Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:33:51 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in latest upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Package: vym
Version: 1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-2
Severity: grave
Hi
There is a dependency on libqt3c102-mt which makes vym uninstallable on
i386 .
I think a rebuild is necessary.
Greetings
Steffen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'
Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>>Are there several modprobe's running in parallel? Or does modprobe
>
> Yes.
>
Is this supposed to be synchronized in user space, or in the
kernel?
Regards
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 337864 with 336167
Bug#337864: ncpfs_2.2.6-2_mipsel: FTBFS: internal compiler error: Floating
point exception
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 336167, 336463
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Package: php-net-checkip
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Your debian/copyright file is missing the verbatim copy of the license
that is required by Debian policy 12.5.
Regards,
--
Göran Weinholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer, sysadmin, netadmin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
Package: dancer-ircd
Version: 1.0.36-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I installed dancer-ircd on a freshly installed etch system. I copied a
working config from a working irc server into /etc/dancer-ircd. The
server fails to start. When i run dancer-ircd by hand on the
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote:
package libdevice-serialport-perl
found 324877 1.002-0.2
tag 324877 - fixed
thanks
I'm still seeing the original build failure for
libdevice-serialport-perl with the latest upload, using pbuilder:
Are you sure you are using the latest upload? I can
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:32:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311835: fixed in haskell-cabal 1.1.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: udev
Version: 0.072-2
Followup-For: Bug #337881
First, sorry for my english:
The udev package dont isntall properly because udevd is running. I have
killed the udevd process and then make dpkg --configure --pending and
the udev have been installed right.
-- Package-specific info:
-- /e
Ardo van Rangelrooij ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >> Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > tags 328749 patch
> > >> > thanks
> > >>
I don't think the crash from glibc has anything to do with the /dev/fd0*
warnings, since they appear even when the crash is worked around as per
my previous message.
--
Jeff Bonham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key ID: BA289747
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I've found that this bug only occurs when there is no volume specified
in the config. If you work around it by creating a volume, you can get
a basilisk2 emulation window, but the program still crashes after with a
SIGSEGV.
--
Jeff Bonham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key ID: BA289747
signature
Package: basilisk2
Version: 0.9.20050730-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After applying the workaround for bug #337496, the following crash
occurs:
Basilisk II V1.0 by Christian Bauer et al.
Reading ROM file...
WARNING: Cannot open /dev/fd0u1440 (No such file or director
Your message dated Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:58:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337797: xbase-clients: [beforelight] beforelight hangs my
system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> tags 337865 patch pending upstream
Bug#337865: udev - udevd fails to timeout events if the kernel have no inotify
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending, upstream
>
End of
Package: udev
Version: 0.072-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When upgrading to 0.072-2, the following occured:
Setting up udev (0.072-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/udev-mtab ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/udev ...
Installi
smalsa.so': No such file
> or directory
> dh_install: command returned error code 256
> make: *** [binary-arch-helper] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20051106-2327
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bas
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:01:26AM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >Package: ncpfs
> >Severity: serious
> >Version: 2.2.6-2
> >Tags: sid
> >Justification: fails to build from source
> >
> >There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> >
> >Aut
Package: hula
Version: 0.1.0+svn379-2.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of hula_0.1.0+svn379-2.1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libssl-dev,
Package: drivel
Version: 2.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
drivel fails to build on Alpha:
[...]
if alpha-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
-DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\""/usr/share/locale"\"
-DDRIVEL_GLADE_DIR=\"/usr/share/drivel/glade\"
-DDRIVEL_GLADE_FILE
Package: crash
Version: 4.0-2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
crash fails to build on Alpha:
[...]
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I.
-I./../include -I./../intl -I../intl -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -c
Package: fvwm1
Version: 1.24r-47
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
fvwm1 fails to build on Alpha:
[...]
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/X11R6/include-Dlinux
-D__alpha__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SO
Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:30:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337702: openoffice.org 2.0 won't start since upgrade, libc
problem?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:01:26AM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>Package: ncpfs
>Severity: serious
>Version: 2.2.6-2
>Tags: sid
>Justification: fails to build from source
>
>There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
>Automatic build of ncpfs_2.2.6-2 on rem by sbuild/mips
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks installer
All installations of unstable now end as follows:
Need to get 23.3MB of archives. After unpacking 87.5MB will be used.
Writing extended state information... Error!
E: failed to rename /var/lib/aptitude/pk
Package: udev
Version: 0.72-2
Severity: grave
udevd fails to timeout events if it runs on a kernel without inotify.
The attached patch fixes the select call.
Bastian
--
Actual war is a very messy business. Very, very messy business.
-- Kirk, "A Taste of Armageddon", stardate 31
Package: ncpfs
Severity: serious
Version: 2.2.6-2
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of ncpfs_2.2.6-2 on rem by sbuild/mipsel 69
Build started at 20051028-2357
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied b
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:47:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336455: fixed in lincvs 1.4.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 332835 +patch
Bug#332835: xdb: Please undergo the C++ 'c2' transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
diff -urN xdb-1.2.0.lastupload/debian/changelog xdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog
--- xdb-1.2.0.lastupload/debian/changelog 2005-11-06 23:19:35.0 +0100
+++ xdb-1.2.0/debian/changelog 2005-11-06 23:14:56.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xdb (1.2.0-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer
Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:34:29 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #337830,
regarding Security problem in kphone
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) kphone-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: I
Now the 'missing' messages are showing up, but in the wrong month's
archives!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 329454 + patch
tags 331086 + patch
thanks
Here a patch to solve this bug.
--
Regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>!
Package: tar
Version: 1.15.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package tar in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/tar-1.15.1/tests'
/usr/bin/m
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Starting any openoffice.org program fails:
~$ oowriter
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 224: 17544 Segmentation fault
"$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@"
~$ ooffice
/usr/lib/openoffice/progra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 337830 + security
Bug#337830: Security problem in kphone
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
> thanks bts programm
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:35:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337813: fixed in gtk+2.0-directfb 2.0.9.2-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:37:58 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326420: fixed in licq 1.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 327934 !
Bug#327934: boson-base: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Changed Bug submitter from Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Adeodato Simó
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 327949 !
Bug#327949: python-kde3: uninst
[Thomas Petazzoni]
> Maybe it's a problem around libneon24 (linked against openssl0.9.7)
> and the fact that subversion is linked against openssl 0.9.8.
Since you have a ready test case for this, can you try the neon package
at http://www.barcikacomp.hu/deb/libneon25_0.25.4.dfsg-1_i386.deb, as
me
First, apologies for the delayed response - I didn't get the BTS mail
until the other day, possibly because of the known mail backlog
affecting certain Debian services.
> svn: MKCOL of
> '/svn/thomas/!svn/wrk/b82d4a0a-4a04-0410-8ac2-c33f329d32ff/uclibc-sos/trunk/test/string':
> Could not read sta
Package: kphone
Version: 4.2-3
Severity: serious
I think I have found a security flaw in kphone:
it creates ~/.qt/kphonerc world-readable! This file contains the user's
SIP-password and so on, so I guess this is a bad thing, because the
~/.qt dir itself is by default also readable by everybody.
I
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:47:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337794: fixed in libhtml-fromtext-perl 2.05-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335506: fixed in gnumed-client 0.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
tags 337794 pending
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCC'd
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:09:48PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> building the package libhtml-fromtext-perl in a clean sid build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: [...]
OK, this bug was triggered by the latest libhtml-parser-perl
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:17:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337450: fixed in qterm 0.4.0pre3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 317435 + patch
Bug#317435: FTBFS (gcc change) and numerous security holes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:47:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319230: fixed in nevow 0.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 337794 pending
Bug#337794: libhtml-fromtext-perl: FTBFS: Failing tests
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: pending
> thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCC'd
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Hi,
Due to this bug, speakup is not available in testing, while with the
attached simple patch speakup compiles and boots fine.
Please apply.
Regards,
Samuel
--- kernel-image-speakup-i386-2.4.27-orig/debian/control2005-02-25
21:27:18.0 +0100
+++ kernel-image-speakup-i386-2.4.27/
Package: tse3
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of tse3_0.3.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
> -I. -I../../.. -I../../../src-fP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> reopen 333052
Bug#333052: race in the modules loader?
Bug#333522: udev: modules randomly aren't loaded at startup - "Unknown symbol"
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of mes
On Nov 06, Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hadn't seen Rusty's patch on Debian's bts, until you mentioned
> it. I have applied both patches now, and rebooted twice: By now
> it worked. But that's what I thought before.
It cannot be relevant, because when the bug is triggered / is stil
Pozsar Balazs wrote:
>
> Well, that's really wierd, It Should Work(tm) :)
> Did you apply both patches (Rusty's + mine), or only the latter?
>
I hadn't seen Rusty's patch on Debian's bts, until you mentioned
it. I have applied both patches now, and rebooted twice: By now
it worked. But that's wh
Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb0
Version: 2.0.9.2-11
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 3.5
Hi,
After install libgtk+2.0-directfb0 in a fresh chroot, here is the ouput
of ldd:
# ldd /usr/lib/directfb/libgtk-directfb-2.0.so.0
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libgdk_p
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:46:55 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265063: fixed in tse3 0.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 336278 + pending
Bug#336278: FTBFS: No match for operator<<
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Followup-For: Bug #334613
I haven't upgraded Sid in several weeks--is it possible that something's
significantly different in the conf files such that choosing to keep my
old one is a problem?
Hmm. I see in the tetex files under /tmp that the map files have
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > tags 328749 patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
> >> experimental installed:
> >
> > Now that teTeX 3.0 is in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 337346 grave
Bug#337346: guile-1.6-libs: slib.scm doesn't support slib 3a2
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 337358 grave
Bug#337358: libguil0: slib.scm doesn't support slib 3a2
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ?? Whatever I do with slib forces the removal of g-wrap ??
Please read the bug log to which you were appending.
(http://bugs.debian.org/337359).
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
Package: libasis-3.15p-1-dev
Version: 3.15p-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
compiling the Debian package gch in current unstable (tested on i386 and
sparc) results in:
===
[...]
gnatmake -j2 -Pgch
gnatgcc -c -o /tmp/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 337794 confirmed
Bug#337794: libhtml-fromtext-perl: FTBFS: Failing tests
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCC'd
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
tags 337794 confirmed
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCC'd
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:09:48PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> building the package libhtml-fromtext-perl in a clean sid build environment
> (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: [...]
Reproducable here, thanks for the pointer. Hmm, strange, mu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # not fixed in 0.9.3-1.1, see
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=sim&ver=0.9.3-1.1&arch=alpha&stamp=1128326800&file=log&as=raw
> tags 300930 - fixed
Bug#300930: sim: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'const char*' to 'unsigned
int' loses precisi
Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:48:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337625: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Framebuffer module for
NVIDIA card not loaded in initrd
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
# not fixed in 0.9.3-1.1, see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=sim&ver=0.9.3-1.1&arch=alpha&stamp=1128326800&file=log&as=raw
tags 300930 - fixed
thanks
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:33:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337766: svk: missing dependency to libsvn-core-perl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337785: fixed in ipw2100 1.1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337785: fixed in ipw2100 1.1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336082: fixed in ipw2100 1.1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 07:17:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336082: fixed in ipw2100 1.1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:55:07AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Package: librplay3-dev
> Version: 3.3.2-9
> Severity: serious
> File: /usr/include/rplay.h
>
> Per Policy §3.5, librplay3-dev should depend on libc6-dev | libc6-dev.
This should probably have been "libc6-dev | libc-dev"
Gruesse,
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:50:05PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> > For testing I have added it to Debian's
> > module-init-tools 3.2-pre9. Works for me.
> >
>
> No, it doesn't. After the 3rd reboot the
> problem was back.
Well, that's really wierd, It Should Work(tm)
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale
Package: libhtml-fromtext-perl
Version: 2.05-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libhtml-fromtext-perl in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
#
# Comprehensive d
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:32:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333079: fixed in rcconf 1.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 337785 grave
Bug#337785: module-build failes with ieee80211-1.1.6
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 337785 336082
Bug#336082: ipw2100-source: does not build against recent ieee80211
Bug#337785: module-build failes with ieee80211-1.1.6
Merged 33
Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> For testing I have added it to Debian's
> module-init-tools 3.2-pre9. Works for me.
>
No, it doesn't. After the 3rd reboot the
problem was back.
Regards
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: librplay3-dev
Version: 3.3.2-9
Severity: serious
File: /usr/include/rplay.h
Per Policy §3.5, librplay3-dev should depend on libc6-dev | libc6-dev.
Its header file references C library headers, and if those are not
installed, the compilation of source code which #includes rplay.h will
fai
Package: libnjb-hotplug
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
since udev 0.71-1 is into testing, hotplug has been removed and the
configuration of libnjb-hotplug is not used anymore by udev.
I dont really understand how it works but it doesnt :)
thanks,
k
On Nov 2, 2005, at 12:53, Alexander Wirt wrote:
if I start gobby, quits it segfaults the next if I try to start it.
An strace looks like that it has problems while reading the xml
config.
I cannot trace this bug back to /anything/ useful, I am sorry.
Currently I am hoping that the new upstr
Package: libnumerix-ocaml
Version: 0.19-5.1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is what I obtain when trying to install libnumerix-ocaml
# apt-get install libnumerix-ocaml
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libnumerix-ocaml: Depends: libgmp3 but it i
gftp crashes when downloading directories which contains other
directories. In fact, since a month or two, I can't use gftp without a
segfault each time I use it...
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:24:44PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Nicolas a écrit :
> >Package: gftp
> >Version: 2.0.18-10
> >Followu
Kurt Roeckx @ 2005-06-12 (Sunday), 23:05 (+0200)
> You should be using something like dpkg --print-architecture or
> dpkg-architecture instead.
Would this patch do the trick?
--
/Martin
diff -ur checkinstall-1.5.3/checkinstall checkinstall-patched-1.5.3/checkinstall
--- checkinstall-1.5.3/checkins
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 333958 patch
Bug#333958: blender - build puts files outside of the build directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:47:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330851: fixed in pxe 1.4.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:21:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335402: penguin-command: shouldn't this bug be closed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:32:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337304: fixed in slang2 2.0.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Nicolas a écrit :
Package: gftp
Version: 2.0.18-10
Followup-For: Bug #324912
gftp regularly crashes, it's almost unusable. Is someone trying to debug
that ?
This bug report is pretty useless without a way to reproduce the craches
you observed. Could you send me that?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:02:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333522: fixed in module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:02:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333522: fixed in module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 337249 unreproducable help
Unknown tag/s: unreproducable.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fix
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 330895 patch
Bug#330895: blender [CVE-2005-3302]: Arbitrary code execution when importing a
.bvh file
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> reassign 333052 module-init-tools
Bug#333052: race in the modules loader?
Bug#333522: udev: modules randomly aren't loaded at startup - "Unknown symbol"
Bug reassigned from package `li
Package: slib
Version: 3a2-1
Followup-For: Bug #337359
>From a normal apt-get upgrade:
Setting up slib (3a2-1) ...
ERROR: Unbound variable: with-load-pathname
dpkg: error processing slib (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while
tags 337249 unreproducable help
severity 337249 normal
thanks
On Thursday 03 November 2005 19:38, Hanuš Adler wrote:
> I'm attaching both. I am afraid I can't tell when this started to
> happen -- last time I was using it sometimes in August, and then it
> did work okay.
Thanks for the traces, no
tags 330895 patch
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:51:35 +0200, Joxean Koret wrote:
> The bvh_import.py script supplied with the current Debian Stable and (I
> think) unstable versions of Blender is vulnerable to arbitrary code
> execution.
This time the patch is dpatch'yfied
On Nov 05, Pozsar Balazs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With my patch, modprobe waits until the needed modules come out of the
> "Loading" or "Unloading" state.
Looks like it works, I will upload a new package today.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
