On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 15:36 -0700, Corey Hickey wrote:
> Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> > as you might have noticed, a very similar bug was opened 6 years ago
> > (bug number one order of magnitude lower than current). Unfortunately
> > I don't have access to an testing/unstable alpha right n
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> postalias: warning: inet_protocols: IPv6 support is disabled: Address
> family not supported by protocol
> postalias: warning: inet_protocols: configuring for IPv4 support only
Your kernel doesn't have support for IPv6. You need to add
inet_protocols
The last mdadm change -- 1.9.0-2.1 -- did NOT fix the bug,
but made the situation worse.
rcS.d/S04mdadm-raid is now the FIRST thing the system is
doing when booting. At that stage, /proc is not mounted
(it is mounted later), and in mdadm-raid bootscript, there's
the following code:
if [ "x
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 00:40:52 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed on glade-2 2.6.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
severity 304437 important
(Btag 304437 unreproducible
(Bstop
(B
(B2005-04-12 ($B2P(B) $B$N(B 23:14 -0600 $B$K(B dann frazier
$B$5$s$O=q$-$^$7$?(B:
(B> Package: evolution
(B> Version: 2.2.1.1-1
(B> Severity: grave
(B> Justification: renders package unusable
(B>
(B> After upgradin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 304437 important
Bug#304437: evolution: hang on startup after upgrade
Severity set to `important'.
> tag 304437 unreproducible
Bug#304437: evolution: hang on startup after upgrade
Tags were: sid
Tags added: unreproducible
> stop
Stopping proc
Package: evolution
Version: 2.2.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #304437
The evolution upgrade to 2.2.1 worked for me. Evolution started up without any
problems. Evolution prints a lot of messages about charset converters but I do
not remember if this was there before 2.2.1. The following lines are a samp
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 06:24:35PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:58:32AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Installing new version of config file /etc/postfix/postfix-files ...
> > postconf: error while loading shared libraries: libpostfix-global.so.1:
> > cannot open shared o
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:58:32AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Installing new version of config file /etc/postfix/postfix-files ...
> postconf: error while loading shared libraries: libpostfix-global.so.1:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Are there any diversions of pos
Package: postfix
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: grave
The severity is based on the fact that although postfix seems
to work, it should be investigated if these issues could
cause any harm.
<-- snip -->
# apt-get --purge install postfix
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Do
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:03:16AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:18:20PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > tags 301684 patch
> > thanks
>
> This patch looks generally OK to fix problem but I am not sure about
> one thing.
>
> > Proposed patch for this:
> ...
> > +@@@sta
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:18:20PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> tags 301684 patch
> thanks
This patch looks generally OK to fix problem but I am not sure about
one thing.
> Proposed patch for this:
...
> +@@@start-info-docbookxml-latexps-active@@@
> + -1 1 page per pag
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:02:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303420: fixed in tea 7.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:02:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303305: fixed in tea 7.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 304438 sid
Bug#304438: libphysfs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on
'automake-1.7'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 304438 serious
Bug#304438: libphysfs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on
'automake-1.7'
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:32:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296976: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: pavuk
Severity: serious
Tags: security
pavuk has some buffer overflows that are fixed in new upstream version
0.9.32.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8,
Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> as you might have noticed, a very similar bug was opened 6 years ago
> (bug number one order of magnitude lower than current). Unfortunately
> I don't have access to an testing/unstable alpha right now.
>
I was wondering if this might fix that, but I don't know
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of package
Package: libplanner1-0
Version: 0.13-0.1
Severity: serious
SÃlection du paquet libplanner1-0 prÃcÃdemment dÃsÃlectionnÃ.
DÃpaquetage de libplanner1-0 (Ã partir de
.../libplanner1-0_0.13-0.1_i386.deb) ...
dpkgÂ: erreur de traitement de
/var/cache/apt/archives/libplanner1-0_0.13-0.1_i386.deb (--u
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:32:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304390: fixed in postfix-gld 1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: slapd
Severity: serious
Hi,
Apparently the upstream authors of OpenLDAP decided that
limits user size=100
is no longer accepted, meaning slapd fails to start after upgrade.
It evades me why their parser in 2.1 didn't see this as a problem, yet the
new one suddenly breaks shit. I mean,
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:19:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304506: pvm[d] fails to start: /tmp/pvm./sock: No
such file ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:57:21PM +0100, Hugh C. Pumphrey wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pvm
> > libpvm [pid6045] /tmp/pvm.4222/sock: No such file or directory
> > libpvm [pid6045]: Console: Can't start pvmd
>
> Just a hunch; what does your /etc
El lun, 11-04-2005 a las 17:42 -0700, Steve Langasek escribiÃ:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:18AM +0300, Diana Cionoiu wrote:
> > Try to compile either Yate without Zaptel, either first install Zaptel.
>
> No, this is a package bug. Fix the package.
Yup, there is a problem here that I will t
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:47:40 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304208: fixed in usermin-contrib 1.110-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:33:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304378: fixed in regexp-pp 0.9.5.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Apr 2005 16:17:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304526: subversion: FTBFS: cdbs has no patchsys-quilt.mk
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Package: subversion
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: serious
subversion's debian/rules line 13:
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk
subversion's debian/control build-depends: cdbs (>=0.4.26)
cdbs 0.4.27-3 changelog.Debian, ChangeLog, and changelog make no
mention of quilt. There is a
Package: libxerces2-java
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libxerces2-java in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
prepare-common:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/
Package: swscanner
Version: 0.1.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
building the package swscanner in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
config.status: creating config.h
config.status
* Gert Doering ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050413 18:50]:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 06:14:02PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Juergen Kosel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050413 18:10]:
> > > in the debian bug tracking system I saw in
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199351
> >
> > Well,
Mike Furr wrote:
Samuel Mimram wrote:
Please also note that some files of this package are under the Q Public
License which is generally considered as non-DFSG-free. If someone
decides to maintain it, he will certainly have to deal this issue with
upstream (I don't have time for that, so I won't ad
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 05:57:21PM +0100, Hugh C. Pumphrey wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pvm
> libpvm [pid6045] /tmp/pvm.4222/sock: No such file or directory
> libpvm [pid6045]: Console: Can't start pvmd
Just a hunch; what does your /etc/hosts contain?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Samuel Mimram wrote:
> Please also note that some files of this package are under the Q Public
> License which is generally considered as non-DFSG-free. If someone
> decides to maintain it, he will certainly have to deal this issue with
> upstream (I d
Package: pvm
Version: 3.4.2-18
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Any attempt to start the pvm console results in the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pvm
libpvm [pid6045] /tmp/pvm.4222/sock: No such file or directory
libpvm [pid6045]: Console: Can't start pvmd
The log
hi,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 06:14:02PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Juergen Kosel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050413 18:10]:
> > in the debian bug tracking system I saw in
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199351
>
> Well, the bug is still open and tagged woody, because this bug i
* Juergen Kosel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050413 18:10]:
> in the debian bug tracking system I saw in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199351
>
> That there is a "bugreport" (more a bug mentioned) about a buffer
> overrun bug.
>
> In the changelog of mgetty, there was a bugfix for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301709 serious
Bug#301709: qgis: please depend upon xerces26 instead of xerces21
Severity set to `serious'.
> severity 301710 serious
Bug#301710: gdal: please depend upon xerces26 instead of xerces21
Bug#301650: Please rebuild gdal against a n
Hello,
in the debian bug tracking system I saw in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199351
That there is a "bugreport" (more a bug mentioned) about a buffer
overrun bug.
In the changelog of mgetty, there was a bugfix for a bufferoverrun in
connection with callerid/callername:
S
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:17:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304405: fixed in geneweb 4.10-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:22:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs for mysql-3.23 due to the release of an DSA
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Yes,
0.6.4-4.12 (from current sarge) works if /usr is mounted via nfs.
Frank
--
## Dept. of Computer Science, Dresden University of Technology, Germany ##
## http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~fm3 ##
pgpx3H50bUnxC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tags 303321 patch
thanks
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:04:50AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: uim
> Severity: serious
>
> Several of the binary packages build from uim conflict with each other,
> I confirmed this at least for
> libuim0-nox <-> libuim0 (e.g. usr/lib/uim/plugin/libuim-cust
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:22:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs for mysql-3.23 due to the release of an DSA
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
tags 301684 patch
thanks
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:05:58PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Bug#301684: userv: FTBFS: debiandoc2ps: unknown option
> `1'"):
> > Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> > sed -e '/<\/version>/ s/>/&1.0.3-2/' \
> > spec.s
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:22:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs for mysql-3.23 due to the release of an DSA
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301684 patch
Bug#301684: userv: FTBFS: debiandoc2ps: unknown option `1'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 303321 patch
Bug#303321: Several undeclared conflicts between binary packages from this
source package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Did you try pressing enter?
You can switch the behaviour back with an option, and the status bar
suggests to press enter. I know it's a behavioral change and sorry about
it, but the old behavior was even worse and more annoying that we
decided to change this.
--
P
Alberto Maurizi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Wed, Apr 13, 2005:
> When trying to fill in forms, the keystroke are bound by elinks as
> elinks shortcuts to commands.
> As an example, in the debian packages section on www.debian.org, if I
> try to type "elinks" in the "Search package directories" sectio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 285276 + fixed
Bug#285276: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957)
Tags were: pending patch security woody
Bug#296674: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957)
Tags added: fixed
> tag 296674 + fixed
Bug#2966
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:14:40PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Package: id-utils
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> Version: 3.2d-10
>
> >From the id-utils build log:
[...]
I found out what causes the FTBFS: If (x)emacs is installed (which is not
in the build de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 304475 sid
Bug#304475: elinks: filling form impossible
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 304470 sid
Bug#304470: glade-gnome-2: needs to be rebuilt using newer libraries
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:32:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304243: fixed in evolution-data-server1.2 1.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285111: fixed in postfix 2.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 à 19:22 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Does this bug also occur when using the cifs driver instead of the smbfs
> driver?
I couldn't reproduce the problem now... it looks like the bug only
happens with a Windows (2000) SMB server because I tried to reproduce
the proble
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:28:16PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: ocamldbi
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> ocamldbi needs to be rebuilt with ocaml 3.08.3, and its dependencies
> updated to ocaml{,-base}-nox-3.08.3.
I don't understand this messa
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294207: fixed in postfix 2.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On 13/04/2005-15:56, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:28:16PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > ocamldbi needs to be rebuilt with ocaml 3.08.3, and its dependencies
> > updated to ocaml{,-base}-nox-3.08.3.
>
> I don't understand this message. Subversion contains a debian/control
> I agree to this, a maintainer-script shouldn't just write on random
> places on the filesystem.
> For instance, looking a bit better at the code, I think it has a serious
> security problem. What if a malicious would do the following:
>
> touch mydata.gwb
> ln -s /sbin/init mydata.update.gw
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:34:31 +0200
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > All this unasked for. A maintainer script has no business messing
> > around with peoples data!
>
> It does not. It *adds* a xxx.update.gw file along with
Package: elinks
Version: 0.10.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to fill in forms, the keystroke are bound by elinks as
elinks shortcuts to commands.
As an example, in the debian packages section on www.debian.org, if I
try to type "elinks" in the "Search pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 304469 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46388
Bug#304469: openoffice.org: Invalid range checking in DOC header parsing
leading to possible heap overflow
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://www.openoffic
> In this case, you're creating the bin directory in the clean target.
debian/rules contains this:
clean::
rm -rf bin/*
debconf-updatepo
By remove the "/*" from the rm command line, the build works (on i386,
didn't try under mips; I did verify that the build problem was
reproduci
Package: glade-gnome-2
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: grave
This package is not installable. It depends on libgda2-1 and
libgnomedb2-3 which have been superseded by libgda2-3 and libgnomedb2-4.
cheers
domenico
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.3-8
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Lee Xioajun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reported an issue with invalid input
checks in DOC header parsing, which can possibly be exploited with remote
code execution. I'm including his advisory verbos
I looked at this bug and ran doc++ under valgrind on i386, and it found
a problem:
==24836== Mismatched free() / delete / delete []
==24836==at 0x1B904B04: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:152)
==24836==by 0x80813A6: TOClist::~TOClist()
(in /home/liw/Debian-bug-fixing/doc++/doc++-3.4.10/src/doc++
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 13:35 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> as you might have noticed, a very similar bug was opened 6 years ago
> (bug number one order of magnitude lower than current). Unfortunately
> I don't have access to an testing/unstable alpha right now.
>
> Falk: Can you confir
Package: wordpress
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Nicolas Montoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reported two security vulnerabilities
in Wordpress, which insert verbose, as I could not find a public WWW
reference for them.
Cheers,
Moritz
==
Package: libgnome2.0-cil
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
When installing libgnome2.0-cil with apt-get after a dist-upgrade to
unstable, it fails to install.
# apt-get install libgnome2.0-cil libgtksourceview2.0-cil
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building
Hello,
as you might have noticed, a very similar bug was opened 6 years ago
(bug number one order of magnitude lower than current). Unfortunately
I don't have access to an testing/unstable alpha right now.
Falk: Can you confirm that this patch fixes your bug as well?
Kaare: Does the entire demo
Package: kdelibs4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Invalid range checking in PCX header parsing possibly permits execution
of arbitrary code. Please see http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102328
for a full description, a crafted test image and a patch from Waldo Ba
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 304412 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46388
Bug#304412: CAN-2005-0941: "OpenOffice DOC document Heap Overflow"
Forwarded-to-address changed from
http://.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46388 to
http://www.openoffi
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: postfix-gld
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
The author has released version 1.5 fixing this, which I'll package ASAP.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
retitle 304434 bb: segfaults on amd64 and alpha (patch attached)
thanks
I can confirm that bb crashes on alpha too in the same way as on amd64,
thus indeed rendering this RC. Len's patch solves this issue on alpha
too.
-ukh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 304434 bb: segfaults on amd64 and alpha (patch attached)
Bug#304434: bb: segfaults on amd64 (patch attached)
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:02:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304409: fixed in childsplay 0.80.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:02:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304410: fixed in childsplay-plugins 0.80.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
81 matches
Mail list logo
