On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 07:57:13AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Any concerns if I drop the Breaks before the upload?
>
> None, please go ahead for bullseye :)
Upload:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1243344/accepted-uimaj-2102-4-source-into-unstable/
Unblock bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:47:49 -0700
tony mancill wrote:
> My apologies if using Breaks in this way is a common pattern. I am
> simply not familiar with it. If you have used the pattern before, I
> will upgrade the package as-is, since your way is cleaner. Otherwise, I
> will remove the Breaks.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 07:57:13AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:52:14 -0700
> tony mancill wrote:
> > I saw the note in the changelog that Breaks is in fact there to remove
> > the empty package, but it's not happening for me when I try to upgrade
> > locally. My
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:52:14 -0700
tony mancill wrote:
> I saw the note in the changelog that Breaks is in fact there to remove
> the empty package, but it's not happening for me when I try to upgrade
> locally. My test case is to install uima-utils (which will install
> libuima-adapter-soap
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 07:46:28AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 10:29:25PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > So let's remove its binary package and add Breaks: to it.
> > MR is here, could someone review it, please?
> > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/uimaj/-/merge_reque
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 10:29:25PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> control: tags -1 +patch
>
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 18:40:31 +0200 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > It appears the change itself was intentional:
> >
> > > uimaj (2.10.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> > >
> > > * No longer build the uim
control: tags -1 +patch
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 18:40:31 +0200 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> It appears the change itself was intentional:
>
> > uimaj (2.10.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> >
> > * No longer build the uimaj-adapter-soap module
> >
> > -- Emmanuel Bourg Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:07:17
It appears the change itself was intentional:
> uimaj (2.10.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * No longer build the uimaj-adapter-soap module
>
> -- Emmanuel Bourg Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:07:17 +0100
However, the binary package should probably also have been removed.
Maintainers, please come
Package: libuima-adapter-soap-java
Version: 2.10.2-3
Severity: grave
$ dpkg -L libuima-adapter-soap-java
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libuima-adapter-soap-java
/usr/share/doc/libuima-adapter-soap-java/README.Debian
/usr/share/doc/libuima-adapter-soap-java/changelog.Debian.gz
/u
9 matches
Mail list logo
