Bug#994551: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#994551: 994551: no 1.0.1-4

2021-09-28 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Andreas and Étienne, On 2021-09-27 22:07, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Andreas Tille, on 2021-09-27: >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:29:58AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: >>> NB: libcifpp 1.0.1-4 has not been released at all [1]. I am not aware of >>> common practices on how to avoid such skipped rele

Bug#994551: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#994551: 994551: no 1.0.1-4

2021-09-27 Thread Étienne Mollier
Aloha, Thanks Andrius for your review! :) Andreas Tille, on 2021-09-27: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:29:58AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > NB: libcifpp 1.0.1-4 has not been released at all [1]. I am not aware of > > common practices on how to avoid such skipped releases, though. I myself > >

Bug#994551: 994551: no 1.0.1-4

2021-09-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andrius, On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:29:58AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > NB: libcifpp 1.0.1-4 has not been released at all [1]. I am not aware of > common practices on how to avoid such skipped releases, though. I myself > usually check 'git tag' on Git-hosted packaging repositories. Argh!

Bug#994551: 994551: no 1.0.1-4

2021-09-26 Thread Andrius Merkys
NB: libcifpp 1.0.1-4 has not been released at all [1]. I am not aware of common practices on how to avoid such skipped releases, though. I myself usually check 'git tag' on Git-hosted packaging repositories. Skipped releases, like this instance, most likely do no harm. However, we will have to rem