Package: cups-pdf
Version: 1.7.3-6
Followup-For: Bug #331378
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) never mind, folks. I RTFReadme file.
Out of curiosity, would it be too absurd to suggest a change in how
certain changes are reported for packages?? This might involve an email
to root about specific usability
Package: php4-syck
Version: 0.55-2
Severity: grave
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of syck_0.55-2 on ninsei by sbuild/i386 69
> Build started at 20051002-2242
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depend
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 330177 -etch
Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates
Tags were: etch
Tags removed: etch
> close 330177 0.8-beta2-3
Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 325532 patch
Bug#325532: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused))
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Package: cups-pdf
Version: 1.7.3-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just upgraded tonight my Sid system, and found that print jobs
sent through cups-pdf (printpdf) failed to create a file in my
home directory. I tried a direct job...
lpr -P printpdf funny.txt # si
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330862: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.3.cvs.20050927-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # bug fixed in sid
> tag 330177 + etch
Bug#330177: klineakconfig crashes after my latest X updates
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch
> # downgrade severity to important so that the package could migrate to
> # etch
> severity 330177 important
Bu
* Daniel Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> > If there was no final decision/consensus, isn't it a bit premature to
> > start filing bugs against packages?
>
> Well, I first thought there is no 'license-mix' at the code-base, so
> there is just a wrong/incomplete debian/co
Hi Ola,
在 2005/10/3 上午 3:39 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：
Now I have run the entire test suite...
zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/
loop4 -M /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI: (unkno
Hi Ola,在 2005/10/3 上午 1:54 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：How did you tested and found what kind of security problem?I assume you found you couldn't pass the test 109,121 of testfs.sh script, right? Actually I run the rootesc program and saw that it was possible toescape.I think the rootesc program is only wo
Hello
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:30:02PM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:47:28PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >
> > >> I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I
>
Package: python-pysqlite1.1
Version: 1.1.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
>From my build log:
...
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), libsqlite0-dev (>= 2.5.6), python,
python2.3-dev, python2.4-dev
...
gcc -pthre
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331363: fixed in oaf 0.6.10-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: dfb++
Version: 0.9.22-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
>From my build log:
...
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, libdirectfb-dev (>= 0.9.22)
...
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cache
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329459: fixed in emacs21 21.4a-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 00:57:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close Bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2005 00:57:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close Bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 279391 freeradius: [FTBFS] libltdl3-dev now conflicts with libtool1.4
Bug#279391: please upgrade to newer libtool (libtool1.4 being removed)
Changed Bug title.
> severity 279391 serious
Bug#279391: freeradius: [FTBFS] libltdl3-dev now conflicts
Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:09:49PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> imlib+png2 is just the png2 version of imlib; since png2 (aka png10)
>> is now gone, imlib+png2 is on its way out too.
>
> I'll be uploading once my build-depends are installable again
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:09:49PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> imlib+png2 is just the png2 version of imlib; since png2 (aka png10)
> is now gone, imlib+png2 is on its way out too.
I'll be uploading once my build-depends are installable again. Your change of
package name means I have to w
Package: oaf
Version: 0.6.10-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of oaf_0.6.10-4 on ball by sbuild/mips 65
> Build started at 20051001-2034
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 2.0.0)
imlib+png2 is just the png2 version of imlib; since png2 (aka png10)
is now gone, imlib+png2 is on its way out too.
imlib now provides the necessary libraries (with appropriate new
sonames) and gnome-1 (the libraries of which I now maintain) are
transitioning. Once everything is transitioned, we
* Carl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.4-2sarge3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I accidently double-clicked the Firefox titlebar a few too many times
> and it suddently crashed. Now, whenever I try to launch it, I get the
> foll
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> # libtool1.4 hasnt been removed yet, this isnt serious...?
> severity 279391 important
Bug#279391: please upgrade to newer libtool (libtool1.4 being removed)
Severity set to `importan
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328342: fixed in gnome-libs 1.4.2-24
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
> at won't execute any job at all and report the following in the logs :
>
> Oct 2 22:59:00 dino atd[18647]: PAM unable to
> dlopen(/lib/security/pam_unix.so)
> Oct 2 22:59:00 dino atd[18647]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/libselinux.so.1: symbol
> regexec, version GLIBC_2.3.4 not defined in file libc.so
Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2005 21:23:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331324: debian-installer: Installation fails at
"Installing base system"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: debian-installer
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
When the installation of the testing-20050929 with the netinst cd
achieve the Installing Base System, the progress
bar stops at 1% and nothing happens.
Viewing the processes running I saw that wget was running,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 320782 0.8.6g-1
Bug#320782: cacti: Fails to run because adodb.inc.php has moved
Bug marked as not found in version 0.8.6g-1.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
hello,
i just uploaded a NMU that fixes 3 bugs to the DELAYED-5 queue on
gluck. patch is attached.
...
jonas
diff -rNu siege-2.61.orig/debian/changelog siege-2.61/debian/changelog
--- siege-2.61.orig/debian/changelog2005-10-03 01:39:01.0 +0200
+++ siege-2.61/debian/changelog 2005-10-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 325993 + fixed
Bug#325993: fuse-utils: Removing fuse-utils causes dpkg to break
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 15:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324663: fixed in libbinio 1.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 330164 unreproducible
Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass
Tags were: security
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
# bug fixed in sid
tag 330177 + etch
# downgrade severity to important so that the package could migrate to
# etch
severity 330177 important
thanks
sagi a écrit :
Package: klineakconfig
Version: 0.8-beta2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
terminal copy paste (start
tags 330164 unreproducible
thanks
hi christian, joey, martin, et al:
after having spent more time looking at this bug, i'm once again
unconvinced that there is a problem. the original poster in the ubuntu
bts said:
> I launched the attached exploit both against 4.0.24 and 4.1.14 and in both
>
hello,
here is the patch for the NMU. only a changelog entry, as rebuilding the
package is sufficient.
...
jonas
diff -rNu graveman-0.3.12-4.orig/debian/changelog
graveman-0.3.12-4/debian/changelog
--- graveman-0.3.12-4.orig/debian/changelog 2005-10-03 00:46:47.0
+0200
+++ graveman
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 325937 + fixed
Bug#325937: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
i don't know what's the matter today, but the build of fuse is somehow
screwed up, and therefore even the second patch was not enough.
finally, here's the correct one.
...
jonas
diff -rNu fuse-2.3.0.orig/debian/changelog fuse-2.3.0/debian/changelog
--- fuse-2.3.0.orig/debian/changelog2005-10
sorry, here is the complete patch (forgot to insert changelog entry last
time).
...
jonas
diff -rNu fuse-2.3.0.orig/config.log fuse-2.3.0/config.log
--- fuse-2.3.0.orig/config.log 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ fuse-2.3.0/config.log 2005-10-03 00:34:45.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,2
hello,
i just uploaded a NMU to fix that bug into the DELAYED-5 queue on gluck.
the patch is attached.
...
jonas
diff -rNu fuse-2.3.0.orig/debian/fuse-utils.postrm
fuse-2.3.0/debian/fuse-utils.postrm
--- fuse-2.3.0.orig/debian/fuse-utils.postrm2005-10-03 00:13:59.0
+0200
+++ fuse-2
Dear Frank!
On Son, 02 Okt 2005, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Please grab a current texinfo_4.8-1 from the tug server.
ANd another one: Again 4.8-1, this time teh ChangeLog should contain a
time stamp of
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 00:25:58 +0200
last ChangeLog entry:
* Include a tempfile race fix ba
Package: asterisk
Version: 1.0.9.dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The debian package doesn't include the copyright for codecs/ilbc.
As this is potentially non-free, ilbc should be removed from the
.dfsg.tar.gz distributed by Debian.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/10
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 330934 + fixed
Bug#330934: FTBFS: ICE on m68k, arm and hppa
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Package: iaxclient
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The iaxclient package debian/copyright needs to include all distributed
files/ libraries.
For example the copyright for libspeex is not included.
Mark
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package subversion
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: subversion
> # to be fixed in 1.2.3b
> tags 329184 +pending
Bug#329184: subversion_1.2.3a-1 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: unsatisfiable kaffe
build-dependency
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
> thank y
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321048: fixed in beep-media-player 0.9.7.1+cvs20050803-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321048: fixed in beep-media-player 0.9.7.1+cvs20050803-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:47:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331207: fixed in enigmail 2:0.92-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:48:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330714: fixed in ispellcat 0.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:49:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330517: fixed in ntop 2:3.2rc1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:47:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327963: fixed in fwbuilder 2.0.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:47:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327963: fixed in fwbuilder 2.0.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:47:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327017: fixed in fwbuilder 2.0.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:47:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327017: fixed in fwbuilder 2.0.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 329184 pending
Bug#329184: subversion_1.2.3a-1 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: unsatisfiable kaffe
build-dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 331206 + pending
Bug#331206: bugzilla: Two information disclosure vulnerabilities in Bugzilla
Tags were: confirmed security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 313817 + fixed
Bug#313817: potracegui: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections
Tags were: pending patch l10n
Tags added: fixed
> tag 327984 + fixed
Bug#327984: potracegui: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: pending patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 291328 + fixed
Bug#291328: ktimetrace: libcomedi.so.0 => not found
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 327986 + fixed
Bug#327986: ktimetrace: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: pending patch sid
Tags adde
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 305500 + fixed
Bug#305500: apollon: [INTL:da] Wrong language code for Danish translation
Tags were: patch pending l10n
Tags added: fixed
> tag 314120 + fixed
Bug#314120: apollon: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections
Tags were: patch pending l10n
Ta
tags 331206 + pending
thanks
This bug is closed in the svn package `bugzilla 2.18.4-1'.
It will be uploaded soon.
Thanks for the report.
--
Alexis Sukrieh
Package: at
Version: 3.1.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
at won't execute any job at all and report the following in the logs :
Oct 2 22:59:00 dino atd[18647]: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_unix.so)
Oct 2 22:59:00 dino atd[18647]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/libselinux
Hello
Now I have run the entire test suite...
zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/loop4 -M /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI: (unknown)
---
testing ext2 filesystem ...
[000]* (ext2
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:47:28PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> >> I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I
> >> can check on a patched 2.4 kernel with old style patch.
>
> Okay, I have a machine ru
Package: guile-gnome-platform
Version: 2.7.99-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the
following error:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
guile-gnome-gw-libgnomeui.c: In function
'gw__tmp7192_gnome_icon_list_get_selection_wrapper':
guile-gnome-gw-lib
Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2005 20:59:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: Missing declaration inter alia
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: imms
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your configure script is trying to make shared libraries and it's
not using -fPIC to do so. From config.log:
configure:5653: checking for XFlush in -lX11
configure:5683: g++ -o conftest -g -O2 -I/usr/include/taglib -shared
-L/usr/X11R6/lib co
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 11:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330890: fixed in dia 0.94.0-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 330890 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#330890: dia: Arbitrary code execution when importing a .svg file
Tags were: upstream security
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
Hi Andrew
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:18:47AM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
>
> ?b 2005/10/2 ?W?? 5:52 ???AOla Lundqvist ?g???G
>
> >I have now tested on one of my systems and that I have a security
> >problem there.
> >On the other system (2.4.26 + grsec) the problem do not exist. So
> >I'm not
>
|--==> Luk Claes writes:
LC> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
LC> Hash: SHA1
LC> Hi
LC> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
LC> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
LC> patch or if you think that the attached patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 331261 linux-2.6
Bug#331261: linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8: Oops when mounting DVD; unsup
command in ide-scsi
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8' to `linux-2.6'.
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
When I try to mount a DVD (mount /media/cdrom1) under this kernel, I
get an oops in ide-scsi. The problem does not exist under the
2.6.1
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 05:53:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> severity 279391 serious
> tags 279391 + patch
> thanks
> Hi,
> With the following patch, it should build with libtool 1.5. It
> should hopefully also fix #288547.
> I've also attached a patch that for things I changed that aren't
>
在 2005/10/2 上午 5:52 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：
I have now tested on one of my systems and that I have a security
problem there.
On the other system (2.4.26 + grsec) the problem do not exist. So
I'm not
sure if I can confim or deny this.
How did you tested and found what kind of security problem?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 279391 serious
Bug#279391: please upgrade to newer libtool (libtool1.4 being removed)
Severity set to `serious'.
> tags 279391 + patch
Bug#279391: please upgrade to newer libtool (libtool1.4 being removed)
Tags were: confirmed sid fixed-upstre
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:15:07PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> 'dak' currently Build-Depends on 'postgresql-dev' which installs
> '/usr/include/postgresql/8.0/postgres.h' only.
>
> The file '/usr/include/postgresql/8.0/server/postgres.h' would be
> installed by the package 'postgresql-server-d
Package: libxbase2.0-0c102
Version: 2.0.0-7
Severity: grave
Upgrade from woody to sarge fails because of libxbase2.0-0c102.
Looks like the package was renamed from libxbase2.0-0 to
libxbase2.0-0c102 without proper conflicts/replaces fields.
Since sarge is already released, it's too late to fix it,
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 11:13:13 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing aptitude bug #293130
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Marga,
You posted that the package dependencies for evolution 2.4.0-2 are
waiting in the ftp-master queue on September 15th. When I look at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html, I see that gtkhtml3.8 is waiting
(3 weeks), but I cannot see libgtkhtml3.8-15 or libgal2.6-common.
Do you know what m
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 11:16:37 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing aptitude bug #309105
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
hello,
i fixed that bug in an NMU to DELAYED-5 on gluck. if nobody objects, the
packages will reach unstable within 5-6 days.
...
jonas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 12:14:44PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Package: mozilla-enigmail
> Version: 2:0.92-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Hi,
>
> could you please update enigmail for mozilla 1.7.11 ?
>
> # apt-get install mozilla-enigmail
> Reading packa
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 06:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323106: fixed in tinymux 2.3.5.24-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Looks fine to me, please do go ahead with the NMU.
Ben.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 03:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328007: fixed in valknut 0.3.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 03:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328007: fixed in valknut 0.3.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 03:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326035: fixed in valknut 0.3.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2005 03:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326035: fixed in valknut 0.3.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 331206 + confirmed
Bug#331206: bugzilla: Two information disclosure vulnerabilities in Bugzilla
Tags were: security
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
tags 331206 + confirmed
thanks
* Moritz Muehlenhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> [...]
>
> Please see http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.4/ for the full advisory.
> 2.18.4 fixes these issue.
Ok, I'll then package 2.18.4 as soon as possible for closing those issues.
Thanks for the report.
--
Package: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0
Version: 0.8.8-3
Followup-For: Bug #329759
There is another problem created by the gconf2 missing dependency:
it is impossible to install libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0.
If you try to install this package it is left in an unusable state, and
it's impossible to reinstall o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonas
You uploaded an NMU to DELAYED-5, but forgot (?) to mention anything in
the bugreport?
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDP7Wa5UTeB5t8Mo0RAqmIAJ9yycyLQHWsHMDTpTTGXz8PXpOLpACcDOrK
EQwloSxgTLI5
Package: bugzilla
Version: 2.18.3-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Two information disclosure vulnerabilities have been found in Bugzilla:
+ It is possible to bypass the "user visibility groups" restrictions
if user-matching is turned on in "substring" mode.
+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
Package: mozilla-enigmail
Version: 2:0.92-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
could you please update enigmail for mozilla 1.7.11 ?
# apt-get install mozilla-enigmail
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
- --- cynthiune.app-0.9.4/debian/ch
Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2005 10:09:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of aptitude 0.3.4-1 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
