On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 09:45:54PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > I can detail this some more if you wish but rest assured that there are no
> | > bus errors anywhere.
> | Yes, there are. That was the reason for the failure in the build log that
> It only looks that way when the error is
> Right after I upgraded linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 to 2.6.14-5 and rebooted,
> boot is interrupted with repeated messages:
>
> /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory
>
> until it finally stops completely, with message:
>
> Device /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev seems to be down
Er
Hi!
Frank Küster [2005-12-11 13:27 +0100]:
> >> Did you see Martin Pitt's "enhanced" patch - do both address the same
> >> problems?
> >
> > The appendix removes the douplette Martin found, so yes.
>
> I looked at both, and it seems that Martin's does more. I'm speaking of
> the patch attached t
Hi Frank, hi Joey!
Frank Küster [2005-12-09 19:01 +0100]:
> Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After discovering that the same flawed multiplication is also present
> > in upstream's other two patches, I decided to completely rework the
> > patch.
> >
> > I attach the debdiff with separ
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:17:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343036: fixed in hermes1 1.3.3+really1.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:07:21AM +0200, Aapo Rista wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
> Version: 2.6.14-5
> Followup-For: Bug #343048
>
>
> After upgrading linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 from 2.6.14-4 to 2.6.14-5,
> IBM Thinkpad X40 fails to boot. Last lines before the end of
> initializing p
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 04:33:29AM +0100, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragao wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
> > Version: 2.6.14-5
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks the whole system
> >
> > Right after I upgraded linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 to 2.6.14-5 and
Hi Andreas!
Andreas Kostyrka [2005-12-11 16:31 +0100]:
> > Can you please give more details about what exactly you are trying to
> > do? 'It breaks' is not very helpful for fixing things.
>
> I'm trying to compile slony.
> And it did bomb in type conflicts in the headers between
> postgresql-serv
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-5
Followup-For: Bug #343048
After upgrading linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 from 2.6.14-4 to 2.6.14-5,
IBM Thinkpad X40 fails to boot. Last lines before the end of
initializing process are here:
---8<-8<---
Unifor
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:34:11AM -0200, Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragao wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
> Version: 2.6.14-5
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Right after I upgraded linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 to 2.6.14-5 and rebooted,
> boot
> is interrupted
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 337735 oooqs-kde: fails to install - needs update for OOo2
Bug#337735: oooqs-kde: fails to install
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 337735 oooqs-kde: fails to install
Bug#337735: oooqs-kde: fails to install
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:02:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330812: fixed in xprint 1:0.1.0.alpha1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Added to /etc/yaird/Default.cfg:
MODULE piix
MODULE generic
MODULE ide-disk
and ran:
yaird --verbose --output=/boot/initrd.img-2.6.14-2-686 2.6.14-2-686
Exactly the same problem: no joy.
I thought this might be needed:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440B
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After the last update (-4 => -5), the system fails to boot. There are
several error messages: waiting for /sys/block.../hda to come up. It
seems like the IDE module is loaded, but no
this bug appears to be fixed in GNU Make CVS
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/make/make/?sortby=date#dirlist
(there seem to be a lot of fixes since this beta, including modifying
the problematic second expansion feature to be controlled by a
pseudotarget.)
--
I usually have a GPG digital signa
This problem exists in Debian's stable branch with apache2-mpm-worker
2.0.54.
It appears to have been fixed already in Ubuntu versions 4.10, 5.4, and
5.10.
From http://www.ubuntulinux.org/usn/usn-225-1
"The problem can be corrected by upgrading the affected package to
version 2.0.50-12ubuntu
Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragao wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Right after I upgraded linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 to 2.6.14-5 and rebooted, boot
is interrupted with repeated messages:
/bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/d
On 11 December 2005 at 19:24, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 09:14:00PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 11 December 2005 at 19:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > | On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:49:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > |
| > | > On 11 December 2005 at 17:25
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 09:14:00PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 11 December 2005 at 19:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:49:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | > On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote:
> | > | Package: foreign
> | > | Severity:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 343042 yaird
Bug#343042: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Boot aborts with message '/bin/cat:
/sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.14-2-686' to `yaird'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Pl
On 11 December 2005 at 19:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:49:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote:
| > | Package: foreign
| > | Severity: serious
| > | Justification: fails to build from source
|
| > | foreign failed
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:49:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote:
> | Package: foreign
> | Severity: serious
> | Justification: fails to build from source
> | foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
> | (The
On 11 December 2005 at 19:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote:
| | Package: foreign
| | Severity: serious
| | Justification: fails to build from source
| |
| |
| | foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
| | (The
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Right after I upgraded linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 to 2.6.14-5 and rebooted, boot
is interrupted with repeated messages:
/bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory
until
Howdy,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:18:29AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the
> g++-3.3 package.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:54:22AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> We would like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although
> curre
On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote:
| Package: foreign
| Severity: serious
| Justification: fails to build from source
|
|
| foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
| (The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.)
|
|
| make[2]: Ente
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341936: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326876: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335125: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331104: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320904: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: foreign
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
(The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.)
make[2]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/test
Package: libbonobomm1.3
Severity: serious
Usertag: g++-3.3
This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely,
because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We will
get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3
package.
Please (re)check, if the package
Package: hermes1
Severity: serious
Usertag: g++-3.3
This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely,
because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We will
get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3
package.
Please (re)check, if the package can be
Package: ava
Severity: serious
Usertag: g++-3.3
This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely,
because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We will
get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3
package.
Please (re)check, if the package can be buil
Package: ccmalloc
Severity: serious
Usertag: g++-3.3
This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely,
because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We will
get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3
package.
Please (re)check, if the package can be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 339541 - moreinfo
Bug#339541: xemacs21-mule: installation fails
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:41:55 -0500
> Replacing Aurelien's patch with this one fixes the
> /lib64/libc.so.6: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type
> 0x4f
> problem, and "/lib64/libc.so.6 --version" works fine.
>
> However, 64-bit bina
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [PR target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in
libjava, when configured for i486-linux
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:14:43PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Package: libc6-sparc64
> Version: 2.3.5-8
> Severity: normal
>
> There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code
> in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS
> relcation support is in sysde
Hallo,
the attached patch fixes the problem.
Claus--- usermin-1.110/mailbox/view_mail.cgi 2005-12-12 00:23:55.129641390 +0100
+++ /usr/share/usermin/mailbox/view_mail.cgi2005-12-12 00:20:13.704377761
+0100
@@ -56,10 +56,10 @@
# Check if we have gotten back a DSN for *this* email
&update_de
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:02:41PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:52:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > geomview (1.8.1-10) unstable; urgency=low
> > > .
> > >* debian/control: Add "texinfo" to build-deps so that command
> > > "makeinfo"
> > > is avail
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:57:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339222: fixed in libtorrent 0.8.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339235: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:59:55 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339217: fixed in libprinterconf 0.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339156: fixed in cegui-mk2 0.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337524: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 339278 + fixed
Bug#339278: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
> There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code
> in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS
> relcation support is in sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/dl-machine.h, and
> therefore so no binary linked against 64-bit libc can execute.
>
> Not even "/lib64/libc.so.6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 338460 with 339688
Bug#338460: rfb: Uninstallable due to libxclass0 -> libxclass0c2
Was blocked by: 339688
Blocking bugs removed: 339688
> block 339259 with 339688
Bug#339259: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Was
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 338460 with 339688
Bug#338460: rfb: Uninstallable due to libxclass0 -> libxclass0c2
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 339688
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Sat 10. December 2005 16:47, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > I am not sure, whether it is correct, but when applied patch
> > from http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47835, I
> > was able to create new version of package which seems to work.
>
> Correction, no it doesn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 342936 grave
Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b on testing dist
Severity set to `grave'.
> close 342936
Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b on testing dist
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send
Package: toolame
Version: 02l-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
toolame fails to build on almost all architectures:
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/toolame-02l'
gcc -O3 -DNDEBUG -DINLINE=inline -march=pentium -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall
-DNEWENCODE -DNEWATAN -c co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 340360 !
Bug#340360: libapache2-mod-auth-kerb: GSSAPI fails with "Request is a replay"
under krb5 1.4.3
Changed Bug submitter from Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Russ Allbery
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 328201 !
Bug#328201: r-cran
My last message was wrong about the broken rule. It's the following
rule from /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:
# These rules should do all the work of actually creating a .deb from the
staging
# directory.
$(patsubst %,binary/%,$(DEB_ARCH_PACKAGES)) :: binary/% : testdir testroot
common-bin
CTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:04:15 +0100
Source: doc-linux
Binary: doc-linux-text doc-linux-html
Architecture: source all
Version: 2005.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian LDP Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is it possible that the broken rule is in
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk?
I see a bunch of rules that look like this:
$(patsubst %,install/%,$(DEB_ALL_PACKAGES)) :: install/%:
dh_installdirs -p$(cdbs_curpkg) $(DEB_INSTALL_DIRS_$(cdbs_curpkg))
These kinds of rules look like good cand
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 01:59:18PM -0500, Christopher Martin wrote:
> This is probably related to qt-x11-free's FTBFS on hppa.
>
> Our build fails like this:
> > /build/buildd/qt-x11-free-3.3.5/bin/uic
> -L /build/buildd/qt-x11-free-3.3.5/plugins pixmapfunction.ui -o
> pixmapfunction.h
> > make[
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:32:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325678: fixed in svnmailer 1.0.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:17:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342855: fixed in debianutils 2.15.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 342892 Make regression: all CDBS packages FTBFS, see #342879
Bug#342892: Incompatible with make 3.80+3.81.b3-1
Changed Bug title.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> block 342870 with 342879
Bug#342870: licq contains dev headers from licq-dev
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 342879
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
By accident (I was bitten by this bug as well, being a fan of debtags),
I noticed this[1] comment of a succesful use of dh-buildinfo.
Thanks for a neat little tool!
- Jonas
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341945;msg=31;a
"Brendan O'Dea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You're causing a SEGV by attempting to address a non-existant argument
> to printf. You don't need a large number to do this--the same happens
> with:
>
> perl -e 'printf q/%1$vs/'
This was because "%vs" by itself did strange things. Same with "%
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338813: fixed in mp32ogg 0.11-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342928.
> reassign -1 doc-linux-nonfree
Bug#342928: doc-linux-text:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342922.
> severity -1 important
Bug#342922: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342921.
> reassign -1 doc-linux-nonfree
Bug#342921: doc-linux-text:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 342879 + confirmed
Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> block 342892 by 342879
Bug#342892: Incompatible with make 3.80+3.81.b3-1
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 342879
> retil
tags 342879 + confirmed
block 342892 by 342879
retile 342892 Make regression: all CDBS packages FTBFS, see #342879
thanks
Hi,
Attached is a sample Makefile which used to work in previous versions
of make.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
default: bar/foo
$(patsubst %,bar/%,
Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
Hi,
You know, as good bug reports go, this one is pretty
deficient; there is no useful information to go on, and the package
in question is not a small, self contained one to ease debugging, and
no effort has been made to dig deeper. I expected better from a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342917.
> severity -1 important
Bug#342917: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342916.
> reassign -1 doc-linux-nonfree
Bug#342916: doc-linux-text:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
> reassign 335220 doc-linux
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug reassigned from package `doc-linux-text' to `doc-linux'.
> clone 335220 -1
Bug#
The bug seems to be caused by the new make (3.80+3.81.b3-1).
The README.Debian lists several backwards incompatibility warnings for
this version. Possibly the build failure is caused by one of those.
The build succeeded after downgrading to make 3.80-12.
I'm not sure where this problem needs to
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342902: fixed in udev 0.076-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 342902 missing replaces on initramfs-tools
Bug#342902: upgrade fails
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:52:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 314988
> thanks
>
>
> > geomview (1.8.1-10) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* debian/control: Add "texinfo" to build-deps so that command "makeinfo"
> > is available. Closes: #338773.
> > .
> >* debian/contro
Package: klibc
Version: 1.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to build from source
I was trying to recover from yaird failing to create an initrd for the
new kernel and, to install initramfs-tools, had to try to build klibc
locally as it's not available from the mirrors for Sparc.
This r
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:31:34PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On 2005-11-14, I filed grave bug #339056: "Library package fails
> to include shlibs file" [0] on package tktable-dev [1] , on which my
> package saods9 build-depends. I'm concerned about this bug because 1)
> its RC; 2) I haven't he
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:52:17 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Package: udev
Version: 0.076-5
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace udev 0.076-4 (using .../archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement udev ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/u
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338334: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
You know, as good bug reports go, this one is pretty
deficient; there is no useful information to go on, and the package
in question is not a small, self contained one to ease debugging, and
no effort has been made to dig deeper. I expected better from a
fellow developer.
Am Sonntag, den 11.12.2005, 15:04 +0100 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> tag 342583 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi Andreas!
>
> Andreas Kostyrka [2005-12-08 9:23 -0800]:
> > postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which happens
> > to be 8.1 specific.
>
> libpq{4,-dev} is not version specific, it wor
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.32
Severity: serious
Hi,
Cdbs breaks for some packages when upgrading to make 3.80+3.81.b3-1.
This make version explicitely has incompatibilities with previous
versions, I'm afraid this has to be fixed on the side of CDBS.
The problem I encountered was with
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.12r-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
My hardware clock is set to localtime, not to GMT. And everything worked OK
until a few days ago.
Yesterday I noted that my system clock was an hour fast. I set it to a
valid value, rebooted the system, and (surprise!) the problem renewe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 340081 340852
Bug#340081: gpsd: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `floor'
Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'
Merged 340081 340852.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> block 342212 with 342875
Bug#342212: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';'
token
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 342875
>
End of message
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 13:32 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> package gpsd
> tags 340852 patch
> thanks control ;)
>
> I've fixed this in my merge of gpsd for Ubuntu. Attached is the
> (rather trivial) fix, though I suspect that a better solution would be
> to notify upstream of this problem and modify
merge 340081 340852
thanks
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:17 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: gpsd
> Version: 2.30-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> gpxlogger.o: In function
> `signal_handler':/build/buildd/gpsd-2.30/gpxlogger.c:6
> 7:
Package: make
Version: 3.80+3.81.b3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: render hundred of packages unbuildable
Hi,
Since version 3.80+3.81.b3-1 of make, all packages using cdbs fail to
build: example of digikam:
rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en
rmdir /bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 342212 -1
Bug#342212: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';'
token
Bug 342212 cloned as bug 342875.
> reassign -1 python2.3-numarray
Bug#342875: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';'
token
Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 285198 patch
Bug#285198: Manual edit of texmf.cnf not recommended
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 342583 moreinfo
Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1
specific.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
