Does this bug also occur when using the cifs driver instead of the smbfs
driver?  It's my impression that the smbfs driver is no longer
well-maintained upstream in 2.6, and that the cifs driver is a better
choice.  I'm not sure if we should consider this bug release-critical when
there are lots of other problematic smbfs bugs out there even if this one
gets fixed.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to