Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> retitle 331293 libc6: atd needs to be restarted on upgrades
Bug#331293: at won't start any job at all : failure with pam
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Package: guile-1.6-slib
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Below is a script of my attempt to install this package. This follows
my attempt to install gnucash via aptitude, which failed, naturally.
Is there a way to resolve this dependency issue that I can try?
Thanks,
K
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:32:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333047: fixed in xzgv 0.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Trent Buck Wrote:
>This is trivial to fix by changing "usr/lib" in debian/chicken.dirs to
>"usr/lib/chicken" (unconfirmed, still building).
>
>
Actually, according to the FHS
(http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEUSRHIERARCHY), /usr/lib
should be read-only and shareable between insta
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:47:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335821: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:47:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326581: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:03:13AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> libglx is an xorg module. It is originally provided by the XFree86 DDX.
> Some drivers feel the need to provide an alternate version, and that's
> great. But nvidia's is entirely specific to nvidia. xserver-xorg's
> works with all t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 171617 + fixed
Bug#171617: libsdl1.2-dev: html documentation should be registered in doc-base
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 246477 + fixed
Bug#246477: Qemu fails to compile, broken sdl-config in libsdl1.2-dev
There were no tags set.
Tag
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 05:03:33AM -0600, Ross Johnson wrote:
> This might not be a kig problem, but it's a problem for kig to be in
> testing when its dependencies can't be met. Can we assign this bug
> somewhere else or merge this with an existing bug report?
To what end? This is not a bug t
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, wolftales wrote:
End of screen ouput:
Begin: Running /scripts/local-top ...
Done.
ALERT! /dev/sda1 does not exist. Dropping to a shell!
Oh, that might be not your controller's bug, but initramfs-tools bug. You
can either use yaird to generate your initrd (check out [0] o
The bug in subject is still present with mplayerplug-in 3.15.
I use debian sarge, so I downloaded the source from debian repository, i built
the package and I installed it.
But the bug in sarge is still present; it doesn't happen with the steps I
described in my bug, but happens often if you chan
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
Could you please check whether 2.6.14-2, which is currently in
unstable, still oopses/hangs with your controllers?
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 334766 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1543
Bug#334766: binutils: ld infinite loops on alpha
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1543.
>
End of message, stopping p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322262 serious
Bug#322262: parted: undefined symbol: ped_unit_get_name
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Package: mp32ogg
Version: 0.11-5
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
I had a directory full of Real Media videos (.rm), Quick Time movies
(.mov), MPEG-4 movies (.mp4) and MPEG Layer 3 audio files (.mp3).
I asked for a conversion of that directory in Ogg Vorbis files.
Unfo
re-sending this since my reply wasn't sopied to the bug report.
the current 2.6.14 has similar problems and is not workable either.
--- Begin Message ---
Jurij Smakov wrote:
Hi,
Could you please check whether 2.6.14-2, which is currently in
unstable, still oopses/hangs with your controllers?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 307947 + fixed
Bug#307947: bison-doc replaces files in bison
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed
> tag 309370 + fixed
Bug#309370: SIGSEGV on invalid %parse-param
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 325738 + fixed
Bug#325738: biso
Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 01:41:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338612: libpcre-ocaml* missing dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 16:32:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330371: fixed in cdrtools 4:2.01+01a03-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Hi,
> > 1. I don't understand why it has to be removed; it's an
> > interface that has been used, and not documented as
> > deprecated anywhere.
>
> I'm not usre that one can say initex _has to_ be removed
> but at least it is reasonable to remove it in teTeX3.0
> as I already explained. Fur
This one time, at band camp, Daniel Stone said:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:21:32PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Right, I was talking about having xserver-xorg do it as well. Let me
> > rephrase a bit:
> >
> > I believe the nvidia packages in debian are doing it right now because
> > they had
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> notfound 333552 0-1
Bug#333552: reading from dev/urandom is useless and drains entropy
Bug marked as not found in version 0-1.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> cl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> reopen 338675
Bug#338675: glabels - not bin-nmu save
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:21:32PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Right, I was talking about having xserver-xorg do it as well. Let me
> rephrase a bit:
>
> I believe the nvidia packages in debian are doing it right now because
> they had to be coinstallable with xserver-xfree86. Since xorg is the
This one time, at band camp, Daniel Stone said:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:03:12PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This has been an ongoing thing, I thought, and could be solved with a
> > dpkg-divert, rather than a conflicts line.
>
> Yes, as nvidia-glx already does for libGLcore. It hasn't upd
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:03:12PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This has been an ongoing thing, I thought, and could be solved with a
> dpkg-divert, rather than a conflicts line.
Yes, as nvidia-glx already does for libGLcore. It hasn't updated its
diversions for xserver-xorg yet, so it spuriously
This one time, at band camp, Daniel Stone said:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:21:06AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:52:45PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Obviously, this is nvidia-glx's problem, not xorg's.
> >
> > The nvidia-glx package exists, and was here first.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:26:13PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached a dpatch file to fix this bug. The code is taken
> from upstream CVS. I still don't see why previous version of the glibc
> were built successfully, the tls support was probably broken for them.
I worke
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 147187 1.1.3-6.1
Bug#147187: xdelta: Deltas generated on i386 fail to apply on alpha
Bug marked as found in version 1.1.3-6.1.
> severity 147187 grave
Bug#147187: xdelta: Deltas generated on i386 fail to apply on alpha
Severity set to `grave'.
>
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:21:06AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:52:45PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Obviously, this is nvidia-glx's problem, not xorg's.
>
> The nvidia-glx package exists, and was here first. You don't get to say
> it's somebody else's problem when
Package: backupninja
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
The program contains at least one bashism and will not set with /bin/sh
pointed to ash.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/backup.d>backupninja --now --debug
/usr/sbin/backupninja: 22: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
zsh: exit 2 backupninja --now --deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 335821 + patch
Bug#335821: glibc: ftbfs [sparc] tls-macros.h:735:3: error: #error "No support
for this architecture so far."
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
tag 335821 + patch
thanks
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:26:13PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I am currently building a test version, but it takes very long as I am
> building a lot of things at the same time on the machine. However, the
> sparc-sparc64 flavour has already been built, so I suppose t
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
currently running with my master openldap from rh9 and 5 slaves
running sarge. Trying to put the master on sarge.
First problem was startup of slurpd gives the folowing
slurpd -d 0
Error: : directory speci
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:17:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325272: fixed in skksearch 0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:02:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338098: fixed in extlib 1.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:21:29PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Please provide a 'initex' that prints out a warning that
> > it is being deprecated for etch.
>
> This would break the fundamental initex feature as documented
> in its manual.
>
> I can understand that you've been considerinig
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:47:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304638: fixed in grub2 1.91-0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:02:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336377: fixed in ion3 20051029-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:05:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 338773 pending
Bug#338773: geomview: FTBFS: makeinfo not found
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
tags 338773 pending
thanks
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:04:07PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Adding texinfo to Build-Depends fixes this.
Done. Thanks for the note.
-Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12.11.05 Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
> anyway, the following changes will be applied to Debian whizzytex default
> configuration to work around the problem.
>
> --- whizzytexrc 24 Mar 2005 23:19:26 - 1.4
> +++ whizzytexrc 12 Nov 2005 03:42:20 -
>
Package: ghc-cvs
Version: 20050331-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package ghc-cvs in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 338432 + fixed
Bug#338432: chasen: cannot open shared library
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
Hi,
Please find attached a dpatch file to fix this bug. The code is taken
from upstream CVS. I still don't see why previous version of the glibc
were built successfully, the tls support was probably broken for them.
I am currently building a test version, but it takes very long as I am
building a
As cl-ironclad has been upgrade to 0.10, I found that now I can compile
it correctly, so this bug may be closed.
Thanks
--
GnuPG Key: 0xF7C63B10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: geomview
Version: 1.8.1-9
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
building the package geomview in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/geomview
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 316030 + pending
Bug#316030: SystemError: dynamic module not initalized correctky
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 337309 + pending
Bug#337309: openoffice.org-core: pulls a complete Java environment
There were no tags set.
Tags a
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 07:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330034: fixed in plptools 0.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 333831 important
Bug#333831: kernel-image-2.6.12: Hangs on boot loading ide-cd
Severity set to `important'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Could you tell us what ramdisk generation tool you used (yaird or
> initramfs-tools, probably yaird)
yaird.
> and if you could try to blacklist the ide-cd
> module while booting (at worse just move it somewhere else), and once booted
> try to load it by hand, and send us wh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 326471 minor
Bug#326471: Package ndiswrapper-utils depends on ndiswrapper-modules-* .
Severity set to `minor'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
severity 326471 minor
thanks
No, it's really not uninstallable if you have the modules package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 338715 xserver-xorg 6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2,nvidia-glx
quit
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:52:45PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 02:17:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The xserver-xorg package in experimental can't be installed on a system
> > where nvidia-glx is also
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 338715 xserver-xorg 6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2,nvidia-glx
Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx
Bug reassigned from package `nvidia-glx' to `xserver-xorg'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: ndiswrapper-utils
Version: 1.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #326471
Hello,
I've bumped severity to grave as this missing dependency renders
ndiswrapper-utils uninstallable.
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:57:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338675: glabels - not bin-nmu save
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 326471 grave
Bug#326471: Package ndiswrapper-utils depends on ndiswrapper-modules-* .
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:47:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337457: fixed in tagcoll 1.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 338715 nvidia-glx
Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `nvidia-glx'.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
reassign 338715 nvidia-glx
kthxbye
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 02:17:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The xserver-xorg package in experimental can't be installed on a system
> where nvidia-glx is also installed:
>
> # dpkg -i ../xserver-xorg_6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2.1_i386.deb
> (Reading database ... 1
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.2.0-rc1.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source since gcc on sparc doesn't know
the -march option.
| Automatic build of asterisk_1:1.2.0-rc1.dfsg-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
| Build started at 20051112
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:39:01AM +, Simon Waters wrote:
> > We would like to know if your bug (Hangs on boot loading ide-cd) is
> still present with the 2.6.14-2 packages currently in unstable ?
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> thanks for the response.
>
> 2.6.14-2?
>
> 2.6.14-1 doesn't work same error..
Package: bluez-utils
Version: 2.19-1
Severity: serious
See policy 10.6: packages must use MAKEDEV instead of calling mknod.
Please remember that there is no need to check for udev or devfs in the
script, because MAKEDEV does it internally.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
Package: sl-modem-source
Version: 2.9.9d-7
Severity: serious
See policy 10.6: packages must use MAKEDEV instead of calling mknod.
(Please remember that there is no need to check for udev or devfs in the
script, because MAKEDEV does it internally.)
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Dig
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336939: fixed in binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336175: fixed in binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333980: fixed in binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334626: fixed in binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334626: fixed in binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327780: fixed in binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326103: fixed in binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326103: fixed in binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326103: fixed in binutils 2.16.1cvs20051109-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 317971 + fixed
Bug#317971: ia32-libs: CAN-2005-2096: old version of zlib
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed
> tag 334346 + fixed
Bug#334346: please remove zlib packages from ia32-libs for amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 33
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:17:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338712: fixed in wv2 0.2.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
This might not be a kig problem, but it's a problem for kig to be in
testing when its dependencies can't be met. Can we assign this bug
somewhere else or merge this with an existing bug report? I can't
install kde in testing because it depends the problem originally
posted. How did kig get i
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285831: fixed in scsitools 0.8-1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from
tetex and no longer functions.
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:44:30 +0900
> 1. I don't understand why it has to be removed; it's an
> interface that has been used, and not documented
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 338269 by 336114
Bug#338269: knights: fails to start
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 336114
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:02:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325270: fixed in dbskkd-cdb 1:1.01-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
The xserver-xorg package in experimental can't be installed on a system
where nvidia-glx is also installed:
# dpkg -i ../xserver-xorg_6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2.1_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 126792 files and directories currently in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 338669 gnumeric 1.6.0 FTBFS against goffice 0.1.1
Bug#338669: gnumeric: FTBFS on powerpc
Changed Bug title.
> tags 338669 + confirmed upstream pending
Bug#338669: gnumeric 1.6.0 FTBFS against goffice 0.1.1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: co
retitle 338669 gnumeric 1.6.0 FTBFS against goffice 0.1.1
tags 338669 + confirmed upstream pending
thanks
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 18:09:32 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> gnumeric still has a problem building from source.
In goffice, gog_object_write_xml and gog_persist_dom_save have been remove
Package: libwv2-1c2
Version: 0.2.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
libwv2-1c2 is not installable in a pure sid environment anymore as it
depends on libgsf-1 which is no longer in sid as a result of a library
versioning changed announced previously
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/10/msg0
Package: pxlib1
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
pxlib1 is not installable in a pure sid environment anymore as it depends on
libgsf-1 which is no longer in sid as a result of a library versioning
changed announced previously
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/10/msg00020.htm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 336114 + pending
Bug#336114: gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9 backwards incompatible changes
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 01:03:49 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329664: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 01:03:49 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329664: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 321427 + fixed
Bug#321427: mozilla-mailnews: Upgrading to 1.7.10 causes UI problems with
Mozilla mail
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 327366 + fixed
Bug#327366: [CAN-2005-2871] IDN buffer overflow [MFSA 2005-57]
Tags were: fixed up
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.15-4
Severity: grave
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 03:44:38PM +0200, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> I have again a misterious build problem on s390:
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=quagga&ver=0.99.1-7&arch=s390&stamp=1130456712&file=log&as=raw
>
> epstopdf --outfil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 338700 grep
Bug#338700: libcpre3: grep fails on boot when /usr/lib on different partition
from /lib
Warning: Unknown package 'libcpre3'
Bug reassigned from package `libcpre3' to `grep'.
> tags 338700 + fixed
Bug#338700: libcpre3: grep fails o
reassign 338700 grep
tags 338700 + fixed
thanks
* David Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-12 01:02]:
> My /usr treeis on a different disc partition than the boot partition
> / So when grep is trying to run to start and set up the system it
> cannot find libpcre.so.3 so most of the system fails.
94 matches
Mail list logo
