 85A0 06FD 9A6C 4701 27C2 5536 3533 50CA 5808 08C4
diff -ur
53 matches
Mail list logo
