Bug#296912: marked as done (ipsec-tools: /etc/init.d/setkey restart is broken)

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:47:07 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296912: fixed in ipsec-tools 1:0.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#296977: gworkspace.app: GWorkspace doesn't start on a VNC 8bit display

2005-02-25 Thread Paolo
Package: gworkspace.app Version: 0.6.5-3; reported 2005-02-26 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable hello, well, it *might* work smoothly indeed, but the fact is that I'm accessing a Sarge sys via a vnc session at 8bit, and all I got is: 2005-02-26 06:59:40.000 GWorkspace[3169

Bug#296976: sgml2x: FTBFS: Permission denied in ELinks

2005-02-25 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: sgml2x Severity: serious Version: 1.0.0-8 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... links -dump TODO-html/t1.htm >TODO.txt ELinks: Permission denied make[1]: *** [TODO.txt] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/sgml2x-1.0.0' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 I ha

Bug#295112: marked as done (clamsmtp requires newer start-stop-daemon, but can be installed without)

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:02:09 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295112: fixed in clamsmtp 1.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#295112: clamsmtp requires newer start-stop-daemon, but can be installed without

2005-02-25 Thread Chad Walstrom
Brian Ristuccia wrote: > Package: clamsmtp > Version: 1.2-3 > Severity: serious > > The init.d script for clamsmtp breaks with start-stop-daemon in dpkg > (1.9.21) because it doesn't provide the --group option. It needs to use one > of the various dependancy mechanisms to make sure a newer dpkg pr

Bug#296975: installing udev on running system left me with a /dev/null that was not a device file

2005-02-25 Thread Joey Hess
Package: udev Version: 0.053-1 Severity: grave I installed gnome on a running system and this pulled in udev. After the installation was complete, I noticed that /dev/null was not a device, was only writable by root, and probably contained some output redirected from some program that ran during t

Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails

2005-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
> The problem may be that the DB_PASSWORD line is unable to handle an @ > sign (though I cannot reproduce it). I'm not sure why you can't reproduce this: $ perl -e "my %CF_REPLACE = ( 'DB_TYPE'=> mysql, 'DB_HOST' => localhost, 'DB_TYPE' => mysql, 'DB_HOST' => lo

Processed: fixed package has reached sarge

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 289623 -sarge Bug#289623: openoffice.org-thesaurus-it: should depend on openoffice.org Tags were: patch sarge Tags removed: sarge > close 289623 Bug#289623: openoffice.org-thesaurus-it: should depend on openoffice.org 'close' is deprecated; see ht

Bug#296971: ltp_20050107-2_ia64: FTBFS: implicit declaration of function `_syscall3'

2005-02-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: ltp Version: 20050107-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid The most recent upstream version of ltp fails to build from source on ia64: [...] make[5]: Entering directory /build/buildd/ltp-20050107/build-tree/ltp-full-20050107/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getdents' cc -Wall -I../../include -g -Wa

Bug#272364: Pleaseupdate kernel-patch-redhat to 2.6.8

2005-02-25 Thread Russell Stuart
If people actually use this, then I have created a similar package. However I am not a Debian developer, so it would need a sponsor. You can find the various patches under here: http://www.lubemobile.com.au/ras/debian/ Look under then kernel-source-2.X.Y.redhat and kernel-source-2.6.Y.fedora d

Bug#260808: reopening bug

2005-02-25 Thread Erich Schubert
reopen 260808 thanks Reopening this bug report. You must not close bugs in changelogs if you did not *change* anything. Please handle this bug report correclty. Greetings, Erich Schubert -- erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C(o_ Which is worse: ignorance or

Processed: reopening bug

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 260808 Bug#260808: avifile-player: Crashed X Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Bug#296395: marked as done (gmailfs: No Module Named Profile)

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:23:36 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 296395 is closed in 0.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kernel-image-speakup-i386 2.4.27-1.1

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 295624 + fixed Bug#295624: not yet rebuilt with security fixes Tags were: security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#295624: NMU diff

2005-02-25 Thread Joey Hess
I'm NMUing the speakup kernel so we can get the security fixes in place in time for d-i rc3. I've attached the NMU diff. I'm not very pleased to have to do this, since while I've tested the new kernel in d-i, I don't have the actual hardware or knowledge to test the speakup bits of it. The patch s

Bug#295624: patch

2005-02-25 Thread Joey Hess
Of course I forgot the patch.. diff -ur old/kernel-image-speakup-i386-2.4.27/debian/changelog kernel-image-speakup-i386-2.4.27/debian/changelog --- old/kernel-image-speakup-i386-2.4.27/debian/changelog 2004-08-19 15:41:32.0 -0400 +++ kernel-image-speakup-i386-2.4.27/debian/changelo

Processed: tagging 295344

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 295344 - unreproducible Bug#295344: segfaults on startup Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: tagging 296732

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 296732 patch Bug#296732: 3dwm: FTBFS: Fails to detect OpenGL There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#294501: Question regarding apache-crash

2005-02-25 Thread Matt Brown
Hi David, On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:42 +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > Do you have ulimits (max RAM, max CPU or so) enabled on your system? A friend > of mine had apache crashing without useful errormessages after memory > limiting apache and installing another module and thus exceeding the > al

Bug#295344: reproduced on current sid

2005-02-25 Thread David Schmitt
Hi Siggi, *! I could reproduce this on a current sid machine: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] gxine > /tmp/gxine.out 2>&1 Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Here is also the backtrace from gdb, sorry no debugging info: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switchin

Bug#294501: Question regarding apache-crash

2005-02-25 Thread David Schmitt
Hi Matt, *! Do you have ulimits (max RAM, max CPU or so) enabled on your system? A friend of mine had apache crashing without useful errormessages after memory limiting apache and installing another module and thus exceeding the allowance... Regards, David -- - hallo... wie gehts heute? - *h

Processed: small fixes

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 293195 concurrent usage of snd_cmipci and sk98lin freezes system Bug#293195: =?utf-8?q?kernel-image-2=2E6=2E10-1-k7=3A_concurrent_usage_of_snd=5Fcmipc?= =?utf-8?q?i_and_sk98lin_freezes_system=0D=0AHello=2C?= Changed Bug title. > flags 295344

Bug#296732: FTBS cause found

2005-02-25 Thread David Schmitt
Hi! 3dwm has an additional Build-Dep on libxmu-dev. Without this, the configure test will fail. It also tests for libglut, but doesn't seem to require it. Regards, David -- - hallo... wie gehts heute? - *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch* - gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)

Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails

2005-02-25 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for answering the bug report. > > I did as you requested, and then tried an install of the package. This > is the output: Okay, it is as I suspected; perl is somehow causing the problem. > + [EMAIL PROTECTED] I

Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails

2005-02-25 Thread Filippo Rusconi
Hello, thanks for answering the bug report. I did as you requested, and then tried an install of the package. This is the output: Setting up webcalendar (0.9.45-3) ... + Version=0.9.45-1 + set -e + . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule ++ '[' '!' '' ']' ++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 ++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY

Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails

2005-02-25 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:42:43PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > Package: webcalendar > Version: 0.9.45-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > The Setting up of webcalendar fails with following output: > > Setting up webcalendar (0.9.45-3) ... > Search pattern not ter

Bug#288829: marked as done (apt-proxy - opens database files as root)

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:02:17 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#288829: fixed in apt-proxy 1.9.27 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#296514: Cervisia license issues

2005-02-25 Thread André Wöbbeking
On Friday 25 February 2005 03:30, Ben Burton wrote: > Hi. > > Currently cervisia is licensed under the QPL. As the maintainer of > kdesdk in debian, I am unfortunately faced with having to remove > cervisia from the debian distribution since the QPL does not meet > with debian's free software guid

Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails

2005-02-25 Thread Filippo Rusconi
Package: webcalendar Version: 0.9.45-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The Setting up of webcalendar fails with following output: Setting up webcalendar (0.9.45-3) ... Search pattern not terminated at -e line 1. dpkg: error processing webcalendar (--configure): subprocess

Processed: flac accepted into testing, this bug can be closed

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 289440 -sarge Bug#289440: k3b crashes when pressing "Burn" Tags were: sarge patch Tags removed: sarge > close 289440 Bug#289440: k3b crashes when pressing "Burn" 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed,

Bug#295714: marked as done (gftp: DSA 686-1: directory traversal vulnerability)

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:48:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gftp: DSA 686-1: directory traversal vulnerability has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#296925: remote shell via format string vulnerability (CAN-2005-0523)

2005-02-25 Thread Joey Hess
Package: prozilla Version: 1:1.3.7.3-1 Severity: grave prozilla has another security hole. A format string vulnerability allows remote code execution. I've not verified this, but here's the exploit: http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/prozillaFormatString.c Based on info

Bug#296922: netplan: Typo in init.d script

2005-02-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: netplan Version: 1.9-1 Severity: serious The init.d script in netplan fail to start netplan, because of a typo. This is the output: # /etc/init.d/netplan restart Stopping plan appointment daemon: netplanstart-stop-daemon: option requires an argument -- s Try `start-stop-daemon -

Processed: Re: ia64 unstable debootstrap fails due to libparted rename

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 295571 grave Bug#295571: ia64 unstable debootstrap fails due to libparted rename Severity set to `grave'. > tags 295571 sid Bug#295571: ia64 unstable debootstrap fails due to libparted rename There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks S

Bug#295306: Need advice wrt #295306

2005-02-25 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Ven 25 Février 2005 17:32, Frank Küster a écrit : > Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]: > >> - : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by > >> categories, and it will be really difficult to put the entries at > >> the ri

Bug#292290: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: XFS filesystem corruption: Input/output error

2005-02-25 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On jeu, fév 03, 2005, Loïc Minier wrote: > > So I'm about to get a fresh xfsprogs or a live CD and xfs_repair my FS > to get a log and send it upstream. I've lost my log, I successfully uploaded it to another box, but the box was running an evil OS which decided that it wouldn't

Bug#296514: Cervisia license issues

2005-02-25 Thread Christian Loose
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 14:39 schrieb Richard Moore: > I did the KDE 3 port of cervisia (kpartifying etc.), and the CVS > import. I'm not really interested in licenses. If others want to > dual-license my parts of the code with GPL that's fine I personally > couldn't care less. I'm equally unb

Bug#280134: marked as done (libgd1: vulnerable to CAN-2004-0990?)

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:02:14 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#280134: fixed in libgd 1.8.4.debian-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#279374: marked as done (javax-servletapi2.3: FTBFS: doctranslet.DocTransletException)

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:47:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#279374: fixed in javax-servletapi2.3 4.0-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#296912: ipsec-tools: /etc/init.d/setkey restart is broken

2005-02-25 Thread Tuomas Jormola
Package: ipsec-tools Version: 1:0.5-3 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole In restart target of the setkey init script setkey is run with the following command: $SETKEY -f $SETKEY_CONF: This fails of course since it appends ':' to the configuration file name. Potential security hole

Processed: fixed in sarge

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 291209 -sarge Bug#291209: csmash window black ! Tags were: sarge confirmed Tags removed: sarge > close 291209 Bug#291209: csmash window black ! 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further e

Processed: errseverity

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 295146 moreinfo Bug#295146: kernel: can delete root directories There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > severity 295146 important Bug#295146: kernel: can delete root directories Severity set to `important'. > stop Stopping processing here.

Processed: reopen 296395

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 296395 Bug#296395: gmailfs: No Module Named Profile Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databas

Bug#295306: Need advice wrt #295306

2005-02-25 Thread Frank Küster
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]: >> - : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by categories, >> and it will be really difficult to put the entries at the right >> place in the postinst > > In fact, is not ve

Bug#294415: security problems are fixed officialy now in 1.0.1

2005-02-25 Thread Eric Dorland
* Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Package: mozilla-firefox > Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-6 > Followup-For: Bug #294415 > > Hi, > > As I see, a new Firefox upstream version is released as 1.0.1[1]. This > release contains the security fixes that the Debian package _may_ > already have, bu

Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license

2005-02-25 Thread Joe Barnett
for what it's worth, http://dotlocal.org/mdnsd/ appears to be a GPL/BSD dual licensed implementation of multicast dns... not sure how elegant the code is, but it's at least a start. Hasn't been updated in about 2 years though, so there may not be any upstream at this point. -Joe -- To UNSUBSC

Bug#295306: Need advice wrt #295306 (Was: debian/uw-imapd-ssl.postinst clobbers existing imaps line params)

2005-02-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]: > - : this is really not trivial : inetd.conf is sorted by categories, > and it will be really difficult to put the entries at the right > place in the postinst In fact, is not very difficult, since you just feed update-inetd the

Bug#296907: nvclock violates policy by being in Main

2005-02-25 Thread Jo Shields
Package: nvclock Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 *** Please type your report below this line *** nvclock's Description states: "You need to have the official nVidia drivers installed." However, the Depends on the package does not reflect this. If the package does indeed depend on nvid

Bug#291408: OpenLDAP 2.2 packages

2005-02-25 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi there, Please help testing the new OpenLDAP 2.2 packages at http://pkg-openldap.alioth.debian.org/ I'd like to know if they fix the index and data corruption problems. Thanks Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: reassign 262925 to cman,cman-kernel,ccs,dlm,dlm-kernel,fence,gfs,gfs-kernel,gnbd-kernel,iddev,magma,magma-plugins

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > reassign 262925 > cman,cman-kernel,ccs,dlm,dlm-kernel,fence,gfs,gfs-kernel,gnbd-kernel,iddev,magma,magma-plugins Bug#262925: gfs framework should not enter testing Bug reassigned fro

Processed: your mail

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 296899 -1 Bug#296899: CAN-2005-0531: Buffer overflow in atm_get_addr Bug 296899 cloned as bug 296905. > reassign -1 kernel-source-2.4.27 Bug#296905: CAN-2005-0531: Buffer overflow in atm_get_addr Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.8'

Bug#292673: why was the sarge tag removed?

2005-02-25 Thread dann frazier
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 10:56 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:53:43PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > > Why was the sarge tag removed? Did I misuse it? > > Probably. The sarge tag is for bugs that only appear in testing but not > in unstable. Since I couldn't see anything

Bug#296901: CAN-2005-0530: information disclosure because of signedness error in copy_from_read_buf

2005-02-25 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-13 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole "Signedness error in the copy_from_read_buf function in n_tty.c for Linux kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11rc1 allows local users to read kernel memory via a negative argument." The offending co

Bug#296900: CAN-2005-0529: Buffer overflow in proc_file_read

2005-02-25 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-13 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Cite: " Linux kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11rc1-bk6 uses different size types for offset arguments to the proc_file_read and locks_read_proc functions, which leads to a heap-based buffer ov

Bug#296899: CAN-2005-0531: Buffer overflow in atm_get_addr

2005-02-25 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-13 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Cite: "The atm_get_addr function in addr.c for Linux kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 before 2.6.11-rc4 may allow local users to trigger a buffer overflow via negative arguments." The offen

Bug#296897: CAN-2005-0532: Buffer overflow in reiserfs_copy_from_user... on 64bit arches

2005-02-25 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-13 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Cite: "The reiserfs_copy_from_user_to_file_region function in reiserfs/file.c for Linux kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 before 2.6.11-rc4, when running on 64-bit architectures, may allow l

Bug#296514: Cervisia license issues

2005-02-25 Thread Richard Moore
I did the KDE 3 port of cervisia (kpartifying etc.), and the CVS import. I'm not really interested in licenses. If others want to dual-license my parts of the code with GPL that's fine I personally couldn't care less. I'm equally unbothered if Debian remove it (though I do wonder if the final relea

Bug#294415: security problems are fixed officialy now in 1.0.1

2005-02-25 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-6 Followup-For: Bug #294415 Hi, As I see, a new Firefox upstream version is released as 1.0.1[1]. This release contains the security fixes that the Debian package _may_ already have, but may contain other security fixes. Also, it fixes some other bugs

Processed: fix for #238151

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 238151 grave Bug#238151: util-linux - please enable fdisk on s390 Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Bug#283171: Newest Internet Security Pack

2005-02-25 Thread Internet Security Center
An attachment named "installation96.exe" was removed from this document as it constituted a security hazard. If you require this document, please contact the sender and arrange an alternate means of receiving it.   Microsoft   All Products |  Support |  Search |  Microsoft.com Guid

Bug#276964: phpbb2-conf-mysql: I reported same problem

2005-02-25 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:09:11PM +1100, herbert wrote: > > Good catch. We need to check whether the EXEVAL is thrown by a subshell > and if so relay it to the top. > > Please try these two patches instead. We need one more patch. EXEVAL should not modify the exit status. -- Visit Openswan a

Bug#276964: phpbb2-conf-mysql: I reported same problem

2005-02-25 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:07:50PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: > > A subshell forked in eval or a dot file within an or list does not > return, causing the parent shell to block: Good catch. We need to check whether the EXEVAL is thrown by a subshell and if so relay it to the top. Please try thes

Bug#296863: libgnomedb: FTBFS: Errors processing docs

2005-02-25 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: libgnomedb Severity: serious Version: 1.0.4-8 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... *** Building HTML *** test -d ./html || mkdir ./html cd ./html && gtkdoc-mkhtml libgnomedb ../libgnomedb-docs.sgml /usr/bin/jade:../sgml/gnome-db-config.sgml:68:69:E: character ":" is

Bug#292673: why was the sarge tag removed?

2005-02-25 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:53:43PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > Why was the sarge tag removed? Did I misuse it? Probably. The sarge tag is for bugs that only appear in testing but not in unstable. Since I couldn't see anything in your report that was specific to sarge I removed the tag. If I was

Bug#295428: marked as done (FTBFS: autoconf bug?)

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:17:14 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295428: fixed in apache2 2.0.53-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#293471: marked as done (xemacs21: XEmacs 21.4.16 withdrawn by upstream, 21.4.17 will be released Feb 6)

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:54:40 +0900 (JST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: still present in sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#296824: sbcl: Stale fasls

2005-02-25 Thread Kevin Rosenberg
severity 296824 normal retitle 296824 Please upload new version of sbcl to fix bug tags 296824 + pending thanks Alan Shields wrote: > The issue was that the fasls weren't recognized as incompatible. I put > in the recompile-stale-fasls code and it thought everything was fine. I > was given to beli

Processed: Re: Bug#296824: sbcl: Stale fasls

2005-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 296824 normal Bug#296824: sbcl: Stale fasls Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 296824 Please upload new version of sbcl to fix bug Bug#296824: sbcl: Stale fasls Changed Bug title. > tags 296824 + pending Bug#296824: Please upload new version