>The version of libtiff-tools in testing still outputs to stderr, so I am
>inclined to say this is not (yet) a Debian bug, and certainly not important.
>
>Indeed, your patch will break the version of gscan2pdf in testing.
Arguably, this is for this type of problems that we have the ability to
spe
On 17/12/2020 20:05, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote:
That's a tad rude. I understand you're preparing the release but the
meaning of a bug is not up to discussion, problems in unstable, and even
in experimental have always been considered bugs. As the package was
almost unusable since my scans were
Quack,
On 2020-12-16 16:54, Jeff wrote:
The version of libtiff-tools in testing still outputs to stderr, so I
am inclined to say this is not (yet) a Debian bug, and certainly not
important.
That's a tad rude. I understand you're preparing the release but the
meaning of a bug is not up to dis
Thanks for the report.
The version of libtiff-tools in testing still outputs to stderr, so I am
inclined to say this is not (yet) a Debian bug, and certainly not important.
Indeed, your patch will break the version of gscan2pdf in testing.
Does the attached patch also fix your problem?
diff -
Package: gscan2pdf
Version: 2.10.1-1
Severity: Important
Tags: patch
Quack,
At startup I got this warning:
Warning: missing packages
Save image requires libtiff
And indeed I can scan but not save.
I looked in the code how the detection work and found out that `tiffcp
-h` is now outputtin
5 matches
Mail list logo
