Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338334: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 15:34:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 07:34:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZry4-0005kX-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 07:34:32 -0800
Received: from [217.251.234.173] (helo=[127.0.0.1])
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
id 1EZrxX-0005XE-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:34:00 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:28:33 +0100
From: Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tetex-doc: Debian changelog is missing
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious
The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc
directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12.7 of the
Policy Manual.
-- System Information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338334-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 15:11:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 07:11:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElSj1-000811-Tz; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?Frank_K=C3=BCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#338334: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-11
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 3.0-11
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_3.0-11.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-11.diff.gz
tetex-base_3.0-11.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-11.dsc
tetex-base_3.0-11_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-11_all.deb
tetex-doc_3.0-11_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_3.0-11_all.deb
tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:10:55 +0100
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
tetex-doc - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 261529 338334 341110
Changes:
tetex-base (3.0-11) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Since /etc/texmf is a real TEXMF tree now, TeX input files are no
longer treated as configuration files. Upon upgrade, unchanged files
are removed, changed ones are moved to appropriate directories where
they are found by kpathsea [frank]
* Install files in TEXMFDIST, i.e. /usr/share/texmf-tetex, and depend on
tex-common (>=0.12) [frank]
* Install changelog.Debian in tetex-doc, too (closes: #338334)
* Unset variables that might override texmf.cnf settings in postinst
[frank]
* Remove tetex-extra's format and log files when the package is removed,
thanks to Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (closes: #341110)
[frank]
* Install an updated copy of marvosym.pfb from CTAN, it is still buggy
in teTeX 3.0 (closes: #261529) [frank]
* dvips/config.ps: keep lines under 80 characters long [jdg]
Files:
99da90d5e1cf28c6cb2d2f8459155f18 794 tex optional tetex-base_3.0-11.dsc
8fcac46cd346416688d2c7ee5a1e53d8 341168 tex optional tetex-base_3.0-11.diff.gz
e02302f26e617ee42fcfbcfecc2a1b05 22387040 tex optional
tetex-base_3.0-11_all.deb
cfe0067a38cbb73636c7177c49ad7cd6 10821332 tex optional
tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb
fe05285d40cf85a683750ed5e8e6133d 50142326 doc optional tetex-doc_3.0-11_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDnDz2+xs9YyJS+hoRAgwfAJ9Y8rh15wGeBO5PgxPY3aghu5T77wCgstv7
0sRv500e/WOxP91k3jKcIPA=
=zHWq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
