On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 10:29:25PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > control: tags -1 +patch > > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 18:40:31 +0200 Chris Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > It appears the change itself was intentional: > > > > > uimaj (2.10.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > > > * No longer build the uimaj-adapter-soap module > > > > > > -- Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:07:17 +0100 > > > > However, the binary package should probably also have been removed. > > > > Maintainers, please come to a conclusion regarding the now empty binary > > package. > > Okay, libuima-adapter-soap-java has no reverse dependency. > > $ apt-rdepends -r libuima-adapter-soap-java > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Reading state information... Done > libuima-adapter-soap-java > > > So let's remove its binary package and add Breaks: to it. > MR is here, could someone review it, please? > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/uimaj/-/merge_requests/1
Thank you for addressing this. I will handle the merge and upload. Just one quick question... Why is the Breaks necessary? Is it there to force removal of libuima-adapter-soap-java when libuima-core-java is upgraded? Cheers, tony
