On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> If glibc in unstable doesn't require significant fixes to build with gcc-4.0,
> it really would be a good idea to backport the fix for this bug and the
> rpc/xdr.h one.
I started to try this but gave up quite quickly; the problem
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310812: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310812: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310690: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302093: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291118: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291118: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291033: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#268357: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269085: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278401: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291033: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297990: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310690: fixed in imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:19:32 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321193: FTBFS: Cannot find XML::Parser
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
already fixed.
2005-08-03 (水) の 09:54 -0700 に Matt Kraai さんは書きました:
> Package: gnome-peercast
> Version: 0.4.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> gnome-peercast fails to build because it cannot find the Perl module
> XML::Parser:
>
> > checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parse
Package: tagcolledit
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
tagcolledit failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder:
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/tagcoll-1.0 -DXTHREADS
-I/usr/include/gtkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/gtkmm-2
Package: debtags-edit
Version: 1.0.3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
debtags-edit failed to build on my sparc pbuilder: (It failed to build on
a sparc buildd due to temporary dependancy problems.)
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/tagcoll-1.0
-I/u
Package: kaffe
Version: 2:1.1.5-5
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
kaffe failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder:
if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile sparc-linux-gnu-gcc
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.5/build
Your message dated Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:35:15 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321175: kile: ftbfs [sparc] ISO C++ forbids declaration of
'KXMLGUIClient' with no type
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
reassign 320256 kernel-source-2.4.27
tag 320256 +pending
thanks
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 09:19:29AM +0200, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> I tried to build this kernel on a newer PIV. This dos *not* build with
> gcc 4.0 or gcc 3.4, but *does* build with gcc 3.3
>
> I'll try this on the target machin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 320256 kernel-source-2.4.27
Bug#320256: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k6: FTBFS on its intended target
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k6' to
`kernel-source-2.4.27'.
> tag 320256 +pending
Bug#320256: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k6: FTBFS
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309001: fixed in zopectl 0.3.4.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#232648: fixed in zopectl 0.3.4.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229368: fixed in zopectl 0.3.4.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#234155: fixed in zopectl 0.3.4.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251038: fixed in zopectl 0.3.4.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
So, 496 more packages in the C++ transition waiting on glibc.
If glibc in unstable doesn't require significant fixes to build with gcc-4.0,
it really would be a good idea to backport the fix for this bug and the
rpc/xdr.h one.
If it does require significant fixes, perhaps you could suggest to the
Package: grip
Version: 3.3.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: uninstallable in sid
Hi,
grip currently cannot be installed due to the unmet dependency on
libid3-3.8.3. The name of the library providing libid3 has changed to
libid3-3.8.3c2 due to C++ transition, so the package needs to
Your message dated Wed, 3 Aug 2005 20:35:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line -m owner make segfault iptables
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Package: snacc
Version: 1.3bbn-8
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
snacc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder:
mkdir c-lib/{{Ce,e,m,s}buf,tbl} c++-lib/c++
autoreconf -fi
configure.ac:183: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
FYI, this bug breaks the apt build. It is going to stall at least
77 packages.
--
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get me out of this fascist nightmare!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
The problem is, as mentioned above, not arch dependent. The reason is
the strange asm-magic used in hxclientkit which is not yet fixed to
comply with gcc4.
As a dirty workaround, gcc3.3 can be enforced, but due to the ABI
change, the plugins will not work anymore with c++ applications compiled
wit
Package: cl-port
Version: 20050624-1
Severity: grave
(require :port)
;;; Please wait, recompiling library...
debugger invoked on a SIMPLE-TYPE-ERROR: logical host not yet defined: "CLOCC"
Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL.
restarts (invokable by number or by possib
package: helix-player
version: 1.0.4-1
severity: serious
The license-files shipped within *some* directories of the
source-tarball do *only* apply to the particular directory and its, if
existing, subdirectories. But there are a lot of directories, which are
not sub-directories of those particular
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 309121 FTBFS with GCC4
Bug#309121: helix-player: FTBFS on amd64
Changed Bug title.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
T
Package: gnome-peercast
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
gnome-peercast fails to build because it cannot find the Perl module
XML::Parser:
> checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is
> required for intltool
This check is part of the AC_PROG_INTLTOOL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 309121 - experimental
Bug#309121: helix-player: FTBFS on amd64
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
> severity 309121 serious
Bug#309121: helix-player: FTBFS on amd64
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 312454 1:4.2.0a+stable-4
Bug#312454: ntpdate: Bug #294636 needs fixing in sarge
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1:4.2.0a+stable-4, send any further explanations
to Richard La
tag 320891 +patch
tag 321052 +patch
tag 321093 +patch
tag 321158 +patch
thanks
Hello Adam,
I've prepared a non-maintainer upload to fix the various RC bugs
reported against the mpich source package. It is based on the
1.2.5.3-6 version you uploaded a month ago, which was recently
rejected
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 320891 +patch
Bug#320891: libmpich1.0: libpmpich++.so.1.0 is not linked against the libraries
it depends on
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tag 321052 +patch
Bug#321052: mpich: clean target does not undo all the effects of build
There
El Miércoles, 3 de Agosto de 2005 23:19, GOTO Masanori escribió:
> Yes, I was confused. I understood the explanation from vorlon that
> (1) the previous version was compiled with old lkh - so the bug
> #318979 was happenned, (2) but unfortunatelly new lkh has another
> problem with xorg-x11, so it
* GOTO Masanori [Thu, 04 Aug 2005 06:19:13 +0900]:
Hello,
> Looking through this bug, the problem was introduced for compat_ioctl
> - the header used long type accidentally. I'll check it more.
Do you have an approximate idea when an upload could happen? Depending
on your timing, I'd like t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 307063 important
Bug#307063: ec-fonts-mftraced: install fails if tetex-bin not installed
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Package: libgettext-ruby-util
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge
rgettext does not work due to dependency problem.
/usr/bin/ruby is symlinked to ruby1.8.
But apt installed libgettext-ruby1.6 to fix dependency.
# apt-get install libgettext-ruby-util
Reading Package Lists... Done
Buildin
Peter Karlsson wrote:
Unfortunately, GoldEd+ development seems to have more or less stopped as
well.
First of all, there is quite fresh snapshot golded+1.1.5-20050419.tgz available
for download at
http://golded-plus.sourceforge.net/download.html
Second, I've made two patches available at
ht
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:53:29PM +0200, Markus Kolb wrote:
> Package: libcgicc
> Version: 3.2.3-2.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> This is a C++ package which needs a rebuild.
> g++ -I/usr/include -g -O2 -L/usr/lib -lcgicc -o dnd main.o
> /usr/lib/libcgicc.s
Package: libgettext-ruby-util
Version: 0.8.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
I ran rgettext but it does not work anyway.
libgettext-ruby-0.8.1% rgettext bin/rgettext -o rgettext.pot
numeric literal without digits
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT po
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 307063 serious
Bug#307063: ec-fonts-mftraced: install fails if tetex-bin not installed
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
* Tomas Fasth [Tue, 02 Aug 2005 03:02:36 +0200]:
> Hello,
> I recently adopted this package and wasn't aware that this was
> broken. I have decided to not support an upgrade path from version
> older than 2.6. The faulty code that was intended to handle the
> upgrade has been removed in preparatio
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318690: fixed in libhoard 2.1.2d-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:31:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259816: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.207-9
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
util-vserver failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder:
if diet -Os gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I ./lib -I ./ensc_wrappers
-D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG -DN
Package: vic
Version: 1:2.8ucl1.1.5-6
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
vic failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder:
c++ -O2 -g -Wall -DUSE_NON_CONST -DLinux -DHAVE_IPV6 -DLINUX_IPV6 -DUSE_SHM
-fsigned-char -DED_YBITS=4 -DSIGRET=void -DNLAYE
Package: kile
Version: 1:1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
kile fails to build on my sparc pbuilder: (It failed on the sparc buildd
due to an uninstallable dependacy.)
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/kile -I../.. -I/usr/include/kde
-I/usr/share/qt3/in
Package: gs-esp
Version: 8+8.15rc3.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
gs-esp failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder:
sparc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_HYPOT -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototyp
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.34-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
clisp failed to build on a sparc buildd:
chmod +w config.lisp
echo '(setq *clhs-root-default* "http://www.lisp.org/HyperSpec/";)' >>
config.lisp
./lisp.run -B . -N locale -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8
Your message dated Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:17:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bug!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321147: fixed in enigmail 2:0.92-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:00:01 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Torsten,
>
> please re-run the bogofilter command that goes into a loop with the
> -vvxdi options set, and make sure you are not accidentally discarding
> debugging output. The output generated may help us isolate the problem.
>
> Thank
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:19:35PM -0400, Gravis Zero wrote:
> The name of this software MUST be changed. Short of this,
> this application should NOT be distributed.
First, we found no evidence of kedit or KEDIT being trademarked
at uspto.gov or TESS search.
Second we do not _proactivelly_ enf
Your message dated Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:49:39 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321136: kedit: TRADEMARK VIOLATION
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:16:03PM -0700, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 04:21:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Yes, libgmp is the only C++ lib that ghc6 depends on. I had already
> > talked to the maintainer about doing a rebuild NMU for this (he isn't
> > planning to work on
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321090: fixed in openh323 1.15.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Op wo, 03-08-2005 te 14:16 -0700, schreef Chuan-kai Lin:
> I just tried: ghc-6.4 fails to build on gcc-4.0. The Fedora people had
> also come to the same conclusion:
>
> http://haskell.org/fedora/haskell/4/x86_64/repodata/repoview/ghc-0-6.4.1.20050626-0.html
>
> So there we are. I would like to
At Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:02:46 -0400,
Josh Metzler wrote:
> As far as I understand, #318979 caused xorg-x11 to FTBFS on sparc because it
> included which used __user but failed to include
> where __user was defined. This was apparently fixed in
> linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1. So, #318979
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 317467 serious
Bug#317467: FTBFS: Build-Depends missing tk8.4
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 317467 321093
Bug#317467: FTBFS: Build-Depends missing tk8.4
Bug#321093: mpich: missing build-dependency on tk8.4
Merged 317467 321093.
>
End of
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 04:21:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, libgmp is the only C++ lib that ghc6 depends on. I had already
> talked to the maintainer about doing a rebuild NMU for this (he isn't
> planning to work on these packages until the new upstream version
> comes out), but if som
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.3
> severity 320535 serious
Bug#320535: racoonctl is linked against libracoon which isn't included
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Package: anjuta
Version: 1.2.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #320751
After an apt-get upgrade that replaced xfree86 components with
xorg equivalents, only Anjuta appears to have been affected. Running
Anjuta under KDE, all the menus and toolbars, file selectors and
message window contents are fine. The edi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 316584 + fixed
Bug#316584: libmusicbrainz-2.1: FTBFS with g++-4.0: cast from 'char*' to 'int'
loses precision
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 318518 + pending
Bug#318518: libcrypto++: FTBFS: CryptoPP::FixedRounds<16u>::
is/uses an anonymous type
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 21:19:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:17:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321145: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.30-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: libcgicc
Version: 3.2.3-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is a C++ package which needs a rebuild.
g++ -I/usr/include -g -O2 -L/usr/lib -lcgicc -o dnd main.o
/usr/lib/libcgicc.so: undefined reference to
`std::__default_alloc_template::allocate(unsigned
Hi Helge,
* Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-03 21:43]:
> Hallo Nico,
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 03:03:18AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > #320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and poss
Package: enigmail
Version: 2:0.92-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package has a build dependeny on:
mozilla-dev (>= 2:1.7.8), mozilla-dev (<< 2:1.7.8.0)
This currently can't be satisfied in sid because version
2:1.7.10-1 is already in sid, and that's newer.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.30-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because you don't have a build
dependency on fastjar.
>From the log:
JAR=fastjar ./configure \
--with-origin-name=gcj-4.0 \
--with-gcc-suffix=-4.0 \
--with-arch-directory=s39
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 321126 2.6.3
Bug#321126: dupload stops uploading
Bug marked as not found in version 2.6.3.
> -- apologies
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.3
> found 321126 2.6.3
Bug#321126: dupload stops uploading
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.3.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Hallo Nico,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 03:03:18AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and possibly
> oldstable,
> which was filed against the fetchmail package.
>
> It h
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 12:50:32PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I can confirm that fam 2.7.0-7 fixes this problem.
> It's a real pity sarge shipped with the broken version.
Okay. I need to do an upload to sarge to fix #316579 anyway, which
seems to be the same bug as this one. I will let you know
severity 321133 important
reassign 321133 libssl0.9.7
thanks
#include
* Matt Price [Wed, Aug 03 2005, 01:11:29PM]:
> Package: encfs
> Version: 1.2.3.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> hi there,
>
> all attempts to use encfs result in the following error message:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 321133 important
Bug#321133: encfs: "relocation error"
Severity set to `important'.
> reassign 321133 libssl0.9.7
Bug#321133: encfs: "relocation error"
Bug reassigned from package `encfs' to `libssl0.9.7'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Package: kedit
Severity: critical
>From http://www.kedit.com
"KEDIT is a trademark of Mansfield Software Group, Inc."
The name of this software MUST be changed. Short of this,
this application should NOT be distributed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers uns
Package: encfs
Version: 1.2.3.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hi there,
all attempts to use encfs result in the following error message:
encfs: relocation error: /usr/lib/libencfs.so.1: undefined symbol:
EVP_bf_cfb64
I'm afraid I have no idea what that means...
in
I can confirm that fam 2.7.0-7 fixes this problem.
It's a real pity sarge shipped with the broken version.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Torsten,
please re-run the bogofilter command that goes into a loop with the
-vvxdi options set, and make sure you are not accidentally discarding
debugging output. The output generated may help us isolate the problem.
Thanks.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Package: anjuta
Version: 1.2.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #320751
I had the same problem on ,my laptop, and luckily it still worked fine on
this machine, so I could compare libraries and versions, and determined that
the problem went away when I downgraded the 'libpango1.0' packages from
version 1.8.2-1
Package: dupload
Version: 2.6.3.1
Severity: grave
Great, you've added yet another layer of checks for gpg signatures,
duplicating checks in several other places after the upload. However,
you've now broken all of the buildds with this change. If the key cannot be
found to do the verification, yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318524: fixed in biew 5.6.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: gnome-apt
Version: 0.4.7-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Fails to build with :
make[4]: entrant dans le répertoire «
/home/sven/debian/gnome/gnome-apt-0.4.7/src/gdeb »
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/include
-I/usr/include/libgksu1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/u
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:37:13AM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> I was just talking in #debian-devel and it seems the path is clear for
> a update for this bug to go in...
You are right in that the g++ ABI transition path is now clear, but
another semi-showstopper related to apt 0.6 transition turne
> From the bug description, the problem should be demonstrable with a
> script like the one attached and an appropriate message file. The
> combination of attached script & message work fine for me.
Same here;
LANG: C, LC_CTYPE: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# 10 words, 1 message
# 10 words, 1 message
X-B
Yes, you simply have to recompile the current source package, without
a change (tested on i386 and sparc, with the current up-to-date sid).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 321071 important
Bug#321071: gaim: Gaim segfaults when syncing buddy list
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Only the web pages of this packages are not DFSG free. I have started to
rewrite them, but it takes some time.
So, please don't remove this package from main.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PR
Package: djvulibre
Version: 3.5.14-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
djvulibre fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to
bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
-O2 or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.
A full buil
Package: libtunepimp
Version: 0.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
libtunepimp fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to
bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
-O2 or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.
A full b
Package: opencv
Version: 0.9.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
opencv fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to
bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
-O2 or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.
A full buildd log
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
