Dear Scott,
> > I mention it in particular because I tend to prefer the "accept +
> > RC bug" approach (and have filed 100s of these) so I "should" be
> > the primary user of this, if you know what I mean.
>
> I suggested this, since currently it's easier to write a reject message than
> a
> bug from within DAK. I envision something like an "Add overrides and file
> bug" option within process-new so that accept plus bug would be approximately
> as easy/fast as writing a reject message.
I believe we are furiously agreeing with other. :)
My only addition is that it would not /quite/ fit my workflow so I,
speaking entirely for myself, I would be unlikely to use such
an *integrated* feature, relying on my existing workflow to file
such things (#917299, #917249, #917251, #916424, etc. etc. etc.)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
