Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331449: fixed in minpack 19961126-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2005 15:27:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 08:27:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EMSDy-0001iO-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 08:27:30 -0700
Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:211:9ff:feed:c498])
        by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EMSDx-0005BE-GV; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:27:29 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1EMSDx-00032L-4i; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:27:29 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libminpack1: empty package
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:27:29 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libminpack1
Version: 19961126-6
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

After building libminpack1 is an empty package. It is due to the fact
the name of the files in the debian/ directory have not been changed,
whereas the package name has changed.

Quick fix:

cd debian/ && for i in minpack1* ; do mv $i lib$i ; done

Bye,
Aurelien

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc7-amd64
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 331449-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 20:41:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 13:41:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ERFBP-0002WN-00; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:39 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James R. Van Zandt)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#331449: fixed in minpack 19961126-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:32:39 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: minpack
Source-Version: 19961126-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
minpack, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libminpack1_19961126-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/minpack/libminpack1_19961126-7_i386.deb
minpack-dev_19961126-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/minpack/minpack-dev_19961126-7_i386.deb
minpack_19961126-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/minpack/minpack_19961126-7.diff.gz
minpack_19961126-7.dsc
  to pool/main/m/minpack/minpack_19961126-7.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated minpack package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:20:26 -0400
Source: minpack
Binary: minpack-dev libminpack1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 19961126-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libminpack1 - nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares shared library
 minpack-dev - nonlinear equations and nonlinear least squares static library
Closes: 331449
Changes: 
 minpack (19961126-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix package renaming (thanks to Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
     closes:Bug#331449)
Files: 
 d29ef76c696a84ee9784ab23ceb2efc0 732 devel optional minpack_19961126-7.dsc
 b2e3ab55f664c7e787c5a5f69b51833c 181021 devel optional 
minpack_19961126-7.diff.gz
 a15d4c942839d34d6eae8b5a2be3995d 64984 devel optional 
minpack-dev_19961126-7_i386.deb
 8840af0a25a7a859244b661e6a1c3408 19886 devel optional 
libminpack1_19961126-7_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQ1K2+jHnPxTimJZtAQHEIQP9Gp8/FyDHRSR9MfmrUZg2PmfCBLlpzw0k
HoigIVJGUTJpP+CrKSt7/ZX0C+Vl9PMWkTg6GHkfDuQuYEIKdU0iwaUb3zbHbxHl
56lF2pVwkk/WAhDJydDTQcXd3HxsmySFjiLeiRj9NOUuoLdliZ3712iO2RCiMo3m
8HOoZ9Q57gM=
=Y17b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to