Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 301192 + fixed
Bug#301192: avalon-framework: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on junit
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 302201 sid
Bug#302201: msmtp: doesnt install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Hello,
I've prepared an NMU for this bug based on Andreas's patch, which I will be
uploading shortly. Please find the full diff attached.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u avalon-framework-4.1.2/debian/control
avalon-framework-4.1.2/debian/control
--- avalon-framework-4.
Le Mercredi 06 Avril 2005 00:35, Christopher Martin a écrit :
> On April 5, 2005 11:27, Thomas Labourdette wrote:
> > Package: kleopatra
> > Version: 4:3.3.2-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > When I select "Configurer Kleopatra ..." in configuration menu, the
On Tue April 5 2005 18:35, Christopher Martin wrote:
> On April 5, 2005 11:27, Thomas Labourdette wrote:
> > Package: kleopatra
> > Version: 4:3.3.2-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > When I select "Configurer Kleopatra ..." in configuration menu, the
> > appl
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:32:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276977: fixed in uptimed 1:0.3.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: xball
Version: 3.0-15
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xball_3.0-15 on solitude by sbuild/mipsel 17
> Build started at 20050323-1532
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 303177 +pending
Bug#303177: kernel-source-2.6.8: DoS vulnerability in tmpfs
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
> tag 302704 +pending
Bug#302704: CAN-2005-0750: Possible local root exploit through insufficient
range checking in af_bluetooth
Ta
Package: libfox1.2-dev,libfox1.0-dev
Subject: libfox1.2-dev,libfox1.0-dev: conflicting files
Severity: serious
At least the following files are included in at least two
packages (there may be others, only the first one found is reported):
usr/bin/reswrap
You may want to add conflicts to one or mo
Package: freebsd-sendpr,arla
Subject: freebsd-sendpr,arla: conflicting files
Severity: serious
At least the following files are included in at least two
packages (there may be others, only the first one found is reported):
usr/share/info/send-pr.info.gz
You may want to add conflicts to one or mor
Package: synce-dccm,dcc-milter
Subject: synce-dccm,dcc-milter: conflicting files
Severity: serious
At least the following files are included in at least two
packages (there may be others, only the first one found is reported):
usr/bin/dccm
You may want to add conflicts to one or more of the packa
Package: libapache-modxslt,libapache-mod-xslt
Subject: libapache-modxslt,libapache-mod-xslt: conflicting files
Severity: serious
At least the following files are included in at least two
packages (there may be others, only the first one found is reported):
usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_xslt.so
You may w
Package: libcgi-dev,cgilib
Subject: libcgi-dev,cgilib: conflicting files
Severity: serious
At least the following files are included in at least two
packages (there may be others, only the first one found is reported):
usr/lib/libcgi.a
You may want to add conflicts to one or more of the packages
I can arrange an account with sudo access.
As long as we do the account info off-bug.
Or I can setup your public key and give you sudo with sudo group
membership so things require only your private key and no passwords.
Priv-Mail me if you want to pursue this.
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:06 -0700,
Package: zope-dcworkflow,zope-cmfworkflow
Subject: zope-dcworkflow,zope-cmfworkflow: conflicting files
Severity: serious
At least the following files are included in at least two
packages (there may be others, only the first one found is reported):
usr/lib/zope/lib/python/Products/DCWorkflow/versi
Package: uim
Severity: serious
Several of the binary packages build from uim conflict with each other,
I confirmed this at least for
libuim0-nox <-> libuim0 (e.g. usr/lib/uim/plugin/libuim-custom-enabler.so)
libuim-nox-dev <-> libuim-dev (e.g. usr/lib/pkgconfig/uim.pc)
but there may be others as
Hi Greg,
Apologies for the dormancy on this bug; yours is one of several RC bugs on
initrd-tools that have been long in the resolving, so it's not just you...
FWIW. :)
You mentioned being able to get access to this machine for debugging. Is
that still a possibility?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
p
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:02:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301149: fixed in fakeroot 1.2.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
retitle 301149 Symbolic links in /usr/lib64/libfakeroot are incorrect on sparc
reassign 301149 fakeroot
thanks
Hi,
This problem is most likely caused by the symbolic links in the
/usr/lib64/libfakeroot directory pointing to the non-existent file:
debian:~# ls -al /usr/lib64/libfakeroot/
total 82
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 294660 serious
Bug#294660: libtao-qtreactor-dev installation fails
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 301149 Symbolic links in /usr/lib64/libfakeroot are incorrect on sparc
Bug#301149: strace: ftbfs [sparc] build fails with fakeroot
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 301149 fakeroot
Bug#301149: Symbolic links in /usr/lib64/libfakeroot are incorrect
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:12:05PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> After uploading from 2.03-dev-3 to 2.04-dev-1, whenever I try to use my
> mod_perl2 applications I get a fatal error. This gets logged:
Hm, I tested the package before uploading it. Is there any special code
trigging this, or will just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 303304 sid
Bug#303304: libapache2-request-perl: Dies complaining uploads cannot be
disabled(parser not found)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping
I am also seeing trouble with the new ifupdown. None of my interfaces
are working now -- I had to get the network running by manually
configuring it. Here's a typical trace of the errors, and I've
attached my interfaces file.
Apr 5 17:18:29 kleph ifplugd(eth0)[23315]: Executing
'/etc/ifplugd/i
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:43:54PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > This bug is currently present in sarge.
No, it is not. Versions of polygen in sarge works correctly with the
ocaml version in sarge (just tried on an up-to-date testing machine).
> > More exactly, there are at least two cases where
hi jochen,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:38:36PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > configure: error: Asked to use libwrap but I couldn't find it.
> > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
>
> Please check if your libwrap0-dev package is broken on your system
> somehow. Do you have a possibility to try bu
On April 5, 2005 11:27, Thomas Labourdette wrote:
> Package: kleopatra
> Version: 4:3.3.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When I select "Configurer Kleopatra ..." in configuration menu, the
> application crash with this message :
> KCrash: Application 'kleopatra' c
Package: tea
Version: 7.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Setting up tea (7.0-1) ...
error in control file: `Files' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs
line 617, line 10.
dpkg: error processing tea (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned e
Subject: libapache2-request-perl: Dies complaining uploads cannot be disabled
(parser not found)
Package: libapache2-request-perl
Version: 2.04-dev-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After uploading from 2.03-dev-3 to 2.04-dev-1, whenever I try to use my
mod_perl2 applicati
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:48:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:44:12PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > sed -n 's/.*\(=>\)\?[[:blank:]]\+\(\/[^[:blank:]]*\).*/\2/p'
> >
>
> Something like '[:blank:]' is too much gawk. A few weeks ago
> I had sent the attached patch.
> --- /u/harri/initrd-tools/initrd-tools-0.1.77/mkinitrd200
George Cristian Birzan wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.77
> Severity: grave
> Tags: experimental patch
>
> It's not exactly a patch, just the regular expression I've found to work
> with libc6 2.3.4:
>
> sed -n 's/.*\(=>\)\?[[:blank:]]\+\(\/[^[:blank:]]*\).*/\2/p'
>
Something like '[
tags 303062 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi Sean,
>
> checking tcpd.h usability... yes
> checking tcpd.h presence... yes
> checking for tcpd.h... yes
> checking for TCP wrappers library -lwrap... no
> checking for yp_get_default_domain... no
> checking for yp_get_default_domain in -lnsl... yes
> chec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 303062 + unreproducible
Bug#303062: snmpd: FTBFS something to do with libwrap
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:48:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291250: fixed in pdftohtml 0.36-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:55:46PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> Package: gcompris
> Version: 6.5.2-1
> Severity: serious
This one is already fixed in -2, although there is still apparently a
-lxrandr missing somewhere, causing ftbfs on arm, so I don't close the
report yet.
Best regards,
--
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-27
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
Dear TeX maintainers,
the patch you used to fix CAN-2005-0064 in -26 seems to have been derived from
xpdf 3.00-12, which unfortunately was missing a portion of the security fix
(the one that
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.6.4-4.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upgrade to 0.6.5 causes device not found message on ifup.
/var/log/syslog and /etc/network/interfaces below
Apr 5 18:28:51 localhost ifplugd.hotplug[3904]: Stopping ifplugd for
eth1
Apr 5 18:28:52 lo
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
> >> doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 299486
Bug#299486: Mozilla-firefox: firefox crashes
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
retitle 302684 ifupdown hook script results in double address assignments; it
should be removed
thanks
For now the hook script in if-up.d should be removed IMHO. The package
remains useful to people who are prepared to run zeroconf manually.
Further integration with ifupdown should be discussed
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:21:24PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Paul Brossier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > ahum, sorry, forgot about my last two posts, the various crashes
> > i experimented only happened on a house compiled 2.6.11.3, on
> > which i experienced other weird errors. rebooting on
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:21, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > > David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The following code is AFAICS not conditional upon first installation,
> > > > thus overriding a local ad
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Tue, Apr 05, 2005:
> Matt Brubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Unfortunately, today's upload of sgml2x didn't fix the problem.
> >
> > I didn't have any problem building the latest sgml2x in a chroot. What
> > was the exact error?
>
> As I said in t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 302684 ifupdown hook script results in double address assignments; it
> should be removed
Bug#302684: Limit families/methods for which zeroconf is called?
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:21:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299486: kernel related crashes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package qtorrent
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: qtorrent
> severity 302124 grave
Bug#302124: qtorrent crash because of python
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 20:21, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:04:08PM +0200, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I assume you are not using i386? The problem is that currently other
> > architectures are not working yet, I am preparing a new upload which
> > fixes this.
>
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:21, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The following code is AFAICS not conditional upon first installation,
> > > thus overriding a local admin who has intentionally removed the link.
> > >
>
(Please note that I didn't read mail while I wrote some to this bug, and
now I'm starting to answer from the first mail I got. No offense
intended, but I might not yet know some things you said in later
mails).
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.77
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental patch
It's not exactly a patch, just the regular expression I've found to work
with libc6 2.3.4:
sed -n 's/.*\(=>\)\?[[:blank:]]\+\(\/[^[:blank:]]*\).*/\2/p'
See bug #301455
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:15:28PM +0200, Martin-�ric Racine wrote:
> > When trying to build on powerpc, I got the following failure:
> > ../../src/nano.h:90:20: config.h: Tiedostoa tai hakemistoa ei ole
> > ../../src/nano.h:94:18: glib.h: Tiedostoa tai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 303262 Please detail SAP behaviour change
Bug#303262: SAP does not work in new version.
Changed Bug title.
> severity 303262 normal
Bug#303262: Please detail SAP behaviour change
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
excerpts from the buildd log.
| Automatic build of gcompris_6.5.2-1 on zeus by sbuild/m68k 27
| Build started at 20050405-0939
| **
[...]
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: libgnomeui
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: Re: wwwoffle: Overwrites local configuration upon upgrade
> Package: wwwoffle
> Version: 2.8e-1
> Severity: serious
I have prepared a patch for an NMU, or for adoption by Paul. This patch
is not yet finished and does not yet address all issues (
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:32:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303261: fixed in binstats 1.08-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
tags 291386 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi Eric,
I've tried to pin down this bug, but I find that the current version of
initrd-tools builds correct (matching) initrds whether or not the lvm10
package is installed. Is it possible that the broken initrd was built with
an old version of initrd-
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:17:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303225: fixed in ifupdown 0.6.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:17:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303148: fixed in ifupdown 0.6.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:04:08PM +0200, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I assume you are not using i386? The problem is that currently other
> architectures are not working yet, I am preparing a new upload which fixes
> this.
No, it has nothing to do with that. It fails on i386 too if
Hi,
> This seems to be caused by a missing build dependency on ccache.
P.S.: actually it isn't using ccache, I admit the output is confusing; this is
fixed in pending 0.5.1 version.
> PS: I think installing to /opt isn't a good thing.
This is also not the actualy place it is using, it is just
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 291386 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#291386: creates initrd that cannot use lvm 2 volumes if both lvm2 and lvm10
are installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Hi,
I assume you are not using i386? The problem is that currently other
architectures are not working yet, I am preparing a new upload which fixes
this.
Greetings, Joost Damad
--
The planet Andete is infamous for it's killer edible poets.
roses are red | violets are blue | all of my base |
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 18:34, Frank Küster wrote:
> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
> doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
Indeed. Great. Thanks!
> > The "overwwrites local config" pa
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:29:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#268995: fixed in gtkhtml 1.1.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
ahum, sorry, forgot about my last two posts, the various crashes
i experimented only happened on a house compiled 2.6.11.3, on
which i experienced other weird errors. rebooting on 2.6.9 i
could not crash firefox anymore.
cheers, piem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: openmsx
Version: 0.5.0-10
Severity: serious
Your package is failing to build. This is the error I get:
Probing target system...
Found libraries:
libpng: no
libxml2: no
OpenGL: no
SDL: no
SDL_image: no
TCL: no
zlib:
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
> doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
I'm a bit busy with all sorts of things (e.g. new upstream rsync this
we
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> In the elif line, this must be $USE_PPP, of course.
Good one.
This looks like it may be _the_ bug...
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 303196 serious
Bug#303196: xchat-systray: FTBFS (amd64): Missing -fPIC
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.1.svn20050314-1
Severity: grave
Hello, Sam. Since the update to testing in vlc I am unable to use SAP
interface, thus rendering vlc unusable for me, as I work on a native
multicast environment (one of the european NRENs, RedIRIS). Under the GUI,
SAP does not app
Package: binstats
Version: 1.08-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
$ binstats
Usage: mktemp [-V] | [-dqtu] [-p prefix] [template]
/usr/bin/binstats: Cannot create temporary directory!
This bug is also in sarge.
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "overwwrites local config" part is way harder. Looking at the postinst
> gives me the creeps.
I've found one more. This script would be much better readable if it
wouldn't use the same code over and over, without any shell function -
I found at lea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 299702 Hugs98-2005 should not go into sarge yet
Bug#299702: "Hugs98-2005 should not go into sarge yet"
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:32:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303237: fixed in clamsmtp 1.4-0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
> Hi *!
>
> The easier part of this problem is addressed by the attached patch:
> wwwoffle.config tries to preseed the
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:32:26 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303077: fixed in lcrash 7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 299702 "Hugs98-2005 should not go into sarge yet"
Bug#299702: hugs shouldn't go into sarge yet
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:18:12 +0200,
Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will prepare a new version this evening.
Thanks Wolfgang. I'll build it with pbuilder to be sure next time.
--
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
--
T
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #299486
well, i could also crash after mozilla-firefox-gnome-support was removed;
i also noted apt-cache crashed during the removal:
$ sudo dpkg --purge mozilla-firefox-gnome-support
(Reading database ... 131490 files and directories c
tags 303237 pending
quit
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:54:17PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> [root olympe] /etc/init.d/clamsmtp restart
> /etc/init.d/clamsmtp: 46: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
>
> seems to be some useless ()
Partially correct. The "function" keyword is a bashism. Fixed pendin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # unreproducible bug, waiting for submitter feedback
> tags 301826 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#301826: kturtle: Kturtle crashes right after opening the program.
There were no tags se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 303237 pending
Bug#303237: clamsmtp: bashism in init.d
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Package: kleopatra
Version: 4:3.3.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
When I select "Configurer Kleopatra ..." in configuration menu, the
application crash with this message :
KCrash: Application 'kleopatra' crashing...
Call stack :
(no debugging symbols found)
Using
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #299486
I installed mozilla-firefox-gnome-support following my previous post.
I could not reproduce the same crash, but when looking at
http://linuxfr.org/pub/, firefox crashed. i could reproduce the bug
quite easily just reading that pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 303237 serious
Bug#303237: clamsmtp: bashism in init.d
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Your message dated Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:48:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301333: fixed in php4-rrdtool 1.04-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: kpdf
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
Dear KDE maintainers,
the security fix for CAN-2005-0064 was derived from xpdf 3.00-12, which
in fact turned out to be incomplete wrt to a missing range check in XRef.cc.
Attached you can find a
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:28:12AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This bug is currently present in sarge.
> More exactly, there are at least two cases where this bug can cause
> breakage:
> 1. If someone using testing upgrades to the unstable ocaml
> 2. if the ocaml transition makes it into testing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 300848 + help
Bug#300848: doesn't work anymore: fatal error
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
reassign 302154 ftp.debian.org
retitle 302154 RM: fnfx [!i386] -- RoM: tool specific to i386 laptop models
severity 302154 normal
thanks
Hmm, I think the package changelog and description speak for themselves:
fnfx (0.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Changed target architectures in control file. (
Package: njbtools
Severity: grave
Version: 0.0.1-1
Tags: sid
frobnitz:/var/cache/pbuildd# apt-get -s install njbtools
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are usi
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.6.5
Severity: serious
Hi,
I just updated ifupdown and the update fails with
Setting up ifupdown (0.6.5) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/ifupdown ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/ifupdown-clean ...
ln: `/etc/network/run': File
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:15:28PM +0200, Martin-ïric Racine wrote:
> When trying to build on powerpc, I got the following failure:
> ../../src/nano.h:90:20: config.h: Tiedostoa tai hakemistoa ei ole
> ../../src/nano.h:94:18: glib.h: Tiedostoa tai hakemistoa ei ole
Hmm, how come config.h doesn't e
tags 302599 sarge-ignore
thanks
Hi Frank,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:45:06AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > There's one more small point, the license of the documentation. The info
> > files currently don't permit modification,
> Since there were similar problems all over the source and we talke
Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: libgnumail-java
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0-4
From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
gnumail:
[javac] Compiling 115 source files to
/tmp/buildd/libgnumail-java-1.0/classes
...
[javac] Found 1 semantic error compiling
"/tmp/buildd/libgnu
I'm still working on this bug, the problem is that I don't get the latest
userland utilities to compile with the latest patch I provided too so until
I don't get around to fix this there will be no rsbac-admin packages in
Debian. This makes the kernel-patch package rather useless as RSBAC goes,
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:38:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303204: Uninstallable: wrong dependency on libkcal2 (now
renamed libkcal2a ?)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 302599 sarge-ignore
Bug#302599: documentation is not DFSG-free
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 302154 ftp.debian.org
Bug#302154: fnfx_0.3-5: Please request the removal of unsupported binary
packages
Bug reassigned from package `fnfx' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 302154 RM: fnfx [!i386] -- RoM: tool specific to i386 laptop models
Bug#
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
