Processed: fixed upstream

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package fl-cow Ignoring bugs not assigned to: fl-cow > tags 326864 fixed-upstream Bug#326864: fl-cow: FTBFS: ./flcow-test.sh: line 3: 26795 Segmentation fault There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#326864: fixed upstream

package fl-cow tags 326864 fixed-upstream thanks Updating the package to 0.5 fixes this. -rob -- Banks and banks of humming machinery... signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#315069: Intention to NMU

Hi, In the article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if > you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a > patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Please go ahea

Bug#334460: imms: 100% CPU Usage

Package: imms Version: 2.1.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When enabling IMMS, or starting XMMS with IMMS enabled, XMMS' process uses 100% CPU and the GUI locks up. (The current song if any plays to completion.) Nothing happens if there is nothing in the playlist, but

Bug#334423: marked as done ([CAN-2005-3120] buffer overflow in nntp schema handling)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:02:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334423: fixed in lynx-cur 2.8.6-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#334344: marked as done (r-cran-gtkdevice causes R to segfault on window destruction)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:47:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334344: fixed in gtkdevice 1.9.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#334122: marked as done (Receive an "Segmentation fault" when launching gramps)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:26:58 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334122: Receive an "Segmentation fault" when launching gramps has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#329384: marked as done (hylafax: Temporary file vulnerability in xferfaxstats and other security concerns)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:46:56 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line recording fixed version properly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#196590: marked as done (stable is missing several security updates)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:03:32 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line adding correct version fixed information again has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#319670: a patch

I hope this fixes the bug. diff -ru aspell-pt-0.50-2/debian/aspell-pt.files aspell-pt-0.50-2-new/debian/aspell-pt.files --- aspell-pt-0.50-2/debian/aspell-pt.files 2005-10-17 22:19:53.0 -0200 +++ aspell-pt-0.50-2-new/debian/aspell-pt.files 2005-10-15 20:32:55.0 -0300 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@

Bug#334344: r-cran-gtkdevice causes R to segfault on window destruction

Hi Duncan, First off, thank you *very much* for the detailed and extremely timely replies! Much appreciated! On 17 October 2005 at 07:58, Duncan Temple Lang wrote: | | Thanks for the report. | I was just making minor modifications to that package | last week, so I'll take a look. | I can't rep

Bug#319669: a patch

I hope this fixes the bug. diff -ru br.ispell-2.4.really.3.0.beta4/debian/aspell-pt-br.install br.ispell-2.4.really.3.0.beta4-new/debian/aspell-pt-br.install --- br.ispell-2.4.really.3.0.beta4/debian/aspell-pt-br.install 2005-10-17 22:22:30.0 -0200 +++ br.ispell-2.4.really.3.0.beta4-new/deb

Bug#334457: debian-cd: Debian-cd website offers binaries but not sources, violating GPL

Subject: debian-cd: Debian-cd website offers binaries but not sources, violating GPL Package: debian-cd Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 "The program must include source code" I'm looking for the source code that matches the binary releases that Debian provides. It is not in an obviou

Bug#334452: debian-cd: Debian-cd website offers binaries but not sources, violating GPL

Subject: debian-cd: Debian-cd website offers binaries but not sources, violating GPL Package: debian-cd Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 "The program must include source code" I'm looking for the source code that matches the binary releases that Debian provides. It is not in an obviou

Bug#332481: marked as done (mozilla-thunderbird: Segfault in [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:32:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332481: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#326841: bug fixed upstream

This bug will be fixed in the next upstream version. See: http://www.mnogosearch.org/bugs/index.php?id=1004&edit=2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324276: marked as done (bzflag-server: bzflag cannot join the local bzfs server)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324276: fixed in bzflag 2.0.4.20051017 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#324170: marked as done (bzflag: jitter = -21xxxxxxxx problem)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324170: fixed in bzflag 2.0.4.20051017 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#323815: marked as done (bzflag: shoots trough other players)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323815: fixed in bzflag 2.0.4.20051017 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#320268: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing class declaration)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320268: fixed in bzflag 2.0.4.20051017 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Re: Bug#334206: mozilla-enigmail not decrypting messages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 334206 + unreproducible Bug#334206: mozilla-enigmail not decrypting messages There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > tags 334206 + sarge Bug#334206: mozilla-enigmail not decrypting messages Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: sarge

Bug#334206: mozilla-enigmail not decrypting messages

tags 334206 + unreproducible tags 334206 + sarge thanks > > Encrypted mails get displayed as attachment which one has to save and > decrypt on the commandline. Signed mails get checked normally. > > To check just send a mail to yourself using mozilla-enigmail itself. cannot reproduce this. Ma

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gpsim 0.20.14-7.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 244126 + fixed Bug#244126: gpsim: please recompile against libgtkextra17-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 265766 + fixed Bug#265766: gpsim: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bison' and gcc-3.4 problem Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed

Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:28:47 +0200 Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Francesco! > > You wrote: > > > A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and > > simply asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be > > tracked, contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing. >

Bug#333863: marked as done (xmail: [CAN-2005-2943] buffer overflow)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:32:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333863: fixed in xmail 1.22-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: [scsitools] raise #285831 to critical as it lets a LVM system unbootable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 285831 critical Bug#285831: scsitools: unmounting proc conflicts with mountvirtfs Severity set to `critical'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#334221: marked as done (gbib: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: Old gettext macro.)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334221: fixed in gbib 0.1.2-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#333242: marked as done (koffice: ftbfs [sparc] make[4]: *** [KChartViewIface_skel.cc] Illegal instruction)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:09:48 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line KOffice just built on sparc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Processed: sorry

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 33407 - confirmed help Bug number 33407 not found. > tags 334407 + confirmed help Bug#334407: gbib segfaults after update There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, help > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#329231: [Kst] debian unstable X errors (WAS: kst-1.1.0 and svn HEAD X Errors)

I now believe that Qt 3.3.5 (or debian's configuration of this) may be part of the problem. I have just successfully compiled and used kst from SVN head on an kubuntu breezy installation. This uses gcc 4.0.1, Xorg, KDE 3.4.3, and Qt 3.3.4. There were no issues. My major remaining question is

Bug#334122: Receive an "Segmentation fault" when launching gramps

James A. Treacy wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 11:09:25AM -0700, Jim Woodruff wrote: Cannot launch gramps as it exits with an "Segmentation fault" error. This is almost certainly a problem with python or the gtk/gnome bindings. Try starting python and importing modules: $ python i

Bug#334407: gbib segfaults after update

tags 33407 + confirmed help thanks Am Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:35:29PM +0200 hat Peter Henseler getippert: > after upgrading from version 0.1.2-6 gbib segfaults on program startup > and dumps a core file. The command: > gdb -c core `which gbib` > tells me: > #0 0x0f77bfa0 in __gnu_cxx::__pool::_M_

Bug#331634: Intention to NMU

Hi Steve, Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 16:12 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek: > The libssl transition should not be a priority, but this is not the same > thing as it being "called off". You should still upload to fix RC bugs as > usual, and not worry about whether this means libssl0.9.7 or libssl0.9

Bug#333635: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-dependencies on libdbus-cil and libgtk-cil)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:47:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333635: fixed in galago-sharp 0.3.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#329759: marked as done (libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0: prerm failure: gconftool-2: command not found)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:47:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329759: fixed in gst-plugins0.8 0.8.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: Re: Bug#329759: unfixed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 329759 + pending Bug#329759: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0: prerm failure: gconftool-2: command not found There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors

Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Dan Griswold] >>> Can you try with ltrace? >> >> Yields nothing obviously of value. > > Well, please send the last 50 lines anyway Will do! cantor:/usr/src/plan-1.9(root)# ltrace netplan __libc_start_main(0x804bfb0, 1, 0xb914, 0x804deb0, 0x

Bug#329759: unfixed

tags 329759 + pending thanks On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote: > I want the package to install and purge without errors. It seems that the > NMU doesn't have gconf2 as a depends, still. I still didn't check the NMU diff, but I uploaded a fixed package using misc:depends instead of a gco

Bug#306123: syslinux: FTBFS: undefined reference to `memcpy' and static declaration of 'crc_32_tab' follows non-static declaration)

Hi, this bug caught my eye when browsing the list of release critical bugs to find things I could help fix (possibly by doing an NMU). Andreas Jochens, I'd like to ask for clarification for a point about the patch you included: --- ../tmp-orig/syslinux-2.11/memdisk/Makefile 2004-01-24

Bug#265766: Bug#*: Intention to NMU

Luk,      Thanks for the heads up. And thanks for the NMU.  I've been extremely busy.    I need to get the much newer gpsim built and uploaded.  Graphviz is in my queue    first, however.   Regards, Stephen --   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]    

Bug#334423: [CAN-2005-3120] buffer overflow in nntp schema handling

Package: lynx, lynx-cur Severity: grave Tags: security Various vendors have reported a remotely exploitable buffer overflow vulnerability in Lynx. From: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [USN-206-1] Lynx vulnerability To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@sec

Bug#327460: marked as done (rhythmbox: Missing dependacy on libtotem-plparser0)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:40:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line experimental/fixed-in-experimental==closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#333349: acknowledged by developer (Bug#330867: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-1)

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >* include symbol versioning in Configure (closes: #330867) Thanks! -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." --

Bug#333295: marked as done (rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333295: fixed in manpages-pl 20051117-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors

[Dan Griswold] >> Can you try with ltrace? > > Yields nothing obviously of value. Well, please send the last 50 lines anyway, to let me know what is going on when it fails. And send the last 50 strace lines as well, though I do not expect them to tell me much. > So, I guess I need to gpg --impo

Processed: Re: Processed: bts cleaning

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 334146 Bug#334146: rpm should declare Conflicts: & Replaces: manpages-pl ( << 20051017-1 ) Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl Disconnected #334146 from all other report(s). > severity 33

Bug#333522: possible problem cause: wait4(-1)

On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 23:07 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Any comments? Martin Wilck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 0. the module loading tool runs during boot with PID 1. I do not understand how this can happen. request_module() cannot occur until usermodehelper_init() is called. This is only don

Bug#289318: Intention to NMU

+++ Luk Claes [17/10/05 19:38 +0200]: > Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > > I haven't had time to properly maintain DCTC since a while and will be > > orphaning it shortly (along with a few other packages). > > > > Please go ahead, > > Shall I orphan it properly with Maintainer set to Debian QA Grou

Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors

Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can you try to verify this by installing the old binary package and > see if it get rid of the problem? > > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/plan/netplan_1.9-2_i386.deb> Verified. 1.9-2 runs, and I can access my served calendars from plan.

Bug#328243: More info on slibcat creation on slib package

Hi. On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:11:14 +0100 Simon Richard Clarkstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I checked in /usr/share/, and found that /usr/share/slibcat did not exist, >and permissions (0755) ensured that only root would be able to create >this file. Upon reading the documentation, I found that S

Bug#199557: NMU?

Hi Frank, Thanks very much for taking care of this. Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Hi. Openal currently fails to build on mips and mipsel again since you again missed to include the NMU patches in subsequent uploads. Please consider the following updated patch. If you don't raise any objections I wi

Processed: Re: Processed: bts cleaning

ackage `rpm,manpages-pl' to `rpm'. > severity 334146 important Bug#334146: rpm and manpages-pl contain the same files Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl Severity set to `important'. > retitle 334146 rpm should declare Conflicts: & Replaces:

Bug#333349: marked as done (openssl: Must either version symbols or conflict with ALL libraries linked to previous version)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330867: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#330867: marked as done (libssl0.9.7 g series break pam_pgsql)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330867: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#334146: Processed: bts cleaning

unmerge 333295 334146 reassign 334146 rpm severity 334146 important retitle 334146 rpm should declare Conflicts: & Replaces: manpages-pl ( << 20051017-1 ) thanks Hi, I'm just uploading new version of the manpages-pl package, which has the conflicting files removed. But for the

Bug#289318: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > +++ Luk Claes [17/10/05 18:29 +0200]: > >>Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if >>you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a >>patch or if you think that the at

Bug#334407: gbib segfaults after update

Package: gbib Version: 0.1.2-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, after upgrading from version 0.1.2-6 gbib segfaults on program startup and dumps a core file. The command: gdb -c core `which gbib` tells me: #0 0x0f77bfa0 in __gnu_cxx::__pool::_M_reclaim_block () fro

Bug#334404: fwbuilder-linux: fwbuilder fails to build fw script with "Unrecognized host OS linux24 (family linux24)" message

Package: fwbuilder-linux Version: 2.0.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable fwbuilder can't build a firewall script for linux. Here's the message written when compiling: Unrecognized host OS linux24 (family linux24) Here are some fwbuilder related packages installed on my

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libgphoto2 2.1.6-5.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 333678 + fixed Bug#333678: libgphoto2-2: Fails to install in chroot without udev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#334371: only with 'Composite' extension enabled

the thing i changed recently was the 'composite' extension. i disabled it, and now rdesktop works great again. I'm using nvidias accelerated X driver, an a self-compiled debian 2.6.12-10 kernel. juergen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#333678: NMU diff for libgphoto2 2.1.6-5.2

Hi, Attached is the diff for the 2.1.6-5.2 NMU. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer| Public key available on - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F

Bug#334387: marked as done (liballegro4.1-dbg: not installable in sid)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:49:52 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334387: liballegro4.1-dbg: not installable in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#289318: Intention to NMU

+++ Luk Claes [17/10/05 18:29 +0200]: > Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if > you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a > patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Hi Luk, I haven't had time to properly maintain DCTC s

Bug#323556: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Vers

Bug#333678: Bug #333678 on libgphoto2-2

Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I just wanted to make sure you're aware of this bug report as the NMU'er of > the last version of libgphoto2 -- with this version, libgphoto2-2 fails to > install without udev also being installed, which is a serious problem, since Well, you're

Bug#289318: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Vers

Processed: tagging 329759

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > tags 329759 - fixed Bug#329759: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0: prerm failure: gconftool-2: command not found Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed > End of message, stopping processing here

Bug#327312: Intention to NMU

> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if > you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a > patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. I uploaded a new version over the weekend (to anonymous-ftp-master) that was rejected. It lo

Bug#333768: Acknowledgement (inkscape: editing text changes font size)

I found that this bug cannot be reproduced consistently. 1. Sometimes inkscape behaves as previously reported 2. Sometimes, the font size will decrease (opposite of what was reported) 3. Sometimes, inkscapes behaves correctly (no corruption of font size). Right now I don't have any idea what tr

Bug#329759: unfixed

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:28:52PM +0200, Loic Minier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote: > > Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to > > not fail if gconf2 is unavailable. > > Can you -vv your remark? You want the dh_gconf to be more robust? S

Bug#288819: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Ver

Bug#334387: liballegro4.1-dbg: not installable in sid

Package: liballegro4.1-dbg Version: 2:4.1.15-5.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install liballegro4.1-dbg Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have

Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors

[Dan Griswold] > That's what I thought when I looked in the changelog. I upgrade very > frequently, so my replaced version must be the immediately previous > one, 1.9-2. Can you try to verify this by installing the old binary package and see if it get rid of the problem? ftp://ftp.debian.org/debi

Bug#327312: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Vers

Bug#265766: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Vers

Bug#333510: marked as done ([FTBFS] perl fails on arm with -O2)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333510: fixed in perl 5.8.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: reopen

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 334228 Bug#334228: renders network unusable Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Bug#334228: reopen

reopen 334228 thanks As discussed on IRC, -mtune didn't do it. I've tested and can confirm that the following cflags (suggested by Aurelien) work: "-pipe -O -march=" -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#333079: rcconf: rcconf 1.14 does not work

Wrong email address?On 17 Oct 2005 23:54:46 +0900, Atsushi KAMOSHIDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't locate stddef.ph in @INC (did you run h2ph?) (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8

Bug#315069: Intention to NMU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Vers

Bug#334374: python2.4-psyco: raises ImportError: undefined symbol PyFPE_jbuf (version mismatch?)

Package: python2.4-psyco Version: 1.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable python2.4-psyco fail to import, here's a transcript: $ python2.4 -c 'import psyco' Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ? File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/psyco/__init__.py"

Bug#333079: rcconf: rcconf 1.14 does not work

> Can't locate stddef.ph in @INC (did you run h2ph?) (@INC contains: /etc/perl > /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 > /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 > /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/bits/types.ph line 10. > Compilation f

Bug#333941: acknowledged by developer (Bug#333941: fixed in mbrowse 0.3.1-6)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >* corrected snmp build-dep, Salut Luk Hi Noèl ;-) I suppose it was a quick and easy fix :-) Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D

Bug#331483: xmms-oggre_0.3-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with outdatad libtool.m4

Re: Ryan Murray in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The correct 'configure' script will have output that looks like this: > linux*) > lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all > ;; Hi, I've just compiled xmms-oggre with a modified configure script that uses the above mentioned paragraph. It throws no further

Bug#334371: rdesktop: whole desktop freezes

Package: rdesktop Version: 1.4.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable after invoking rdesktop with parameters -u, -d, -p, -g, -B, -z, -a, -x my desktop freezes (kde). this also happended when invoking rdesktop with 'krdc'. this bug was introduces in the last 10 days or so, be

Bug#334367: php4-curl: php4 FTBFS due to libcurl3-dev disappearing from unstable

Package: php4-curl Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source libcurl3-dev disappeared from unstable on or about October 10th (based on the upload date in the changelog) and the last PHP4 upload got caught in the transition. Some architectures' autobuilders could still get ahol

Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors

Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Dan Griswold] >> With the new upgrade, the netplan daemon ate up all the memory on the >> system and caused the xserver and its associated tty to fail. This >> required a reboot. > > Hm. I'm not aware of any changes which could give this result.

Bug#328456: marked as done (pngwriter_0.5.2-4(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#323389: marked as done (python-extclass_1.2.0zope-2.5.1-4(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#328452: marked as done (pyid3lib_0.5.1-6(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#328457: marked as done (smart_0.39-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#329089: marked as done (uqwk_2.21-11(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#323387: marked as done (umfpack_4.4-3(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#327112: marked as done (xjdic_24-6(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#326904: marked as done (pyflac_0.0.4-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#325563: marked as done (pyopenal_0.1.5-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Processed: Re: 321644 not fixed with 1.7.12-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 321644 important Bug#321644: mozilla-browser: mozilla 1.7.10 version crashes almost immediately and all other browsers that use the mozilla core crash with similar frequency Severity set to `important'. > tags 321644 + unreproducible Bug#3216

Processed: confirming 327550

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 327550 + confirmed Bug#327550: [CAN-2005-2414] Race condition in the XPCOM library Tags were: security Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Processed: Re: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 323200 important Bug#323200: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module Severity set to `important'. > tags 323200 + unreproducible Bug#323200: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module Tags were: patch Tags adde

Bug#323200: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module

severity 323200 important tags 323200 + unreproducible thanks Hi, On lun, aoû 15, 2005, Luke Schierer wrote: > according to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311035#c7, > which a bug I submitted was marked duplicate of, gcc4 generates bad > code in the libimglib2.so module, and th

  1   2   >