On 17/12/2020 20:05, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote:
That's a tad rude. I understand you're preparing the release but the meaning of a bug is not up to discussion, problems in unstable, and even in experimental have always been considered bugs. As the package was almost unusable since my scans were lost I could even have raised the severity to prevent a broken version to enter testing and end-up in the release. I think you're confusing the severity of the bug itself and the priority generated by the situation (which has no real field in the BTS).
Yes, you are right. I misread 4.1.0+git201212-1 and didn't realise that it was the version in unstable. I apologise.
Yes it does. Using 'both' is clever and I think proposing the patch upstream would be a better solution (considering other distros and custom installs).
Thanks for the feedback. I'll push the fix ASAP.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
