ruby1.8-dev
[...]
> ruby1.8 extconf.rb
> make: ruby1.8: Command not found
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
> ******
> Build finished at 20051016-1744
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
ruby-v4l lacks a bui
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 334292 lftp@uniyar.ac.ru
Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free detected
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tags 334292 + confirmed upstream
Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free det
forwarded 334292 lftp@uniyar.ac.ru
tags 334292 + confirmed upstream
severity 334292 normal
merge 334059 334292
thanks
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Filippo Giunchedi:
Hello,
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> consider this sample output
>
> [EMAIL P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328608 important
Bug#328608: xfce4-weather: It makes the xfce4-panel crashes on if you try to
query your location
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hi Marcelo,
Since you Andreas' patch looks good, do you plan to upload a fixed
gtkglextmm soon? Although this bug does not affect the version of
gtkglextmm in testing, the version that is in testing is also RC-buggy
because it's built for the old C++ ABI and does not build-depend on g++-3.3;
and
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:50:21PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> I've seen this cause a boot take hours. The system looks like it's
> mostly idle, but everything which uses syslog is excruciatingly slow.
> It is possible that this is the same which is mentioned in bug 273269,
> as both systems I'
El d�a 19/09/2005 a 12:18 Nicolas DET escribi�...
Hi,
>
> Just try to query your location inside the prefs and it will make the
> xfce4-panel crash.
>
Can you please upgrade to the latest version and see if it happens
again. And please let us know which city/location you fill in, since
it wor
rem: 5.8.7-6, success
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=perl&ver=5.8.7-6&arch=mipsel&stamp=1129187254&file=log&as=raw
--
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.
pgp1cziOxAOIL.pgp
Description
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:17:06PM -0700, Sven Luther wrote:
> tag 324351 + fixed
> tag 329614 + fixed
> tag 330446 + fixed
> tag 333857 + fixed
>
> quit
>
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
For anyone who cares, this
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 11:09:25AM -0700, Jim Woodruff wrote:
> Cannot launch gramps as it exits with an "Segmentation fault" error.
This is almost certainly a problem with python or the gtk/gnome bindings.
Try starting python and importing modules:
$ python
>>> import gtk
>>> import gnome
>>> imp
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334157: fixed in openvrml 0.15.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: cfengine2
Version: 2.1.15-1.0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
We're using cfengine2 over IPv6, and since 2.1.15-1.0.1 (which was
rebuilt against libssl 0.9.7; 2.1.15-1.0 works), we've had odd problems
with authentication. More specifically, the machine ident
On Sunday 16 October 2005 13:37, Ted Kisner wrote:
> I'm not sure if KDE 3.4.2 included in debian unstable has been patched.
> However, I think the fact that we can compile kdelibs and kst means that
> this is not an issue (i.e, it dealt with ui files during compile time).
I looked through the cha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 329759 + fixed
Bug#329759: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0: prerm failure: gconftool-2: command not
found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:06:40PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Luk,
> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> > Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> > you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> > patch or if
> Any news on fixing this bug? It's making at least one other package
> (tyvis) FTBFS, too (though that package has other bugs, anyway).
I recently did the ABI transition for the library this package depends on -
clutils. I'm working on the ABI transition for this package as well as
part of this
Package: sysklogd
Version: 1.4.1-16
Severity: critical
I've seen this cause a boot take hours. The system looks like it's
mostly idle, but everything which uses syslog is excruciatingly slow.
It is possible that this is the same which is mentioned in bug 273269,
as both systems I've seen this on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 225750 grave
Bug#225750: discus: Very Broken
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 324351 + fixed
Bug#324351: initrd-tools: /etc/mkinitrd/scripts files not executed if files
contain a "."
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> tag 329614 + fixed
Bug#329614: -o relative-file puts it inside the build directory, which gets
deleted
Hi Francesco!
You wrote:
> A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and simply
> asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be tracked,
> contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing.
I'm afraid that this will turn out to be infeasable. Lots and lots of
p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Luk,
Hi
> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
>
>>Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
>>you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
>>patch
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:17:35 +0300 Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
> Hello members of debian-legal,
Hi!
>
> It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open
> Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and
> therefore needs to be changed.
Indeed.
>
> Currently web
Package: lftp
Version: 3.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
consider this sample output
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lftp mysite
Password:
cd ok, cwd=/
lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/> cd www
cd ok, cwd=/www
lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/www> put ~/tmp/subscribe.php
801 bytes transferr
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332828: fixed in hal 0.4.8-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259671: fixed in vte 1:0.11.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi,
I noticed that after rebuilding the rpm package with patch for #333999
there are all required dependencies.
Regards
Artur
--
Na twardzielu dioda gore
/z pamiętnika administratora/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334228: fixed in kfreebsd-5 5.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333858: fixed in yaird 0.0.11-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316130: fixed in nxml-mode 20041004-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331449: fixed in minpack 19961126-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316130: fixed in nxml-mode 20041004-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Sunday 16 October 2005 07:38, Mark Hymers wrote:
> So it looks like some sort of KDE-3.4, Qt-3.3.5 interaction. It is
> highly unlikely to be a g++ transition issue as that side is pretty much
> finished in Debian now and I'm sure that kst's dependencies have been
> transitioned as has kst.
I
Hi Luk,
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
>
> Note that this also r
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334158: fixed in gtksourceview-sharp 0.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
0.10.1-3 built with gcc 4.0.2 fixed the problem (see [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)
pgp5WBtvZ7Ly9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 333760 librpm4
Bug#333760: rpm: please suppress lib64 ("MARK64") nonsense
Bug reassigned from package `rpm' to `librpm4'.
> merge 333760 333999
Bug#333760: rpm: please suppress lib64 ("MARK64") nonsense
Bug#333999: librpm4: breaks rpm due to m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 333295 serious
Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl
Severity set to `serious'.
> reassign 333295 rpm,manpages-pl
Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 333760 patch
Bug#333760: rpm: please suppress lib64 ("MARK64") nonsense
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> severity 333760 grave
Bug#333760: rpm: please suppress lib64 ("MARK64") nonsense
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 333760 333999
Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 333999 patch
Bug#333999: librpm4: breaks rpm due to missing binary files in the package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334048: fixed in curl 7.15.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334021: fixed in curl 7.15.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333609: fixed in curl 7.15.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tags 333999 patch
thanks
Hello,
As far as we do not support bi-arch/multi-arch configuration following patch
should solve the problem. At least it works for me.
Regards
Artur
--
Nie taki daemon straszny jak go killują
/z pamiętnika administratora/
diff -Naru rpm-4.4.1.orig/config
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334079: fixed in asmail 1.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello members of debian-legal,
It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open
Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and
therefore needs to be changed.
Currently web pages are "Copyright © 1997-2005 SPI" and license terms
linking to Open Publication licens
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 307210
Bug#307210: nufw_1.0-2(alpha/unstable): assumes sa_restorer is part of sigaction
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> close
On Sunday 16 October 2005 10:23 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: koffice
> Version: 1:1.3.5-5
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > Automatic build of koffice_1:1.3.5-5 on ska by sbuild/m68k 69
> > Build started at 20051014-1604
>
> [...]
>
>
Hi.
just to say that I managed to get evo 2.4 running on evol by tweaking
and using ubuntu libgal packages.
That was just before I found out that my home sarge server got hacked :(
For those who want to perform the operation, here's a short and long
description:
- download ubuntu's packages for
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:48:15PM +0200, I wrote:
>
> Here it is.
But I had forgotten to deal with the configuration file in postrm. Here
is an updated patch.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--- lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/rules
+++ lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/rules
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
install --mode=644 debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 329884 -pending
Bug#329884: packagesearch_2.0.1 (arm,hppa,m68k): FTBFS: internal compiler
error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
> # removing tag pending, because my pending solution did not s
Am Sonntag 16 Oktober 2005 17:59 schrieb Thorsten Sandfuchs:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 04:03:09AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > samba.schema and samba3.scheama weren't copied to /etc/ldap/schema,
> > > therefore the setup process couldn't find the corresponding
> > > schema-definit
erform'
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/update.c:59: undefined reference to
> `curl_easy_setopt'
> /build/buildd/apt-spy-3.1/update.c:59: undefined reference to `curl_easy_init'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [apt-spy] Error 1
> make[1]: Lea
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:50:59 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324032: packagesearch: FTBFS: Links a shared lib against a
static non-PIC lib.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Package: animals
Version: 20031130-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
The package needs to be rebuilt, as due to the C++ ABI transition
libdb4.2++ was renamed to libdb4.2++c2.
--
Yavor Doganov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334215: fixed in crack-attack 1.1.14-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:36:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333902: libdebtags1-dev is not available anymore in
unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.0.2-31
> Severity: serious
>
> libkpathsea3 is now built by libkpathsea3 -- tetex-bin needs to be updated
> to not build libkpathsea3 packages anymore.
How grave is this problem for the autobuilders? I plan to upload
tetex-
On Sun, 16, Oct, 2005 at 10:48:16AM -0400, George Staikos spoke thus..
> On Sunday 16 October 2005 10:38, Mark Hymers wrote:
>
> > comerr-dev kdelibs-bin kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2 libarts1-dev libarts1c2
>
> kdelibs4? Is that KDE *4*, or in other words, "trunk"? That could be the
> problem..
Version: 2.0.2
Thanks for the report. This issue is fixed in 2.0.2 which depends on
libapt-front now. libaot-front provides PIC compatability by default
(and so does libtagcoll now).
Best regards
Benjamin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 334030 !
Bug#334030: perl_5.8.7-6(m68k/unstable):
Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>.
> retitle 334030 perl_5.8.7-6(m68k/unstable): FTBFS: failed test suite
> t/op/rand.t
Bug#334030: perl_5.8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package egroupware-fudforum
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: egroupware-fudforum
> tags 323928 patch
Bug#323928: egroupware-fudforum: Incomplete check of user rights gaining access
to all messages (CAN-2005-2600)
Tags were: help upstream security
Tags a
submitter 334030 !
retitle 334030 perl_5.8.7-6(m68k/unstable): FTBFS: failed test suite t/op/rand.t
thanks
I seriously fucked up with this one.
LaMon gave me his scripts that he uses to handle bug reports, and this
was the first time I tried the 'bug' feature of those things. When I
found that a)
On Sunday 16 October 2005 10:38, Mark Hymers wrote:
> comerr-dev kdelibs-bin kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2 libarts1-dev libarts1c2
kdelibs4? Is that KDE *4*, or in other words, "trunk"? That could be the
problem..
--
George Staikos
KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/
St
package egroupware-fudforum
tags 323928 patch
thanks
The page given above contains a patch (also included in this mail in
dpatch form) that should fix the issue. Why have you tagged the bug
"help"?
09-egw-fudforum-CAN-2005-2600.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript
pgpACXoNgOR5P.pgp
D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package cdw
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cdw
> tags 324803 patch
Bug#324803: cdw Segmentation fault
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
package cdw
tags 324803 patch
thanks
The buffer used in sscanf is just a bit too small (typo?). The
attached patch fixes the bug.
--- cdw-0.2.3/src/options.c 2004-03-07 11:12:00.0 +0100
+++ cdw-0.2.3patch/src/options.c 2005-10-16 16:26:23.0 +0200
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
struct conf rea
On Thu, 13, Oct, 2005 at 04:05:11PM -0700, Ted Kisner spoke thus..
> Mark- have you had any more luck diagnosing this? It seems very strange that
> other software in the unstable archive are not seeing these things.
>
> In the mean time, let me know if I can do anything to help out, and it looks
Package: koffice
Version: 1:1.3.5-5
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of koffice_1:1.3.5-5 on ska by sbuild/m68k 69
> Build started at 20051014-1604
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: g++-3.4 [ar
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334139: fixed in enigmail 2:0.93-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331083: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320258: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320258: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285080: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318363: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318363: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:56:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317177: fixed in allegro4.1 2:4.1.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:56:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 334170 + patch
Bug#334170: lirc-modules-source: modifies conffiles in postinst
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
tags 334170 + patch
thanks
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 05:04:09AM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > (I might write the corresponding patch if you wish.)
>
> Please! :)
Here it is.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--- lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/rules
+++ lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/rules
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
Package: visualboyadvance
Version: 1.7.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on some arches because g++ seems
to need lots of RAM. On arm and mipsel it failed with a message
like:
cc1plus: out of memory allocating 616522820 bytes after a total of 47400632 byt
es
make[3]: **
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 06:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315120: fixed in apt-spy 3.1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 02:29:35PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [stripping implied recipients...]
>
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:52:59 +0200
> Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hope this is helpful and i didn't do something st
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:52:59PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:43:10 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > I will fix this bug but not use time on switching to SVN this
> > > weekend.
> >
> > I co
Hi,
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:25:57 +0300
Jani Monoses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember having something similar, and it turned out that a system
> tray was already added in the taskbar so it would not create
> another.But the error message is misleading indeed if it's your case
> too.So if y
Package: libgpcl-dev
Version: 2.32-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable or mostly so
The libgpcl-dev package has its header file in the wrong place on alpha and
ia64:
$ dpkg -c ../non-free/g/gpcl/libgpcl-dev_2.32-1_alpha.deb |grep '\.h$'
-rw-r--r-- root/root 4921 2005-05
Package: kfreebsd-5
Severity: critical
There's a critical usability problem with version 5.4-2. See:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/glibc-bsd-devel/2005-October/000563.html
I have verified that 5.4-1 is not affected. Since the differences between these
versions are minimal:
*
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:52:59PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:43:10 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > I will fix this bug but not use time on switching to SVN this
> > > weekend.
> >
> > I co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[stripping implied recipients...]
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:52:59 +0200
Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hope this is helpful and i didn't do something stupid.
>
> Hm. I think you did, actually
Sorry - here it was again: Outright "stupi
Package: gbib
Version: 0.1.2-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches. During
configure we see:
checking for gettext in libc... no
Which later results in:
c++ -o gbib -g bibentry.o bibfiles.o bibrc.o gui.o lyxsup.o entrydialog.o lyxco
nnect.o entrydef.o entrylis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 326714 confirmed
Bug#326714: kbear crashes at every file transfer
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> forwarded 326714 http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1179759
Bug#326714: kbear crashes at every file transfer
Noted your statement t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:43:10 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will fix this bug but not use time on switching to SVN this
> > weekend.
>
> I commited the package to svn, added the patch, fixed the manpage
> accordyingly, and added
Hi Luk,
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
>
> Note that this also r
Package: crack-attack
Version: 1.1.14-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Crack-attack won't launch anymore:
% crack-attack --solo
Crack Attack! v1.1.14
freeglut ERROR: Function called without first
calling 'glutInit'.
The attached patch seems to fix the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Note that this also resolves the build error and
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:51:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334201: gosa: samba.schema and samba3.schema not copied
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Am 16.10.2005 um 12:21 schrieb Thorsten Sandfuchs:
Package: gosa
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
samba.schema and samba3.scheama weren't copied to /etc/ldap/schema,
therefore the setup process couldn't find the corresponding
schema-definition, and no
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Jaldhar H. Vyas told:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Michael Perry wrote:
>
> >Package: dovecot-imapd
> >Version: 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1
> >
> >On a dist-upgrade this evening this package will not load my ssl certs with
> >the following error:
> >
> >Oct 15 16:53:44
Package: mozilla-enigmail
Version: 2:0.91.4
Severity: grave
Encrypted mails get displayed as attachment which one has to save and
decrypt on the commandline. Signed mails get checked normally.
To check just send a mail to yourself using mozilla-enigmail itself.
This behaviour shows up since
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 12:03:20PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:30:41 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:59:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > > -while getopts "d:km
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
