Bug#981731: Multi-threaded bullet

2022-07-11 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Sonntag, dem 10.07.2022 um 20:27 -0700 schrieb Dima Kogan: > Markus Koschany writes: > > > I have no strong preferences here. I would rebuild all > > reverse-dependencies with the multi-threaded version and see if that > > works. If this is successful, we could just drop single threaded > > su

Bug#981731: Multi-threaded bullet

2022-07-10 Thread Dima Kogan
Markus Koschany writes: > I have no strong preferences here. I would rebuild all > reverse-dependencies with the multi-threaded version and see if that > works. If this is successful, we could just drop single threaded > support and re-use the existing binary packages (just bumping the > SONAME a

Bug#981731: Multi-threaded bullet

2022-07-10 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Dima, Am Sonntag, dem 10.07.2022 um 14:35 -0700 schrieb Dima Kogan: > Hi. I'm updating the Debian package to the latest upstream version now. > And I can do the multi-threaded builds. > > Which of these do we want? All of them? > > Also, is there a good reason to build both multi- and single-

Bug#981731: Multi-threaded bullet

2022-07-10 Thread Dima Kogan
Hi. I'm updating the Debian package to the latest upstream version now. And I can do the multi-threaded builds. We have the following options: BULLET2_MULTITHREADING: Build Bullet 2 libraries with mutex locking around certain operations (required for multi-threading) BULLET2_USE_OPE