Package: ssh
Version: 1:4.2p1-3
Subject: OpenSSH client causes segmentation fault
Severity: critical
Hello!
I have just made a update of my sid installation, which includes the version
1:4.2p1-3 of ssh.
Now, trying to connect to a ssh-server causes an segmentation fault
immediately.
Regards
Ma
Package: gtkdiskfree
Version: 1.9.3-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
gtkdiskfree handles a temporary file (/tmp/gtkdiskfree) in an insecure
way, which allows a local attacker to remove or overwrite an arbitrary
file of the user who invokes gtkdiskfree. See
http://www.zataz.net/adviso/gtkdiskfre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
why are you running a totally outdated twiki package?
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/twiki only lists 20040902-3, in
which this problem has been solved using the robustness patch from
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cheers
Sven
Paul Sza
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 327380 serious
Bug#327380: libpq-dev: missing depends on libssl-dev
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 327380 important
Bug#327380: libpq-dev: missing depends on libssl-dev
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:58:57AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Please rebuild libdbi-perl_1.48-2 as it failed due to a problem on the
> host q650. Thanks!
I don't understand. Why did you submit this as a bug against your own
package?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever lon
severity 327380 important
thanks
I downgrade this bug to important to make the current version go into
Etch. The current testing version has the bug, too, but the testing
scripts are not yet clever enough to deal with version tracking.
Immediately after that I will upload a new version which fixes
Package: libdbi-perl
Version: 1.48-1
Severity: serious
Hello
Please rebuild libdbi-perl_1.48-2 as it failed due to a problem on the
host q650. Thanks!
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=libdbi-perl&ver=1.48-2&arch=m68k&stamp=1126835719&file=log&as=raw
> t/40profile...
> # Failed tes
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:17:04AM +0200, Uli Martens wrote:
> Package: podracer
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream patch
> Justification: Policy 3.5
>
> podracer uses the awk function 'gensub' which does not exist in mawk but
> fails without any error message.
Which podracer version? 1.3-1 upl
Package: twiki
Version: 20030201-6
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
Please see
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/410721
Verified with
http://iw/iw/view/Main/TWikiUsers?rev=3D2%20%7Cless%20/etc/passwd
http://iw/iw/view/Main/TWikiUsers?rev=3D2%20%7Cps%20aux|cat%20
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:55:03 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mixxx: unable to resolve xmu symbols
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:41:21PM -0700, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 05:03:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Can be done, but I didn't offer that option because I don't really
> > like it. :-) At that point, I don't really see any reason to change
> > the package name from w
Package: python2.4-psycopg
Version: the .deb package seems to be non-installable
Followup-For: Bug #319509
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 53816 Jul 17 05:55 site-packages
moresing:~/abc/usr/lib/python2.4# file site-packages
site-packages: ELF 3
Package: podracer
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch
Justification: Policy 3.5
podracer uses the awk function 'gensub' which does not exist in mawk but
fails without any error message.
The following patch should fix this incompatibility.
(please notice that it's 4am over here and test it bet
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:04:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328191: gnomemeeting: uninstallable (unstable). conflicts
libopenh323-1.15.3c2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 325557 + pending
Bug#325557: pdsh_1.7-6-9(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> tags 325889 + confirmed
Bug#325889: pdsh: Upstream it exists a more recent version 2.7
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libflash-mozplugin
Version: 0.4.13-1.1
Followup-For: Bug #325188
Here is some more system information. Mine is an AMD Athlon XP-M 1400+
with over 512mb ram and the latest debian firefox 1.06. I have the
latest xserver-xorg.
-- System Information:
Debian
Russ Allbery wrote:
While it would be nice to clean up this sort of thing just to avoid future
confusion, this doesn't strike me as a serious problem worthy of removing
the software from Debian unless the upstream copyright holders indicate
that they really had intended to offer no license for th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 316566 + upstream
Bug#316566: Can't start XUL apps like firefox/thunderbird with fluxbox
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 316566 serious
Bug#316566: Can't start XUL apps like firefox/thunderbird with fluxbox
Severity set to `serious'.
> #justification: breaks unrelated software
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 04:12:30 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Upstream no longer includes the offending file to package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 325210 + fixed
Bug#325210: glademm has a spurious build-dependency on libgnomeuimm2.0-dev and
libgnomemm2.0-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Looks like this only happens on amd64:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ for i in *deb; do echo $i; dpkg --contents $i | grep
alias; done
pingus_0.6.0-8.1_amd64.deb
-rw-r--r-- root/root 2664 2005-09-11 05:32:29
./usr/share/locale/locale.alias
pingus_0.6.0-8.1_i386.deb
pingus_0.6.0-8.1_sparc.deb
ping
Package: kwin-style-newstep
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package depends on kdelibs4, which no longer exists, thus render
your package uninstallable on sid.
As a part of the C++ ABI transition this library has moved to the
kdelibs4c2 package.
Simply recompiling and
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:15:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302462: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327976: fixed in klogic 1.62-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: libopengl-dylan
Version: 2.3.11-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be
Package: glimmer
Version: 1.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
On 09/14/2005 03:24 AM, Andre Meister wrote:
> gnomemeeting is uninstallable in debian unstable:
fixed with libopenh323-1.15.3c2 1.15.6-1 and gnomemeeting 1.2.2-1.
thanks and keep up the good work!
- --
.''`. andre meister | ILF
Package: pspp
Version: 0.3.0-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either orpha
Package: spip-eva
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either o
Package: brahms
Version: 1.02-kde3-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:38:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317314: fixed in firebird2 1.5.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:44:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328219: fixed in autobook 1.4.4-unofficial-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: elastic
Version: 0.0.36-2.3
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either
Package: gman
Version: 0.9.3-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either orpha
Package: gerstensaft
Version: 0.2-5.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be eithe
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:27:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325074: fixed in kaffeine 0.7.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:27:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325074: fixed in kaffeine 0.7.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:26:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317997: fixed in twin 0.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:26:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297825: fixed in twin 0.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 05:03:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Can be done, but I didn't offer that option because I don't really
> like it. :-) At that point, I don't really see any reason to change
> the package name from what it was in sarge. (There never was a good
> reason, but it was done
Package: libapache-mod-witch
Version: 0.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should
Package: slpim
Version: 0.1.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun
to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in
testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages
that should be either or
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:02:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321567: fixed in bugzilla 2.18.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't that indicate that libpam-ldap *does* have an appropriate
> versioned dependency, which you violated by versioning your local
> package with an epoch that's not present in the Debian archive?
Probably.
> The shlibs system of shared library hand
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
Severity: critical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is fixed in 2.6.13-rc7.
See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4940.
The attached patch is taken from bugzilla.
- --- dpt_i2o.c.orig2005-08-08 08:25:46.888900616 -0400
+++ d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 328042 0.9.12-10
Bug#328042: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev
Bug marked as found in version 0.9.12-10.
> submitter 328042 !
Bug#328042: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev
Changed Bug submitter from Matt Kr
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:48:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328151: fixed in searchandrescue 0.8.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:47:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328413: fixed in mysql-dfsg-4.1 4.1.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:47:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326902: fixed in libmpcdec 1.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:48:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326260: fixed in pdns 2.9.18-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:47:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321578: fixed in mysql-dfsg-4.1 4.1.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 322236 + fixed
Bug#322236: fbi: uninstallable in sid (depends on libexif10 which is
UNAVAILABLE)
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Greetings! 3.4 too -- am backing off to 3.3 on arm now...
Take care,
Phil Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 22:24 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > On arm only, gcc cannot handle C identifiers like:
> > >
> > > static void L1__GET_$ENVIRONMENT__defmacro()
> >
> > pl
Hi,
an NMU with the following patch is sitting in DELAYED/7.
diff -u libnss-ldap-238/ldap-nss.c libnss-ldap-238/ldap-nss.c
--- libnss-ldap-238/ldap-nss.c
+++ libnss-ldap-238/ldap-nss.c
@@ -384,6 +384,37 @@
timelimit = __session.ls_config->ldc_bind_timelimit;
+#ifdef HAVE_LDAP_START_TLS_S
+
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:10:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line python2.3-pygame: Uninstallable, requires packages that does
not exist anymore.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Re: Moritz Muehlenhoff in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> fbi only requires a re-compile to fix this bug. I've tried it and
> I can verify that it works without problems.
Here's the patch for the NMU I just uploaded:
diff -u fbi-2.01/debian/changelog fbi-2.01/debian/changelog
--- fbi-2.01/debian/changelog
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:34:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319526: mysql-server: An update to MySQL version 4.1.12
fixes a low-impact security problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Hello,
If you have the time, can you try the last version of the package (5.6.2-2)
to see if the default is still present (I have no AMD64)?
Can you send the result of ' ldd /usr/games/liquidwar '?
Regards.
Alexandre PIneau
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 328498 important
Bug#328498: cdebconf: package is uninstallable
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 328413 + pending
Bug#328413: mysql-server: uninstallable in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Package: chromium
Version: 0.9.12-10
Followup-For: Bug #328042
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
xlibmesa-gl-dev | xlibglu1-xorg-dev doesn't make sense as the former is for
libGL but the latter is for libGLU. As chromium seems to use libGLU, it
should be something like
libglu1-mesa-
tags 328413 + pending
thanks
Hello Steve
On 2005-09-15 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The dependencies in mysql-server-4.1 are made in a way that it should
> > "force" the user to upgrade from mysql-server.
>
> No, they are not. The only possible result of these package relationships
> is that it wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322133 + pending
Bug#322133: mysql-dfsg: Buffer overflow in user defined functions
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Ian Jackson writes ("fontforge bug found and fixed, I hope"):
> --- fontforge-0.0.20041218/debian/rules
> +++ fontforge-0.0.20041218/debian/rules
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>
>
>
> -CFLAGS = -O2
> +CFLAGS = -O0
> INSTALL = install
> INSTALL_FILE= $(INSTALL) -p-o root -g root -m 644
> IN
tags 322133 + pending
thanks
Hello
On 2005-08-19 Martin Pitt wrote:
> This is CAN-2005-2558, btw. Christian, can you please add it to the
> appropriate position of the changelog?
(back from holydays...)
Done. The packages have just been uploaded, I overlooked this bug report
though. Will close i
Well I spoke too soon... since it looked like it was going to work under
my normal account, I added in all my feeds - now I get the same error as
the first time, one for each feed, under my 'james' account.
For example (this is one of many)
=== SEND THE FOLLOWING TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===
E: co
I think the patch below, which I have just applied to Ubuntu Breezy's
fontforge, fixes this crash.
--- ../orig/fontforge-0.0.20041218/fontforge-20041218/mensis/scripting.c
2003-10-16 00:51:37.0 +0100
+++ fontforge-20041218/mensis/scripting.c 2005-09-15 19:27:24.0
+01
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327639: fixed in kexec-tools 1.101-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327715: fixed in kexec-tools 1.101-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: zope3
Version: 3.0.93-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
zope3 fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization (-O2 usually works) or gcc-
Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> (Note that I have yet to test Lorenzo's new package.)
> >
> > Are you in a position to do so?
>
> Sure, but the question is if you want to rely on the results. You
> don't seem to trust my judgement on this matter, for reasons I don't
> know.
I simply did not understan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 324193 - sarge
Bug#324193: lm-sensors: Insecure tempfile usage in pwmconfig
Tags were: fixed etch sarge patch security
Tags removed: sarge
> tag 324193 - fixed
Bug#324193: lm-sensors: Insecure tempfile usage in pwmconfig
Tags were: fixed etch patch
> > I have no clue for solving thisso I will just give up..:-)
>
> there is a patch for it:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=301274
>
> sadly, the upstream author lags in answering...
> I've just ping him again, and I'll see. If he doesn't answer,
> I'll dpatch the beast whi
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.84
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
this package is uninstallable because it depends on libpango, which
depends on debconf, which conflicts with cdebconf
(maybe this is intended, because of the package description, which
advises against the ins
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* James Curbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-14 22:32]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ r2e new [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ r2e add http://planet.debian.net/rss20.xml
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ r2e run
=== SEND THE FOLLOWING TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===
E: could not parse http://plan
On Sep 15, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You apparenly don't understand the difference between a license and a
> copyright notice.
I do, and I stand by my opinion: the package license is intended to be
applied to everything, and pretending otherwise is useless pedantry.
--
ciao,
Marco D'Itri wrote:
No, maybe it's you who do not understand english, or probably just like
armchair lawyering.
Please stop being rude when you're wrong.
You apparenly don't understand the difference between a license and a
copyright notice. Actually, it's
quite possible the authors of NTP d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 323798 +patch
Bug#323798: [sparc] corrupted double-linked list
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
tags 323798 +patch
quit
It crashes (SIGBUS) inside XmString.c.
There are many warnings "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules". In file XmString.c about 40.
Openmotif with "-fno-strict-aliasing" patch compiles on sparc fine.
--- debian/rules~ 2005-09-15 15:2
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are several files that are BSD with advertising clause, including
> > libntp/memmove.c, libntp/mktime.c, libntp/random.c, libntp/strerror.c,
> > libntp/strstr.c, ntpd/refclock_jupiter.c, and ntpd/refclock_mx4200.c.
> > These
I'd like to upload the attached NMU.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
If there is a sin against life, it consists perhaps not so much in
despairing of life as in hoping for another life and in eluding the
implacable grandeur of this life.
-- Albe
Package: gcl
Version: 2.6.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The gcl binary package depends on "binutils-dev (<= 2.16.1-999)", and
as a result is now uninstallable in unstable where binutils is at
version 2.16.1cvs20050902-1. Please fix gcl so that it's compatible
with the
On 15-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| * John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-14 02:07]:
|
| > On 10-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| >
| > | John, could you please confirm that this would fix the bug?
| >
| > Looking at the code, I think it will avoid the problem.
|
| Should w
* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-14 02:07]:
> On 10-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> | John, could you please confirm that this would fix the bug?
>
> Looking at the code, I think it will avoid the problem.
Should we then file a bug report against the libc6 package requesting
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:32:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327332: fixed in kde-i18n 4:3.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:32:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326610: fixed in kde-i18n 4:3.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
> That is indeed non-free and fails DFSG #6, the package cannot
> be in main, but could be in non-free maybe.
No, this is really an additional restriction over the GPL, thus
rendering the software undistributable for everyone but the
original author.
--
HTH,
massa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: bbpager
Version: 0.4.1b1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Automatic build of bbpager_0.4.1b1-1 on garkin by sbuild/m68k 42
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), libsm-dev, libx11-dev, libice-dev, libxt-dev,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 324193 + fixed
Bug#324193: lm-sensors: Insecure tempfile usage in pwmconfig
Tags were: etch sarge patch security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328453: fixed in pbzip2 0.9.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 06:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328376: fixed in exiv2 0.7-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On 9/15/05, Niklas Jakobsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seems to be some packages missing for the latest evolution 2.4
> build in experimental.
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> evolution: Depends: gtkhtml3.8 (>= 3.8.0) but it is not installable
> Depend
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1.1
Hi,
i got a similar problem: every time i do a right click on the xine
player window the program terminates with the following error message:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08126c89 ***
System:
Kernel: Linux procyon 2.6.11.10-custom-with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina schrieb:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:00:22PM +0200, Torsten Marek wrote:
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Hello,
>
>
> Hi, I just returned from holidays.
>
>
>>this problem is due to changes
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:00:22PM +0200, Torsten Marek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
Hi, I just returned from holidays.
> this problem is due to changes introduced in libqt3-mt 3.3.4-8. The Qt UI
> styles
> are now built as plugins, before they were compil
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 06:22:08PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> Package: libqscintilla6
> Version: 1.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Both libqscintilla5 and libqscintilla6 ship the file:
>
> /usr/lib/qt3/plugins/designer/libqscintillaplugin.so
Strange... I'd swear I included a Conflicts: in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 328238 1.0.4-2
Bug#328238: mozilla-firefox: FTBFS on s390/experimental
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.4-2.
> severity 328238 important
Bug#328238: mozilla-firefox: FTBFS on s390/experimental
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping pro
found 328238 1.0.4-2
severity 328238 important
thanks
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:53:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: mozilla-firefox
> > Version: 1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-1
> > S
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
