Bug#320017: marked as done (vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines (CAN-2005-2368))

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:24:46 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320017: fixed in vim 1:6.3-071+1sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#318946: marked as done (shorewall: A client accepted by MAC address filtering to bypass any other rule)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:21:43 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318946: fixed in shorewall 2.2.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#285831: marked as done (scsitools: unmounting proc conflicts with mountvirtfs)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:21:31 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285831: fixed in scsitools 0.8-1sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Fixed in NMU of razor 2.670-1sarge2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 314433 + fixed Bug#314433: crafted emails get razor to segfault Tags were: fixed fixed-upstream patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#343682: cupsys: dummy bug to block current cupsys goes testing

Package: cupsys Version: 1.1.23-14 Severity: serious Tags: sid This bug is dummy. We, Debian CUPS team are considering what's best way to handle CUPS configuration. CUPS of current sid since 1.1.23-13 is test case and really unstable. So we prevent current CUPS enters testing. Thanks, -- Kensh

Bug#343608: Core dump at start

I think I found the reason for that core dump: http://w-ber.ormgas.com/html2utf8.pl If UTF-8 is really not in use and that script is loaded in ~/.irssi/startup , irssi dumps core during startup. Probably the bug is in that script rather than in irssi. But as long as I am really not yet in UTF-8-

Bug#329664: marked as done (shell command execution)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:34:54 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329664: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#327452: marked as done (security issue revealed: CAN-2005-2871)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:34:46 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327452: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2sarge4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#329667: marked as done (mozilla-thunderbird --compose executes shell commands)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:34:54 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329664: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#326260: marked as done (pdns-backend-mysql: sed on non-existent pdns.local makes postrm fail)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:36:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326260: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-13sarge2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#323366: marked as done (SECURITY: XML::RPC remote code injections (CAN-2005-2498))

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:36:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323366: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#322352: marked as done (pdns and pdns-doc both contain /usr/share/doc-base/pdns (sarge security update version))

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:36:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322352: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-13sarge2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#321974: marked as done (upgrade forces pdns-server to use pipe backend)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:36:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321974: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-13sarge2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#318284: marked as done (CAN-2005-2256 directory traveral vulnerability)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:37:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318284: fixed in phppgadmin 3.5.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#317739: marked as done (XSS in phpbb2 (MS IE only) [CAN-2005-2161])

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:37:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317739: fixed in phpbb2 2.0.13+1-6sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#316447: marked as done (remote code execution in PEAR::XML_RPC)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:36:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316447: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#312106: marked as done (preconfiguration bug break woody to sarge upgrade)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:35:37 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312106: fixed in nut 2.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mozilla 2:1.7.8-1sarge3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 321427 + fixed Bug#321427: mozilla-mailnews: Upgrading to 1.7.10 causes UI problems with Mozilla mail Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > tag 327366 + fixed Bug#327366: [CAN-2005-2871] IDN buffer overflow [MFSA 2005-57] Tags were: fixed upstream

Processed: Fixed in NMU of phpmyadmin 4:2.6.2-3sarge1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 328501 + fixed Bug#328501: CAN-2005-2869: Two XSS vulnerabilities Tags were: fixed patch sarge security Tags added: fixed > tag 335306 + fixed Bug#335306: CVE-2005-3300: Local file inclusion vulnerability Tags were: fixed sarge security Tags added:

Processed: Fixed in NMU of polygen 1.0.6-7sarge1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 325468 + fixed Bug#325468: polygen: ignores umask Tags were: fixed security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mantis 0.19.2-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 330682 + fixed Bug#330682: mantis: Several vulnerabilities in Mantis Tags were: fixed pending security Tags added: fixed > tag 335938 + fixed Bug#335938: mantis: Mantis "t_core_path" File Inclusion Vulnerability Tags were: fixed pending security Ta

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mdadm 1.9.0-4sarge1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 299623 + fixed Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed Tags were: pending confirmed fixed sarge patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Processed: Fixed in NMU of lm-sensors 1:2.9.1-1sarge2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 324193 + fixed Bug#324193: lm-sensors: Insecure tempfile usage in pwmconfig Tags were: etch patch security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0-8.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 339458 + fixed Bug#339458: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code Tags were: fixed patch security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Processed: Fixed in NMU of f-prot-installer 0.5.14.sarge.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 323930 + fixed Bug#323930: f-prot-installer: Script /usr/bin/f-prot doesn't work with f-prot 4.6.0 Tags were: fixed sarge Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Processed: severity of 343192 is wishlist

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > severity 343192 wishlist Bug#343192: cupsys: infrastructure for dvi autodetection and printing missing. Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#311357: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.8-2: via-rhine fails to reserve I/O region, no networking available)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:30:24 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311357: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-16sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#338296: marked as done (common-lisp-controller 4.15sarge2 broke clisp+cl-asdf)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:20:42 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338296: fixed in common-lisp-controller 4.15sarge3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#323318: marked as done (Array element has incomplete type)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:30:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323318: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-10sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#309308: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: null pointer oops on udp packets)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:30:24 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309308: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-16sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#322607: marked as done (SECURITY: HTTP proxy responses with both Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers (CAN-2005-2088))

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:19:02 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322607: fixed in apache 1.3.33-6sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#322591: marked as done (awstats: [CAN-2005-1527] arbitrary command injection)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:19:49 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322591: fixed in awstats 6.4-1sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#323318: marked as done (Array element has incomplete type)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:30:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320256: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-10sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#316579: marked as done (fam: compact flash card destroyed)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:22:45 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316579: fixed in fam 2.7.0-6sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#296609: marked as done (fam: can not unmount floppy)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:22:45 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296609: fixed in fam 2.7.0-6sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gtk+2.0 2.6.4-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 339431 + fixed Bug#339431: CVE-2005-3186: Integer overflow in gdk-pixbuf's XPM code Tags were: fixed patch fixed-in-experimental security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trac

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kazehakase 0.2.7-2.sarge1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 325124 + fixed Bug#325124: segfault visiting any site if no tab is open (e.g. upon startup) Tags were: fixed patch Tags added: fixed > tag 326509 + fixed Bug#326509: Segfaults always when opening Kazehakase's website from the menu Tags were: fixed

Processed: Fixed in NMU of eric 3.6.2-2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 330893 + fixed Bug#330893: eric: Arbitrary code execution when generating documentation for a malicious project file Tags were: fixed etch sarge Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Processed: Fixed in NMU of backup-manager 0.5.7-1sarge1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 308897 + fixed Bug#308897: backup-manager: insecure default configuration Tags were: fixed sarge security patch Tags added: fixed > tag 315582 + fixed Bug#315582: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files Tags were: fixed sarge security

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ettercap 1:0.7.1-1sarge1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 311615 + fixed Bug#311615: ettercap: [CAN-2005-1796] buffer overflow in ec_curses.c Tags were: fixed sarge patch security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admi

Processed: Fixed in NMU of cgiemail 1.6-26sarge1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 320752 + fixed Bug#320752: sendmail not found Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UN

Bug#343411: vegastrike: Can't play the game: Out of memory error

Em Qui, 2005-12-15 às 21:45 -0500, Mike Furr escreveu: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > How much memory (physical & swap) does your machine have? When you run > the game, how is currently free? > > - -Mike > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) >

Bug#342887: util-linux: too early yet too late

Package: util-linux Version: 2.12r-2 Followup-For: Bug #34288 You could also make the argument that it runs too late--since it runs after checkroot, even after copying the symlinked localtime into /etc/, the root filesystem will still be checked every other boot. I'm not sure what exactly changed.

Bug#340850: still fails

Timestamp skew was a red herring. It's a missing build-depends. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: bug supposedly fixed in kmail from kde 3.4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 329766 4:3.4.1-1 Bug#329766: kmail ignores send mail button 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 4:3.4.1-1, send any further explanations to Sven Bergner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > th

Bug#337296: kitchensync crashes during the first run

On Thursday 03 November 2005 01:24 pm, Hervé Leroux wrote: > Subject: kitchensync crashes during the first run > Package: kitchensync > Version: 4:3.4.2-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > When I run kitchensync for the first time (or after > deleting .kde/share/apps/k

Bug#343679: gloox: ftbfs [sparc] doxygen: Command not found

Package: gloox Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gloox failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. It also failed on all other buildds. touch build-arch-stamp dh_testdir doxygen make: doxygen: Command not found make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Err

Processed: still fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 340850 Bug#340850: units: FTBFS: makeinfo: Command not found Bug reopened, originator not changed. > found 340850 1.85-2 Bug#340850: units: FTBFS: makeinfo: Command not found Bug marked as found in version 1.85-2. > thanks Stopping processing h

Processed: Same problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Fixed in 20051214-1 > close 343611 20051214-1 Bug#343611: Can not be installed 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 20051214-1, send any further explanations to Juhapekka Tolvanen <[E

Bug#340850: still fails

reopen 340850 found 340850 1.85-2 thanks sparc and some other buildds failed to build with this error. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338100: marked as done (licq_1.3.2-4_m68k: FTBFS: /bin/moc: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 04:32:37 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line licq_1.3.2-4_m68k: FTBFS: /bin/moc: No such file or directory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#343611: Can not be installed

Dear Juhapekka, On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > > Package: tex4ht > Version: 20050402.1817-1 > Severity: grave > > > I was trying to upgarde to version 20051130-1: Sorry about the goof-up. Version 20051130 is indeed uninstallable and is superceded by 20051214 which should work

Bug#285613: marked as done (cyrus-sasl2-mit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'global_callbacks' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:17:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285613: fixed in cyrus-sasl2-mit 2.1.19-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#276865: marked as done (cyrus-sasl2-mit: Local privilege escalation on setuid environment (CAN-2004-0884))

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:17:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#276865: fixed in cyrus-sasl2-mit 2.1.19-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#341228: Severity rising

On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:05:11PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Guerkan Senguen wrote: > > I have read them and I still disagree to you. > Here is a short explaination, why I raised the severity again: > * A patent applies even if you don't know of it. This means, one have to > _first_ check al

Processed: Debian Kerberosish: r2296 - in cyrus-sasl2-mit: . debian debian/current debian/current/cyrus-sasl2-mit debian/current/cyrus-sasl2-mit/debian debian/current/cyrus-sasl2-mit/debian/patches de

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 332703 pending Bug#332703: FTBFS: Syntax error before MD5_CTX Tags were: pending fixed patch Tags added: pending > tags 285605 pending Bug#285605: cyrus-sasl2: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'global_callbacks' follows non-static dec

Processed: Debian Kerberosish: r2292 - in cyrus-sasl2-mit: . debian/current debian/current/debian debian/current/debian/patches debian/current/p

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 332703 pending Bug#332703: FTBFS: Syntax error before MD5_CTX Tags were: fixed patch Tags added: pending > tags 285605 pending Bug#285605: cyrus-sasl2: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'global_callbacks' follows non-static declaration

Bug#341234: NMU diff

Attached is an NMU diff for these two grave bugs. I will be uploading the NMU to delayed/3days. diff -ruN ../orig/apt-move-4.2.24/Makefile apt-move-4.2.24/Makefile --- ../orig/apt-move-4.2.24/Makefile2003-02-22 10:56:27.0 + +++ apt-move-4.2.24/Makefile2005-12-17 00:31:41.00

Bug#337269: gatos: FTBFS: invalid lvalue in assignment

If I knew, I would, but didn't find how to. I'm tempted to orphan the package, as it's for rather old video cards, and that there is a new gatos Christian Lars Wirzenius a écrit : If I change src/i2c.c, line 398 to be like this: if (loop) (N1) ? (N2=N) : (N1 = N) ; if (N2) loop = 0 ; } Th

Bug#343092: recovery ?

Would anyone be kind enough to provide recovery instructions for this issue, for current state and/or when the newer linux-image are available? Link to an appropriate man page qualify :) Thanks, Jean-Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Bug#335973: marked as done (FTBFS: Tests fail)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:17:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335973: fixed in libjson-perl 1.00-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#329758: marked as done (libbusiness-onlinepayment-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libtie-ixhash-perl, libnet-ssleay-perl, liburi-perl')

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:17:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329758: fixed in libbusiness-onlinepayment-perl 2.99devel3.00+03-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 343109 +unreproducible +sarge +moreinfo Unknown tag/s: +sarge, +moreinfo. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-

Bug#343109: boa-constructor: Fails to start

Hello, Can you start boa-constructor, and send me the full console output ? You should have something like: $ boa-constructor Starting Boa Constructor v0.3.0 importing wxPython reading user preferences Created directory: /home/op/.boa-constructor Created directory: /home/op/.boa-constructor/docs-

Bug#341676: marked as done (liboctaviz.so not found)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341676: fixed in octaviz 0.4.0-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#337269: gatos: FTBFS: invalid lvalue in assignment

If I change src/i2c.c, line 398 to be like this: if (loop) (N1) ? (N2=N) : (N1 = N) ; if (N2) loop = 0 ; } Then the build continues, but fails later with this error: g++ -Wall -pipe -O -o .libs/xatitv xatitv.o xutils.o .libs/xatitvS.o ./.libs/libgatos.so -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libibtk.so -L/usr/

Bug#343185: marked as done (firefox: Not available on powerpc.)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:17:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341766: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#341766: marked as done (firefox: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:17:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341766: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338930: gambas - FTBFS: creating symbolic link: Permission denied

The patch below allows the package to be built. A quick glance at it doesn't indicate any huge problems, but since I don't the package at all, I didn't test it. Hopefully this is helpful in gettinga fixed upload done anyway. Happy hacking. --- gambas-1.0.12/debian/rules 2005-12-16 21:13:24.0

Bug#343042: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Boot aborts with message, '/bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory'

I can confirm, as others have mentioned, that this bug affects AMD systems as well. All of my symptoms were identical to others reported. I chose to downgrade yaird to testing and this resolved the problem (now running 2.6.14-5). I appears to me that the patch mentioned above doesn't apply yet

Bug#341228: Severity rising

Guerkan Senguen wrote: > I have read them and I still disagree to you. Here is a short explaination, why I raised the severity again: * A patent applies even if you don't know of it. This means, one have to _first_ check all the patents, and _then_ upload/distribute a program. Otherwise, one can

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 341228 serious Bug#341228: mazeofgalious: patent infringement Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#337870: FTBFS (alpha): conflicting types for 'strlen'

Attached please find two patches. patch-1.txt is minimal, just enough to make the build succeed. It modified fvwm/alpha_header.h so that it uses the proper (standardized!) headers instead of declaring things itself. This is, I hope, sufficient to fix the bug in question. patch-2.txt includes the m

Bug#343250: [Bulk] Re: Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

Robert Luberda wrote: Thanks for your report. I've just uploaded new CVS snapshot of upx-ucl-beta (1.94+0.20051214cvs-1). Could you please check if the problem still exists in that version? It fails to be build from sources on amd64 with the following error: g++ -O2 -g -DWITH_UCL -o packmast.

Processed: merge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 340900 important Bug#340900: kronolith: saves but does not display events Severity set to `important'. > severity 254981 important Bug#254981: kronolith: Events are not saved/displayed Severity set to `important'. > tags 340900 + upstream Bug

Bug#343612: marked as done (libgc: FTBFS on arm platforms)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:02:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343612: fixed in libgc 1:6.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging 343612

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > tags 343612 upstream pending Bug#343612: libgc: FTBFS on arm platforms Tags were: patch Tags added: upstream, pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Bug#343146: fiaif: Fiaif stops all traffic on CBQ shaped interfaces even when CBQ not enabled (on upgrade only)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Laurent, sorry for taking so long to tackle your bug report. On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:49:50AM +0100, Laurent CARON wrote: > I just installed latest FIAIF package, and when my ppp connection went > down, and then up i was unable to browse the int

Processed: tagging 339343

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 339343 pending Bug#339343: swish-e - FTBFS: Failed to find [swish-config] in PATH There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Processed: Re: Bug#343543: rageircd: user authentication can be bypassed by not providing a password

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #343543 important Bug#343543: rageircd: user authentication can be bypassed by not providing a password Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#343543: rageircd: user authentication can be bypassed by not providing a password

severity #343543 important thanks On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:34:12PM +, James Troup wrote: > Severity: grave I have to disagree here, as the bug doesn't allow access to the accounts of the package's users. Adjusting severity. > If rageircd is configured to require a password to connect to th

Bug#343608: Core dump at start

Can you run strace -o irssi.log irssi and send me irssi.log -- David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341398: Please, post backtraces

Hi, If you get racoon to disapear, please run under gdb, add -F option (to stay in foreground) and post backtrace. -- Aidas Kasparas IT administrator GM Consult Group, UAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343612: libgc: FTBFS on arm platforms

Package: libgc Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: no longer builds from source libgc 6.6 FTBFS on arm platforms using any current gcc/binutils combo, bailing out with an error of the following type: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands -- `swp r3,r5,[r3]' The ARM 'swp Rd,

Bug#343556: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#343555: alsa-source: fails to configure with bash 3.1 as /bin/sh

This version fixes the problem. Thanks, -Ivan On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:23:55AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: > Please test 1.0.10-3 which is now in incoming > > http://incoming.debian.org > > or unstable. > -- > Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Bug#343611: Can not be installed

Package: tex4ht Version: 20050402.1817-1 Severity: grave I was trying to upgarde to version 20051130-1: -=*[ROOT ZSH]*=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root # apt-get -f -u -t unstable install tex4ht Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This

Bug#336983: PATCH: Fix for qemu build on PowerPC

On Dec 15, 2005, at 9:17 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: Guillem Jover wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:45:23PM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: If that release is imminent, there is something that I would like to take care of beforehand: I think I have found a bug that causes random garbage to be

Bug#338309: ndiswrapper-source: oops in update_wireless_stats

Adrian, thanks for the patch. Works great. :-) Claudio, I retried the 1.5 with 2.16.11: no problem, so *it's* a kernel upgrade matter or, if you prefer, call it as "an incompatibility between 1.5 sources and 2.6.14 kernel" ;-) BTW, is there any reason to not have the latest (1.6 & 1.7) source

Bug#343608: Core dump at start

Package: irssi Version: 0.8.10-1 Severity: grave [(status)] > *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08686118 *** zsh: 10273 abort (core dumped) irssi % gdb /usr/bin/irssi core-irssi-1134742770-6-10273 GNU gdb 6.3.90_20051119-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation

Bug#343599: (no subject)

On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 02:53:19PM +0100, Gregoire Masliah wrote: > the version of ghemical i've attempted to install is 1.01-2 I have requested a rebuild for the amd64 archive which should make ghemical installable on stable/amd64 again. thanks for the report, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian

Bug#343606: libcatalyst-perl: missing build-dep on libtemplate-perl

Package: libcatalyst-perl Severity: serious Version: 5.61-1 Fails to build without Template available, it's in Makefile.PL... -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc

Bug#343599: (no subject)

Hi, the version of ghemical i've attempted to install is 1.01-2 thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343599: ghemical: This package depends on libsc5 which is not exist in sarg e amd64

Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 02:19:14PM +0100, Gregoire Masliah wrote: > Package: ghemical > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable Which version of ghemical are you looking at? The .deb from http://amd64.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/ghemical/ghemical_1.90-2_amd64.deb depends

Bug#343599: additional information

If possible, should be build against libsc6 which is available on sarge amd64. # apt-get install ghemical Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the uns

Bug#343599: ghemical: This package depends on libsc5 which is not exist in sarg e amd64

Package: ghemical Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Bug#335148: marked as done (removal of automake1.6)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335148: fixed in xbsql 0.11-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#343583: marked as done (kernel-source-2.4.27: kernel-source and kernel-image version out of sync for Sparc)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:36:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343583: kernel-source-2.4.27: kernel-source and kernel-image version out of sync for Sparc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#318974: marked as done (libxbsql0: CXX 4.0 transition)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318974: fixed in xbsql 0.11-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#343461: marked as done (geoip_1.3.14-1(unstable/arm/grieg): needs libtool update for arm)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:02:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343461: fixed in geoip 1.3.14-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#323321: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to define uoff_t)

Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:12:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.8.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

  1   2   >