On 17 Nov 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:02:38PM -0200, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
>>
>> and even for `.tar.zstd', `.gem.zstd', `.spkg.zstd', as people are
>> probably going to create archives with such extensions.
>
>Bad idea -- tar doesn't consider .zst_d_ as a valid ex
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:02:38PM -0200, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> >Thus, please add support for .tar.zst (note: no 'd').
>
> I can certainly add support for `.tar.zst' alone, but shouldn't it also
> work for other extensions, as well? (it works for ot
Control: tags -1 upstream
On 17 Nov 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
>Both upstream tar (for months) and Debian's tar (since today) support
>zstd compression. It's drastically faster than gzip while compressing
>much better, thus some of us switched to it already. Alas, if
>bash-completion is enabled
Package: bash-completion
Version: 1:2.8-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Both upstream tar (for months) and Debian's tar (since today) support zstd
compression. It's drastically faster than gzip while compressing much
better, thus some of us switched to it already. Alas, if bash-completion
is enabled, i
4 matches
Mail list logo