Am Sonntag, dem 10.07.2022 um 20:27 -0700 schrieb Dima Kogan:
> Markus Koschany writes:
>
> > I have no strong preferences here. I would rebuild all
> > reverse-dependencies with the multi-threaded version and see if that
> > works. If this is successful, we could just drop single threaded
> > su
Markus Koschany writes:
> I have no strong preferences here. I would rebuild all
> reverse-dependencies with the multi-threaded version and see if that
> works. If this is successful, we could just drop single threaded
> support and re-use the existing binary packages (just bumping the
> SONAME a
Hi Dima,
Am Sonntag, dem 10.07.2022 um 14:35 -0700 schrieb Dima Kogan:
> Hi. I'm updating the Debian package to the latest upstream version now.
> And I can do the multi-threaded builds.
>
> Which of these do we want? All of them?
>
> Also, is there a good reason to build both multi- and single-
Hi. I'm updating the Debian package to the latest upstream version now.
And I can do the multi-threaded builds.
We have the following options:
BULLET2_MULTITHREADING:
Build Bullet 2 libraries with mutex locking around certain
operations (required for multi-threading)
BULLET2_USE_OPE
4 matches
Mail list logo