Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org> writes: > I have no strong preferences here. I would rebuild all > reverse-dependencies with the multi-threaded version and see if that > works. If this is successful, we could just drop single threaded > support and re-use the existing binary packages (just bumping the > SONAME and changing the version suffix). What do you think?
Sounds fine by me. Do you already have a set of reverse dependencies in mind?