On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 1:00 AM Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Hi Mert!
>
> Am 29.11.18 um 14:44 schrieb Mert Dirik:
> > I've created a merge request for 40-systemd at
> > https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/merge_requests/19 .
> > Reviews and comments are welcomed.
> >
> > If this is fully app
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:48 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, in shell [ "${foo}" ] is equal to [ -n "${foo}" ].
>
> Not always / portably.
>
>
> I recommend
>
> test -n "$foo"
>
> for POSIX (which is equivalent to [ -n "$foo" ] but better
Am 01.12.18 um 23:31 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> This will also make it easier to switch to a binary
> implementation later.
Ok, I take this as a positive signal. So far this has been rejected
outright.
Regards,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
uni
Am 01.12.18 um 23:40 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> If there is a binary implementation, then you would be using
>> #!/lib/init/init-d-script
>
> Yes, but it would *also* still work with env(1).
But it would only be an unnecessary redirection.
That said
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, Michael Biebl wrote:
> If there is a binary implementation, then you would be using
> #!/lib/init/init-d-script
Yes, but it would *also* still work with env(1).
bye,
//mirabilos
--
>> Why don't you use JavaScript? I also don't like enabling JavaScript in
> Because I use lynx
Am 01.12.18 um 23:31 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> I'd also be interested to know why
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/env /lib/init/init-d-script
>> is preferred over
>> #!/bin/sh /lib/init/init-d-script
>> given that init-d-script is *no* C implementation.
>
> That’s
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I'd also be interested to know why
>
> #!/usr/bin/env /lib/init/init-d-script
> is preferred over
> #!/bin/sh /lib/init/init-d-script
> given that init-d-script is *no* C implementation.
That’s easy: this way, the shebang at the start of
/lib/init/init-
Am 01.12.18 um 23:04 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 01.12.18 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> I'm still convinced, that fixing this properly in init-d-script would be
>> the much better solution. If init-d-script was implemented in C, it
>> could be used as a shebang/interpreter on non-Linux and it
Am 01.12.18 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> I'm still convinced, that fixing this properly in init-d-script would be
> the much better solution. If init-d-script was implemented in C, it
> could be used as a shebang/interpreter on non-Linux and it would be
> possible to have $0 be set properly. W
Hi Mert!
Am 29.11.18 um 14:44 schrieb Mert Dirik:
> I've created a merge request for 40-systemd at
> https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/merge_requests/19 .
> Reviews and comments are welcomed.
>
> If this is fully applied, systemd redirection will work correctly for
> all init-d-script
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> AFAIK, in shell [ "${foo}" ] is equal to [ -n "${foo}" ].
Not always / portably.
I recommend
test -n "$foo"
for POSIX (which is equivalent to [ -n "$foo" ] but better legible and
making it clear that test is an external command, not a langua
[2018-11-29 16:44] Mert Dirik
> I've created a merge request for 40-systemd at
> https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/merge_requests/19 .
> Reviews and comments are welcomed.
>
> If this is fully applied, systemd redirection will work correctly for
> all init-d-script scripts (using in
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 01:24:07 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:01:33 + Ian Jackson
> wrote:
>
> > To the systemd maintainers: will you have time to look at this, and
> > make the appropriate change, soon ? If not then one of us could
> > probably prepare a patch, if
On 11/23/18, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:01:33 + Ian Jackson
> wrote:
>
>> To the systemd maintainers: will you have time to look at this, and
>> make the appropriate change, soon ? If not then one of us could
>> probably prepare a patch, if that would be helpful.
>
Hi
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:01:33 + Ian Jackson
wrote:
> To the systemd maintainers: will you have time to look at this, and
> make the appropriate change, soon ? If not then one of us could
> probably prepare a patch, if that would be helpful.
A patch for 40-systemd would be highly apprecia
Control: retitle -1 Please would 40-systemd honour __init_d_script_name
Control: reassign -1 src:systemd
Mert Dirik writes ("Re: Bug#826214: Bug#913247: Please provide a C
implementation of /lib/init/init-d-script"):
> "__init_d_script_name" variable is set inside init-d-s
On 11/22/18, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Mert Dirik writes ("Re: Bug#913247: Please provide a C implementation of
> /lib/init/init-d-script"):
>> On 11/22/18, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > So I think this would be fixed if /lib/init/init-d-script detected
>> > this sit
Mert Dirik writes ("Re: Bug#913247: Please provide a C implementation of
/lib/init/init-d-script"):
> On 11/22/18, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > So I think this would be fixed if /lib/init/init-d-script detected
> > this situation and set $0 to the original script name (which
On 11/22/18, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Mert Dirik writes ("Re: Bug#913247: Please provide a C implementation of
> /lib/init/init-d-script"):
>> On 11/22/18, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > I don't know what `systemd redirection' is. Why does it not work ?
>> &g
Mert Dirik writes ("Re: Bug#913247: Please provide a C implementation of
/lib/init/init-d-script"):
> On 11/22/18, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I don't know what `systemd redirection' is. Why does it not work ?
> > Can it be fixed ?
>
> To sum it up, when
On 11/22/18, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Mert Dirik writes ("Bug#913247: Please provide a C implementation of
> /lib/init/init-d-script"):
>> I noticed the new snippet in the man page of experimental version uses
>> the
>> #! /usr/bin/env /lib/init/init-d-script
&
Mert Dirik writes ("Bug#913247: Please provide a C implementation of
/lib/init/init-d-script"):
> I noticed the new snippet in the man page of experimental version uses the
> #! /usr/bin/env /lib/init/init-d-script
> shebang, which doesn't work with systemd redirec
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:22:16 + Dmitry Bogatov
wrote:
>
> [Adding systemd maintainers into thread]
> (We are discussing #826214)
>
> [2018-11-11 22:37] Michael Biebl
> > > #!/lib/init/init-d-script?
> >
> > It doesn't work with #!/lib/init/init-d-script either.
> >
> > Only
> > =
[Adding systemd maintainers into thread]
(We are discussing #826214)
[2018-11-11 22:37] Michael Biebl
> > #!/lib/init/init-d-script?
>
> It doesn't work with #!/lib/init/init-d-script either.
>
> Only
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> if [ true != "$INIT_D_SCRIPT_SOURCED" ] ; th
Am 11.11.18 um 22:08 schrieb Dmitry Bogatov:
>
> [2018-11-09 22:16] Michael Biebl
>> Just tried the
>> #!/usr/bin/env /lib/init/init-d-script
>> proposal.
>> Seem like this breaks the systemctl integration again.
>> See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826214
>
> Wierd. I have n
[2018-11-09 22:16] Michael Biebl
> Just tried the
> #!/usr/bin/env /lib/init/init-d-script
> proposal.
> Seem like this breaks the systemctl integration again.
> See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826214
Wierd. I have no systemd box to check, but are you sure it works with
#!
Am 09.11.18 um 21:01 schrieb Dmitry Bogatov:
>
> [2018-11-08 19:06] Michael Biebl
>> Am 08.11.18 um 18:54 schrieb Ian Jackson:
>>
>>> env(1) would be helpful here. If your daemon is on /usr anyway then
>>> it doesn't matter that it isn't in /bin.
>>
>> /usr is mounted by the initramfs nowadays,
[2018-11-08 19:06] Michael Biebl
> Am 08.11.18 um 18:54 schrieb Ian Jackson:
>
> > env(1) would be helpful here. If your daemon is on /usr anyway then
> > it doesn't matter that it isn't in /bin.
>
> /usr is mounted by the initramfs nowadays, so this wouldn't be an issue
> in practice.
I mad
Am 08.11.18 um 18:54 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> Michael Biebl writes ("Bug#913247: Please provide a C implementation of
> /lib/init/init-d-script"):
>> Package: sysvinit-utils
>> Version: 2.88dsf-59.11
>> Severity: normal
>> File: /lib/init/init-d-script
>
Am 08.11.18 um 18:54 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> env(1) would be helpful here. If your daemon is on /usr anyway then
> it doesn't matter that it isn't in /bin.
/usr is mounted by the initramfs nowadays, so this wouldn't be an issue
in practice.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking inte
Michael Biebl writes ("Bug#913247: Please provide a C implementation of
/lib/init/init-d-script"):
> Package: sysvinit-utils
> Version: 2.88dsf-59.11
> Severity: normal
> File: /lib/init/init-d-script
...
> This is such an ugly construct that so far I did not want to us
Package: sysvinit-utils
Version: 2.88dsf-59.11
Severity: normal
File: /lib/init/init-d-script
Hi!
The skeleton file using init-d-script contains:
'''
#!/bin/sh
# kFreeBSD do not accept scripts as interpreters, using #!/bin/sh and sourcing.
if [ true != "$INIT_D_SCRIPT_SOURCED" ] ; then
set
32 matches
Mail list logo
