Hi Steve,

Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 16:12 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> The libssl transition should not be a priority, but this is not the same
> thing as it being "called off".  You should still upload to fix RC bugs as
> usual, and not worry about whether this means libssl0.9.7 or libssl0.9.8. 
> (It will mean libssl0.9.8 in any case, because this is the only version that
> libssl-dev will point to going forward.)

ok, thanks for the pointer. Anyway, I have been informed by upstream
that the FTBFS on alpha should be resolved in CVS HEAD and once this is
verified, it can be backported to the release version. Now I just need
to find the time to do this. ;)
At worst this weekend I hope. If anybody needs the new pwlib urgently,
just drop me a note and I'll put the ready packages into incoming.

-- 
Best regards,
 Kilian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to