On 15272 March 1977, Chris Lamb wrote:
I suggested this, since currently it's easier to write a reject
message than a bug from within DAK. I envision something like
an "Add overrides and file bug" option within process-new so
that accept plus bug would be approximately as easy/fast as
wri
Dear Scott,
> > I mention it in particular because I tend to prefer the "accept +
> > RC bug" approach (and have filed 100s of these) so I "should" be
> > the primary user of this, if you know what I mean.
>
> I suggested this, since currently it's easier to write a reject message than
> a
> bu
On Friday, January 04, 2019 06:06:09 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Lisandro,
>
> > DAK-process-new does not has the option to ACCEPT a package and file a
> > bug against it.
>
> I like the idea in general but alas being integrated into dak would
> not fit my bug-filing/email workflow so I would be so
Hi Lisandro,
> DAK-process-new does not has the option to ACCEPT a package and file a
> bug against it.
I like the idea in general but alas being integrated into dak would
not fit my bug-filing/email workflow so I would be somewhat
hesitant to use it.
I mention it in particular because I tend t
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi! I was just discussing a REJECT with a FTP team member and he told me that
currently
DAK-process-new does not has the option to ACCEPT a package and file a bug
against it.
There are certain cases in which accepting a package with a bug makes sense,
5 matches
Mail list logo
