Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 15:36:41 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304092: ultrapossum-slapd: FTBFS: failed test
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: oops
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security patch sid woody
> Justification: user security hole
>
> [Cc:ing security@, should affect woody as well]
It does.
> A format string vulnerability in the auth() function for SQL database
> user handling possibly permits e
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 01:17:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307591: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: gnumeric-doc
Severity: grave
I recently upgraded a system from gnumeric-doc version 1.4.3-4 to 1.4.3-5,
and noticed that the installed-size dropped from about 6MB to 90k. Sure
enough, the entire contents of /usr/share/gnumeric/1.4.3/doc/ have vanished,
making this a significantly less-use
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 303860 + sarge
Bug#303860: celestia: ftbfs [sparc] no KDE libraries installed
Tags were: sid
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 23:47:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307567: fixed in apache2 2.0.54-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Besides apparently breaking the installation of libapache2-mod-php4,
Which is actually a seperate bug...
> all of the above violate policy 12.6.
And yeah, we've known for ages, and as there was never a formal bug filed,
it always kept slipping from memory every time I went t
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:03:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> > Format: 1.7
> > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:38:16 -0600
> > Source: tetex-bin
> > Binary: libkpathsea3 tetex-bin libkpathsea-dev
> > Architecture: source i386
> > Version: 2.0.2-29
> > [...]
> > Changes:
> > tetex-b
As from the subject: should this problem be tagged "sarge" as the description
says it's not present in postfix 2.2, which is the one in unstable...
Thanks,
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:00:27PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> [CCed d-release for approval]
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper'
> > to debian/control.
> I uploaded an NMU for this:
Approved.
Thanks,
--
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:03:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Hmm. Did you mean to remove debian/watch and add
> debian/control_damaged_CVS_file in this upload?
Oh. It seems that debian/watch got lost in the the gluck crash. I'll
restore that now, but it's certainly not crit
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 20:02:36 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307625: fixed in gcc-3.4 3.4.3-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
> > Seems like a serious bug somewhere, but not in gettext, who just assumes
> > that their build dependencies may be installed.
>
> This is because gcc-3.3 is currently FTBFS in unstable. :/
>
> > [ Hmm, I wish autobuilders ran sarge for packages that are going to be part
> > of sarge, at least
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 233996 grave
Bug#233996: libc6: non-debug binaries do odd things to the stack
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
severity 307832 important
thanks
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:09:12PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> [1] This is what aptitude says is included with thie package:
>
> # aptitude show freewrl
> Package: freewrl
> State: installed
> Automatically installed: no
> Version: 1.07-1
> ...
> Descript
After upgrading the kernel on my sparc pbuilder to 2.6.8-6, (sarge
version) I retried the build and it succeeded.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard featur
Hi Julian,
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:38:16 -0600
> Source: tetex-bin
> Binary: libkpathsea3 tetex-bin libkpathsea-dev
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 2.0.2-29
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: teTeX maintainers
> Changed-By: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:03:52PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> gettext_0.14.4-2, just uploaded for unstable, fails to build from
> source on at least the following archs:
> mipsel
> hppa
> sparc
> arm
> mips
> The error is always the same:
> jikes-classpath: Depends: classpath but it is not
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 18:32:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302677: fixed in qmail 1.03-37
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 307832 important
Bug#307832: freewrl: NO plugin file included
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 307788 minor
Bug#307788: hplip FTBFS, if python2.2 is installed.
Severity set to `minor'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
On Fri, 06 May 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> > On Thu, 05 May 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > PYVERSION=`/usr/bin/python -c 'import sys; print sys.version[:3]'`
> > > PYTHONSEARCHPATH="python python$PYVERSION python2.2 python2.3 python2.4"
> >
> > That shoul
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> tags 307816 -sid
> thanks
>
> That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report,
> the package in sarge is not really usable.
Agreed.
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:16:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, M
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 18:17:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307816: fixed in tetex-bin 2.0.2-29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, 05 May 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> PYVERSION=`/usr/bin/python -c 'import sys; print sys.version[:3]'`
> PYTHONSEARCHPATH="python python$PYVERSION python2.2 python2.3 python2.4"
That should be completely innefective. That's used to set a yes/no flag, and
abort with an error if python was
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> On Thu, 05 May 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > PYVERSION=`/usr/bin/python -c 'import sys; print sys.version[:3]'`
> > PYTHONSEARCHPATH="python python$PYVERSION python2.2 python2.3 python2.4"
>
> That should be completely innefective. That's used to set a yes/n
I am including a fix for the missing build-depends line in the control file.
However, I am not changing how the package presently handles creating the users.
qmail-src is not in the main package repository. It's in the non-free
repository, which, in reality, means it's not officially part of Deb
[To debian-release: this is about bug#307816 and bug#300768]
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: cweb
> Severity: grave
>
>
> Sid:
>
> cweb is a dummy package.
>
> cweb depends on tetex-bin.
> tetex-bin conflicts with cweb.
>
> cweb is therefore not install
tags 307816 -sid
thanks
That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report,
the package in sarge is not really usable.
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:16:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: cweb
> > Severity:
On Thu, 05 May 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> the configury gets the wrong python installation, for which no python
> qt modules are available.
Huh? I have python2.2 installed here, and it builds just fine.
Ah, you must mean python2.2-dev. I will test that.
> See the diffs to configure and conf
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> On Thu, 05 May 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > the configury gets the wrong python installation, for which no python
> > qt modules are available.
>
> Huh? I have python2.2 installed here, and it builds just fine.
>
> Ah, you must mean python2.2-dev. I will
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 300432 grave
Bug#300432: Spontaneously reboots server...
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 307816 -sid
Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 289708 woody
Bug#289708: kernel-source-2.4.18: binfmt_elf uselib insert race vulnerability
Tags were: security
Tags added: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 307784 libpam-pgsql
Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366
Bug reassigned from package `pam-pgsql' to `libpam-pgsql'.
> merge 307784 230875
Bug#230875: libpam-pgsql: Some note
severity 307683 important
thanks
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On 5/5/05, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:08:12PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > It seems the environment variable AWK is set somewhere to gawk, I
> > > just h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 307683 important
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: cweb
> Severity: grave
> It might be the best to simply remove the cweb package since
> the Conflicts/Replaces/Provides in tetex-bin should be enough.
That doesn't provide a usable automatic transition from woody, though.
--
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:11:56PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> The bug 304367 appears to have been fixed for 21 days, but it has not
> been pushed into testing. This package is priority important. The fix
> (already done) is not to build certain packages that are also in
> openldap2.2, as th
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:15:39AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and
> > > libpam-ldap need to be linked agains
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 307816 sid
Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 307632 critical
Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile)
Severity set to `critical'.
> tags 307632 security
Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 307706 - fixed
Bug#307706: m-tx: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Tags were: fixed sarge
Tags removed: fixed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> Could be something in how r-base is built on amd64... Dirk, any ideas?
> I think it has something to do with /usr/lib/R/etc/Renviron.
It says:
## Use configure values
AWK=${AWK-'gawk'}
While on i386 it says:
## Use configure value
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:30:29PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> ifndef HOST
> HOST=$(shell hostname).$(shell domainname)
Also, /bin/domainname is provided by the 'nis' package, how is this
supposed to work? I wonder why this doesn't cause a FTBFS too,
considering that $HOST isn't general
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:41:13PM +0200, Primoz Bratanic wrote:
> Package: pam-pgsql
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
> Justification: root security hole
> The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open
> again. The changes have disappeared. Please see the patch
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 05-May-05 13:53, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4
> > > -m32' does not work
> > > tags 307521 +patch
> > > t
libapache-mod-php4.postinst:cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini
$phpini
libapache2-mod-php4.postinst: cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini
$phpini
php4-cgi.postinst: cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini $phpini
php4-cli.postinst:cp
/usr/s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 230875 - fixed
Bug#230875: libpam-pgsql: Some notes about pam_pgsql security
Tags were: fixed security
Tags removed: fixed
> severity 307784 grave
Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-200
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 307167 + fixed
Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege
escalation
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
severity 306878 normal
thanks
I'll leave closing the bug up to the maintainer, but based on Allan
Lyons's review, this bug is not RC so I'm downgrading it.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 5/5/05, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:08:12PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > It seems the environment variable AWK is set somewhere to gawk, I
> > just have no idea where.
>
> I'm seeing this only in my amd64 chroot it seems. When I try the
> same in my i38
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 306878 normal
Bug#306878: security hole in ldapdiff.conf path construction
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Just a reminder that it's been 5 days since you promised a fix for this
RC bug "shortly".
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 307820 sarge-ignore
Bug#307820: anon-proxy: [manual] GFDL license is unsuitable for manual pages
(use GPL)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
>
End of message, st
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 15:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307820: fixed in anon-proxy 00.02.39-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi
On 2005-05-05 Sean Finney wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > So it's: "if ( dh_answer==true and no_other_installed_server ) purge();"
>
> okay, that makes sense.
>
> the no_other_installed_server could probably be simplified, now that i'm
> think
severity 307632 normal
thanks
This bug is not RC and is not a security issue. The piece of policy
quoted is intended to warn against attacks such as symlink attacks that
can be performed on unsafely created temp files. The program in question
is run during a fai install, before the system is multi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 307632 normal
Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile)
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Package: fai
Version: 2.8.1
Severity: serious
The script lib/updatebase creates unsecure temp file when called from
task softupdate. This violates the policy.
--
regards Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:08:12PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> It seems the environment variable AWK is set somewhere to gawk, I
> just have no idea where.
I'm seeing this only in my amd64 chroot it seems. When I try the
same in my i386 chroot, it uses mawk. All the buildd logs also
use mawk, an
Sorry, somehow I forgot to answer.
While I agree that the runlevel may be too early I do not agree on this
part of the bug report:
for now I can only say that it should not restart computer in a case of
single failure (upgrade of deamons)
I want my system to be rebooted on a single failure. I wa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 300432 normal
Bug#300432: Spontaneously reboots server...
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Package: freewrl
Version: 1.07-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[1] This is what aptitude says is included with thie package:
# aptitude show freewrl
Package: freewrl
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 1.07-1
...
Description: VRML browser and netscap
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:33:17PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> Funnily enough, it builds here just fine without gawk installed. Are
> you sure you have all of build-essential installed in your chroot,
> including an awk interpreter (mawk is Priority: required, and thus not
> listed in b-e but s
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 14:47:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306261: fixed in ppp 2.4.3-20050321+2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 304786 phpmyadmin
Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf
Bug reassigned from package `apache2-common' to `phpmyadmin'.
> severity 304786 critical
Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf
Severity s
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> So it's: "if ( dh_answer==true and no_other_installed_server ) purge();"
okay, that makes sense.
the no_other_installed_server could probably be simplified, now that i'm
thinking of it. since this is in the postrm, the packag
Looking for popular sfotware, but tight on budget?
We are selilng world bestseslers at the chaepest prcices around! Why so csheap? We don't sel'll
progrmas in a fancy box, with printed documentation, etc., meaning we do not shell out on CD manufacturing.
The sosft is only what you get - availabl
tags 307683 +sarge +moreinfo
thanks
Funnily enough, it builds here just fine without gawk installed. Are
you sure you have all of build-essential installed in your chroot,
including an awk interpreter (mawk is Priority: required, and thus not
listed in b-e but should be present nonetheless)?
On
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 307683 +sarge +moreinfo
Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstr
Package: anon-proxy
Severity: serious
The use of GDFL is questionable for manual pages. Please change the
licence to GPL, because GFDL is known to caus elot of problem when
texts are changed (embedded / copied).
My use of "Severity: serious" derives from my attempt to interpret
Debian Guidelines
Hi.
gettext_0.14.4-2, just uploaded for unstable, fails to build from
source on at least the following archs:
mipsel
hppa
sparc
arm
mips
The error is always the same:
jikes-classpath: Depends: classpath but it is not going to be installed
Seems like a serious bug somewhere, but not in gettex
Hello
On 2005-05-05 Sean Finney wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:34:47AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > I think the following will work:
> > 1. Seting Woodies debconf answer to false once MySQL 4.0 or 4.1 gets
> > installed so that his danger is voided once for all.
>
> sounds like a
Package: cweb
Severity: grave
Sid:
cweb is a dummy package.
cweb depends on tetex-bin.
tetex-bin conflicts with cweb.
cweb is therefore not installable
Sarge:
cweb is a real package.
cweb recommends tetex-bin.
tetex-bin conflicts with cweb.
cweb is therefore hardly usable.
It might be t
Hi Blars,
I wasn't able to reproduce this bug you reported ("celestia: ftbfs
[sparc] no KDE libraries installed") on i386.
Please:
- send your config.log
- test whether version 1.3.0-1 in sarge has the same issue
TIA
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly ou
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 12:17:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#217678: fixed in apt-file 2.0.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 304933 patch
Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to
function `afsconf_AddKey'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, st
Quoting Tomas Hoger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
> > I think it is an FTBFS bug. The following should generally work:
> >
> > apt-get source qmail
> > cd qmail-*
> > dpkg-buildpackage
> >
> > For qmail, this does not work because of the missing Build-Depends on
> > groff-base and because of the mi
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 11:32:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307749: fixed in gettext 0.14.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 263870 RM: jakarta-log4j -- RoQA; RC bug, obsoleted by
> jakarta-log4j1.2
Bug#263870: ITA: jakarta-log4j -- Logging library for Java
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 263870 ftp.debian.org
Bug#263870: RM: jakarta-log4j -- RoQA; RC bug, obsoleted b
tags 307167 patch
thanks
Patch attached.
Moritz
diff -Naur affix-kernel-2.1.1.orig/btcore/hci.c affix-kernel-2.1.1/btcore/hci.c
--- affix-kernel-2.1.1.orig/btcore/hci.c2003-12-19 15:29:20.0
+0100
+++ affix-kernel-2.1.1/btcore/hci.c 2005-05-05 17:30:00.0 +0200
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I hadn't checked it yet, it was still on the list of TODOs along with
> netkit-telnet and netkit-telnet-ssl. I just checked and it is in
> fact vulnerable for CAN-2005-0469 as well. I can send a patch later
> if you haven't prepa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 307167 patch
Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege
escalation
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Thu, 5 May 2005 13:02:38 +0200,
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:54:38AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:01:41PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> > Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > I think we can remove jakarta-log4j as
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 16:20:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 16:19:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 16:22:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
The bug 304367 appears to have been fixed for 21 days, but it has not
been pushed into testing. This package is priority important. The fix
(already done) is not to build certain packages that are also in
openldap2.2, as this would make security support impossible.
Torsten, et al., is this ready
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > CAN-2005-0469 describes a buffer overflow in the slc_add_reply()
> > function. It has already been fixed in krb5, but is present in
> > krb4 as well. I'm not familiar with the krn4 code base, but the
> > fix from krb5 seems applicable as well. It's attached, but please
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> CAN-2005-0469 describes a buffer overflow in the slc_add_reply()
> function. It has already been fixed in krb5, but is present in
> krb4 as well. I'm not familiar with the krn4 code base, but the
> fix from krb5 seems applicable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 305412 + fixed
Bug#305412: p2c segfaults on specific input
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 307706 + fixed
Bug#307706: m-tx: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 306141 woody sarge sid
Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in slc_add_reply()
and env_opt_add()
Tags were: security patch
Tags added: woody, sarge, sid
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> retitle 306141 CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in
> slc_add_reply() and env_opt_add()
Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflow in slc_add_reply()
Changed Bug title.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> CAN-2005-0469 describes a buffer overflow in the slc_add_reply()
> function. It has already been fixed in krb5, but is present in
> krb4 as well. I'm not familiar with the krn4 code base, but the
> fix from krb5 seems applicable
Hi,
in a minute, I will upload the attached changes to p2c. Josip (or the
respective p2c maintainer), please incorporate them into the next
maintainer upload.
Thanks.
bye,
Roland
--
diff -ruN ../p2c-1.21alpha2/debian/changelog p2c-1.21alpha2/debian/changelog
--- ../p2c-1.21alpha2/debian/chang
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:18:38PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
...
> However, running with a uid an gid other than proxy is not supported.
> Also the spool-dir shouldn't really be changed, especially to /var/tmp
> as it it unpredictable what may happen if all sorts of non-wwwoffle
> files are encou
Package: xtradius
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is no user input verification whatsoever. In
/contrib/authmysql/authmysql.c username
supplied by user is fed directly to database.
Primoz Bratanic
- -- Syst
Package: xosd
Version: 2.2.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
Hi,
building the package xosd in a clean sarge build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
checki
Package: hplip
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
the configury gets the wrong python installation, for which no python
qt modules are available.
See the diffs to configure and configure.in for a patch to get the
default python version.
http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/hplip.diff
-
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
