Hi Steve, Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 16:12 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek: > The libssl transition should not be a priority, but this is not the same > thing as it being "called off". You should still upload to fix RC bugs as > usual, and not worry about whether this means libssl0.9.7 or libssl0.9.8. > (It will mean libssl0.9.8 in any case, because this is the only version that > libssl-dev will point to going forward.)
ok, thanks for the pointer. Anyway, I have been informed by upstream that the FTBFS on alpha should be resolved in CVS HEAD and once this is verified, it can be backported to the release version. Now I just need to find the time to do this. ;) At worst this weekend I hope. If anybody needs the new pwlib urgently, just drop me a note and I'll put the ready packages into incoming. -- Best regards, Kilian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part