Hello,
On Sun 21 Jul 2019 at 07:38AM +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> I have tiny style comments:
>
> Noted for the future, thanks.
(I agree that it's a matter of taste and we do not share the relevant
tastes, except that we agree the git_diff_rc variable should be local.)
--
Sean Whitton
signatu
Hello,
On Sat 20 Jul 2019 at 11:37PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#932476: git-debpush gbp/unapplied upstream tree
> check"):
>> New patch attached addressing all of this -- thanks for the review!
>
> Great, thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Ian Jacks
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#932476: git-debpush gbp/unapplied upstream tree
check"):
> New patch attached addressing all of this -- thanks for the review!
Great, thanks.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
And in my master. (IDK if you noticed that the previous version broke
the tagupl-gbp test
Hello,
On Sat 20 Jul 2019 at 06:59PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm afraid I don't like this very much.
>
> * Can we lead with a case which switches on the quilt mode ?
> That will provide a place to add other checks for other quilt modes.
>
> * Please use the git file selector syntax and git-di
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#932476: git-debpush gbp/unapplied upstream tree
check"):
> Patch attached.
>
> Based on series in #932459.
Thanks.
> +# Upstream tag tree nonidentical
> +
> +if ! [ "x$upstream_tag" = "x
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#932476: git-debpush gbp/unapplied upstream tree
check"):
> On Fri 19 Jul 2019 at 10:51PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > As I wrote in private email:
> >
> > For gbp and unapplied, I think it would be very sensible to check that
> &g
control: tag -1 +patch
Hello,
On Fri 19 Jul 2019 at 10:51PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> For gbp and unapplied, I think it would be very sensible to check that
> the upstream files are treesame in master and upstream. (For gbp,
> ignoring /.gitignore)
>
> I think this may be a common user error an
Hello,
On Sat 20 Jul 2019 at 03:15PM +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I assume the place to look for how to do this would be inside dgit? I
> can't immediately see a "very easy" implementation.
Oh, presumably you meant some filtering of the output of `git diff-tree
--numstat $upstream $branch`?
--
Hello,
On Fri 19 Jul 2019 at 10:51PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Package: git-debpush
> Version: 9.3
> User: d...@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rsn
>
> As I wrote in private email:
>
> For gbp and unapplied, I think it would be very sensible to check that
> the upstream files are treesame in mast
Package: git-debpush
Version: 9.3
User: d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rsn
As I wrote in private email:
For gbp and unapplied, I think it would be very sensible to check that
the upstream files are treesame in master and upstream. (For gbp,
ignoring /.gitignore)
I think this may be a common
10 matches
Mail list logo
