Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:05:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 12:00:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 05:00:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EUjxB-0007h4-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:00:25 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 16so290423nzp
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        
h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        
b=cxKJ2yEKei8qTJpk7xh4anVzsP1xHovoLIeoXEvS7UXiAjn6jx4yYFVlHPz93mKdJfAQEkKkULUx4i3iTOEvjzcBL/JKiscdNho0X9dbStfw8IKK/Jaa2s4JcfU+VD5dr7PxCWwzkkN8b18Qv7AjKZFCKpP1Gmomz03fKQBM2FQ=
Received: by 10.36.109.15 with SMTP id h15mr956132nzc;
        Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.214.1.201? ( [218.108.31.122])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 10sm632442nzo.2005.10.26.05.00.20;
        Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Disposition-Notification-To: binghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 20:02:29 +0800
From: binghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Zhejiang University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051025 
SeaMonkey/1.1a
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot compile and load
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: cl-ironclad
Version: 0.9.0.dfsg-1
Severity: serious

I use '(clc:clc-require :ironclad)' to compile it, all of them get just errors 
in cmucl, sbcl and clisp:

[cmucl]
Type-error in KERNEL::OBJECT-NOT-TYPE-ERROR-HANDLER:  NIL is not of type REAL
   [Condition of type TYPE-ERROR]

Restarts:
  0: [ABORT] Return to Top-Level.

Debug  (type H for help)

(MAX 1 NIL)[:EXTERNAL]
Source: 
; File: target:code/numbers.lisp
(DEFUN MAX (NUMBER &REST MORE-NUMBERS)
  "Returns the greatest of its arguments."
  (DECLARE (OPTIMIZE #) (REAL NUMBER) (DYNAMIC-EXTENT MORE-NUMBERS))
  ...)
0] 

[sbcl]
debugger invoked on a TYPE-ERROR in thread #<THREAD "initial thread" {90032C1}>:
  The value NIL is not of type REAL.

Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL.

restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name):
  0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level.

(MAX NIL)
0] 
;; Compiling file /usr/share/common-lisp/source/ironclad/sha256.lisp ...
*** - SYSTEM::%RPLACD: NIL is not a pair
The following restarts are available:
USE-VALUE      :R1      You may input a value to be used instead.
RETRY          :R2      
Retry performing #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL #x2044C05E> on 
#<IRONCLAD-SYSTEM::IRONCLAD-SOURCE-FILE
  "sha256" #x20445896>.
ACCEPT         :R3      
Continue, treating #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL #x2044C05E> on 
#<IRONCLAD-SYSTEM::IRONCLAD-SOURCE-FILE
  "sha256" #x20445896> as having been successful.
ABORT          :R4      ABORT
Break 1 CRYPTO[2]> 

In both cmucl and sbcl, It seems that something about the function 'max', but I 
just find two line in 'ironclad.asd' which use the function 'max':

(defmethod perform :around ((op compile-op) (c ironclad-source-file))
  (let ((*readtable* *ironclad-readtable*)
        (*print-base* 10)               ; INTERN'ing FORMAT'd symbols
        #+sbcl (sb-ext:*inline-expansion-limit* (max 
sb-ext:*inline-expansion-limit* 1000))
                                                 ~~~ here
        #+sbcl (*features* (cons sb-c:*backend-byte-order* *features*))
        #+cmu (ext:*inline-expansion-limit* (max ext:*inline-expansion-limit* 
1000))
                                             ~~~ and here
        #+cmu (*features* (cons (c:backend-byte-order c:*target-backend*) 
*features*)))
    (call-next-method)))

And clisp seems so buggy, most of cl-* packages in Debian cannot load 
correctly...

I can't point out what's the problem, but this package is so useful, I hope you 
can fix it... Thank you very much.

-- 
(setq reply-to
  (concatenate 'string "Binghe " "<tianchunbinghe" '(#\@) "gmail.com>"))



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 335868-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2005 18:04:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 12 10:04:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [80.241.175.250] (helo=vs5189.areaserver.it)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EazkI-0007hw-O1
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:04:59 -0800
Received: from nanneddu (vs5189.areaserver.it [80.241.175.189])
        by vs5189.areaserver.it (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jACI4u7I023339
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:04:56 +0100
Received: by nanneddu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 4FF937F472; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:05:02 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Bug closed
From: Alceste Scalas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-U245xnv+DcGBtUQYw21w"
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:05:01 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--=-U245xnv+DcGBtUQYw21w
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: cl-ironclad
Version: 0.10

  * Removed :static-file components from ironclad.asd: they are now
    under /usr/share/doc/cl-ironclad/, and (clc-require) doesn't
    appreciate missing files.  (Closes: #335868)

--=20
Alceste Scalas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--=-U245xnv+DcGBtUQYw21w
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDdi7NjNQAc7KwCn8RAvy7AJ9zlIuPE+c9tALKETUfGs4/bdDA9wCbB2fu
b/nBwIZngkd6zRJVPXoxqv4=
=W7Lx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-U245xnv+DcGBtUQYw21w--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to