Am 01.12.18 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl: > I'm still convinced, that fixing this properly in init-d-script would be > the much better solution. If init-d-script was implemented in C, it > could be used as a shebang/interpreter on non-Linux and it would be > possible to have $0 be set properly. Which also means, no changes to > 40-systemd would be necessary. > > Now we have the unfortunate situation, that implementation details like > __init_d_script_name leak into 40-systemd (or the init-d-script name in > your second commit), and I do not like that at all. > > Also, keep in mind, that 40-systemd might not be the only script which > relies on $0 being set properly. E.g. pidofproc in > /lib/lsb/init-functions uses $0. So I can only hope, that no init script > based on init-d-script ever uses pidofproc or $0 directly.
Btw, so far no (convincing) reason was presented why this is not fixed in init-d-script directly. Would be interested to know, why the sysvinit maintainers came to this conclusion. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
