On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 03:51:38PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > openjdk-13 does have the problem, so we could do another upload, but
> > given that it's not an LTS release and 14 is already available and
> > patched, do we need to?
>
> Good question. It's easy to do, and it does fix a bug, so
* Julian Gilbey:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 06:22:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * tony mancill:
>>
>> > I had already prepared the NMU for openjdk-15 - building first without
>> > the patch and then with it so I could test with both - so I will go
>> > ahead and upload that package today.
>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 06:22:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * tony mancill:
>
> > I had already prepared the NMU for openjdk-15 - building first without
> > the patch and then with it so I could test with both - so I will go
> > ahead and upload that package today.
>
> There's also an upstr
* tony mancill:
> I had already prepared the NMU for openjdk-15 - building first without
> the patch and then with it so I could test with both - so I will go
> ahead and upload that package today.
There's also an upstream change to honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:
commit 1a16a4b62829e54a4af5446ef15b981
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 03:51:38PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:21:46PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > Great, and there's a bug report #944738
> > > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=94
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:21:46PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Great, and there's a bug report #944738
> > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944738) for
> > openjdk-11; I haven't checked if there are bugs reported
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:47:52PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > Obviously, similar builds will be needed for openjdk-{11,13,14,15}.
> >
> > Yes, I will start working on the others.
>
> Great, and there's a bug report #944738
> (
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:47:52PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > Super! I wonder, though, why it didn't work for me first time round?
> > I rebuilt it and it worked the second time, though. So maybe I
> > changed something.
>
> The rebuild of openjdk-14, including tests and the ad-hoc jlink tes
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:09:28AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > dh_strip_nondeterminism gets its timestamp from the debian/changelog
> > > file, while strip-nondeterminism strips the timestamps.
> > >
> > > So here's a replacemen
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:09:28AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > dh_strip_nondeterminism gets its timestamp from the debian/changelog
> > file, while strip-nondeterminism strips the timestamps.
> >
> > So here's a replacement patch which fixes everything except
> > java.naming.jmod. I have to ru
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 01:45:23PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:49:24PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > * Run the sha256sum command (protected with a '-' in case it fails!)
> > > at several points in the build-arch and install targets to see when
> > > the hashes ch
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:49:24PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > * Run the sha256sum command (protected with a '-' in case it fails!)
> > at several points in the build-arch and install targets to see when
> > the hashes change, if at all.
>
> Good idea. I am doing that now, and also buildin
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:49:24PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > One other thing I wanted to mention is what I'm using for a test case:
> >
> > jlink --add-modules java.desktop --output test
> >
> > This fails, com
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:49:24PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> [...]
>
> One other thing I wanted to mention is what I'm using for a test case:
>
> jlink --add-modules java.desktop --output test
>
> This fails, complaining about the hash of java.xml recorded in
> java.base. But other invocat
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 09:24:36PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:03:08AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:59:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > > Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
> > > >
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:03:08AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:59:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
> > > [...]
> > > Julian, I applied the patch and built the package successfull
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:59:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
> > [...]
> > Julian, I applied the patch and built the package successfully, but
> > jlink still fails with the "expected hash" error. It's (perh
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:59:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
> [...]
> Julian, I applied the patch and built the package successfully, but
> jlink still fails with the "expected hash" error. It's (perhaps)
> interesting that the expected hash does differ between the patched
Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:13:55PM -0300, Tiago Daitx wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Matthias is the actual Debian Maintainer, but in my opinion the patch
> is great and should be ok to go do an upload including it.
Yes, that's a good point. Once the upload is ready (see below), I w
Dear Tony and Tiago,
Pleasure! Needs forced me to do so ;-)
Best wishes,
Julian
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:13:55PM -0300, Tiago Daitx wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Matthias is the actual Debian Maintainer, but in my opinion the patch
> is great and should be ok to go do an upload including it.
>
Hi Tony,
Matthias is the actual Debian Maintainer, but in my opinion the patch
is great and should be ok to go do an upload including it.
Thanks Julian for the investigation and figuring out how to fix this
problem, I really appreciate it. =)
Best regards,
Tiago
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:12 AM
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> tags 944738 patch
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:45:39PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > affects 944738 openjdk-14-jdk
> > thanks
> >
> > The same problem is still present in openjdk-14 - see
> > https://bugs.debian.org/968
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:15:14AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I have located the source of the bug and have a patch to fix it.
>
> The cause is the use of dh_strip_nondeterminism late in the build
> process. This reorganises the jmod files, which in turn changes their
> SHA256 checksums. This
tags 944738 patch
thanks
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:45:39PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> affects 944738 openjdk-14-jdk
> thanks
>
> The same problem is still present in openjdk-14 - see
> https://bugs.debian.org/968991
I have located the source of the bug and have a patch to fix it.
The cause
affects 944738 openjdk-14-jdk
thanks
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:02:05PM -0700, Bill Zaumen wrote:
> I just ran into a similar problem:
>
> jlink --add-modules java.desktop --output test
>
> fails with this message:
>
> Error: Hash of java.xml
> (19574d688f234255aab0ff4ff8e88ae8190ecd7c8d2c422fb
I just ran into a similar problem:
jlink --add-modules java.desktop --output test
fails with this message:
Error: Hash of java.xml
(19574d688f234255aab0ff4ff8e88ae8190ecd7c8d2c422fbdb31cc10963b383)
differs to expected hash
(4473ef1f3d22979bd9136b21a520907553e3874435d88321999370312f1a)
record
I just ran into a similar problem:
jlink --add-modules java.desktop --output test
fails with this message:
Error: Hash of java.xml
(19574d688f234255aab0ff4ff8e88ae8190ecd7c8d2c422fbdb31cc10963b383)
differs to expected hash
(4473ef1f3d22979bd9136b21a520907553e3874435d88321999370312f1a)
record
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:40:52AM +0200, masar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the bug is still present in
>
>openjdk-11-jdk 11.0.7+9-1
Hi Maurizio,
In your initial bug report you said that you have a reproducible test
case with docker. Would you mind sharing that with me?
FWIW, I happened to notice
Hi,
the bug is still present in
openjdk-11-jdk 11.0.7+9-1
Package: openjdk-11-jdk
Version: 11.0.5+10-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
from version "11.0.5+10-post-Debian-2" I receive this error every time I use
jlink:
jlink --module-path build/jmods:$JAVA_HOME/jmods \
--strip-debug --vm=server --compress 2 --no-header-files
--no-man-p
30 matches
Mail list logo
