Your message dated Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337813: fixed in gtk+2.0-directfb 2.0.9.2-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2005 17:16:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 06 09:16:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYo7z-0002f5-00; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:16:23 -0800
Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:211:9ff:feed:c498])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EYo7x-0007rN-KI; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:16:21 +0100
Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EYo7x-0004vU-Fj; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:16:21 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgtk+2.0-directfb0: missing dependencies on libglib2.0-0,
libpango1.0-0,
etc.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:16:21 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb0
Version: 2.0.9.2-11
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 3.5
Hi,
After install libgtk+2.0-directfb0 in a fresh chroot, here is the ouput
of ldd:
# ldd /usr/lib/directfb/libgtk-directfb-2.0.so.0
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => not found
libgdk-directfb-2.0.so.0 => not found
libdirectfb-0.9.so.22 => /usr/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.22 (0x55700000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x5574c000)
libfusion-0.9.so.22 => /usr/lib/libfusion-0.9.so.22 (0x55760000)
libdirect-0.9.so.22 => /usr/lib/libdirect-0.9.so.22 (0x55765000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x5576e000)
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => not found
libpango-1.0.so.0 => not found
libatk-1.0.so.0 => not found
libgobject-2.0.so.0 => not found
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => not found
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x55781000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => not found
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x55786000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x557ab000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000)
I don't know how the dependencies should be computed for the .udeb
packages, but at least for the .deb packages, you can use
${shlibs:Depends} . This is the purpose of the patch below.
Bye,
Aurelien
diff -u gtk+2.0-directfb-2.0.9.2/debian/control
gtk+2.0-directfb-2.0.9.2/debian/control
--- gtk+2.0-directfb-2.0.9.2/debian/control
+++ gtk+2.0-directfb-2.0.9.2/debian/control
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
Section: libs
Provides: libgtk-directfb-2.0-0
Architecture: i386 ia64 arm alpha hppa mips mipsel sparc powerpc s390 m68k
amd64 kfreebsd-i386
-Depends: libc6 | libc, libdirectfb-0.9-22
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: gtk+2.0 implementation for the frame buffer
DirectFB is a thin library that provides hardware graphics acceleration, input
device handling and abstraction, integrated windowing system with support for
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 337813-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2005 19:21:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 06 11:21:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYq0s-00017X-00; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:17:10 -0800
From: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#337813: fixed in gtk+2.0-directfb 2.0.9.2-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:17:10 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gtk+2.0-directfb
Source-Version: 2.0.9.2-12
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtk+2.0-directfb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-12.diff.gz
gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-12.dsc
to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-12.dsc
libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev_2.0.9.2-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev_2.0.9.2-12_i386.deb
libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.0.9.2-12_i386.udeb
to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.0.9.2-12_i386.udeb
libgtk+2.0-directfb0_2.0.9.2-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/libgtk+2.0-directfb0_2.0.9.2-12_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gtk+2.0-directfb
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:13:19 +0000
Source: gtk+2.0-directfb
Binary: libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev libgtk+2.0-directfb0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.9.2-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev - gtk+2.0 implementation for the frame buffer,
development files
libgtk+2.0-directfb0 - gtk+2.0 implementation for the frame buffer
libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb - gtk+2.0 implementation for the frame buffer (udeb)
Closes: 337505 337813
Changes:
gtk+2.0-directfb (2.0.9.2-12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Make libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev depend on pkg-config.
* Add dependencies to -dev: libatk1.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libpango1.0-dev.
Closes: #337505.
* Update 20_no_rpath.patch to account for build changes introduced
to build on kfreebsd-i386.
* Add ${shlibs:Depends} for libgtk+2.0-directfb0. Closes: #337813.
Files:
5d22f19ab785377a6581957c9723d248 897 libs optional
gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-12.dsc
0bbe348b7866b67df0d1b74bb133e787 5734 libs optional
gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-12.diff.gz
36e5f3461fe54377d88bf84192372ac0 946222 debian-installer extra
libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.0.9.2-12_i386.udeb
b323359e272b655cfa75d11a8c102567 3228684 libdevel optional
libgtk+2.0-directfb-dev_2.0.9.2-12_i386.deb
2b1a84607e5b14e9b1d88ce23a3b5f97 986662 libs optional
libgtk+2.0-directfb0_2.0.9.2-12_i386.deb
Package-Type: udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDblKPQTK/kCo4XFcRAmLjAKCC2EEkwp08HP/tfNWCpeekolqPmgCgkfto
qkDn89eix9eioTG9AfzfkXU=
=SK5k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
