On Céad, 2005-06-29 at 09:58 -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> As of Wednesday, the priority of libslang2 is still standard, which
> prevents pbuilder from creating a chroot. Is this bug really fixed or
> does an ftp-master need to update the override file?
The package priority is required,
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316263: fixed in idesk 0.7.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
On 2005/06/29, at 17:14, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Well, the idea (sorry if I didn't explain myself properly) was not to
> ship ruby1.9 in any Debian stable release, not only Sarge. For this,
> the bug would have to be kept open even after releasing Sarge,
> otherwise the package will mig
Package: gcc-4.0
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hello,
I am trying to compile gcc-4.0 on Ubuntu, so I can recompile the
latest openoffice.org2 package.
However, I get different errors each time. I don't think these are ubuntu
specific. If you consider this the wron
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:51:03 -0400 grok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I am getting this crash pretty regularly now when I start shuffling
> around the 'snapshot' URLs
Can you elaborate?
ELinks will crash if one selects a bookmark, selects Delete, allows
the session snapshotting (or anything
Subject: Re: Bug #312552 - Obsolete package
Followup-For: Bug #312552
Package: unrar-free
Version: 1:0.0.1-2
*** Please type your report below this line ***
It is USABLE.
I don't use non-free softwares.
Therefore, I don't use the non-free rar 3.x.
This package at least provides the ability
to d
I downgraded libgsf to version from stable, and
gnumeric doesn't crash anymore. My mistake was
that I looked at apt-cache output instead of looking
at actual version of package.
Sorry for the noise,
Yevgen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reopen 315914
Bug#315914: libslang2 must be equal or greater Priority as whiptail
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:58:50AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> As of Wednesday, the priority of libslang2 is still standard, which
> prevents pbuilder from creating a chroot. Is this bug really fixed or
> does an ftp-master need to update the override file?
Seems to me that ftpmaster st
Howdy,
As of Wednesday, the priority of libslang2 is still standard, which
prevents pbuilder from creating a chroot. Is this bug really fixed or
does an ftp-master need to update the override file?
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:02:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315771: fixed in perdition 1.17-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:37:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316307: fakeroot: fakeroot execs interactive /bin/sh
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:37:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316307: fakeroot: fakeroot execs interactive /bin/sh
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: fakeroot
Version: 1.4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The fakeroot scripts do not have the #! prefix before the path.
This causes fakeroot to invoke a shell, waiting for user response (^D
/ exit) before actually running the program requested.
$ mkdir foo
$ cd
Package: fakeroot
Version: 1.4
Severity: grave
As of version 1.4, fakeroot gives me an interactive /bin/sh before
executing the command given on the command line:
,
| $ fakeroot debian/rules clean
| sh-3.00$ exit
| dh_testdir
| dh_testroot
| dh_clean
| [...]
`
After downgrading to 1.2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316301 sid
Bug#316301: gdesklets not installable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: gdesklets
Severity: serious
Justification: unknow
Please fix dependency problem (libgtop2-5 instead of libgtop2-2).
bobok:/home/djdeath# apt-get install gdesklets
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:14:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316295: phpbb 2.0.16 is out
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
> Corrin wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:06, Gary V wrote:
>>> BTW, razor version 2.74 which does address the Segfault issue is
>>> available.
>> Yes, though I'd prefer to concentrate on getting the patched version into
>> stable than going from a patched 2.72 to an unpatches 2.74.
There are
Package: phpbb2
Version: 2.0.13-6
Severity: grave
Tags: security
phpBB Group announces the release of phpBB 2.0.16. This release
addresses some bugfixes and one critical security issue.
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=302011
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefer
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:47:52PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:19:01PM +0100, Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Please find attached patch file to build spfmilter with libspf instead
> > of libspf2. This should fix both bug#307086[0] and bug#306071[1].
>
>
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:06, Gary V wrote:
> BTW, razor version 2.74 which does address the Segfault issue is
> available.
Yes, though I'd prefer to concentrate on getting the patched version into
stable than going from a patched 2.72 to an unpatches 2.74.
> Note that razor-client is now depre
Package: mysql-query-browser
Version: 1.1.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the
following error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DXTHREADS -pthread -DORBIT2=1
-I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/u
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Works fine for me. What terminal are you using it in? Does it work for you
> in an xterm?
Fails for me in konsole (my default choice), xterm, rxvt & eterm. I
couldn't think of any others to try. I just now noticed that it does work
on my framebuffe
Hi.
There was't reason. The package was rebuild from scratch because many
things changed.
This problem and other two minor bugs were fixed in the version 0.7.3-2
package, as soon as ready (may be tomorrow) the package will be released.
Thanks
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Package: idesk
Versi
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:32:06PM -0700, Paul Telford wrote:
> Package: w3m-img
> Version: 0.5.1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> w3m-img which (AIUI) is supposed to allow w3m to display images inline,
> does not seem to do anything at all. No images are displayed,
severity 316273 important
thanks
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:34:33PM +0200, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> Package: kwiki
> Version: 0.18-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 12.5
> debian/copyright doesn't mention where kwiki sources were obtained. This
> is a violation of policy 12.5. Fix shou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 316273 important
Bug#316273: kwiki: copyright file doesn't say where the upstream sources were
obtained
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316263 sid
Bug#316263: idesk should be arch: any
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316247 sid
Bug#316247: python-apt has missing dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 08:30:55PM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> 4/ I have tried to make a submittable patch, but I noticed that 0.36-1
> was using upstream's 0.18 release (I may have been mistaken).
You're right, although the package version is 0.36-1, it contains
upstream version 0.18
Package: w3m-img
Version: 0.5.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
w3m-img which (AIUI) is supposed to allow w3m to display images inline,
does not seem to do anything at all. No images are displayed, no matter
what combination of options I try. The documentation is non-e
Package: kwiki
Version: 0.18-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
debian/copyright doesn't mention where kwiki sources were obtained. This
is a violation of policy 12.5. Fix should be trivial, as I guess the
maintainer knows where he finds the upstream sources.
-- System Information:
D
I have no problems on my system, and the only difference seems to be my
version of libc6. I've got 2.3.2.ds1-22 installed, and you have
2.3.5-1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suggest tagging this moreinfo,unreproducible, and downgrading when
and if that is necessary for new packages to move to testing (which
should be deliberately prevented until #314289 is fixed).
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: xosview
Version: 1.8.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
The sparc buildd failed to build this package due to a g++ error.
Many packages that attepmted buidling on that day had gcc problems, so
this looks like a gcc version or buildd problem.
On my s
Package: idesk
Version: 0.7.3-1
Severity: serious
idesk has been changed from "Architecture: any" to "Architecture: i386".
This is a policy violation, unless there is a reason for such a change
(but idesk 0.7.3-1 still run fine on my sparc). In that case, an
explanation in the changelog would ha
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:24:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316251: aptitude: Stops working after an upgrade of
apt/dpkg (recompile needed?)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
BTW, razor version 2.74 which does address the Segfault issue is available.
Note that razor-client is now deprecated, so /etc/razor/razor-agent.conf
will no longer be created when you run razor-client. This is
actually a good thing. Now when you run 'razor-admin -create',
razor-agent.c
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 07:10:32PM +0200, Johannes Raspe wrote:
> Package: python-apt
> Version: 0.5.10
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Thanks for your bugreport.
> trying to install python-apt results in the following missing dependencies:
> python-apt:
> Hängt ab:
For What It's Worth, I patched version 2.67 with this patch, and the program
appeared to work normally. It did not Segfault when fed email.txt, and it still
detected it as spam, but I am not a programmer, so draw your own conclusions;
no warranty:
sample email at: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/ema
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.5.10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
trying to install python-apt results in the following missing dependencies:
python-apt:
Hängt ab: libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0 but it is not installable
Hängt ab: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 but it is no
Title: lit
http://ct2edta.salacious.ldlfjd.info/?Of8026
$655,000.00 / 28 yrs / 2.92% APR
"It is a title I have always wanted, I probably haven't ridden as well as I could have in the past in this event, but everything came together at the weekend and it was great to win the Open, right here
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:18:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315566: fixed in ruby1.8 1.8.2-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: spfmilter
Version: 1.99+0.95-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
spfmilter can not be installed because of broken depencency. spfmilter does
want libspf2-0 (>=1.0.4) which is not available (only libspf2-2 is
available).
spfmilter depends on libspf2-0 (>= 1.0.4)
libs
Steve Kemp wrote:
> > |Proxy HTTP: If a response contains both Transfer-Encoding
> > |and a Content-Length, remove the Content-Length to eliminate
> > |an HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability and don't reuse the
> > |connection, stopping some HTTP Request Spoofing attacks.
>
> Ca
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 07:11:49PM -0400, Igor Belyi wrote:
> Attached is the /etc/lvm/backup/lvmg config file for the group.
You forget one essential information: lvm1 or lvm2 metadata, otherwise
I'm only able to say: works for me.
Bastian
--
Love sometimes expresses itself in sacrifice.
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 08:49:21AM -0400, Igor Belyi wrote:
Here's what I get with lvm2 2.01.04-5 tools:
# vgdisplay lvmg
[...]
Formatlvm1
[...]
So it is lvm1.
Do you need those 64K of metadata as well?
On related note, is it possibl
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 08:49:21AM -0400, Igor Belyi wrote:
> Here's what I get with lvm2 2.01.04-5 tools:
> # vgdisplay lvmg
[...]
> Formatlvm1
[...]
So it is lvm1.
> On related note, is it possible to convert it into lvm2 without loosing
> data?
Yes, it is, vgconvert will do
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 07:11:49PM -0400, Igor Belyi wrote:
Attached is the /etc/lvm/backup/lvmg config file for the group.
You forget one essential information: lvm1 or lvm2 metadata, otherwise
I'm only able to say: works for me.
Bastian
Here's what I get wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 316096 serious
Bug#316096: gnumeric: Crash when saving to MS Excel format
Severity set to `serious'.
> reassign 316096 libgsf-1
Bug#316096: gnumeric: Crash when saving to MS Excel format
Bug reassigned from package `gnumeric' to `libgsf-1'.
>
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2005 07:32:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316181: fixed in pkg-config 0.18.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2005 04:44 schrieben Sie:
> > Yes. This is known. But I have nothing no no clue about python...
>
> It would appear to be because:
>
> 1. python can't find the shared library, need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
> /usr/lib/openoffice2/program. Ideally the library should go so
Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2005 05.18 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
> Fix to corrupted emails crashing razor (Closes: #314433)
> This fix is a hack (from freeBSD). Hopefully the next version will
> fix the issue correctly. The version of razor released with stable (2.67)
> is not vulnerable
Package: flwm
Version: 1.00-7
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Sometimes, flwm just "loses" a window. The client thinks it's still connected
to the X server, but I can't find it in the flwm menu, and I don't know another
way to get it to reappear.
I'm not sure yet what c
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316157: fixed in gringotts 1.2.8+1.2.9pre1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
56 matches
Mail list logo
