Aloha, Thanks Andrius for your review! :)
Andreas Tille, on 2021-09-27: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:29:58AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > NB: libcifpp 1.0.1-4 has not been released at all [1]. I am not aware of > > common practices on how to avoid such skipped releases, though. I myself > > usually check 'git tag' on Git-hosted packaging repositories. > > Argh! I personally keep on preaching that people keep UNRELEASED in the > package changelog when a package is not released. Its simply to error > prone that people check `git tag` (which might have been also a > forgotten tag) or the package pool. I *definitely* try to avoid not > released versions and I can confirm I prevented such things in similar > cases - but obviously I failed here. I'm sorry, I didn't check the version tracker when updating the changelog, and just dch --team'ed away. I probably should have been more carful about this. :( […] > > However, > > we will have to remember to manually close bugs which would have been > > closed by 1.0.1-4. > > I asked ftpmaster for rejection since I consider it more clean to > get the bugs closed properly by an upload. Thanks Andreas for taking care of the issue before it reaches the archive! Have a nice day everyone, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emoll...@emlwks999.eu> : :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
