Hi Greg,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:17:49PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> I can arrange an account with sudo access.
> As long as we do the account info off-bug.
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:06 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Apologies for the dormancy on this bug; yours is one o
Hi Thomas,
I'm trying to understand this release critical bug.
I can see that make-fai-nfsroot wants to install ext2resize into the NFS
root that it creates, because it is listed in $packages in
/etc/fai/make-fai-nfsroot.conf, but I can't see any further use of it. I
grepped all the files that ar
Package: xscreensaver-gnome
Version: 4.21-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I'm not 100% certain it's xscreensaver-gnome or just xscreensaver. But since
I use Gnome as my desktop, I'll report it here. After some time (anywhere
from a couple days to a week) of using xscree
Hi Steve,
Ah, a rock-and-hard-place problem ...
On 8 April 2005 at 19:43, Steve Langasek wrote:
| Package: quantlib-ruby
| Version: 0.3.8-1
| Severity: serious
| Tags: sid
| Justification: FTBFS
|
| The most recent version of quantlib-ruby has failed to build on mipsel with
| multiple source er
Ahh but now I can't test it until Monday morning... I will verify the
fix for i386 on Monday if no one beats me to it.
- Adam
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:15:16 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:27:13PM -0500, Adam M wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2005 3:56 AM, Jossel
Package: quantlib-ruby
Version: 0.3.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: FTBFS
The most recent version of quantlib-ruby has failed to build on mipsel with
multiple source errors:
make[1]: Entering directory /build/buildd/quantlib-ruby-0.3.8'
g++ -fPIC -Wall -g -O2 -fPIC -O2-I. -I/u
Does this bug also occur when using the cifs driver instead of the smbfs
driver? It's my impression that the smbfs driver is no longer
well-maintained upstream in 2.6, and that the cifs driver is a better
choice. I'm not sure if we should consider this bug release-critical when
there are lots of
Your message dated Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:29:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303834: sendmail: #296491 is still present in sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
I am a bit at lost. Maybe it is not an X bug after all.
Could you try with moving ~/.xsession and ~/.xinitrc in a backup
directory before retrying startx with 'leszek'.
As your new user won't have those, it may explain why it works as
'blah'.
You X logs show nothing wrong (the drm thing at the
Argh i forgot the most obvious test.
Does login with gdm as 'leszek' with session set at "debian"
works ?
Hope it helps
Alban
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.13.3-6
Severity: serious
This is a reminder that archived bug #296491 ("Sendmail blocks
valid networks") is still present in sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 303832 - sarge
Bug#303832: scmail: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
severity 303748 important
tags 303748 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 05:07:11PM +0200, Tom Albers wrote:
> Package: fontconfig
> Version: 2.3.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Hi, when the user has put fonts in a subfolder with a dash, the
> postinstall script will fail on:
> fon
Package: scmail
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
The build dependency on gauche (>= 0.8.3) can't be fulfilled
in sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you both so much for being will to work with me on solving this
bug; I know I can be difficult at times and I appreciate your
patience.
The new libgconf11 package hasn't hit powerpc yet (where I do all my
unstable development). Once it does, I'll verify that it solves the
observed symptoms
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 300532
Bug#300532: hunit: FTBFS: dh_haskell crash
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 300532 +sarge
Bug#300532: hunit: FTBFS: dh_haskell crash
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 303748 important
Bug#303748: fontconfig: the postinstall script fails when using subfolders with
a dash
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 303748 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#303748: fontconfig: the postinstall script fails when using subfold
Your message dated Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:50:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303643: No copyright in /usr/share/doc/graphviz
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:36:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line geda-gschem: FTBFS on sarge: conflicting types for
`g_key_file_new'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:46:24AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:31:56 +0200,
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Also GLIBC_PRIVATE is only used by glibc itself, so the only source of
> > problems may the different glibc packages. But I currently see nothing
> > which may really cause
On 2005-04-01 02:39:57 -0500 Francesco P. Lovergine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice news. I'll keep an eye to the proposed patches before committing.
The symlink exploit should be obviously manageable.
Upstream says that he also thinks my patches fix the bug.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/me
Your message dated Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:02:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303165: fixed in gpe-contacts 0.34-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Hi,
Couldn't the free version of unrar's error message could be modified to
say that the non-free version might work. This wouldn't help automated
scripts, but would be another useful place to inform users.
Drew Daniels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:38:05 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
GOTO> OK, I pulled the Jakub's patch and built it. I put it at:
GOTO>
GOTO> http://www.gotom.jp/~gotom/debian/glibc/2.3.2.ds1-21_ia64.linuxthreads
GOTO> David, could you test this glibc on your ia64
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 273368 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#273368: dansguardian: denied access to .com or .exe files can be bypassed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> tags 303402 + moreinfo
Bug#303402: keepalived: configuration parsing erro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 303621 serious
Bug#303621: Missing ucf dependency for fuse-utils
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
reassign 303687 gnucash
retitle 303687 gnucash must depend on libgconf11 (>= 1.0.9-7)
thanks
A manual dependency of gnucash on libgconf11 (>= 1.0.9-7) should fix
this issue for everyone.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 303687 gnucash
Bug#303687: Dumps core on start
Bug reassigned from package `gconf' to `gnucash'.
> retitle 303687 gnucash must depend on libgconf11 (>= 1.0.9-7)
Bug#303687: Dumps core on start
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing h
2.6.0 was uninstallable, unless one also installed components from
experimental, so if anything was compiled against it and uploaded to
unstable, it seems to me that would be a bug with that package.
Is there a list somewhere showing packages in unstable built against 2.6.0?
-brad
> -Origin
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:26:26AM -0700,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 44 lines which said:
> > The lack of a copyright file (the licence is there, but not the
> > mandatory copyright file) seems a violation of
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:27:13PM -0500, Adam M wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2005 3:56 AM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could you please tell us whether gnucash still crashes for you with the
> > latest (1.0.9-7) gconf packages?
> No, gnucash -11 with gconf 1.0.9-7 does not work. I get t
Now fixed in svn, thanks.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 303760 + fixed
Bug#303760: syslog-ocaml: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Package: approx
Version: 1.07
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'approx' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
make[2]: Entering directory `/approx-1.07'
make[2]: /usr/share/ocaml-tools/OCamlMakefile: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr
Now fixed in the svn repository, thanks.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know you can reassign bugs all you want, but the problem remains
> that gnucash DOES NOT work in Sid. I downgraded gnucash to the one in
> Sarge and it works perfectly, with latest gconf.
Yes, this is not in dispute. The problem is that either gconf2 (or
gc
On Apr 8, 2005 12:43 AM, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> severity 303687 normal
> reassign 303687 gconf2
> thanks
>
> "Adam M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: gnucash
> > Version: 1.8.10-11
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > gnucash dumps core on startup after the latest
On Apr 8, 2005 3:56 AM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you please tell us whether gnucash still crashes for you with the
> latest (1.0.9-7) gconf packages?
No, gnucash -11 with gconf 1.0.9-7 does not work. I get the same error
as before,
gtkhtml-ERROR **: gconf error: Failed
Hi Andreas,
I have just comitted a new antennavis to unstable. I am only reading
your mail just now. If it builds okay, I will close the bug outside of
debian/changelog.
Regards,
Joop
--
Linux for your hamradio desktop
___
http://www.qsl.net/pg4i/linux
--
To UNS
Package: rails
Version: 0.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Rails is under development and will have (could have) a lot of changes
before the 1.x milestone. It should not be added to Sarge at this time.
Rails is an arch all package and should have all its dependencies
satisfied in Sarge for some time. If
Your message dated Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:03:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303419: fixed in steam 1.6.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: syslog-ocaml
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'syslog-ocaml' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
debian/rules clean
debian/rules:5: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch
Package: antennavis
Version: 0.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'antennavis' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
cc -c -g -ansi -Wall -I/usr/include/tcl8.4 -I/usr/include/tk8.4 togl.c
togl.c:34:66: error: X11/Xmu/StdCmap.h: No such file or directory
togl.c: In
Your message dated Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:47:17 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed by new upstream release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Package: libgig
Version: 1.0.cvs02032005-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'libgig' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
/usr/bin/make -f Makefile.cvs
make[1]: Entering directory `/libgig-1.0.cvs02032005'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving di
At Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:29:49 -0600,
dann frazier wrote:
> Your debs worked for me - evolution now starts w/o
> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.18. Thanks.
That's great. I'll put the patch.
BTW, for debian glibc people,
I didn't enable the pthread size fix for alpha, i386, ppc, sparc and
s390 (+sh). I
At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:31:56 +0200,
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Also GLIBC_PRIVATE is only used by glibc itself, so the only source of
> problems may the different glibc packages. But I currently see nothing
> which may really cause problems here as ld.so is not effected. (See this
> as a small part of t
At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:59:35 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The only thing that might be affected would be GLIBC_PRIVATE, and
> nothing needs to be compatible with GLIBC_PRIVATE outside the glibc
> packages. I don't think it will actually affect GLIBC_PRIVATE, either,
> but I'd have to play arou
GOTO,
Your debs worked for me - evolution now starts w/o
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.18. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 303656 normal
Bug#303656: ifupdown: can't write /etc/network/run/ifstate no space left on
device
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: fontconfig
Version: 2.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi, when the user has put fonts in a subfolder with a dash, the
postinstall script will fail on:
fontconfig.postinst:
find /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d -name fonts.cache-1 | xargs rm -f
(arou
mike at dst wrote:
Preparing to replace ifupdown 0.6.6 (using ifupdown_0.6.6_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement ifupdown ...
Setting up ifupdown (0.6.6) ...
Moving /etc/network/ifstate to /etc/network/run/ifstate
mv: writing `/etc/network/run/ifstate': No space left on device
dpkg: error processin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm a spanish student of Telecommunications, from Valladolid. I'm Debian
user during last 2 years.
I use unstable distribution, and two days ago, I updated my sustem by
means of 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. All was fine, but ifupdown postinst
script f
Your message dated Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:47:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302838: fixed in gaim-encryption 2.36-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Ave!
I think we had correspondence a long time ago if it was not you I am sorry.
If it was I could not answer you because my Mozilla mail manager was down for a
long time and I could not fix it only with my friend's help I got the emails
address out for me ..:)
I hope it was whom we were cor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 303142 + woody
Bug#303142: phpmyadmin: Cross-Site-Scriping vulnerability in convcharset
Tags were: security
Tags added: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
reopen 303142
tags +woody
thanks
The original submitter said that stable might be affected. I did not
find any note in this bug report to the contrary. Please close again
if stable is indeed not affected.
Thanks
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff -ru orig/debian/zope.postrm zope-2.6.4/debian/zope.postrm
> --- orig/debian/zope.postrm 2005-04-08 12:09:23.0 +0300
> +++ zope-2.6.4/debian/zope.postrm 2005-04-08 10:46:22.0 +0300
> @@ -43,12 +43,6 @@
> ;;
> purge)
>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:04:17PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:46:51 -0700,
> David Mosberger wrote:
> > GOTO> I fear to change this interface until sarge release because there
> > GOTO> might be another packages that uses sched_setaffinity.
> >
> > Well, yes, schedutil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 303142
Bug#303142: phpmyadmin: Cross-Site-Scriping vulnerability in convcharset
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags +woody
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:04:17PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> The problem I concerned is the symbol GLIBC_PRIVATE is defined as
> GLIBC_2.3.4, not the current symbol GLIBC_2.3.3. I'm not certain this
> change does not cause any problems.
It is a chain of version definitions. But binaries only
At Thu, 7 Apr 2005 23:46:51 -0700,
David Mosberger wrote:
> GOTO> I fear to change this interface until sarge release because there
> GOTO> might be another packages that uses sched_setaffinity.
>
> Well, yes, schedutils probably would need updating. I don't know of
> anything else, though.
At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:11:07 -0700,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Investigation in the lintian lab on gluck.d.o shows that there are at
> > > least
> > > two packages, valgrind and schedutils, which would need to be updated to
> > > use
> > > the new API once this change is uploaded. Unfortunately,
> Setting up ifupdown (0.6.6) ...
> Moving /etc/network/ifstate to /etc/network/run/ifstate
> mv: writing `/etc/network/run/ifstate': No space left on device
Please send the output of:
df
ls -l /etc/network
ls -l /etc/network/run
ls -l /dev/shm
ls -l /dev/shm/network
> Severity:
tags 291386 patch
thanks
Hi all,
After poking at this, I believe the attached patch represents the best
available heuristic for choosing lvm10 vs. lvm2 for the initrd, given that
(AIUI) there is no apparent way to query the type of an individual volume
from userspace.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 291386 patch
Bug#291386: creates initrd that cannot use lvm 2 volumes if both lvm2 and lvm10
are installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
I also note that since zope has not had a maintainer upload since 2003,
it seems, I will make a non-maintainer upload, using the patch I just
sent, via DELAYED/7 today or tomorrow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 256615 + patch
thanks
Attached is a patch that removes deletion of the zope user and group
from the zope package.
diff -ru orig/debian/changelog zope-2.6.4/debian/changelog
--- orig/debian/changelog 2005-04-08 12:09:23.0 +0300
+++ zope-2.6.4/debian/changelog 2005-04-08 10:49:16.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 256615 + patch
Bug#256615: uninstalling zope removes user and group zope even if you have got
zope2.7 installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Hi Leszek,
You wrote in your report that
> I added gdm back in - it was complaining that /var/lib/gdm already exists,
> and it gave some other warning, and voilla, once again I could log onto X
> as 'leszek'.
It's not clear to me whether "log onto X" here means running startx, or
logging in us
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:56:24AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Could you please tell us whether gnucash still crashes for you with the
> latest (1.0.9-7) gconf packages?
In fact, it does work for me when installing the latest gconf package, so
this bug can probably be closed or tagged sarge i
At Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:05:51 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:17:44PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> > While there hasn't been any discussion for glibc bugzilla report #685
> > [1], private communication with one of the glibc maintainers indicates
> > that this issue is
Hi,
while this bug may really affect kernel 2.4.29, this kernel version is
AFAIK not in sarge, but this bug is preventing openswan from entering sarge.
It would be nice to consider to lower the severity for this reason (or
tagging 'sid' if that helps). On the other hand this bug does not make
t
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:38:13PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Package: graphviz
> Version: 2.2-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 12.5
> The lack of a copyright file (the licence is there, but not the
> mandatory copyright file) seems a violation of
> http://www.debian.org/doc/
[Noèl Köthe]
> the copyright:
>
> "...
> You acknowledge that this software is not designed or intended for use
> in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear
> facility."
>
> This makes the package non-free.
Eh, no it doesn't. The license do not forbid the use of this s
Could you please tell us whether gnucash still crashes for you with the
latest (1.0.9-7) gconf packages?
Thanks,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
-
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> An strace shows that libgconf11 is trying to start gconfd-2, not gconfd-1.
> It succeeds in starting it, then fails to find the control file in the
> desired gnome 1.2 location.
Ok, then perhaps it's true that fixing libgconf11 is best.
Regardless, tho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reassign 303687 gconf
Bug#303687: Dumps core on start
Bug reassigned from package `gconf2' to `gconf'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:02:43AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, I think it's equally valid to say that this is a libgconf11 bug, for
> > trying to launch the gnome2 version of gconfd and *not* falling back to
> > launching the gnome1.2 ve
Your message dated Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:32:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294660: fixed in ace 5.4.2.1.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: ipmitool
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG 6.
Hello,
the copyright:
"...
You acknowledge that this software is not designed or intended for use
in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear
facility."
This makes the package non-free.
I discu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 303101
Bug#303101: libossp-uuid12 - fails to install
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I think it's equally valid to say that this is a libgconf11 bug, for
> trying to launch the gnome2 version of gconfd and *not* falling back to
> launching the gnome1.2 version. If people want to fix this via gconf2,
> that's fine; the important t
Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 01:08 +0200, Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
>> Hi again
>>
>> Valgrind is not in woody, so I installed it from backports, and made
>> the following trace:
>>
>> valgrind -v -- smbd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 303687 grave
Bug#303687: Dumps core on start
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 303687 sid
Bug#303687: Dumps core on start
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Your message dated Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:17:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#267353: fixed in libapache-mod-security 1.8.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Fri, 08 Apr 2005 03:17:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297983: fixed in libapache-mod-security 1.8.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:32:29PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:19:06 -0800,
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > The attached patch updates sched_[gs]etaffinity to the new interface
> > > from glibc 2.3.4.
> I hav
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:32:29 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
GOTO> I fear to change this interface until sarge release because there
GOTO> might be another packages that uses sched_setaffinity.
Well, yes, schedutils probably would need updating. I don't know of
an
89 matches
Mail list logo
